Poweshiek (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Poweshiek (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Poweshiek (IA)
5,991
Total Investors in Poweshiek (IA)
1,355
Investor Owned SFR in Poweshiek (IA)
1,069(17.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,201
SFR Owned
866
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
154
SFR Owned
229
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,069 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Poweshiek County's Investor Market, Controlling 96.1% of Housing Stock
Investors own 1,069 SFR properties in Poweshiek County (17.8% of the market), with small-scale mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 96.1% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.3% for institutional investors. In Q4 2025, landlords were quiet, purchasing just 6.2% of homes sold but securing a significant 35.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is defined by consistent net buying from local investors, with institutional players remaining almost entirely on the sidelines.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,069 SFRs in Poweshiek County, with individual landlords holding 81.0% of the portfolio.
Investor portfolios are predominantly owned free and clear, with cash-owned properties (765) outnumbering financed ones (304) by more than two to one. The investor base is overwhelmingly composed of individuals, with 1,201 individual landlords compared to just 154 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 35.6% less than homeowners in Q4, an average discount of $90,235.
The pricing advantage for landlords is highly volatile, swinging from a 12.9% discount in Q3 to a 43.0% premium in Q2 2025. This fluctuation suggests that with low transaction volumes, individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity was minimal in Q4, capturing only 6.2% of the 81 total home sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 80.0% of the 5 investor purchases. A notable outlier was a single purchase by an institutional-tier investor, a rarity for this market. Five new landlord entities entered the market, acquiring single properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 96.1% of investor SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 3 properties, which amounts to only 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, controlling 75.0% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, owning 65.5% of SFRs in that tier.
Despite company dominance in larger tiers, individual investors are the majority owner in portfolios of 1 to 5 properties. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 87.6% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 50171 and 50112 zip codes holding 64.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The 50171 zip code is the primary hub for investors, with the highest count of investor properties (395) and one of the highest ownership rates at 30.0%. This indicates a strong correlation between investor volume and market penetration in key areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Poweshiek County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 71 properties while selling only 26 in 2025.
This trend of portfolio growth has been consistent, with landlords also being strong net buyers in 2024, when they added a net 60 properties (69 buys vs. 9 sells). Institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity, indicating they are holding their small portfolios, not actively buying or selling.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in only 6.2% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, with 8 total deals.
In Q4, institutional buyers paid a 35.4% premium, with an average price of $189,500 compared to $140,000 for new single-property landlords. All 8 investor purchases came from the open market, with 0% sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,069 SFRs in Poweshiek County, with individual landlords holding 81.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Poweshiek County, investors hold a significant 17.8% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 1,069 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 866 properties, representing 81.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 229 properties (21.4%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where there are 1,201 individual landlords compared to only 154 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 8 to 1.

A strong indicator of financial stability in the market is the preference for cash ownership. Landlords own 765 properties outright, more than double the 304 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 1,037 of the 1,069 investor-owned properties identified as rented, underscoring the primary business focus of these owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 35.6% less than homeowners in Q4, an average discount of $90,235.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rates, paying an average price of $163,438 compared to $253,673 for traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial 35.6% discount, saving investors an average of $90,235 per property.

However, this price advantage is not consistent throughout the year, showing extreme volatility. In Q3 2025, the discount was a more modest 12.9% ($37,321).

Strikingly, in Q2 2025, the trend completely reversed, with landlords paying a 43.0% premium over homeowners ($362,700 vs. $253,717). This highlights the variability within a market characterized by a low volume of investor transactions, where a few high-value purchases can significantly impact quarterly averages.

The Q1 2025 data shows a return to the discount trend, with landlords paying 33.9% less than homeowners, reinforcing the pattern of opportunistic buying.

Overall price appreciation in the market is evident, with average landlord acquisition prices rising from $244,896 in the 2020-2023 period to $257,150 for the full year of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity was minimal in Q4, capturing only 6.2% of the 81 total home sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 was subdued, with landlords purchasing just 5 of the 81 total SFR properties sold in Poweshiek County, accounting for a small 6.2% market share.

The majority of this limited activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 4 of the 5 purchases, making up 80.0% of the quarter's investor buying.

New entrants continue to fuel the market, with 5 new landlord entities making their first purchase and acquiring 3 properties, representing 60.0% of all investor-bought homes in the quarter.

In a surprising development for a market dominated by small players, a single property (20.0% of the quarterly total) was acquired by an institutional-tier investor (1,000+ properties).

This low-volume quarter demonstrates that while new, small landlords are the primary source of activity, even large-scale investors are making strategic, albeit infrequent, acquisitions in the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 96.1% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Poweshiek County is unequivocally defined by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 96.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, with 829 properties representing 75.0% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on new and small-scale rental providers.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent presence, owning just 3 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-held stock. This counters the narrative of large corporate dominance in this local market.

The mid-size landlord category is also very small, with investors owning 11-100 properties controlling a combined 3.4% of the portfolio.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market where ownership is distributed across a large number of small, local investors rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, owning 65.5% of SFRs in that tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, a clear crossover point emerges as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority owner in the 6-10 property tier, holding 38 properties (65.5%) compared to 20 held by individuals (34.5%).

This indicates that while individuals are more likely to enter the market, entities structured as companies are more prevalent among those who scale their operations beyond a handful of properties.

In the smaller tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. For single-property portfolios, individuals own 744 properties (87.6%), and for two-property portfolios, they own 43 properties (74.1%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, owning 91 properties, which accounts for 76.5% of the homes in that segment.

This pattern reveals a distinct lifecycle: individuals typically initiate investment activity, but a shift toward a corporate structure occurs as a portfolio reaches a modest size of 6-10 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 50171 and 50112 zip codes holding 64.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Poweshiek County is not evenly distributed but is heavily concentrated in a few key areas. The zip codes of 50171 and 50112 alone account for 690 properties, representing 64.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The zip code 50171 stands out as the epicenter of investor activity. It contains the largest number of investor-owned homes at 395 and also boasts a high investor ownership rate of 30.0%, meaning nearly one in three SFRs there is investor-owned.

Following behind is the 50112 zip code, which hosts 295 investor properties, translating to a 10.7% ownership rate.

The 50157 zip code, while smaller in total volume with 26 investor properties, has a notable ownership rate of 13.8%.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities within the county, rather than adopting a scattered approach.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Poweshiek County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 71 properties while selling only 26 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Poweshiek County are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently operating as net buyers. Across 2025, they purchased 71 SFR properties while selling only 26, resulting in a net gain of 45 properties for the year.

This pattern of accumulation was even stronger in 2024, when investors acquired 69 properties and sold just 9, for a net increase of 60 properties. This demonstrates a multi-year trend of growth.

Activity has remained steady on a quarterly basis throughout 2025, with net gains in every period, including Q4 (8 buys, 6 sells), Q3 (23 buys, 10 sells), and Q2 (26 buys, 10 sells).

Significantly, the data shows a complete lack of transaction activity from institutional-tier (1,000+) investors. Their minuscule holdings appear to be static, as they were not involved in any recorded buys or sells.

This transactional behavior underscores that the growth in investor ownership is driven entirely by small and mid-sized landlords actively acquiring properties from the open market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in only 6.2% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, with 8 total deals.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter saw minimal transaction volume from investors, who participated in just 8 of the 129 total SFR transactions, a market share of only 6.2%.

A significant price disparity emerged among different types of investors. The institutional-tier buyer paid an average price of $189,500 for their single acquisition, which is 35.4% more than the $140,000 average paid by new single-property landlords.

This suggests differing acquisition strategies, where new, smaller landlords may be targeting lower-cost entry-level properties, while larger, more sophisticated buyers may be acquiring higher-value assets.

The market for investor-to-investor sales was nonexistent in Q4. All 8 properties purchased by landlords were acquired from non-landlords, indicating that investors are sourcing their deals from the traditional homeowner market.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) drove the activity, accounting for 7 of the 8 total transactions, reaffirming their role as the primary movers in this market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 96.1% of Investor Housing in Poweshiek County; Institutions Remain on Sidelines
Holdings
In Poweshiek County, landlords own 1,069 single-family properties, which constitutes 17.8% of the total market. The ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 866 properties (81.0%), compared to 229 properties (21.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4 2025, paying 35.6% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to an average discount of $90,235 per property ($163,438 vs. $253,673).
Activity
Investor purchasing activity was low in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 5 properties, or 6.2% of all sales. Despite low volume, 5 new single-property landlords entered the market, underscoring grassroots-level growth.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 96.1% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) control a mere 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio scales to the 6-10 property tier, where they own 65.5% of the properties.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, operating as net buyers with 71 purchases versus 26 sales in 2025. Institutional investors, however, were completely inactive, recording zero buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Poweshiek County, Iowa, is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own 1,069 SFR properties, making up 17.8% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 96.1% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors comprise the vast majority of this group, holding 81.0% of the properties, while institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 homes have a negligible footprint of just 0.3%.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and steady portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were highly selective, purchasing only 6.2% of homes sold, but they did so at a significant 35.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This reflects a disciplined approach to buying. Over the course of 2025, investors were clear net buyers, adding a net 45 properties to their holdings. This growth is driven entirely by smaller players, as institutional investors recorded no transaction activity at all.

The key takeaway for the Poweshiek County housing market is its insulation from large-scale corporate investment. The rental market is provided by a dispersed base of local individuals and small companies, not by Wall Street. While this ensures a fragmented ownership structure, it also highlights a trend where companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, suggesting a professionalization of operations as landlords scale. The market's health and future growth depend almost entirely on the continued activity of these small-scale, local entrepreneurs.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPoweshiek (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions