Worth (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Worth (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Worth (IA)
2,461
Total Investors in Worth (IA)
339
Investor Owned SFR in Worth (IA)
282(11.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
294
SFR Owned
238
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
45
SFR Owned
55
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 282 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Worth County's SFR market is defined by mom-and-pop investors, who control 96.2% of rentals while institutions are absent.
Investors own 282 SFR properties in Worth County (11.5% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling a staggering 96.2% of that portfolio. In Q4, active investors acquired properties at a massive 65.4% discount to homeowners and continued to be strong net buyers, signaling a long-term hold strategy in a market completely devoid of institutional participation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 282 SFR properties in Worth County, with individual investors holding a dominant 84.4% share.
The majority of investor properties, 78.7% (222), are owned outright with cash. Nearly all investor properties (96.1%) are operated as rentals, signaling a strong focus on investment returns.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties in Q4 for $50,000, a massive 65.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
The landlord discount has fluctuated, from a 9.5% premium in Q2 to a 59.0% discount in Q3, widening to a substantial 65.4% in Q4. This suggests investors are targeting distressed or lower-value properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 7.4% of the Worth County market in Q4, acquiring 2 of 27 total SFR properties sold.
Activity was split between the smallest and mid-size investors, with one new landlord (Tier 01) and one mid-size landlord (Tier 06) each buying one property. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Worth County's rental market, owning 96.2% of all investor SFRs.
The market is dominated by the smallest investors, with 70.9% of properties held by single-property landlords alone. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in Worth County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority ownership starting in the 11-20 property tier.
The ownership crossover occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 83.3% of properties. Below this, in the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly split at 53.8% individual and 46.2% company.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Worth County is concentrated in Northwood (50459), which holds 89 investor-owned properties.
While Northwood (50459) has the most investor properties, Grafton (50440) has the highest concentration at 17.1%. This is followed by Joice (50446) and Kensett (50448), both at 15.5%.
Historical Transactions
Worth County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 6.67 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
The net buyer position has intensified in 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.67x, up from 2.78x in 2024. This is driven by a sharp decrease in selling activity, from 9 properties in 2024 to just 3 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 5.1% of all Q4 property transactions in Worth County, with 2 total transactions.
The new single-property landlord paid $79,000 for their acquisition, while a mid-size investor paid just $21,000. Neither of the two landlord purchases in Q4 were from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 282 SFR properties in Worth County, with individual investors holding a dominant 84.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a total of 282 Single-Family Residential properties in Worth County, which constitutes 11.5% of the total 2,461 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the local rental market, owning 238 properties, or 84.4% of the investor-owned portfolio. This leaves companies with a smaller share of 55 properties (19.5%).

The ownership landscape is similarly skewed by entity type, with 294 individual landlords making up 86.7% of all investors, compared to just 45 company landlords.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 222 properties (78.7%) held free of financing, compared to only 60 properties (21.3%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on generating rental income, as demonstrated by the 271 properties classified as rented, representing 96.1% of all investor-owned homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties in Q4 for $50,000, a massive 65.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Worth County demonstrated an ability to secure properties at a significant discount in Q4 2025, paying an average price of just $50,000.

This price point represents a staggering 65.4% discount compared to the $144,621 average paid by traditional homeowners in the same quarter, a savings of $94,621 per property.

The Q4 discount marks a dramatic widening of the price gap from previous quarters. In Q3 2025, the discount was 59.0% ($105,435), while in Q2 investors surprisingly paid a 9.5% premium, indicating significant volatility in the types of properties being acquired.

Looking at longer-term trends, the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($129,947) reflects a notable decrease from the 2024 average of $186,281, suggesting a market correction or a strategic shift towards lower-cost assets.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $86,673 establishes a baseline from which prices escalated significantly in 2024 before beginning to recede in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 7.4% of the Worth County market in Q4, acquiring 2 of 27 total SFR properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity constituted a small portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 2 of the 27 total SFRs sold, a market share of 7.4%.

The acquisitions were entirely driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and mid-size landlords making up 100% of the buying activity.

One new landlord entered the Worth County market, acquiring their first rental property and accounting for 50.0% of all investor purchases in the quarter.

The other half of the activity came from a single mid-size investor in the 21-50 property tier, demonstrating that purchasing power is not exclusively held by new entrants.

In stark contrast, large and institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases and reinforcing their absence from the local market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Worth County's rental market, owning 96.2% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Worth County is defined by its reliance on small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone of the rental market, owning 205 properties, which accounts for 70.9% of the entire investor portfolio on their own.

The ownership concentration drops off sharply in larger tiers. Investors with 2 properties hold 6.6%, those with 3-5 properties hold 9.7%, and those with 6-10 properties hold 9.0%.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a negligible slice of the market, collectively owning just 3.5% of investor-held homes.

Institutional-scale investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have no ownership stake in Worth County, indicating the market is entirely served by local and regional players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority ownership starting in the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of Worth County's rental market, overwhelmingly owning properties in smaller portfolio tiers. Individuals own 87.9% of single-property portfolios and 89.5% of two-property portfolios.

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes more prevalent. The 6-10 property tier represents a transition zone, with ownership nearly split between individuals (53.8%) and companies (46.2%).

The definitive crossover to corporate dominance occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own a commanding 83.3% of the properties, suggesting this is the scale at which professionalization and incorporation become standard practice.

This trend highlights a clear life cycle: investors typically start as individuals and incorporate as they scale their operations beyond about 10 properties.

An interesting anomaly exists in the 101-1,000 property tier, where a single property is held by an individual, running counter to the broader trend of corporate ownership at scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Worth County is concentrated in Northwood (50459), which holds 89 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The largest volume of investor-owned properties in Worth County is located in the 50459 zip code (Northwood), with a total of 89 properties held by investors.

However, the highest rate of investor ownership is found elsewhere. The 50440 zip code (Grafton) leads the county with a 17.1% investor ownership rate, indicating a high saturation of rental properties in that community.

High investor concentration is also seen in 50448 (Kensett) and 50446 (Joice), which share the second-highest ownership rate at 15.5% each.

This reveals a key geographic pattern: while the largest town, Northwood, has the most rental units by count, smaller surrounding communities have a significantly higher percentage of their housing stock controlled by investors.

The investor ownership rate in Northwood (50459), the volume leader, is a more moderate 9.0%, well below the rates seen in several smaller zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Worth County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 6.67 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Worth County are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. In 2025, investors acquired 20 properties while only selling 3, resulting in a net gain of 17 properties.

The buy-to-sell ratio accelerated significantly in 2025 to 6.67x, meaning nearly seven properties were bought for every one sold. This is a substantial increase from the 2.78x ratio seen in 2024 (25 buys vs. 9 sells).

The intensified net-buyer stance is primarily driven by a sharp reduction in selling. The number of properties sold by landlords dropped by 66.7%, from 9 in 2024 to just 3 in 2025.

Acquisition volumes have remained relatively steady, with 20 purchases in 2025 compared to 25 in 2024, indicating a sustained appetite for new properties.

This combination of steady buying and decreased selling points to a strong 'hold' sentiment among existing landlords, who appear confident in the long-term value of their assets.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 5.1% of all Q4 property transactions in Worth County, with 2 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity represented 5.1% of the total real estate transactions in Worth County during Q4 2025, with landlords making 2 purchases out of 39 total market transactions.

The activity was split between opposite ends of the small-investor spectrum: one transaction was by a new single-property landlord, and the other was by an established investor in the 21-50 property tier.

A significant price disparity existed between the two transactions. The new landlord (Tier 01) purchased a property for $79,000, while the mid-size landlord (Tier 06) acquired one for just $21,000, suggesting highly divergent investment strategies or asset qualities.

None of the landlord acquisitions in Q4 were sourced from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are buying properties from the traditional market (i.e., homeowners) rather than trading assets among themselves.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions, continuing a pattern of complete inactivity in the county's transaction market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Worth County's SFR market is defined by mom-and-pop investors, who control 96.2% of rentals while institutions are absent.
Holdings
Investors own 282 SFR properties in Worth County, representing 11.5% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors who hold 238 properties (81.2%), while companies own the remaining 55 (18.8%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords acquired properties at a significant 65.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $50,000 versus the homeowner price of $144,621.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 7.4% of all Q4 home purchases, acquiring 2 properties. Activity was driven by small investors, with one new single-property landlord entering the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The local rental market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 96.2% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
While individual investors form the backbone of the market, owning over 80% of properties in portfolios under 6 units, a shift occurs at scale. Companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Worth County are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.67 properties for every one they sold in 2025 (20 buys vs. 3 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential investment market in Worth County, Iowa is characterized by its local scale and the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own 282 SFR properties, making up 11.5% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who own 96.2% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors own 81.2% of these properties, reflecting a highly fragmented market structure that stands in stark contrast to markets with heavy corporate participation; institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence here.

Investor behavior in Worth County points toward a strategy of disciplined accumulation and long-term holds. In Q4 2025, investors were highly selective, accounting for just 7.4% of purchases but securing them at a massive 65.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This suggests a focus on value or distressed assets. Over the course of 2025, landlords have been aggressive net buyers, acquiring nearly seven properties for every one they sold. This trend is driven by a sharp decrease in selling, signaling strong confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway for the Worth County housing market is its stability and insulation from the influence of large-scale institutional capital. The rental housing supply is provided by a dispersed base of local individuals and small companies who are steadily growing their portfolios. This dynamic fosters a market driven by fundamental value acquisition rather than speculative momentum, with growth occurring through gradual, small-scale transactions sourced directly from the traditional homeowner market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:38 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWorth (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional