Jefferson (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (IA)
4,690
Total Investors in Jefferson (IA)
768
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (IA)
768(16.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
618
SFR Owned
550
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
150
SFR Owned
238
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 768 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County with 94.6% Ownership, Acquiring Homes at a 40% Discount
Investors own 16.4% of the SFR market in Jefferson County, Iowa, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 94.6% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors acquired 21.2% of homes sold, paying a remarkable 40.0% less than traditional homeowners, while remaining strong net buyers with a 6.7x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 768 SFR properties in Jefferson County, with individuals holding a 71.6% majority.
The investor portfolio is predominantly cash-based, with 586 properties (76.3%) owned outright versus just 182 financed. A significant 735 of all investor-owned properties are classified as rented, confirming a focus on income generation. The landlord base is composed of 618 individuals and 150 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 40.0% discount in Q4, paying $82,276 less than homeowners.
The landlord discount has been significant but volatile throughout 2025, peaking at 55.4% in Q1 before narrowing to 17.4% in Q2 and widening again in the second half of the year. Landlord acquisition prices averaged $136,992 in 2025, down from $159,046 in 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured 21.2% of all Q4 home sales, purchasing 14 SFR properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominated Q4 activity, accounting for 13 of the 14 purchases (92.9%). Institutional investors were entirely absent from the market, acquiring zero properties. The market saw an influx of new investors, with 17 new single-property entities making purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Jefferson County's rental market, owning 94.6% of investor SFRs.
Institutional investors have zero presence in this market. The rental landscape is highly fragmented, with the smallest investors—those owning a single property—controlling the majority share at 61.5% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 81.1% of those portfolios.
Individual investors dominate all smaller tiers, holding over 81.0% of single-property portfolios and over 53% in every tier up to 10 properties. The crossover to company-majority ownership occurs definitively once a portfolio scales beyond 10 properties. Institutional-level companies own zero properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 52556 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 631 investor-owned properties.
While 52556 has the highest volume, the 52585 zip code claims the highest concentration, with a 20.0% investor ownership rate. Investor activity is highly localized, with the top two zip codes by count (52556 and 52533) also posting high ownership rates of 16.6%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 6.7x buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 20 properties while selling 3.
This aggressive buying posture is a continuation of a multi-year trend; landlords were net buyers for all of 2025 (adding 40 properties) and 2024 (adding 39 properties). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity, confirming growth is driven by smaller players.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.1% of all Q4 market transactions, totaling 20 deals.
Mom-and-pop investors drove all activity, conducting 19 of the 20 landlord transactions. A notable 23.5% of purchases made by new single-property investors were sourced from other landlords, indicating healthy market churn.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 768 SFR properties in Jefferson County, with individuals holding a 71.6% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a notable 16.4% share of the single-family residential market in Jefferson County, with a total portfolio of 768 properties.

Individual, or 'mom-and-pop', investors are the definitive market leaders, owning 550 properties, which accounts for 71.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to 238 properties (31.0%) held by companies.

The landlord community itself is heavily skewed towards individuals, with a ratio of more than four individual landlords (618) for every one company landlord (150).

A strong indicator of financial stability among investors is the preference for cash purchases, with 76.3% of the portfolio (586 properties) held free of financing, while only 23.7% (182 properties) are financed.

The vast majority of the portfolio, 735 properties, is actively rented, underscoring that the primary strategy for investors in this market is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 40.0% discount in Q4, paying $82,276 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jefferson County consistently purchase properties at a significant discount, paying an average of just $123,333 in Q4 2025, which is 40.0% below the $205,609 average paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage translated into an average savings of $82,276 per property for landlords during the fourth quarter.

The landlord discount has been a persistent but fluctuating feature of the market throughout 2025, ranging from a low of 17.4% in Q2 to a high of 55.4% in Q1, demonstrating investors' ability to find value in various market conditions.

Comparing year-over-year trends, average landlord acquisition prices have decreased from $159,046 in 2024 to $136,992 in 2025, suggesting a shift in either market conditions or investor acquisition strategy.

The substantial and ongoing price gap indicates that landlords are likely targeting different segments of the market than homeowners, possibly focusing on properties that require renovations or are sold through non-traditional channels.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured 21.2% of all Q4 home sales, purchasing 14 SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 14 of the 66 total SFR properties sold, representing a 21.2% market share of all purchases.

The buying activity was almost exclusively driven by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) responsible for 92.9% of all investor acquisitions.

New entrants are the primary driver of market growth, as 17 new single-property landlord entities acquired 11 properties, making up 78.6% of all investor purchases in the quarter.

In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no acquisition activity in Jefferson County during Q4, highlighting the market's local, small-investor character.

The data clearly shows that market expansion is fueled by an influx of new, small landlords rather than consolidation by large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Jefferson County's rental market, owning 94.6% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jefferson County is unequivocally defined by small-scale ownership, as 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.6% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords form the very foundation of the rental market, alone owning 487 properties, which constitutes a 61.5% majority share of the entire investor portfolio.

Defying common narratives about corporate landlords, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Jefferson County, holding 0.0% of the market.

The data reveals a steep drop-off in ownership as portfolio size increases; investors holding more than 10 properties collectively own just 5.4% of the investor-held housing stock.

This ownership structure points to a deeply fragmented and localized rental market, driven by community-level investors rather than large, out-of-state corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 81.1% of those portfolios.
Detailed Findings

A clear strategic shift from individual to corporate ownership occurs as landlords scale their portfolios in Jefferson County.

Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios, commanding an 81.0% majority in the single-property tier and maintaining majority ownership across all tiers up to 10 properties.

The tipping point for incorporation happens sharply at the 11-20 property level. In this tier, companies own 30 properties, representing a commanding 81.1% majority share.

Even as they grow, many small landlords prefer to operate as individuals, who still hold a 63.2% majority in the 6-10 property tier.

This pattern indicates that while individuals drive market entry and early-stage growth, scaling into a mid-size portfolio typically coincides with a transition to a more formal company structure for operational and liability purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 52556 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 631 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Jefferson County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 52556 zip code serving as the primary hub, containing 631 investor-owned SFR properties.

The distinction between volume and penetration is clear: the 52585 zip code has the highest density of investor activity, where one in five homes (20.0%) is investor-owned.

The most popular areas for investors, such as 52556 and 52533 (47 properties), demonstrate both high volume and high penetration rates (16.6%), marking them as core investment zones.

In contrast, other zip codes like 52540 show more moderate activity, with 12 investor-owned properties and a 13.3% ownership rate.

This geographic analysis reveals that investors are not evenly distributed but instead target specific sub-markets within the county, creating pockets of high rental density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 6.7x buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 20 properties while selling 3.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jefferson County are in a distinct portfolio growth phase, acting as aggressive net buyers with 20 purchases against only 3 sales in Q4 2025.

The Q4 buy-to-sell ratio of 6.7-to-1 signals strong market confidence and a clear strategy of accumulation among local landlords.

This trend is not a recent phenomenon. Landlords have consistently been net buyers, adding a net 40 properties to their portfolios over the course of 2025 and 39 properties in 2024.

While the total number of acquisitions decreased slightly from 65 in 2024 to 56 in 2025, sales also slowed, ensuring a continued positive net acquisition rate.

The complete absence of transaction activity from institutional investors underscores that the market's momentum is entirely generated by smaller, active landlords expanding their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.1% of all Q4 market transactions, totaling 20 deals.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a key source of market liquidity in Q4, participating in 20 of the 95 total property transactions, for a 21.1% share of all market activity.

The market's transactional energy comes exclusively from smaller players, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 19 of the 20 landlord-involved deals.

New or single-property investors were the most active cohort, engaging in 17 transactions and demonstrating a reliance on the existing investor network by sourcing 23.5% of their purchases directly from other landlords.

A significant pricing disparity exists between tiers, with small landlords (3-5 properties) paying a much higher average price of $225,000 compared to the $118,500 average paid by single-property buyers.

Institutional investors remained on the sidelines with zero transactions, reinforcing that Q4 activity was exclusively a small-investor affair.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County with 94.6% Ownership, Acquiring Homes at a 40% Discount
Holdings
In Jefferson County, Iowa, investors own 768 SFR properties, representing 16.4% of the total market. Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 550 properties (71.6%) compared to 238 (31.0%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4, paying an average of $123,333—a 40.0% discount compared to the $205,609 paid by homeowners, saving $82,276 per property.
Activity
Investors acquired 21.2% of homes sold in Q4 (14 properties), with activity driven by small players as 17 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 94.6% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors have zero presence in the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (81.1%) in portfolios sized between 11-20 properties, marking a clear operational shift.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 6.7x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (20 buys vs 3 sells), a trend driven entirely by smaller landlords as institutions remained inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jefferson County, Iowa is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 768 properties, comprising 16.4% of the county's SFR housing stock. This portfolio is dominated by individuals, who own 71.6% of these homes. The market structure defies narratives of corporate consolidation; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.6% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have no presence whatsoever, resulting in a highly fragmented, community-based rental landscape.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 21.2% of all homes sold and demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, paying 40.0% less than traditional homeowners. This purchasing power fuels their expansion, as evidenced by their status as strong net buyers with a 6.7-to-1 buy/sell ratio in the last quarter. This activity is driven by new market entrants, with 17 new single-property landlords joining the market, often acquiring properties financed with cash rather than debt.

The key takeaway is that the health and direction of the Jefferson County rental market are tied to the decisions of individual and small-business investors, not Wall Street firms. These landlords are actively and successfully growing their portfolios by identifying and securing undervalued properties. The absence of institutional players suggests a stable, locally-driven market where new investors can still find opportunities, ensuring the rental housing supply remains in the hands of community stakeholders.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:11 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJefferson (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail