Lee (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lee (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lee (IA)
10,963
Total Investors in Lee (IA)
1,602
Investor Owned SFR in Lee (IA)
1,580(14.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,404
SFR Owned
1,201
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
198
SFR Owned
392
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,580 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lee County's Market, Acquiring Properties at a 39.4% Discount
Investors own 1,580 single-family properties in Lee County, representing 14.4% of the market. Small-scale landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 92.2% of this portfolio, while institutional investors hold just 0.3%. In Q4, landlords were net buyers, acquiring 19.7% of all homes sold at an average price of $92,389—a significant 39.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,580 SFR properties in Lee County, with individuals holding a 76.0% majority share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 1,193 (75.5%) paid in cash versus just 387 financed. Individual landlords are the primary market participants, with 1,404 entities compared to 198 company landlords. In total, 95.7% of the investor portfolio consists of rented, non-owner-occupied properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 39.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $60,162 per home.
This significant pricing advantage for investors has been a consistent trend, with discounts reaching as high as 61.6% in Q3 and 50.7% in Q2. Landlords paid an average of $92,389 in Q4, while traditional homeowners paid an average of $152,551 for similar properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 19.7% of all single-family homes sold in Lee County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of all investor purchases this quarter, acquiring 30 properties. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties made zero acquisitions. The market saw 21 new single-property landlords make their first purchase.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.2% of all investor-owned housing in Lee County.
This small investor dominance starkly contrasts with institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who own a negligible 0.3% of the portfolio, or just 5 properties. Single-property landlords alone account for 60.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios grow.
While individuals own 89.7% of single-property portfolios, companies control 60.2% of portfolios in the 6-10 property tier and 81.7% in the 11-20 property tier. This crossover shows a clear trend toward incorporation for larger-scale operations.
Geographic Distribution
The highest concentration of investor-owned homes is in Keokuk (52632) and Fort Madison (52627).
Keokuk (zip code 52632) leads with 664 investor-owned properties, representing a 16.4% ownership rate. However, smaller zip codes like Donnellson (52624) have the highest investor penetration rate at 29.0%.
Historical Transactions
Lee County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 37 properties while selling only 12 in Q4 2025.
This net buyer stance is a long-term trend, with investors maintaining a positive acquisition balance every quarter in 2025 and 2024. For the full year of 2025, landlords bought 117 homes and sold only 42, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 2.8-to-1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.4% of all Lee County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
All 37 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutional tiers. Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were the most likely to buy from other investors, with 36.4% of their purchases sourced from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,580 SFR properties in Lee County, with individuals holding a 76.0% majority share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold 1,580 single-family residential properties in Lee County, which constitutes 14.4% of the total 10,963 SFRs in the market.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords are the definitive backbone of the local rental market, owning 1,201 properties or 76.0% of the investor-owned inventory, dwarfing the 392 properties (24.8%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,404 individual landlords operate, a figure more than 7 times greater than the 198 company landlords in the county.

A strong preference for cash ownership is evident, with 1,193 properties (75.5%) owned outright, compared to only 387 properties (24.5%) that are financed, suggesting a low-risk, long-term hold strategy among local investors.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on rentals, with 1,512 properties (95.7%) classified as rented, confirming the primary business model for SFR investors in Lee County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 39.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $60,162 per home.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lee County demonstrate a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a deep discount. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $92,389, which is 39.4% less than the $152,551 average paid by traditional homeowners—a substantial cash difference of $60,162.

The Q4 price advantage is not an anomaly but part of a persistent trend throughout 2025. Landlords secured even larger discounts in previous quarters, paying 61.6% less in Q3 ($109,780 difference) and 50.7% less in Q2 ($79,208 difference).

This consistent, significant gap suggests that investors are successfully targeting distressed properties, off-market deals, or properties requiring renovations that are less appealing to typical homebuyers.

While overall home prices have fluctuated, the investor discount has remained a powerful market dynamic, allowing landlords to build equity immediately upon purchase and achieve higher potential returns.

Comparing prices over time, the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($84,873) remained nearly flat compared to 2024 ($84,074), indicating a stable purchasing environment for investors despite broader market shifts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 19.7% of all single-family homes sold in Lee County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in Q4, with landlords purchasing 29 of the 147 total SFRs sold, capturing a 19.7% market share.

The quarter was entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) made up 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, highlighting the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

New entrants are a key feature of the market, as 21 entities purchased their very first rental property, representing the largest group of active buyers and signaling continued growth at the smallest scale.

Drilling down into the tiers, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, buying 16 properties, followed by small landlords (Tier 03, 3-5 properties) who acquired 10 properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape in Q4, acquiring zero properties and reinforcing that Lee County's investor market is dominated by local, small-scale players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.2% of all investor-owned housing in Lee County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lee County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 92.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, with 980 properties making up 60.0% of the entire investor portfolio, indicating a low barrier to entry and widespread participation by local individuals.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 5 properties, which accounts for only 0.3% of the investor market. This challenges the common narrative of large corporations controlling residential housing.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also hold a small share, collectively owning 123 properties, or 7.6% of the investor portfolio.

The ownership structure is highly fragmented and concentrated at the bottom, with 85.3% of all investor-owned properties held by landlords with 5 or fewer properties, underscoring the hyper-local character of the rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios grow.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across tiers: individuals dominate smaller portfolios, while companies control larger ones. Individuals own 89.7% of all single-property (Tier 01) investor homes.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 68 properties (60.2%) compared to the 45 properties (39.8%) held by individuals.

This trend accelerates in larger tiers, with companies owning a commanding 81.7% of properties in the 11-20 property tier, demonstrating a clear strategic shift towards formal incorporation as portfolios scale.

Even so, individuals maintain a presence across most of the spectrum, owning 76.4% of properties in the 3-5 property tier and even 18.3% in the 11-20 property tier.

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle in Lee County: individuals start small, and those who successfully grow their portfolios are more likely to incorporate their holdings for liability and financial purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The highest concentration of investor-owned homes is in Keokuk (52632) and Fort Madison (52627).
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Lee County is geographically concentrated in its largest population centers. The zip code for Keokuk (52632) has the highest absolute number of investor-owned homes at 664 properties.

Fort Madison (52627) follows closely with 619 investor properties, making these two areas the primary hubs for rental housing in the county.

While larger towns lead by count, some smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit the highest rates of investor penetration. Donnellson (52624) has the top ownership rate, with 29.0% of its housing stock owned by investors.

Similarly, West Point (52656) and Montrose (52639) show significant investor presence relative to their size, with ownership rates of 9.3% and 14.2% respectively.

This distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas reveals different market dynamics, with investors targeting both urban density in Keokuk and Fort Madison and specific opportunities in smaller communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lee County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 37 properties while selling only 12 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lee County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they were decisive net buyers, with 37 acquisitions against only 12 dispositions.

This pattern of net buying has been consistent over the last two years. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 117 properties while selling just 42. In 2024, the trend was even stronger, with 127 buys versus 32 sells.

The data shows no signs of a landlord sell-off; instead, it points to sustained confidence and expansion within the local rental market.

Institutional investor activity is minimal but follows the same net-buyer trend. In 2025, the 1000+ tier entities bought 3 properties and sold only 1, indicating a slight expansion even at the largest scale.

The steady transaction volume across quarters suggests a stable and liquid market where investors are continuously able to find and execute on new opportunities.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.4% of all Lee County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a key role in market liquidity during Q4, participating in 37 of the 213 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 17.4%.

Activity was exclusively driven by smaller investors, with 100% of the 37 transactions conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04).

A notable pricing strategy emerged among tiers. New, single-property landlords paid the lowest average price at $63,628, likely targeting entry-level or fixer-upper properties. In contrast, more experienced small landlords (3-5 properties) paid the highest average price at $164,438, suggesting they are acquiring more valuable or turn-key assets.

Inter-landlord trading is a component of the market, particularly for established investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 36.4% of their acquisitions (4 of 11 transactions) from other landlords, indicating a mature market for trading rental assets.

New investors (Tier 01) and two-property landlords (Tier 02) did not purchase any properties from other landlords, suggesting they primarily acquire homes from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Lee County with 92.2% of rental homes, acquiring properties at a 39.4% discount.
Holdings
In Lee County, landlords own 1,580 SFR properties, representing 14.4% of the market. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 1,201 of these properties (76.0%) compared to 392 (24.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Lee County achieved a significant 39.4% price advantage over traditional homeowners in Q4, paying an average of $92,389 versus $152,551, a savings of $60,162 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 19.7% of homes sold in Q4 (29 properties), with activity entirely driven by small investors. The market welcomed 21 new single-property landlords, signaling robust grassroots growth.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 92.2% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the entry-level tiers, but a clear shift occurs as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier (60.2% ownership).
Transactions
Landlords in Lee County are strong net buyers, acquiring 37 properties while selling only 12 in Q4. Institutional investors were inactive in Q4 but remained slight net buyers for the year.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Lee County, Iowa, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale enterprise. Investors own 1,580 properties, 14.4% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market composition heavily favors individual operators, who own 76.0% of these homes. This grassroots structure is further confirmed by portfolio size, where 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.2% of all investor-owned real estate, leaving a negligible 0.3% for large institutional firms.

Investor behavior in Lee County is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 19.7% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a small-scale landlord. These buyers demonstrate a powerful pricing advantage, securing properties for 39.4% less than traditional homeowners in the last quarter. This trend of deep discounts, combined with a strong net-buyer position (37 buys vs. 12 sells in Q4), signals a confident and expanding investor base that is capitalizing on market inefficiencies to build their portfolios.

The key takeaway for the Lee County housing market is that it is not driven by Wall Street, but by Main Street. The rental landscape is shaped by 1,404 individual landlords, many of whom own just one or two properties. Their ability to find deals far below the typical market rate allows for a sustainable rental model while also absorbing properties that may not appeal to traditional buyers. This dynamic suggests a stable, highly localized market where investment growth is organic and driven by individuals rather than large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:10 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLee (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail