Floyd (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Floyd (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Floyd (IA)
6,248
Total Investors in Floyd (IA)
950
Investor Owned SFR in Floyd (IA)
1,029(16.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
815
SFR Owned
814
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
135
SFR Owned
220
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,029 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Floyd County's SFR Market, Commanding Massive Discounts
Investors own 1,029 Single-Family Residential properties in Floyd County, IA (16.5% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling a commanding 82.4% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors demonstrated a keen eye for value, purchasing properties at a staggering 66.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While purchasing activity cooled in the last quarter, landlords remain strong net buyers on an annual basis.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,029 SFR properties, with individual landlords owning a 79.1% majority.
The investor portfolio is heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 777 properties owned outright versus 252 that are financed. An overwhelming 94.8% of these properties are operated as rentals (976 out of 1,029). The market consists of 950 distinct landlords, 815 of whom are individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an astonishing 66.6% price discount compared to homeowners in Q4 2025.
This Q4 discount of $132,148 per property ($66,125 vs $198,273) marks a significant widening from the 46.0% discount seen in Q3. The pricing dynamic is highly volatile, as investors paid a 67.9% premium in Q1 2025, suggesting opportunistic buying behavior.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 6.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors driving the activity.
Small investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 75.0% of landlord purchases, acquiring 3 of the 4 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions in the county during the quarter. One new landlord entered the market, purchasing their first investment property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 82.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.2% of the investor portfolio. The single largest group is first-time landlords, with the 'Single-property' tier alone accounting for 561 properties (52.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier.
While individuals maintain a majority everywhere, company ownership share increases with portfolio size, growing from 15.3% in the single-property tier to 41.4% for landlords owning 11-20 properties. In the largest portfolios (21-50 properties), individuals still own a commanding 79.8% share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Floyd County is highly concentrated, with one zip code holding 63.4% of all rental properties.
The 50616 zip code contains 652 of the 1,029 investor-owned properties. However, the zip codes with the highest investor penetration rates are different, led by 50658 (27.8%) and 50620 (25.0%), showing a clear distinction between volume and density.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted to a neutral position in Q4 after being aggressive net buyers for the past two years.
In Q4 2025, landlords bought and sold an equal number of properties (4 each). This contrasts sharply with the full-year trend for 2025, where they were net buyers of 32 properties, and 2024, where they were net buyers of 49 properties. Institutional transaction data was not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in just 4.7% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity coming from smaller investors.
Zero transactions involved institutional investors, and 100% of landlord purchases came from the open market, not from other landlords. The average price for new landlords (Tier 01) was $84,500, significantly higher than the $50,000 paid by two-property landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,029 SFR properties, with individual landlords owning a 79.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Floyd County, IA, investors hold a significant 16.5% share of the Single-Family Residential market, with a total portfolio of 1,029 properties out of 6,248 available SFRs.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by local, individual ownership. Individuals own 814 properties, constituting 79.1% of the investor-held market, compared to 220 properties (21.4%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 815 of the 950 landlords (85.8%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

A strong preference for unleveraged assets is evident, as investors own more than three times as many properties with cash (777) as they do with financing (252). This suggests a market of financially stable, long-term holders rather than highly leveraged speculators.

The portfolio is clearly focused on rental income generation, with 976 properties identified as rented, which accounts for 94.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an astonishing 66.6% price discount compared to homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing power was on full display in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring properties for an average price of $66,125. This represents a massive 66.6% discount compared to the $198,273 average paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $132,148 per transaction.

The price advantage for investors has been wildly inconsistent throughout the year, indicating a market with pockets of significant opportunity. The Q4 discount followed a 46.0% discount in Q3 and a 71.7% discount in Q2, but contrasts sharply with Q1, when landlords paid a surprising 67.9% premium.

This volatility suggests that investors in Floyd County are not simply buying uniformly cheaper properties, but are likely targeting distressed assets, off-market deals, or properties requiring significant renovation, leading to dramatic price variations quarter to quarter.

Comparing prices over a longer horizon, the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average price of $111,592 shows that recent acquisitions can be secured for significantly less, defying typical appreciation trends and highlighting the unique opportunities available in the current market.

The extreme nature of the landlord discount, especially in Q2 and Q4, points to a highly skilled or specialized buyer pool capable of identifying and executing on deeply undervalued assets that are inaccessible or undesirable to the average homebuyer.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 6.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors driving the activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity represented a small fraction of the overall market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 4 of the 58 total SFRs sold, a market share of 6.9%.

The entirety of investor purchasing was driven by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 3 of the 4 acquisitions (75.0%), while a small-medium landlord (11-20 properties) made the remaining purchase.

Notably, institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Floyd County this quarter, underscoring the local, small-investor character of the area.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with one new landlord purchasing their first investment property (Tier 01). This steady influx of new, small investors is crucial for the health and liquidity of the local rental market.

The purchasing activity was distributed evenly across four different tiers, with one property each being bought by a new landlord (Tier 01), a two-property landlord (Tier 02), a small landlord (Tier 03), and a small-medium landlord (Tier 05).

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 82.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of rental housing in Floyd County is dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively hold 82.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market challenges the narrative of large corporate ownership. Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint, controlling only 2 properties, which translates to a mere 0.2% market share.

The bedrock of the investor market is the single-property landlord. This group (Tier 01) is the largest by a wide margin, owning 561 properties and accounting for 52.0% of the entire investor portfolio, demonstrating that the path to real estate investment in the county often begins with a single rental home.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a smaller but significant segment, collectively owning 20.5% of the investor-held properties. This indicates a healthy progression for some investors who grow beyond the initial 1-10 property range.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market where ownership is dispersed among many small players, rather than consolidated in the hands of a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier.
Detailed Findings

In Floyd County, individual investors form the backbone of the rental market across all portfolio sizes. They constitute the majority owner type in every defined tier, from single-property landlords (84.7% individual-owned) to those holding 21-50 properties (79.8% individual-owned).

While individuals dominate, there is a clear trend of increasing corporate ownership as portfolio sizes grow. The share of company-owned properties climbs from just 15.3% in the single-property tier to a significant 41.4% in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier.

This pattern suggests that as investors scale their operations, they are more likely to incorporate for liability and financial reasons. However, even at this more professionalized level, individuals remain the majority owners (58.6%).

The two-property tier shows the highest concentration of individual ownership at 88.7%, indicating that the initial steps of growing a portfolio are almost exclusively taken by private individuals.

There is no crossover point in the available data where companies become the majority owners, reinforcing the conclusion that real estate investment in Floyd County remains primarily an individual-driven endeavor, even for larger local portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Floyd County is highly concentrated, with one zip code holding 63.4% of all rental properties.
Detailed Findings

A staggering concentration of investor ownership exists within the 50616 zip code, which is home to 652 investor-owned SFRs. This single area accounts for 63.4% of all investor properties in Floyd County, making it the undisputed hub of rental housing.

Following distantly are the 50458 and 50468 zip codes, each with 82 investor-owned properties. This demonstrates a dramatic drop-off in investor volume outside of the primary 50616 area.

Interestingly, the areas with the highest raw counts of investor properties are not the ones with the highest market penetration. The top zip code for investor ownership *rate* is 50658, where investors own 27.8% of the SFR housing stock.

This highlights a key geographic insight: while bulk ownership is concentrated in one area (50616), several smaller, distinct markets like 50620 (25.0% rate) and 50636 (21.5% rate) have a much higher density of rental properties relative to their total housing supply.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas is critical for understanding market dynamics, as it points to different types of investment strategies and neighborhood characteristics across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords shifted to a neutral position in Q4 after being aggressive net buyers for the past two years.
Detailed Findings

After a prolonged period of portfolio expansion, investor activity in Floyd County reached an equilibrium in Q4 2025. Landlords bought 4 properties and sold 4 properties, resulting in a net-neutral quarter and signaling a potential pause in their acquisition strategy.

This recent slowdown contrasts with a strong history of accumulation. For the full year of 2025, landlords were significant net buyers, adding a net total of 32 properties to their portfolios (45 buys vs. 13 sells).

The net buying trend was even more pronounced in 2024, when investors acquired a net of 49 properties (64 buys vs. 15 sells), demonstrating a consistent, multi-year strategy of growing their holdings in the county.

The buy/sell ratio for 2025 stands at a robust 3.46, meaning landlords bought nearly 3.5 properties for every one they sold throughout the year, even with the neutral final quarter.

The shift in Q4 from aggressive net buying to a balanced stance could indicate a response to changing market conditions, such as price stabilization or a lack of desirable inventory, and will be a key trend to monitor in upcoming quarters.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in just 4.7% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity coming from smaller investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord transactions constituted a minor segment of the market, with their 4 purchases representing only 4.7% of the 85 total SFR transactions in Floyd County.

All purchasing activity was confined to the 'mom-and-pop' segment. Transaction volume was split evenly, with one purchase each from investors in the 1-property, 2-property, 3-5 property, and 11-20 property tiers.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among the smallest buyers. The new landlord (Tier 01) paid an average of $84,500, which is 69% more than the $50,000 paid by the slightly more experienced two-property landlord, suggesting new entrants may pay a premium to secure their first asset.

Investors sourced all of their Q4 acquisitions from the general market, with 0% of purchases coming from other landlords. This indicates they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers and are not primarily trading assets within an insular investor network.

The complete lack of institutional transactions further solidifies the view of Floyd County as a market fundamentally shaped by the decisions and actions of small, local real estate investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 82.4% of investor housing in Floyd County, acquiring properties at a 66.6% discount.
Holdings
Investors own 1,029 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 16.5% of Floyd County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 79.1% of this portfolio (814 properties), with companies owning the remaining 21.4% (220 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated remarkable purchasing acumen, paying an average of $66,125, which is 66.6% less than the $198,273 paid by traditional homeowners—a discount of $132,148 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 4 properties in Q4, accounting for 6.9% of all market sales. This activity included one new single-property landlord entering the market, with 100% of purchases made by small-to-medium investors.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the local market, controlling 82.4% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible share of just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all portfolio sizes. While company ownership share grows with portfolio size, peaking at 41.4% in the 11-20 property tier, individuals never concede the majority.
Transactions
While landlords were neutral in Q4 (4 buys vs 4 sells), they remain strong net buyers for the full year of 2025, with a 3.46x buy/sell ratio (45 buys vs 13 sells). No institutional transaction data was available.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Floyd County, IA is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. They own 1,029 properties, a 16.5% share of the total market, but this ownership is highly fragmented. Individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords control a staggering 82.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, with 79.1% of all properties held by individuals rather than companies. In contrast, institutional capital has a near-zero presence at just 0.2%, confirming that the local rental landscape is driven by community-level investment, not large corporations.

Investor behavior in Floyd County is characterized by opportunistic and value-driven acquisitions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased only 6.9% of homes sold but did so at an extraordinary 66.6% discount compared to traditional homebuyers. This demonstrates a clear strategy of targeting undervalued or distressed assets. While transaction activity paused to a neutral stance in Q4 (4 buys, 4 sells), this follows a multi-year trend of aggressive portfolio growth, with landlords remaining strong net buyers on an annual basis with a 3.46x buy/sell ratio in 2025.

The key takeaway is that Floyd County's housing market includes a sophisticated and dominant segment of small investors who provide the vast majority of rental housing. Their ability to acquire properties at deep discounts and their sustained, long-term net buying activity make them a stable and defining force. The market's health and future direction are tied not to institutional trends, but to the financial decisions of these hundreds of local, individual owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 12:55 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFloyd (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct