Sac (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sac (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sac (IA)
3,753
Total Investors in Sac (IA)
928
Investor Owned SFR in Sac (IA)
768(20.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
816
SFR Owned
637
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
112
SFR Owned
155
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 768 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sac County's Investor Market: Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Securing Massive 38.6% Discounts
In Sac County, investors own 20.5% of all SFR properties (768 homes), with small, individual landlords overwhelmingly in control. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 24.0% of homes sold, paying an average of 38.6% less than traditional homeowners. The market is defined by strong net buying from small investors and a complete absence of institutional activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 768 SFR properties in Sac County, with individuals controlling a dominant 82.9% of the portfolio.
Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with cash-owned properties (603) outnumbering financed ones (165) by more than 3-to-1. The vast majority of investor-owned properties are rented (741 out of 768). The landlord base consists of 816 individuals compared to just 112 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Sac County landlords acquired properties in Q4 at a 38.6% discount, paying $103,156 versus the homeowner average of $168,110.
This significant price advantage for landlords represents a $64,954 savings per property in Q4. The discount has remained substantial throughout the year, peaking at 63.8% in Q2, indicating a consistent ability for investors to acquire properties below market rate.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 24.0% of all SFR home purchases in Sac County during Q4, acquiring 12 of the 50 properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions, while institutional investors made zero purchases. The market saw 8 new single-property landlords enter, who collectively purchased 6 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Sac County, controlling 98.4% of all investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords alone own 579 properties, representing 72.4% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
In Sac County, companies become the dominant owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 87.9% of homes in that segment.
This is a sharp reversal from smaller tiers, where individuals own the vast majority, such as 87.5% of single-property portfolios. Overall, individuals own 637 properties compared to 155 for companies.
Geographic Distribution
In Sac County, zip code 51450 shows the highest investor concentration with a 30.9% ownership rate.
Zip code 50583 also has a notable investor presence, with 154 landlord-owned properties, representing a 15.0% ownership rate. Data for other zip codes in the county was not sufficient for a detailed comparison.
Historical Transactions
Sac County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 homes for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend was consistent throughout the year, with Q4 showing 16 buys versus only 3 sells. In contrast, institutional investors were neutral, with 1 purchase and 1 sale during 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all Sac County real estate transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 16 transactions.
New, single-property investors paid the highest average price at $146,438. Only 12.5% of their purchases came from other landlords, indicating they primarily buy from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 768 SFR properties in Sac County, with individuals controlling a dominant 82.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 20.5% share of the single-family residential market in Sac County, with a total portfolio of 768 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 637 properties, constituting 82.9% of the investor-owned market, while companies own the remaining 155 properties (20.2%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 816 individual landlords make up the vast majority of the market, compared to only 112 company landlords.

Cash transactions are the prevailing strategy among Sac County investors. The portfolio includes 603 properties owned outright with cash, far surpassing the 165 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 741 of the 768 properties classified as rented, underscoring the primary business model for local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Sac County landlords acquired properties in Q4 at a 38.6% discount, paying $103,156 versus the homeowner average of $168,110.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sac County demonstrate a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $103,156, a full 38.6% lower than the $168,110 paid by homeowners.

This price gap translates to an average savings of $64,954 per property for investors in the last quarter, highlighting a distinct purchasing advantage in the local market.

The trend of deep discounts has been consistent throughout 2025. Landlords secured a 39.3% discount in Q3 ($64,542), a staggering 63.8% in Q2 ($102,273), and a 40.1% discount in Q1 ($73,788).

This persistent and substantial price disparity suggests that investors are successfully targeting distressed properties, off-market deals, or other acquisition channels not typically accessed by traditional buyers.

Comparing prices over time, the average landlord purchase price in 2024 was significantly higher at $179,456, indicating a potential market softening or a shift in investor strategy towards lower-priced assets in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 24.0% of all SFR home purchases in Sac County during Q4, acquiring 12 of the 50 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the Sac County real estate market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 12 of the 50 total SFRs sold, a market share of 24.0%.

The entirety of this Q4 purchasing activity was driven by small-scale, mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) made up 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with 8 new single-property landlords making their first investment purchase in Q4. These new investors were the most active group, acquiring 6 properties, or 50.0% of all landlord purchases.

Landlords owning 6-10 properties were the next most active group, purchasing 3 properties and accounting for 25.0% of investor acquisitions for the quarter.

This data underscores a market completely reliant on small investors for growth, with no footprint from mid-size or large institutional players in recent purchasing activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Sac County, controlling 98.4% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Sac County is characterized by the absolute dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a combined 98.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 579 properties, which is 72.4% of the total investor portfolio.

Mid-size investors are virtually nonexistent. The tiers representing 11-1000 properties collectively own just 13 properties, or 1.6% of the investor-owned housing stock.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence in Sac County, with an ownership share of 0.0%.

This distribution reveals a highly decentralized market, where ownership is spread across a large number of small, local investors rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
In Sac County, companies become the dominant owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 87.9% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Sac County shows a clear divide based on portfolio size. Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 87.5% of single-property portfolios and 86.6% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), companies take majority control, owning 29 properties for an 87.9% share, compared to just 4 properties owned by individuals in that tier.

This pattern suggests that while individuals are the main drivers of market entry and small-scale investment, scaling into a larger portfolio is more commonly done under a corporate structure.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, company ownership begins to increase, accounting for 30 properties (25.9%), a significant jump from the smaller tiers.

Despite the company dominance at higher local tiers, the overall market remains overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 637 properties (82.9%) compared to 155 for companies (20.2%).

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
In Sac County, zip code 51450 shows the highest investor concentration with a 30.9% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis within Sac County reveals pockets of significant investor concentration. The zip code 51450 stands out with the highest rate of investor ownership, where landlords own 30.9% of the single-family residential properties.

Another key area for investor activity is the 50583 zip code, which has the highest raw count of investor-owned homes at 154, translating to a 15.0% ownership rate.

While data for other specific zip codes like 50568, 50588, and 51431 was limited, the available information points to certain areas being more attractive to investors than others.

The high concentration in specific zip codes suggests that investors may be targeting particular neighborhoods or towns within the county that offer better rental yields or acquisition opportunities.

This localized concentration is a key feature of the Sac County market, indicating that investment strategies are not uniform across the entire county but are instead geographically targeted.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Sac County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 homes for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sac County have been in a strong accumulation phase throughout 2025, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. For the full year, investors purchased 63 properties while only selling 9, resulting in a net gain of 54 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 7-to-1.

This net buyer behavior was evident every quarter. In Q4, landlords bought 16 properties and sold 3; in Q3, they bought 21 and sold just 1; and in Q2, they purchased 17 while selling 5.

The data from 2024 shows a similar pattern, with 75 buys against 10 sells, confirming a multi-year trend of portfolio expansion among the county's investors.

In stark contrast, the minimal activity from institutional-level investors shows a neutral position. With only one purchase and one sale in all of 2025, large investors are neither expanding nor divesting in the area, leaving the market's growth entirely to smaller players.

This aggressive acquisition by local landlords signals strong confidence in the Sac County rental market's future performance.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all Sac County real estate transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 16 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a significant role in market liquidity, participating in 16 of the 72 total SFR transactions, a share of 22.2%.

All 16 of these landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), reinforcing their position as the sole drivers of investor activity in the county.

Interestingly, the newest investors paid the most. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) had the highest average purchase price at $146,438 per transaction, significantly more than the $62,167 average for landlords in the 6-10 property tier.

This price disparity suggests that new entrants may be competing more directly for market-rate properties, while more experienced small landlords are securing better deals.

The majority of new inventory for investors comes from the traditional market, not from other investors. Among the most active tier (single-property), only 1 of their 8 transactions (12.5%) involved purchasing from another landlord, with the rest likely acquired from homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Sac County, Owning 98.4% of Rentals and Buying at a 38.6% Discount
Holdings
Investors own 768 single-family homes in Sac County, representing 20.5% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 637 properties (82.9%), compared to 155 properties (20.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties for 38.6% less than traditional homeowners, paying an average of $103,156 versus the homeowner price of $168,110—a discount of $64,954 per home.
Activity
Landlords purchased 24.0% of all homes sold in Sac County in Q4 (12 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop investors. The quarter saw the entrance of 8 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 98.4% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 87.9% of properties in that segment. This indicates a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords in Sac County are strong net buyers, with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (63 buys vs 9 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were neutral for the year, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Sac County, Iowa, is a clear story of local dominance, where small-scale investors shape the market. Landlords own a significant 768 single-family homes, comprising 20.5% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by individuals, who own 82.9% of these properties (637 homes). The ownership structure is highly decentralized; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.4% of all investor-owned real estate, while large institutional firms have zero presence.

Investor behavior in Sac County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy deal-making. In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords purchased 24.0% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a mom-and-pop investor. These investors demonstrate a remarkable pricing advantage, securing properties at an average 38.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners—a savings of nearly $65,000 per home. This trend of accumulation is confirmed by transaction data, which shows landlords are strong net buyers, purchasing seven homes for every one they sold in 2025.

The key takeaway from Sac County is that its rental market is built and maintained by a community of small, local investors, not Wall Street firms. This dynamic creates a market where new landlords continuously enter (8 in Q4 alone) and experienced investors secure deep discounts, likely by tapping into off-market or distressed property pipelines. The absence of institutional capital and the dominance of individual, cash-heavy buyers suggest a stable, locally-controlled rental environment insulated from broader corporate real estate trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:30 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySac (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail