Jackson (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jackson (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jackson (IA)
6,059
Total Investors in Jackson (IA)
849
Investor Owned SFR in Jackson (IA)
792(13.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
677
SFR Owned
551
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
172
SFR Owned
249
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 792 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Jackson County's Real Estate Market, Owning 97% of Rental Homes
Investors own 792 Single-Family Residential properties in Jackson County, representing 13.1% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 96.7% of the inventory, while institutional investors hold a mere 0.2%. In Q4 2025, local landlords continued to expand, purchasing 14.8% of all homes sold and remaining strong net buyers throughout the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 792 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 69.6% majority.
Of the 792 investor-owned properties, 76.5% were acquired with cash (606 properties), indicating a low reliance on financing. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 95.3% of properties (755) classified as non-owner-occupied. Individual investors are the most common entity type, comprising 79.7% of all landlords in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 18.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $40,982.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed significantly; the Q4 discount of 18.8% is much smaller than the 56.3% discount observed in Q3. Average landlord acquisition prices have nearly doubled, rising from $118,654 in the 2020-2023 period to $215,268 in 2024, signaling strong market appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 14.8% of all SFR properties sold in Jackson County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of investor purchases this quarter, acquiring all 9 properties. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market saw the entrance of 10 new or expanding single-property landlord entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.7% of all investor-owned residential properties in Jackson County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, which amounts to only 0.2% of the investor market. The most dominant segment is single-property landlords, who alone own 519 properties, or 64.1% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Ownership shifts from individuals to companies as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority at the 6-10 property tier.
While individuals own a commanding 78.9% of single-property portfolios, companies take control of the 6-10 property tier with a 67.6% ownership share. This indicates a clear trend of incorporating as investment scale increases.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Jackson County is most concentrated in the 52060 zip code, home to 358 investor-owned properties.
While 52060 has the highest volume, the 52032 zip code has the highest market penetration, with an investor ownership rate of 27.3%. This demonstrates that the areas with the most investor properties are not necessarily the most saturated.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jackson County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at 2.76 times the rate they sell them in 2025.
This trend of accumulation has been consistent, with 47 properties purchased versus only 17 sold in 2025. The net-buyer activity continued in Q4 with 13 purchases and 6 sales. This pattern was also evident in 2024, when landlords bought 50 properties and sold only 12.
Current Quarter Transactions
In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 13.3% of all SFR transactions in Jackson County.
A significant price disparity emerged among buyers: new single-property investors paid an average of $199,300, nearly double the $103,667 paid by more established small landlords. More experienced investors were also more likely to buy from peers, sourcing 33.3% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 792 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a 69.6% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 13.1% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Jackson County, with a total portfolio of 792 properties.

The ownership structure is dominated by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 551 properties (69.6% of the investor market), while companies own the remaining 249 properties (31.4%).

A similar pattern exists among landlord entities, where 677 of the 849 total landlords (79.7%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

Cash is the preferred method for acquisitions, with 606 properties (76.5%) owned outright without financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 755 properties (95.3%) being non-owner-occupied, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Comparing entity and property counts reveals that company landlords, while fewer in number, tend to have larger portfolios on average than their individual counterparts.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 18.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $40,982.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jackson County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in Q4 2025, paying an average of $177,231 per property compared to $218,213 for traditional homeowners. This represents a significant 18.8% discount, or $40,982 per home.

However, this pricing gap is tightening. The 18.8% discount in Q4 marks a sharp contraction from earlier in the year, when landlords enjoyed discounts as high as 56.3% in Q3 and 51.8% in Q1, suggesting increased competition for properties.

The market has seen substantial price appreciation since the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $118,654, a figure that jumped dramatically to an average of $215,268 in 2024.

The significant quarter-to-quarter fluctuation in landlord acquisition prices—from $108,045 in Q3 to $177,231 in Q4—likely reflects the low transaction volume in a smaller market, where the mix of properties sold can heavily influence averages.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 14.8% of all SFR properties sold in Jackson County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 14.8% of the Jackson County housing market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 61 total SFRs sold.

The quarter's acquisition activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) made up 100% of all investor purchases, highlighting their role as the primary source of new rental housing supply.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4 and reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of real estate investment in the area.

The market continues to attract new participants, with 10 distinct entities making single-property purchases. These new entrants acquired 7 properties, signaling healthy, grassroots-level growth in the rental sector.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier also expanded their holdings, with 3 entities purchasing 2 properties, demonstrating continued investment from established local players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 96.7% of all investor-owned residential properties in Jackson County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jackson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 96.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This market structure directly challenges the narrative of corporate landlord dominance. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint, holding just 2 properties, which constitutes only 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The foundation of the rental market is built on the smallest investors. Landlords owning just a single property represent the largest single group, controlling 519 properties, or 64.1% of the total investor portfolio.

The entire ownership distribution is heavily skewed towards smaller portfolios. The first four tiers (1-10 properties) combined account for 783 of the 792 total investor-owned properties.

Mid-size and large investors are exceedingly rare. For instance, only 3 properties are held by investors in the 21-50 property tier, and just 6 properties are held by those in the 101-1,000 tier, illustrating a highly fragmented market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Ownership shifts from individuals to companies as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across different portfolio sizes: individuals dominate smaller portfolios, while companies control larger ones.

Individuals form the backbone of the entry-level market, owning 416 (78.9%) of single-property investments and 54 (74.0%) of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level of scale, the ownership structure flips, with companies owning 46 properties (67.6%) compared to the 22 properties (32.4%) held by individuals.

This trend suggests that as landlords expand their holdings and their investment activity becomes more formalized, they are more likely to incorporate for liability, tax, or operational purposes.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, the shift is visible, as the individual ownership share drops to 62.6%—still a majority, but significantly lower than in the smaller tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Jackson County is most concentrated in the 52060 zip code, home to 358 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Jackson County, with specific zip codes serving as hubs for rental properties.

The 52060 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity by volume, containing 358 investor-owned properties, which is 45.2% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

However, for the highest concentration rate, investors should look to the 52032 zip code, where 27.3% of all SFRs are investor-owned, the highest rate in the county.

A key finding is the divergence between volume and saturation. The area with the most investor properties, 52060, has a relatively modest ownership rate of 14.1%, while 52032's high rate is based on a smaller count of 60 properties.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 52031 with 181 properties (12.1% rate) and 52070 with 59 properties and a high 17.4% ownership rate.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Jackson County are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at 2.76 times the rate they sell them in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Jackson County are consistently in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers across all recent timeframes.

In 2025, landlords acquired 47 properties while selling only 17, resulting in a net gain of 30 properties to the rental stock and a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.76x.

This aggressive acquisition trend continued through the most recent quarter, Q4 2025, where investors bought 13 properties and sold just 6, for a net increase of 7 properties.

The pattern of expansion is not new. In 2024, the net buying activity was even more pronounced, with 50 purchases against only 12 sales, for a net gain of 38 properties and a 4.17x buy-to-sell ratio.

With no recorded transactions from institutional investors, this market growth is entirely attributable to the buying activity of smaller, local mom-and-pop landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 13.3% of all SFR transactions in Jackson County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a key component of market activity in Q4 2025, being on one side of 13 of the 98 total SFR transactions, for a 13.3% market share.

A fascinating pricing pattern emerged based on investor experience. New landlords entering the market (Tier 01) paid a significant premium, with an average purchase price of $199,300.

In contrast, more established small landlords (3-5 property tier) acquired properties at a much lower average price of $103,667. This $95,633 difference suggests that experienced local investors may have access to better deals or target different types of properties.

All 13 landlord transactions in the quarter were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutional players, once again underscoring the local nature of the market.

Sourcing strategies also differed by experience level. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired 33.3% of their new properties from other landlords, indicating activity within the existing investor network. Meanwhile, new single-property buyers made 0% of their purchases from fellow landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jackson County's Market, Owning 96.7% of Investor Properties as Active Net Buyers
Holdings
In Jackson County, investors own 792 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 13.1% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (551 properties, 69.6%) compared to companies (249 properties, 31.4%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated a significant purchasing advantage in Q4 2025, paying 18.8% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $40,982 per property ($177,231 vs. $218,213).
Activity
Investor purchasing accounted for 14.8% of all Q4 sales (9 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords. The quarter saw the emergence of 10 new or expanding single-property landlord entities.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 96.7% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 67.6% share, indicating a trend toward incorporation as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are active net buyers, acquiring 2.76 properties for every one they sold in 2025 (47 buys vs. 17 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero recorded buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Jackson County, Iowa, is fundamentally a local, small-scale phenomenon. Investors own 792 Single-Family Residential homes, comprising 13.1% of the county's total SFR stock. This segment is dominated not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 69.6% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 96.7% of the inventory, while institutional investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Jackson County is characterized by strategic acquisition and active growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 14.8% of all homes sold, with 10 new single-property investors entering the market. They consistently achieve a pricing advantage, paying 18.8% less than traditional homeowners in the last quarter. Throughout 2025, landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring nearly three homes for every one they sold. This expansion is driven exclusively by small investors, who exhibit sophisticated behavior, such as experienced players paying nearly half the price per property compared to new entrants.

The key takeaway for the Jackson County housing market is its stability and community-based ownership structure. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of local, individual landlords suggest that the rental market is driven by long-term, small-business principles rather than large-scale corporate strategy. This dynamic, coupled with consistent net buying from existing landlords and a steady flow of new entrants, points to a healthy, growing, and deeply localized rental housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:06 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJackson (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct