Henry (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Henry (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Henry (IA)
5,417
Total Investors in Henry (IA)
738
Investor Owned SFR in Henry (IA)
730(13.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
586
SFR Owned
485
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
152
SFR Owned
256
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 730 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Henry County's Market, Controlling 90.8% of Rentals and Buying at a 42.1% Discount
Investors own 13.5% of Henry County's SFR market (730 properties), with small landlords controlling a massive 90.8% share versus just 0.5% for institutions. In Q4, landlords purchased 17.2% of homes sold, paying 42.1% below homeowner prices, and remained strong net buyers with a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 730 SFR properties in Henry County, with individuals holding a 66.4% majority.
Cash-backed ownership is prevalent, with 515 properties owned outright compared to 215 financed properties. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 692 of the 730 properties (94.8%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords paid 42.1% less than homeowners, a staggering $104,387 average discount.
The landlord purchasing advantage widened dramatically in Q4, with the discount more than doubling from 21.0% in Q3 to 42.1%. Overall acquisition prices for investors have risen from a yearly average of $118,117 in 2024 to $129,105 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 17.2% of all SFR properties sold in Henry County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove the market, accounting for 81.8% of all landlord purchases. Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 90.8% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.5% of the investor-held housing stock. Single-property landlords are the largest single group, holding 59.9% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
The ownership crossover occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies control 61.0% of properties. This trend accelerates in the 11-20 property tier, with companies owning 91.7% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 52641 zip code, which holds 421 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 52621 zip code, where investors own 100.0% of the SFR market. Other hotspots by ownership rate include 52630 (26.1%) and 52652 (20.0%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Henry County are consistently net buyers, acquiring 3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This net buyer trend has been consistent, with a 1.7x buy-to-sell ratio for the full year 2025 (42 buys vs 25 sells) and a 3.6x ratio in 2024. Institutional investors, though small, are also in an accumulation phase with 3 buys and 1 sell in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 11.7% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 12 deals.
Institutional investors paid a 53.6% premium, with an average purchase price of $185,601 compared to $120,833 for single-property landlords. Notably, 0% of investor purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 730 SFR properties in Henry County, with individuals holding a 66.4% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 13.5% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Henry County, totaling 730 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords form the backbone of the rental market, owning 485 properties (66.4%), which is more than double the 256 properties (35.1%) owned by companies.

This dominance by individuals extends to the number of entities, with 586 individual landlords compared to just 152 companies, indicating a market structure of many small players rather than a few large ones.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards generating rental income, as evidenced by 692 of 730 properties (94.8%) being classified as rented.

A strong financial position is apparent in the market, with investors owning more than twice as many properties with cash (515) as with financing (215), suggesting low leverage and high equity across the portfolio.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords paid 42.1% less than homeowners, a staggering $104,387 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Henry County demonstrate a significant purchasing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 for an average of $143,800, which is 42.1% less than the $248,187 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap represents a substantial discount of $104,387 per property, indicating that investors may be targeting distressed properties or leveraging superior negotiation tactics.

The Q4 discount marks a dramatic widening of the price gap throughout the year. It surged from a 21.0% discount in Q3 ($37,973) and a 38.2% discount in Q2 ($68,860), suggesting an increasingly favorable buying environment for investors.

While landlords are securing deep discounts, their overall acquisition costs are on the rise. The average price in 2025 ($129,105) is up from the 2024 average ($118,117) and the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $112,231.

The sharp increase in the landlord discount relative to homeowners suggests investors are finding value in market segments that traditional buyers may be overlooking or avoiding.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 17.2% of all SFR properties sold in Henry County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 17.2% of the Henry County SFR market in Q4, with landlords purchasing 11 of the 64 total properties sold.

The market's growth is fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 9 acquisitions, representing 81.8% of all landlord purchase activity.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market, with 6 of the 11 investor purchases made by single-property landlords, signaling a healthy influx of new capital at the grassroots level.

In stark contrast to the activity from small landlords, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made only a single purchase, accounting for just 9.1% of the landlord total.

The data clearly shows that Q4 acquisition activity was dominated by the smallest players, with the 1-10 property tier purchasing nine times more properties than the 1000+ property tier.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 90.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Henry County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a combined 90.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-investment landlords are the bedrock of the market, as the '1 property' tier alone accounts for 452 properties, representing a 59.9% majority share of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of large, corporate ownership does not apply here; institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier have a minimal presence, controlling only 4 properties, which is just 0.5% of the total.

Ownership concentration rapidly declines as portfolio size increases. After the '1 property' tier, the next largest segment is '3-5 properties' at 16.2%, followed by '6-10 properties' at 7.8%.

This reveals a highly fragmented market structure, where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by local, small-portfolio individuals and businesses rather than large, out-of-market institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure based on portfolio size: individuals are the primary owners of smaller portfolios, while companies dominate the larger ones.

The transition point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, which is the first segment where companies hold a majority stake at 61.0% (36 properties) compared to individuals at 39.0% (23 properties).

For portfolios of 1-5 properties, individual ownership is dominant. Individuals own 79.7% of single-property portfolios, 56.6% of two-property portfolios, and 68.9% of 3-5 property portfolios.

Company ownership becomes almost exclusive in larger mid-size tiers. In the 11-20 property tier, for instance, companies own 33 of the 36 properties, a commanding 91.7% share.

This data suggests a strategic shift where serious scaling of a real estate portfolio in Henry County is typically managed under a corporate structure, likely for liability and financial purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 52641 zip code, which holds 421 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Henry County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 52641 zip code alone accounting for 421 properties, representing a 13.6% ownership rate in that area.

Following 52641, the next most significant areas by sheer volume are 52645, with 103 investor-owned homes (11.2% rate), and 52654, with 46 properties (11.9% rate).

The areas with the highest investor penetration rates are distinct from those with the highest counts. The 52621 zip code stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating a specialized or unique housing market.

Other zip codes with high investor saturation include 52630 (26.1%) and 52652 (20.0%), suggesting these are targeted areas for rental property acquisition.

The data highlights that investor strategy is not uniform across the county; some areas attract a high volume of investment, while others, possibly smaller, attract a high density of it.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Henry County are consistently net buyers, acquiring 3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords have remained strong net buyers in Henry County, with acquisition volume consistently outpacing dispositions. In Q4 2025, they purchased 12 properties while only selling 4, a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This pattern of accumulation was evident throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 42 homes and sold 25, and in 2024, the trend was even stronger with 62 acquisitions versus just 17 sales.

While overall transaction volume in 2025 (67 total transactions) is lower than in 2024 (79 total transactions), the strategic direction remains firmly focused on portfolio growth.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) mirror this growth trend on a smaller scale, having purchased 3 properties and sold only 1 during 2025, signaling confidence in the market.

The persistent net buying activity across multiple timeframes indicates a sustained investor appetite for single-family rentals in Henry County, contributing to a tightening of available housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 11.7% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 12 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in 12 of the 103 total SFR transactions in Q4, capturing an 11.7% share of market activity.

A significant pricing disparity exists between the largest and smallest investors. The institutional (1000+) tier paid an average of $185,601 per property, a 53.6% premium over the $120,833 average paid by new single-property landlords.

This price difference suggests divergent acquisition strategies, with institutional buyers possibly targeting higher-value assets, while smaller investors focus on lower-cost properties with potential for value-add improvements.

Small investors dominated transaction volume, with mom-and-pop tiers (1-10 properties) responsible for 10 of the 12 landlord transactions, while the institutional tier conducted only one.

The market shows no evidence of inter-landlord trading in Q4, as 0% of acquisitions by investors were from another landlord. This indicates that investors are acquiring their inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Henry County with 90.8% Ownership While Securing 42.1% Purchase Discounts
Holdings
Investors own 730 single-family residential properties in Henry County, representing 13.5% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 485 properties (66.4%) compared to 256 (35.1%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid 42.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $104,387 per property ($143,800 vs $248,187).
Activity
Landlords purchased 11 properties in Q4, accounting for 17.2% of all sales, with market growth driven by the entry of 6 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 90.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint at just 0.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control over 91% of portfolios with 11-20 properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (12 buys vs 4 sells), a trend mirrored by institutional investors who remain in an accumulation phase for the year.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Henry County, Iowa, is fundamentally driven by small, local players. Investors command a 13.5% share of the single-family market with 730 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 90.8% of all investor-held homes. Individual investors make up the majority, holding 66.4% of properties and defying the narrative of corporate dominance, as institutional firms own a mere 0.5% of the inventory.

Investor behavior in Q4 was characterized by strategic, discounted purchasing and steady accumulation. Landlords acquired 17.2% of all homes sold, paying a remarkable 42.1% less than traditional homeowners—a discount that widened significantly throughout the year. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 6 new single-property investors joining the market. The consistent net-buyer status, with a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4, underscores a strong, ongoing appetite for expanding rental portfolios across all investor sizes.

The key takeaway for the Henry County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of small-scale investors, not large institutions. This structure suggests that rental housing supply and pricing are influenced by local economic conditions rather than national corporate strategies. The significant purchasing discounts obtained by investors indicate they are absorbing properties that may be less desirable to traditional buyers, potentially fulfilling a crucial role in market liquidity while building equity at an accelerated pace.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 01:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHenry (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail