Plymouth (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Plymouth (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Plymouth (IA)
7,599
Total Investors in Plymouth (IA)
862
Investor Owned SFR in Plymouth (IA)
844(11.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
753
SFR Owned
665
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
109
SFR Owned
200
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 844 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Plymouth County, Owning 94.9% of Investor SFRs and Buying at an 18% Discount
In Plymouth County, investors own 844 SFR properties, representing 11.1% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) who own 94.9% of the investor portfolio, with institutional investors holding zero properties. In Q4 2025, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 12.7% of all homes sold while securing an average discount of 18.2% compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 844 SFR properties in Plymouth County, with individuals holding a dominant 78.8% share.
Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 672 properties owned outright versus 172 that are financed. Of all landlord-owned properties, 803 are confirmed rented, underscoring the strong rental focus of the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 18.2% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $57,072 per property.
This discount has been highly variable, reaching a staggering 55.9% ($147,277) in Q3 2025 and 79.1% ($245,772) in Q1 2025. This suggests landlords are capitalizing on off-market or distressed opportunities not available to typical buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 12.7% of all Single-Family homes sold in Plymouth County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 90.0% of all investor purchases, acquiring 9 properties. Institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale players in the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned homes in Plymouth County.
Single-property landlords alone own 55.5% of the investor portfolio, making them the largest single group. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals are the majority owners in every investor tier, with companies failing to gain a majority even in larger portfolios.
In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly split, with individuals holding 51.8% and companies holding 48.2%. Among single-property landlords, individuals represent a commanding 88.9% majority.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Plymouth County is highly concentrated, with the 51031 zip code holding 423 investor-owned properties.
The 51031 zip code represents the largest cluster of investor activity with an 11.4% ownership rate. Following this, the 51028 zip code has 90 properties (14.8% rate) and 51001 has 86 properties (11.8% rate).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Plymouth County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 3.7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This net buyer trend is long-standing, with landlords acquiring 48 properties while selling only 12 in 2024. In 2025, they have purchased 34 and sold 15, continuing a pattern of portfolio accumulation.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 9.7% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
New, single-property investors paid the highest price at an average of $484,500. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only one transaction occurring between investors, specifically in the 6-10 property tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 844 SFR properties in Plymouth County, with individuals holding a dominant 78.8% share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a significant 844 Single-Family Residential properties in Plymouth County, accounting for 11.1% of the total 7,599 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 665 properties, which constitutes a commanding 78.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties trail significantly at 200, or 23.7% of the total.

The investor market in Plymouth County shows a strong preference for un-leveraged assets. Cash purchases account for 672 properties, nearly four times the 172 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base or a strategy focused on free cash flow.

The entity count further solidifies the dominance of small investors, with 753 individual landlords compared to just 109 company landlords. This 7-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies highlights a market driven by local entrepreneurs rather than larger corporations.

The primary purpose of these holdings is clear, with 803 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration confirms that the vast majority of the investor portfolio is actively serving as housing supply for the rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 18.2% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $57,072 per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Plymouth County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties well below market rates paid by traditional homebuyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased homes for an average price of $257,045, a substantial 18.2% discount compared to the homeowner average of $314,117.

The financial advantage for investors is significant, translating to an average savings of $57,072 per property in the last quarter alone. This pricing power is a key driver of investor activity in the region.

Analysis of previous quarters reveals an even more dramatic pricing gap, indicating a pattern of opportunistic buying. In Q3 2025, the landlord discount was an astounding 55.9% ($147,277), and in Q1 2025, it peaked at an incredible 79.1% ($245,772).

The extreme variability in the quarterly discount suggests that landlords are not competing for the same retail-priced homes as traditional buyers. Instead, they appear to be sourcing deals through alternative channels, potentially including distressed sales, off-market properties, or fixer-uppers.

While prices have risen from the 2020-2023 average of $128,585, the average price in 2025 ($179,237) remains nearly identical to 2024 ($179,568), suggesting a stabilization in acquisition costs for investors despite broader market fluctuations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 12.7% of all Single-Family homes sold in Plymouth County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a notable portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 71 total SFRs sold, capturing a 12.7% market share of all transactions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 9 properties, representing 90.0% of all landlord acquisitions, with landlords in the 11-20 property tier making up the remaining 10.0%.

The market saw the entry of 4 new single-property landlords in Q4. These new investors purchased 3 properties, making up 30.0% of all landlord acquisitions and demonstrating continued growth at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were the most active buyers in Q4, purchasing 4 properties, which accounted for 40.0% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

There was a complete absence of institutional buying activity. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) purchased zero properties, reinforcing that Plymouth County's investor market is exclusively local and small-scale in nature.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned homes in Plymouth County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Plymouth County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively hold 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the most significant force in the market. The 'Single-property' tier alone accounts for 499 properties, representing a 55.5% majority share of the entire investor portfolio.

The ownership concentration rapidly diminishes as portfolio size increases. Landlords with 11-20 properties hold just 4.8% of the market, and those with 21-50 properties control a minuscule 0.2%.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional capital has no footprint in Plymouth County's SFR market. The 1,000+ property tier holds zero properties, a clear indication that this is a market shaped entirely by local and regional investors.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, where market power is spread across hundreds of small landlords rather than being concentrated in the hands of a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals are the majority owners in every investor tier, with companies failing to gain a majority even in larger portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes in Plymouth County, a market characteristic that defies typical trends where companies dominate larger tiers. There is no crossover point where corporate ownership surpasses individual holdings.

The most balanced tier is the 'Small landlord (6-10)' category, where individuals own 59 properties (51.8%) and companies own 55 (48.2%). This near-even split represents the peak of corporate penetration in the local market.

At the entry level, individual ownership is most pronounced. Among single-property landlords, 450 out of 506 properties (88.9%) are owned by individuals, highlighting that new market entrants are overwhelmingly private persons rather than corporate entities.

Even in the largest active tier, 'Small-medium (11-20)', individuals retain a 53.5% majority, owning 23 properties compared to 20 owned by companies. This pattern reinforces the deeply-rooted presence of individual capital throughout the entire investor ecosystem.

This ownership structure indicates that as local investors grow their portfolios, they tend to do so under their own names rather than forming larger corporate structures, preserving the market's mom-and-pop character even at higher ownership levels.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Plymouth County is highly concentrated, with the 51031 zip code holding 423 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Plymouth County is not evenly distributed, but rather concentrated in specific zip codes. The 51031 area is the clear epicenter, containing 423 investor-owned SFRs, which is more than half of the county's entire investor portfolio.

The investor ownership rate in this core area (51031) stands at 11.4%, closely mirroring the county-wide average and indicating a deep and established rental market.

Other pockets of significant investor presence include the 51028 zip code, with 90 properties and a higher-than-average ownership rate of 14.8%, and the 51001 zip code, with 86 properties and an 11.8% rate.

The data points to a potential anomaly in the 51036 zip code, which reports a 100.0% investor ownership rate. This likely represents a very small area with few SFR properties, rather than a large-scale investor takeover.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, possibly driven by factors like proximity to amenities, school districts, or specific housing stock characteristics that are favorable for rentals.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Plymouth County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 3.7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data clearly shows that landlords in Plymouth County are in an aggressive accumulation phase. During Q4 2025, they purchased 11 properties while selling only 3, establishing a strong net-buyer position.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained trend. For the full year of 2025, landlords have bought 34 SFRs and sold 15, resulting in a net gain of 19 properties to the rental market. This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.27 to 1.

The pattern was even more pronounced in 2024, when landlords executed 48 buy transactions against just 12 sell transactions. This 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio demonstrates a period of significant portfolio expansion across the county.

With no institutional activity, this net buying pressure is entirely attributable to small and mid-size local investors who are actively growing their holdings and increasing their market footprint.

The consistent net-positive transaction flow indicates strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term investment strategy focused on asset accumulation rather than short-term flipping or divestment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 9.7% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 11 of the 113 total SFR transactions in Plymouth County, capturing a 9.7% share of all market activity. This activity was exclusively conducted by mom-and-pop investors.

A striking price disparity emerged among buyers, with new single-property investors (Tier 1) paying a significantly higher average price of $484,500. This is more than triple the average price paid by more established small landlords in the 3-5 property tier ($142,875), suggesting new entrants may be buying retail-priced properties.

The market for landlord-to-landlord sales appears limited. Only one transaction in Q4, representing 9.1% of investor deals, involved a property being sold from one landlord to another. This trade occurred within the 6-10 property tier.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier and new single-property landlords were the most active, each accounting for 4 transactions. This highlights that growth is occurring at both the entry-level and among investors looking to expand small portfolios.

There were zero transactions by institutional investors, reinforcing their complete absence from the county's transactional market and leaving the field entirely to smaller, local players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Plymouth County's rental market is controlled by local landlords who own 94.9% of investor properties and are actively buying.
Holdings
Investors own 844 SFR properties, representing 11.1% of Plymouth County's market, with individual investors decisively holding 78.8% of this portfolio compared to 23.7% for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of 18.2% less than traditional homeowners, securing a significant discount of $57,072 per property ($257,045 vs $314,117).
Activity
Landlords purchased 12.7% of all homes sold in Q4 (9 properties), with activity driven by small investors, including 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market with 94.9% control of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single portfolio tier, with companies never surpassing them, maintaining the market's mom-and-pop character even as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Landlords in Plymouth County are strong net buyers, with a 3.7x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (11 buys vs 3 sells), and institutional investors are completely inactive with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential investment market in Plymouth County, Iowa is the definitive portrait of a 'mom-and-pop' landscape. Investors own 844 properties, or 11.1% of the total SFR market, a portfolio overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators. Individual investors hold a commanding 78.8% of these properties, while landlords with 1-10 properties account for a staggering 94.9% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence, indicating the market is entirely shaped by local capital and individual enterprise.

Investor behavior in Plymouth County is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 12.7% of all homes sold and demonstrated significant pricing power, acquiring properties at an 18.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This trend of opportunistic buying is a key feature of the market. Furthermore, transaction data reveals landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring nearly four properties for every one they sold in the last quarter, a pattern consistent with portfolio accumulation over the past two years.

The key takeaway is that Plymouth County's rental housing market is robust, decentralized, and driven by local investors who are actively expanding their holdings. The absence of institutional players creates a stable environment dominated by long-term investment strategies rather than speculative corporate activity. This dynamic suggests a market where deep local knowledge and opportunistic deal-sourcing provide a significant competitive advantage, fueling sustained growth from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:24 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPlymouth (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price