Johnson (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Johnson (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Johnson (IA)
28,536
Total Investors in Johnson (IA)
1,213
Investor Owned SFR in Johnson (IA)
1,095(3.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
958
SFR Owned
728
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
255
SFR Owned
396
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,095 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Johnson County's Market as Activity Cools from Historic Highs
Investors own 1,095 Single-Family Residential properties in Johnson County, IA (3.8% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 90.8% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 6.0% of all homes sold, paying 12.6% less than traditional homeowners, though transaction data shows a shift from strong net buying in 2024 to a net seller position by the end of 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,095 homes in Johnson County, with individuals holding a 66.5% majority.
Cash-owned properties (685) significantly outnumber financed ones (410), demonstrating strong investor equity. The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 1,017 properties (92.9%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 12.6% less than homeowners, a discount of $54,505 per home.
The price advantage for landlords narrowed significantly from Q3 2025, when they enjoyed a 24.8% discount ($111,283). This trend suggests a more competitive purchasing environment toward the end of the year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 6.0% of all single-family homes sold in Johnson County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 95.0% of these acquisitions. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 90.8% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just one property, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor-owned market. Landlords with just a single property represent the largest segment, holding 65.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 88.9% of homes.
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, owning 80.1% of all single-property rentals. The crossover point where ownership is evenly split occurs in the 3-5 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 52317 and 52241 by property count.
However, the highest rates of investor ownership are found in 52228 (14.3%) and 52203 (13.9%). This highlights a difference between where investors own the most properties versus where they make up the largest share of the market.
Historical Transactions
Landlords became net sellers in late 2025, a reversal from strong net buying in 2024.
In Q4 2025, landlords sold one more property than they bought (25 buys vs 26 sells). This contrasts sharply with the full year 2024, when they were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 107 more properties than they sold.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 5.0% of all Johnson County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Mid-size mom-and-pop investors (3-5 properties) paid the highest average price at $496,833 and sourced 50% of their purchases from other landlords. In contrast, new investors paid less ($317,833) and bought just 14.3% from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,095 homes in Johnson County, with individuals holding a 66.5% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a portfolio of 1,095 Single-Family Residential properties in Johnson County, representing a 3.8% share of the total 28,536 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the foundation of the local rental market, owning 728 properties (66.5%) compared to 396 properties (36.2%) held by companies.

The landlord entity landscape is even more skewed towards individuals, with 958 individual landlords comprising 79.0% of the total 1,213 investors in the county.

A significant majority of the investor-owned portfolio, 62.5% or 685 properties, is owned outright with cash, compared to 410 properties (37.5%) that are financed, indicating a low-leverage position for most landlords.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 1,017 properties (92.9%) designated as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming a strong focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 12.6% less than homeowners, a discount of $54,505 per home.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Johnson County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $378,222, which is 12.6% less than the $432,727 paid by traditional homeowners.

This equates to a significant cash discount of $54,505 per property, allowing investors to achieve better returns and acquire assets below the typical market rate.

However, this discount represents a sharp contraction from previous quarters. In Q3 2025, the gap was a remarkable 24.8% ($111,283), and in Q1 it was 26.3% ($117,730), indicating the market became much more competitive for investors as the year progressed.

The shrinking discount suggests that either housing inventory tightened, bidding competition increased, or landlords began targeting properties in higher demand than in previous quarters.

Despite the narrowing gap, landlords have consistently paid less than homeowners throughout 2025, showcasing a sustained ability to identify and secure undervalued properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 6.0% of all single-family homes sold in Johnson County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity accounted for 6.0% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 19 of the 319 SFR properties sold in Johnson County.

The quarter's activity was driven entirely by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) making up 19 purchases or 95.0% of all investor acquisitions.

The market saw an influx of new participants, as 13 new entities purchased their first and only rental property, highlighting the continued accessibility of real estate investment for small-scale players.

In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making no acquisitions in Johnson County during Q4 2025.

This data underscores that recent market growth is fueled by local, small-scale investment rather than large corporate buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 90.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Johnson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 90.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 736 properties and accounting for 65.7% of the entire investor portfolio on their own.

In contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent presence, owning just a single property, which represents a mere 0.1% of the market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also hold a small share, collectively owning just 9.1% of investor-owned properties.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market, reliant on thousands of small, local investors rather than a few large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 88.9% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts decisively from individual to corporate as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals own the vast majority (80.1%) of single-property rentals, companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of six or more properties.

The 6-10 property tier marks the clearest transition point, with companies owning 56 properties, an overwhelming 88.9% share of that segment.

The market shows a near 50/50 split in the 3-5 property tier, where individuals own 77 homes (51.0%) and companies own 74 (49.0%), indicating this is the stage where many investors formalize their operations under a corporate entity.

This pattern suggests a natural business progression: investors start as individuals and incorporate as their holdings grow to manage liability and formalize their investment strategy.

Even in the 11-20 property tier, companies maintain strong control, owning 73.5% of the properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip codes 52317 and 52241 by property count.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of investor concentration within Johnson County. The zip code 52317 contains the highest number of investor-owned homes at 240 properties, followed by 52241 with 185 properties.

A different pattern emerges when analyzing ownership penetration. The highest investor ownership *rate* is in 52228, where investors own 14.3% of all SFRs, followed closely by 52203 at 13.9%.

The divergence between top areas by count and by percentage suggests different market dynamics. Areas with high counts like 52317 may offer more overall inventory, while areas with high rates like 52228 are likely significant rental submarkets.

These concentrated areas indicate that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as proximity to amenities, universities, or favorable rental demand.

This data allows for a nuanced understanding of investor strategy, distinguishing between markets targeted for scale and those targeted for high rental density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords became net sellers in late 2025, a reversal from strong net buying in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a significant cooling of investor sentiment in Johnson County throughout 2025. After being strong net buyers in 2024 with 107 net acquisitions, landlords became slight net buyers for the full year 2025 with just 3 net acquisitions.

The trend is more pronounced in the second half of the year, with landlords becoming net sellers in both Q3 (19 buys, 20 sells) and Q4 (25 buys, 26 sells).

The market's inflection point appears to be Q2 2025, when buying and selling reached equilibrium with 37 transactions on each side.

This shift from aggressive accumulation to neutral or slight disposition suggests that investors may be capitalizing on price appreciation from previous years or responding to changing market conditions.

Institutional investors, while a minimal presence, were also net sellers in 2024, divesting two properties while only acquiring one.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 5.0% of all Johnson County real estate transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 25 of the 505 total SFR transactions in Johnson County, accounting for a 5.0% share of market activity.

Transaction volume was dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who conducted 24 of the 25 total landlord purchases.

A clear divergence in purchasing strategy is evident by tier. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier targeted high-value properties, paying an average of $496,833. In contrast, new single-property investors focused on a lower price point, averaging $317,833 per acquisition.

Sourcing patterns also differ by experience level. More established landlords (Tier 3-5) acquired 50.0% of their new properties from other landlords, indicating trades within the investor community. Newcomers (Tier 01) primarily bought from the general market, with only 14.3% of purchases coming from fellow investors.

This suggests a liquid sub-market for existing rental properties, which more experienced investors are tapping into for portfolio growth.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 91% of Johnson County's Investor Market as Activity Shifts to Net Selling
Holdings
Landlords own 1,095 Single-Family Residential properties in Johnson County, representing 3.8% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 728 properties (66.5%) compared to 396 (36.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased homes for 12.6% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $54,505 per property ($378,222 vs. $432,727).
Activity
Investors purchased 19 properties in Q4 2025, accounting for 6.0% of all sales, with activity driven by small operators and the entry of 13 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 90.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, where they control 88.9% of the homes.
Transactions
Investor sentiment has cooled, shifting from strong accumulation in 2024 to a net seller position in Q4 2025, with 25 properties bought and 26 sold. Institutional investors were also net sellers in 2024.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Johnson County, Iowa is a distinctly local and small-scale ecosystem, not a landscape of corporate dominance. Investors own a modest 1,095 homes, constituting 3.8% of the county's single-family housing. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 90.8% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors, rather than companies, form the backbone of the market, holding 66.5% of the properties, while institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint at just 0.1%.

In terms of behavior, investors remained active in Q4 2025, purchasing 6.0% of homes sold and leveraging their market expertise to acquire properties at a 12.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity was fueled by the entry of 13 new single-property landlords, showing the market remains accessible. However, a broader trend reveals a significant cooldown. After being aggressive net buyers in 2024, landlords shifted to become slight net sellers by the end of 2025, signaling a potential market peak or a strategic pivot towards portfolio optimization over expansion.

The key takeaway for the Johnson County housing market is its stability and insulation from large-scale corporate investment trends. The market is defined by the gradual accumulation and trading of properties among local individuals and small businesses. The recent shift to a net-seller position suggests investors may be capitalizing on recent price gains, a move that could introduce more inventory for traditional homebuyers. This dynamic reinforces a market driven by organic, localized factors rather than national institutional capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:10 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJohnson (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail