Lyon (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lyon (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lyon (IA)
3,343
Total Investors in Lyon (IA)
545
Investor Owned SFR in Lyon (IA)
420(12.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
472
SFR Owned
343
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
73
SFR Owned
98
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 420 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords define Lyon County's market, controlling 98.8% of rentals with zero institutional presence.
Investors own 420 SFR properties (12.6% of the market) in Lyon County, with individuals making up 81.7% of all holdings. In Q4, landlords acquired 14.0% of homes sold, paying 32.9% below homeowner prices. The market is defined by small investors who are consistently net buyers, with no activity from institutional players.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 420 SFR properties in Lyon County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.7%.
The portfolio is heavily cash-based, with 326 properties (77.6%) owned outright versus 94 financed. A significant 98.8% of the investor-owned portfolio (415 properties) is actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 32.9% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a significant $86,827 discount per property.
The price advantage for landlords is highly volatile, swinging from a 15.6% premium paid in Q3 to a deep 32.9% discount in Q4. Average acquisition prices of $177,143 in Q4 show a 45.3% appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $121,915.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 14.0% of all single-family homes sold in Lyon County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions in Q4, purchasing all 6 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Lyon County, controlling 98.8% of all investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords are the market's backbone, owning 330 properties for a 77.3% share. Institutional investors have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the foundation of every small landlord tier in Lyon County, maintaining majority ownership across the board.
Individuals constitute a strong majority in every reported tier, from 85.1% in single-property portfolios to 61.8% in the 3-5 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Lyon County is heavily concentrated in the 51246 and 51237 zip codes by property count.
The 51246 zip code leads in volume with 125 investor-owned properties. However, the 51240 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 15.6% of its housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Lyon County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
This trend of net accumulation is consistent, with a buy/sell ratio of 4.3x for the full Year 2025 (26 buys vs 6 sells) and 7.5x for 2024 (45 buys vs 6 sells). Transaction volume has slowed from 45 buys in 2024 to 26 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 11.6% of all single-family residential transactions in Q4 2025.
All 8 landlord transactions were driven by mom-and-pop investors in the single-property tier, who paid an average of $177,143. Zero percent of these properties were acquired from other landlords, indicating all purchases came from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 420 SFR properties in Lyon County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a notable footprint in Lyon County, owning 420 single-family properties, which constitutes 12.6% of the total 3,343 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is dominated by individual investors, who own 343 properties (81.7%), a 3.5-to-1 ratio over the 98 properties (23.3%) owned by companies.

By entity count, the disparity is even greater, with 472 individual landlords compared to just 73 company landlords, highlighting a market driven by small, independent operators.

A low-leverage, buy-and-hold strategy appears prevalent, as 77.6% of investor-owned properties (326 homes) are owned with cash, while only 22.4% (94 homes) are financed.

The portfolio is sharply focused on rental income, with 415 of the 420 properties (98.8%) classified as rented, confirming the primary business model for investors in the area.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 32.9% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a significant $86,827 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $177,143, which is 32.9% less than the $263,970 paid by traditional homeowners.

This investor discount is highly volatile and not guaranteed. In the prior quarter (Q3 2025), landlords paid a premium of 15.6%, spending $269,000 on average compared to homeowners at $232,642.

The market has seen significant price appreciation since the pandemic era. The Q4 2025 average landlord purchase price is 45.3% higher than the average of $121,915 recorded between 2020 and 2023.

However, recent trends suggest a potential cooling. The average landlord purchase price for all of 2025 ($219,000) is tracking below the 2024 average of $281,786.

The dramatic swings in the landlord-to-homeowner price gap, from a $90,039 premium in Q1 to an $86,827 discount in Q4, suggest investors are highly opportunistic, targeting specific deals rather than buying at general market rates.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 14.0% of all single-family homes sold in Lyon County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 14.0% of the total Q4 market, with landlords acquiring 6 of the 43 single-family homes sold in Lyon County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the buys.

The market welcomed new participants, with all 6 properties being purchased by 8 new single-property landlord entities, signaling growth at the grassroots level.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely dormant, recording zero purchases and exerting no influence on the Q4 market.

This concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum underscores a market characterized by accessibility for new entrants rather than dominance by large players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Lyon County, controlling 98.8% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Lyon County is unequivocally controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a near-total 98.8% share of all investor-held SFRs.

The smallest investors are the most significant force. Single-property landlords alone own 330 properties, accounting for 77.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

The 'missing middle' is apparent, as mid-to-large size landlords (those owning more than 10 properties) collectively own just 5 homes, or 1.2% of the market.

There is absolutely no institutional investor (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) footprint in Lyon County, with their market share standing at 0.0%.

This ownership distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, where the investment landscape is defined by hundreds of individual decisions rather than a few corporate strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the foundation of every small landlord tier in Lyon County, maintaining majority ownership across the board.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force within every major landlord tier in Lyon County, holding an 85.1% majority of single-property portfolios.

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no 'corporate crossover' point. Individuals maintain their majority control even as portfolios grow, owning 67.6% of two-property portfolios and 61.8% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

While companies remain in the minority, their presence does increase with portfolio size. Company ownership grows from just 14.9% in the single-property tier to 38.2% in the 3-5 property tier.

This ownership structure confirms that the county's rental housing supply is primarily provided by local individuals rather than out-of-area corporations.

The data clearly shows a market composed of residents investing in their own communities, with both individuals and companies concentrating their holdings in smaller portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Lyon County is heavily concentrated in the 51246 and 51237 zip codes by property count.
Detailed Findings

The 51246 zip code stands out as the primary hub for investor ownership by sheer volume, containing 125 investor-owned single-family homes.

When measured by market penetration, the 51240 zip code emerges as the leader, with 15.6% of its SFR properties owned by investors, indicating the highest relative concentration.

The 51237 zip code is a strong secondary market, ranking high in both volume (79 properties) and penetration rate (14.5%).

A key finding is the distinction between volume and rate leadership. The area with the most investor-owned homes (51246) is not the one with the highest ownership percentage (51240), revealing different strategic focuses across the county.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely based on factors like rental demand, property values, and community amenities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Lyon County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lyon County are operating in a mode of strong accumulation, demonstrated by an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025 with 8 properties purchased and only 1 sold.

This net-buyer status is a long-term trend. For the entirety of 2025, landlords acquired 26 properties while selling only 6, and in 2024, they bought 45 and sold just 6.

While still accumulating properties, the pace of acquisitions has notably slowed down. The 26 purchases in 2025 represent a 42.2% decrease from the 45 properties bought in 2024.

The consistently low number of sales from landlords signals a dominant buy-and-hold strategy across the market, with investors focused on long-term rental income rather than short-term flips.

Institutional investors are entirely absent from these transaction trends, confirming their lack of participation in the local market's buying or selling activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 11.6% of all single-family residential transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord activity comprised 11.6% of the total market, with investors participating in 8 of the 69 SFR transactions in Lyon County.

The market's transaction activity was exclusively driven by its smallest participants. All 8 landlord purchases (100.0%) were made by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category.

These new entrants are acquiring homes from traditional homeowners, not other investors. Data shows that 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from another landlord, pointing to a lack of inter-investor trading.

The average purchase price for these entry-level investors was $177,143, setting a clear price point for entering the Lyon County rental market this quarter.

Consistent with all other metrics, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, recording zero transactions and having no impact on Q4 market dynamics.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lyon County with 98.8% ownership as landlords act as aggressive net buyers.
Holdings
Landlords own 420 SFR properties in Lyon County, IA, representing 12.6% of the market. Individual investors hold 343 of these (81.7%) while companies own 98 (23.3%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid an average of $177,143, securing a 32.9% discount compared to the $263,970 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Landlords purchased 14.0% of all Q4 home sales (6 properties), with activity driven entirely by 8 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 98.8% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority in every portfolio tier, holding 85.1% of single-property portfolios, meaning there is no crossover point where companies take control.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (8 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The market structure in Lyon County, IA is defined by small-scale, individual investment. Landlords own 420 single-family residential properties, accounting for 12.6% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 98.8% share. Individual investors own 343 of these properties (81.7%), dwarfing the 98 properties (23.3%) held by companies. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no presence in this market.

Investor behavior in Lyon County is characterized by opportunistic acquisition and long-term holds. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 14.0% of all homes sold and demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, paying 32.9% less than traditional homeowners. Transaction data reveals a consistent pattern of accumulation; landlords were strong net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4. This activity is driven exclusively by new, single-property investors, indicating a market with a low barrier to entry for small players.

The key takeaway for the Lyon County housing market is its insulation from large-scale corporate investment and its reliance on local, individual landlords. This structure suggests a more fragmented and potentially stable rental market, less susceptible to the strategic shifts of large institutional funds. The consistent net buying from small investors, coupled with their ability to secure properties at a discount, indicates a healthy environment for rental property entrepreneurs. The market's future will be shaped by the decisions of these hundreds of individual owners, not a handful of corporate boardrooms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:12 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLyon (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail