Jones (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jones (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jones (IA)
5,769
Total Investors in Jones (IA)
590
Investor Owned SFR in Jones (IA)
551(9.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
522
SFR Owned
442
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
68
SFR Owned
113
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 551 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jones County's Market with 95.6% of Holdings Amid Volatile Pricing
Investors own 551 SFR properties in Jones County, representing 9.6% of the market. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) who own 95.6% of the portfolio. In Q4, landlords reversed historical trends by paying a 1.3% premium over homeowners, signaling a more competitive acquisition environment. While landlords remain net buyers annually, a recent shift to net selling in Q3 2025 suggests changing market dynamics.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 551 SFR properties in Jones County, with individuals owning 80.2% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor properties (440) are owned free and clear with cash, compared to only 111 that are financed. Individual landlords (522 entities) vastly outnumber company landlords (68 entities), reinforcing the market's small-scale nature.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 1.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, a reversal of typical discount patterns.
This Q4 premium of $2,727 marks a significant shift from Q1 2025, when landlords secured a massive 63.4% discount. The price gap has been extremely volatile throughout 2025, swinging from deep discounts to premiums, indicating an unpredictable and competitive market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 12.3% of all SFR properties sold in Jones County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 77.8% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made up just 11.1% of the acquisitions, purchasing a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords command a staggering 95.6% of all investor-owned homes in Jones County.
Single-property landlords are the largest segment, owning 64.0% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single home, representing a negligible 0.2% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
Individuals own 90.5% of single-property holdings and 75.2% of portfolios with 3-5 properties. However, in the 6-10 property tier, companies take a 67.6% majority, marking a clear crossover point for professionalization.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 52323 and 52321 showing ownership rates over 18%.
Zip code 52323 has the highest investor penetration at 22.4%, meaning more than one in five homes are investor-owned. In terms of raw counts, the top zip codes are 52205 (177 properties) and 52310 (157 properties).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jones County are strong net buyers annually, but a Q3 shift to net selling signals potential market cooling.
For the full year of 2025, landlords have been aggressive accumulators with a 4.86-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio (34 buys vs 7 sells). However, they sold more than they bought in Q3 (3 buys vs 5 sells), a notable reversal from their net buying stance in Q2.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 12.5% of all Q4 transactions, with small investors paying 159% more than institutional buyers.
Single-property buyers paid an average of $253,929, while the lone institutional buyer paid just $98,000 for their acquisition. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are buying from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 551 SFR properties in Jones County, with individuals owning 80.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 9.6% share of the single-family residential market in Jones County, with a total portfolio of 551 properties.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals, who own 442 properties (80.2%), compared to the 113 properties (20.5%) held by companies. This highlights a market characterized by local, small-scale ownership rather than large corporate presence.

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced, with 522 individual landlords versus only 68 company landlords. This 7.7-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

A significant majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash, with 440 properties owned outright. This is nearly four times the number of financed properties (111), indicating a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily focused on generating rental income, with 526 properties classified as rented, demonstrating the primary business objective of these holdings in Jones County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 1.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, a reversal of typical discount patterns.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of the national trend, landlords in Jones County paid a 1.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $210,850 compared to the homeowner average of $208,123.

This marks a period of extreme price volatility, swinging dramatically from a 63.4% discount ($147,040 below homeowners) in Q1 to a 73.6% premium ($148,439 above homeowners) in Q3. This fluctuation suggests a highly competitive and inconsistent purchasing environment for investors.

Despite the recent premiums, the average acquisition price for investors in 2025 ($202,833) still represents a significant appreciation from previous years. Prices are up 54.9% from the 2024 average ($130,922) and 69.8% from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average ($119,480).

The inconsistent price advantage suggests that investors in Jones County are not uniformly able to secure below-market deals and may be competing directly with retail buyers for limited inventory, especially in the latter half of the year.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 12.3% of all SFR properties sold in Jones County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors captured 12.3% of the Q4 2025 market in Jones County, purchasing 9 of the 73 single-family homes sold during the period.

The market's grassroots nature was evident in Q4 activity, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) responsible for 77.8% of all investor acquisitions, totaling 7 properties.

New entrants are a key driver of activity, as single-property landlords alone purchased 5 properties, representing 55.6% of all investor buying. This activity was spread across 9 new landlord entities, signaling fresh capital entering the market.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact, acquiring only one property, which accounted for 11.1% of landlord purchases.

The data clearly shows that Q4 acquisition activity was powered by small, local investors and new market participants, not by large-scale institutional buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords command a staggering 95.6% of all investor-owned homes in Jones County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Jones County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those holding 1-10 properties, control 95.6% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time or single-holding investors are the backbone of the market, with the '1 property' tier alone accounting for 365 properties, or 64.0% of the total investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) collectively own just 4.2% of the investor-held housing stock.

The influence of large institutional capital is virtually non-existent. The '1000+' tier holds only one property, making up just 0.2% of the market and challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover of local housing.

This distribution confirms that the rental market in Jones County is highly decentralized and reliant on thousands of small, local property owners rather than a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Jones County rental market, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolios. They own 90.5% of single-property holdings and 87.8% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios grow. While individuals still hold a 75.2% majority in the 3-5 property tier, companies become the dominant owner type in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 67.6% of homes.

This pattern suggests that as investors scale beyond five properties, they are more likely to incorporate for liability and operational purposes, signaling a shift from a personal investment to a formal business operation.

Even in the larger tiers, individuals maintain a presence. For instance, in the 101-1,000 property tier, one of the three properties is still held by an individual investor.

The data illustrates a clear lifecycle: individuals initiate market entry, while corporate structures are adopted for growth and scale in the mid-size tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 52323 and 52321 showing ownership rates over 18%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Jones County is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in specific zip codes. The highest penetration is in 52323, where investors own 22.4% of all single-family residential properties.

Other areas with high investor concentration include 52321 (18.0% investor-owned) and 52312 (17.5%), indicating that certain neighborhoods are particularly attractive for rental investments.

In terms of sheer volume, the largest number of investor-owned properties are located in zip code 52205, with 177 properties, and 52310, with 157 properties. These two areas alone account for 60.6% of all investor holdings in the county.

The data reveals a pattern where the areas with the highest counts of investor properties are not necessarily the same as those with the highest percentage rates. This distinction highlights different market dynamics between larger, more saturated areas and smaller zips with a higher density of rentals.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Jones County are strong net buyers annually, but a Q3 shift to net selling signals potential market cooling.
Detailed Findings

On an annual basis, landlords in Jones County are firmly in accumulation mode, demonstrating a strong net buyer position. In 2025, they purchased 34 properties while selling only 7, resulting in a net gain of 27 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 4.86x.

This continues a trend from 2024, where investors were also net buyers with a net gain of 14 properties (33 buys vs 19 sells).

However, a closer look at quarterly data reveals a potential shift in momentum. After being strong net buyers in Q2 2025 with 10 purchases and only 1 sale, landlords became net sellers in Q3, selling 5 properties while acquiring only 3.

The single institutional investor in the market has been a net buyer in 2025, acquiring 2 properties and selling 1. This contrasts with national trends where many institutions are divesting.

The recent Q3 shift to net selling by the broader landlord community, despite a strong annual trend, warrants monitoring as it could be an early indicator of a changing market sentiment or strategy among local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 12.5% of all Q4 transactions, with small investors paying 159% more than institutional buyers.
Detailed Findings

Investors participated in 13 of the 104 total single-family home transactions in Q4, capturing a 12.5% share of market activity.

A massive price disparity exists between investor tiers, revealing vastly different acquisition strategies. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $253,929 per home.

In sharp contrast, the institutional investor (1000+ portfolio) acquired its property for just $98,000. This represents a 61.4% discount compared to what new, single-property investors paid, suggesting a more sophisticated or opportunistic buying approach.

Activity was dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (tiers 01-04), who conducted 11 of the 13 investor transactions (84.6%).

Significantly, none of the investor purchases in Q4 were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are acquiring their inventory from traditional homeowners or new construction, not by trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors control 95.6% of Jones County's rental market as landlord acquisition prices turn to premiums.
Holdings
In Jones County, landlords own 551 single-family properties, representing 9.6% of the total market. The ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 442 of these properties (80.2%), while companies own the remaining 113 (20.5%).
Pricing
Reversing historical trends, landlords paid a 1.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average price of $210,850 versus $208,123. This marks a period of extreme price volatility, contrasting with a 63.4% discount seen earlier in the year.
Activity
Investors purchased 9 properties in Q4, accounting for 12.3% of all sales, with activity driven by small players. During the quarter, 9 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, underscoring grassroots growth.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the local market, owning 95.6% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 67.6% of homes. This indicates a clear point of professionalization as portfolios scale.
Transactions
While landlords are strong net buyers annually in 2025 (a 4.86x buy/sell ratio), they briefly became net sellers in Q3. The single active institutional entity in Jones County was a net buyer for the year, acquiring two properties and selling one.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jones County, IA is fundamentally a local and small-scale enterprise. Investors own 551 properties, comprising 9.6% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market structure defies the corporate landlord narrative; individual investors own a commanding 80.2% of these properties (442 homes). This is further emphasized by the tier distribution, where 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 95.6% of the entire investor portfolio, while institutional giants hold a mere 0.2% share.

In Q4 2025, investor behavior signaled a more competitive market. Landlords acquired 12.3% of homes sold, but did so at a 1.3% premium compared to traditional homeowners, a sharp reversal from deep discounts seen earlier in the year. This pricing volatility suggests investors are competing directly with retail buyers. Transaction data reveals that while investors are net buyers on an annual basis (a 4.86x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025), a temporary shift to net-selling in Q3 could indicate a response to changing market conditions or a move to capitalize on price appreciation.

The key takeaway for Jones County is the resilience and dominance of the small, independent landlord. The market's health and growth are driven not by Wall Street but by local individuals, with 9 new single-property investors entering in Q4 alone. While companies tend to take over as portfolios scale beyond five properties, the bedrock of the rental housing supply remains firmly in the hands of community-level owners. This decentralized structure suggests a market that is more responsive to local economic conditions than to broad national investment trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:10 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJones (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail