Scott (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (IA)
53,228
Total Investors in Scott (IA)
5,327
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (IA)
5,707(10.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,213
SFR Owned
3,478
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,114
SFR Owned
2,310
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,707 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Scott County's 5,707-Property Rental Market, Buying at a 31.7% Discount
Investors own 10.7% of Scott County's SFR market (5,707 properties), with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a massive 86.2% of that portfolio versus a negligible 0.5% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords purchased 10.4% of homes sold, paying 31.7% less than traditional homeowners and demonstrating their status as consistent net buyers in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,707 properties in Scott County, with individual landlords holding a 60.9% majority.
Cash-owned properties (3,732) outnumber financed ones (1,975) by nearly 2-to-1. The portfolio is intensely rental-focused, with 94.6% of all investor-owned properties (5,401) actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 31.7% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $99,768 per property.
The landlord discount has been consistently deep but volatile, peaking at 38.0% in Q3 before settling at 31.7% in Q4. Average landlord purchase prices have appreciated 36.7% since the 2020-2023 period, rising from $164,414 to an average of $224,790 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 10.4% of all single-family homes sold in Scott County during Q4, purchasing 69 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 68.6% of all landlord purchases. The market also saw an influx of 45 new single-property landlords, signaling strong grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Scott County's rental market, owning 86.2% of all investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, controlling just 0.5% of the market (27 properties). Single-property landlords alone form the largest ownership bloc, holding 56.9% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
A clear operational shift occurs as portfolios grow: companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Individuals own 81.3% of single-property portfolios, but their share plummets to 22.4% in the 6-10 property tier, where companies take a 77.6% controlling stake. By the 21-50 property tier, company ownership reaches 97.3%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 52722, 52803, and 52804 holding 58.8% of all investor-owned properties in Scott County.
The areas with the highest investor penetration are different, led by zip code 52801, where 42.9% of all homes are investor-owned. Zip code 52802 is a key investor hub, appearing in the top five for both total count and ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Scott County are consistent net buyers, acquiring nearly twice as many properties as they sold in 2025.
This net buyer trend held steady in Q4, with 85 purchases versus 43 sales. Institutional investors are also in acquisition mode, adding a net of 10 properties in 2025 and showing no signs of a sell-off.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 8.5% of all Q4 property transactions, with institutional buyers paying 47.9% less than new entrants.
A stark pricing gap reveals sophisticated buying strategies, with institutional investors paying an average of $122,901 while new single-property landlords paid $235,843. Mom-and-pop investors dominated transaction volume with 60 purchases.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,707 properties in Scott County, with individual landlords holding a 60.9% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 10.7% share of the single-family residential market in Scott County, with a total portfolio of 5,707 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 3,478 properties (60.9%), while companies own the remaining 2,310 (40.5%).

The ratio of individual landlords to company landlords is nearly four to one (4,213 vs. 1,114), reinforcing that the market is driven by small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

A strong sign of market equity is the prevalence of cash ownership, with 3,732 properties owned outright compared to 1,975 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base.

The primary business of these landlords is clear, as 5,401 properties, or 94.6% of the total investor portfolio, are classified as rented, confirming a deep focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 31.7% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $99,768 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Scott County demonstrate significant purchasing power, acquiring properties in Q4 for an average price of $215,053, a staggering 31.7% less than the $314,821 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage translates to a direct cash discount of $99,768 per property, suggesting landlords are effectively targeting undervalued assets or off-market deals not available to typical buyers.

The landlord discount has remained substantial throughout the year, though it has fluctuated, hitting a high of 38.0% ($125,909) in Q3 and a low of 23.9% ($78,865) in Q2, indicating opportunistic buying behavior.

Reflecting broader market trends, property values have seen significant appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($224,790) is 36.7% higher than the average during the 2020-2023 pandemic era ($164,414).

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 10.4% of all single-family homes sold in Scott County during Q4, purchasing 69 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a solid portion of the Q4 real estate market, purchasing 69 of the 663 single-family homes sold, for a 10.4% market share.

The quarter was defined by the activity of small investors, with 'mom-and-pops' (Tiers 01-04) acquiring 48 properties, or 68.6% of the landlord total. This highlights their role as the primary source of new rental inventory.

In a strong signal of market health and accessibility, 45 new landlord entities entered the market by purchasing their first investment property, making up the largest group of buyers.

Single-property landlords were the most active segment, responsible for 33 property acquisitions (47.1% of all landlord purchases), far outpacing every other tier.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had minimal impact on the acquisitions market, purchasing only 3 properties, which amounts to just 4.3% of the landlord total.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Scott County's rental market, owning 86.2% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Scott County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a commanding 86.2% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Challenging the narrative of corporate dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a near-zero footprint, owning just 27 properties, which translates to only 0.5% of the investor market.

The bedrock of the local rental market is the single-property landlord. This group (Tier 01) owns 3,338 properties, accounting for 56.9% of all investor-owned homes—more than all other eight tiers combined.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) collectively own just 10.4% of the properties, reinforcing the market's fragmented, small-investor structure.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
A clear operational shift occurs as portfolios grow: companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure is tightly correlated with portfolio size, revealing a distinct professionalization curve. While individuals dominate smaller holdings, companies take control as investors scale their operations.

The crossover point occurs decisively in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership jumps to 77.6%, compared to just 40.3% in the two-property tier.

Individual investors are the entry point to the market, comprising 81.3% of single-property owners and 59.7% of two-property owners.

The 3-5 property tier acts as a transition zone, with ownership split almost evenly between individuals (50.3%) and companies (49.7%).

Beyond 10 properties, corporate ownership is standard practice. Companies own 81.2% of properties in the 11-20 tier and a near-total 97.3% in the 21-50 tier, reflecting a strategic shift for liability and management purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 52722, 52803, and 52804 holding 58.8% of all investor-owned properties in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

A few key areas anchor investor activity in Scott County. The top three zip codes by property count—52722 (1,245 properties), 52803 (1,113 properties), and 52804 (996 properties)—collectively account for 3,354 properties, or 58.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

However, the highest concentration rates are found elsewhere, signaling targeted investment strategies. Zip code 52801 leads with an investor ownership rate of 42.9%, making it a rental-dominant neighborhood.

Following 52801, the zip codes with the next-highest investor penetration are 52767 (25.1%) and 52802 (22.1%), indicating specific sub-markets where rentals are a major component of the housing stock.

The divergence between high-volume and high-penetration zip codes suggests investors employ different strategies: some focus on accumulating properties in larger, diverse areas, while others target smaller communities with established rental demand.

Zip code 52802 stands out as a critical area for investors, ranking 5th for total property count (722) and 4th for ownership percentage (22.1%), marking it as a nexus of both scale and concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors in Scott County are consistent net buyers, acquiring nearly twice as many properties as they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords across Scott County are actively expanding their portfolios, demonstrating strong confidence in the local market. In 2025, they purchased 385 properties while selling only 205, for a net gain of 180 properties.

This trend of accumulation continued through the end of the year, as Q4 saw a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 2-to-1 (85 buys vs. 43 sells), resulting in a net increase of 42 investor-owned homes.

The growth pattern is consistent over time, with landlords also being net buyers in 2024 (470 buys vs. 239 sells) and in every quarter of 2025.

Even the small contingent of institutional investors is growing. In 2025, they were net buyers with 12 acquisitions and only 2 sales, signaling a commitment to expanding their local footprint rather than divesting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 8.5% of all Q4 property transactions, with institutional buyers paying 47.9% less than new entrants.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlord activity accounted for 85 of the 1,001 total SFR transactions in Scott County, representing an 8.5% share of market volume.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $235,843 per property, while institutional firms (Tier 09) paid just $122,901.

This price gap of $112,942 per property demonstrates that large, experienced investors leverage scale and market access to acquire assets at a 47.9% discount compared to new market participants.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the most active traders, conducting 60 transactions, which is 20 times the volume of the 3 transactions completed by institutional investors.

Inter-landlord trading was limited but strategic. Medium-large investors (51-100 tier) sourced one-third (33.3%) of their Q4 purchases from other landlords, suggesting portfolio consolidation among established players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Scott County's 5,707-Property Rental Market, Buying at a 31.7% Discount
Holdings
Investors own 5,707 SFR properties in Scott County, representing 10.7% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 3,478 properties (60.9%) compared to 2,310 (40.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power by paying an average of 31.7% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for $215,053 compared to the homeowner price of $314,821.
Activity
Landlords were active in Q4, purchasing 69 properties, which accounted for 10.4% of all market sales. The market saw an influx of 45 new single-property landlords, highlighting strong grassroots growth.
Market Share
The investor market in Scott County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own 86.2% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, controlling just 0.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but a clear shift occurs as portfolios grow; companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier and control over 97% of portfolios with 21-50 properties.
Transactions
Investors are actively accumulating properties in Scott County and are strong net buyers, with a 1.98-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (85 buys vs. 43 sells). This growth trend includes institutional investors, who were also net buyers in 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Scott County, Iowa is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own 5,707 properties, or 10.7% of the county's single-family housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 86.2% of investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, large institutional firms have a minimal presence, owning just 0.5%. Ownership begins with individuals, who hold 60.9% of properties, but shifts to corporate structures as portfolios scale beyond five properties.

Investor behavior in Scott County is characterized by strategic acquisitions and consistent growth. In the last quarter, landlords purchased 10.4% of all homes sold, capitalizing on a significant pricing advantage; they paid 31.7% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of nearly $100,000 per property. This purchasing activity is led by new entrants, with 45 first-time landlords joining the market in Q4 alone. Far from retreating, all investor segments—from smallest to largest—are net buyers, steadily accumulating properties and signaling strong confidence in the local rental market.

The data paints a clear picture of a healthy, fragmented, and growing rental market driven by local entrepreneurs, not distant corporations. The dominance of small landlords, combined with a steady influx of new investors, indicates a market with low barriers to entry. The ability of these investors to secure properties at a deep discount suggests they play a key role in absorbing housing inventory that may be overlooked by traditional buyers. For the Scott County housing market, this means a stable and expanding supply of rental options provided by a diverse base of community-level owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:30 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyScott (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison