Fayette (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fayette (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fayette (IA)
6,458
Total Investors in Fayette (IA)
877
Investor Owned SFR in Fayette (IA)
905(14.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
728
SFR Owned
629
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
149
SFR Owned
296
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 905 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Fayette County's Rental Market, Securing Properties at a 72.7% Discount
Investors own 905 SFR properties in Fayette County, representing 14.0% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small, individual landlords (86.3% of holdings), who in Q4 2025 acquired properties for 72.7% less than traditional homeowners. While local landlords are consistently net buyers, institutional investors have virtually no presence or activity in the county.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 905 SFR properties, with individual landlords controlling 69.5% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with cash-owned properties (694) outnumbering financed ones (211) by more than 3-to-1. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 873 of the 905 properties (96.5%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q4 properties at a staggering 72.7% discount, paying just $49,963 on average.
This massive price advantage over traditional homeowners, who paid $182,971, amounted to a $133,008 savings per property. This significant discount has been a consistent trend, with landlords paying over 60% less than homeowners in both Q1 and Q3 of 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 13.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with 7 total acquisitions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove all the activity, accounting for 71.4% of investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing no new investment in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 86.3% of Fayette County's investor-owned housing.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio. Landlords with only a single property represent the largest group, holding 56.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership from individuals in portfolios sized at 6-10 properties.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 86.5% of single-property portfolios, companies control 51.5% of the 6-10 property tier. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership becomes even more pronounced at 65.9%.
Geographic Distribution
The 50662 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Fayette County, containing 429 investor-owned homes.
Investor-owned properties make up 16.4% of all SFRs in the 50662 zip code. The next most concentrated area is 50655, with 30 investor-owned properties at a 12.6% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Fayette County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 1.6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of portfolio growth is consistent over the long term, with 51 properties bought versus 26 sold in 2025. Institutional investors were dormant, with their last recorded activity being a net-neutral position in 2024 (1 buy, 1 sell).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 10.1% of all Q4 property transactions, with small investors driving the activity.
New single-property investors were the most active, conducting 4 transactions and paying the lowest average price of just $28,875. Among these new investors, 25% of their properties were acquired from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 905 SFR properties, with individual landlords controlling 69.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Fayette County, investors hold a total of 905 Single-Family Residential properties, accounting for 14.0% of the total 6,458 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 629 properties, or 69.5% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties constitute the remaining 32.7% with 296 homes.

The market is composed of 877 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (728) vastly outnumbering company landlords (149), reinforcing the small-scale nature of property investment in the area.

Cash transactions dominate landlord holdings. A significant 694 properties were acquired with cash, compared to just 211 that are financed, indicating a market with high liquidity and less reliance on traditional lending.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals. A total of 873 properties are actively rented, representing 96.5% of all investor-owned homes and signaling a clear focus on generating rental income rather than speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q4 properties at a staggering 72.7% discount, paying just $49,963 on average.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Fayette County demonstrated an exceptional ability to acquire properties far below market rates in Q4 2025. They paid an average of just $49,963, which is 72.7% less than the $182,971 paid by traditional homeowners.

This substantial price gap translates to a direct discount of $133,008 per property, suggesting landlords are targeting distressed assets, off-market deals, or properties in need of significant renovation that are not attractive to typical buyers.

The trend of deep discounts for landlords was consistent throughout 2025. In Q3, they secured a 60.8% discount ($106,737), and in Q1, they achieved a 60.6% discount ($114,984), indicating a persistent and strategic acquisition approach.

Comparing prices over time, the average landlord acquisition price of $78,756 for the full year 2025 is significantly lower than the average of $122,418 during the 2020-2023 period, highlighting a shift towards lower-cost properties in the current market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 13.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with 7 total acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 13.0% of the Fayette County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 7 of the 54 total SFRs sold.

The market's growth is fueled entirely by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 5 of the 7 purchases, representing 71.4% of all investor buying activity.

Four new landlords entered the market in Q4, each purchasing their first investment property. These single-property investors alone made up 42.9% of all landlord acquisitions, signaling healthy grassroots entry into the rental market.

Large-scale investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no acquisitions, reinforcing the highly localized and small-scale nature of the county's investor market.

The remaining acquisitions were made by mid-size landlords, with one purchase each in the 11-20 and 101-1000 property tiers, indicating sporadic activity from more established local players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 86.3% of Fayette County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Fayette County is dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a commanding 86.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the most significant force in the market, alone owning 530 properties, which accounts for 56.3% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small investors to the local rental supply.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership concentration rapidly diminishes. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 13.4% of the housing stock.

Institutional investors have virtually no presence in Fayette County. The 1,000+ property tier accounts for just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor market and dispelling any notion of a corporate takeover of local housing.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented market structure, where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by local community members rather than large, out-of-state corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership from individuals in portfolios sized at 6-10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the rental market in Fayette County, overwhelmingly controlling the smaller portfolio tiers. They own 86.5% of all single-property investments and 57.3% of two-property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership occurs at the 6-10 property tier, which serves as the clear crossover point. In this tier, companies own 50 properties (51.5%) compared to the 47 owned by individuals (48.5%).

Beyond this inflection point, company ownership solidifies. In the next tier of 11-20 properties, companies control a strong majority with 58 properties, representing 65.9% of the homes in that category.

This pattern reveals a typical investor lifecycle in the county: individuals start and grow small portfolios, but scaling beyond five properties often involves formalizing ownership under a company structure for liability and financial purposes.

Even in the smallest tiers, companies maintain a presence, holding 13.5% of single-property portfolios, indicating that some investors choose to incorporate from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 50662 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Fayette County, containing 429 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Fayette County is highly concentrated within the 50662 zip code, which contains 429 landlord-owned properties. This single area accounts for a significant portion of the county's entire rental stock.

The investor penetration rate in 50662 stands at 16.4%, indicating a strong preference for this specific market among landlords for acquisition and rental operations.

The zip code of 50655 shows the second-highest level of investor presence, with 30 properties owned by landlords, translating to a 12.6% ownership rate.

Analysis of other zip codes in the county is limited due to incomplete data, but the available information clearly points to 50662 as the primary hub for real estate investment activity.

This geographic concentration suggests that factors specific to the 50662 area, such as housing stock, local economy, or population density, are particularly favorable for the rental market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Fayette County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 1.6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fayette County are actively growing their portfolios, demonstrating a clear net-buyer position. In Q4 2025, they purchased 8 properties while selling only 5, signaling confidence in the local market.

This accumulation strategy has been consistent throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 51 SFRs and sold just 26, resulting in a net gain of 25 properties for their collective portfolios.

The net-buyer trend extends back to 2024, when landlords purchased 77 properties and sold 27, for a strong buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 3-to-1.

In stark contrast, institutional-level investors (1000+ properties) show no signs of activity or growth. Their only recent transactions were in 2024, with one purchase and one sale, indicating a stable or disinvesting position rather than accumulation.

The persistent net-buying behavior among the broader landlord community, coupled with the absence of institutional activity, underscores that market growth is driven by local, smaller-scale investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 10.1% of all Q4 property transactions, with small investors driving the activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 8 of the 79 total SFR transactions in Fayette County, capturing a 10.1% share of the market's transactional volume.

First-time investors were the most active group, with single-property landlords responsible for 4 of the 8 total landlord transactions. This highlights a healthy influx of new participants into the rental market.

These new investors demonstrated a clear strategy of acquiring low-cost properties, paying an average price of only $28,875. This is significantly lower than prices paid by other tiers, such as the $105,000 paid by small-medium landlords.

The data reveals a small but present secondary market among investors. One of the four properties (25.0%) purchased by single-property landlords was bought directly from another landlord, indicating a flow of assets within the investor community.

No institutional-level transactions were recorded in Q4, reinforcing that all market liquidity and activity are being generated by mom-and-pop and mid-size investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Fayette County with 86.3% of rentals, acquiring properties at a 72.7% discount.
Holdings
In Fayette County, landlords own 905 SFR properties, representing 14.0% of the market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 629 of these homes (69.5%), while companies own the remaining 296 (32.7%).
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average of $49,963, a staggering 72.7% less than traditional homeowners ($182,971), resulting in a discount of $133,008 per property.
Activity
Investors accounted for 13.0% of Q4 sales with 7 purchases, and market growth was driven by small players, including 4 new single-property landlords who entered the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 86.3% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the small-portfolio segment, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase as net buyers, acquiring 8 properties while selling 5 in Q4. In contrast, institutional investors recorded no transactions and remain dormant.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Fayette County, IA is fundamentally a local, small-scale enterprise. Investors own 905 SFR properties, or 14.0% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 69.5% of the properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominating with an 86.3% share of investor housing, while large institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and steady portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords, who made up 13.0% of all buyers, acquired properties at a remarkable 72.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This suggests a focus on distressed or off-market assets. Transaction data confirms landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 1.6 properties for every one they sold in the last quarter, signaling strong confidence in the local market. All this activity is driven by small players, with four new single-property landlords entering the market in Q4 alone.

The key takeaway is that the narrative of corporate landlords taking over housing does not apply to Fayette County. Instead, the rental market's health and growth are dependent on local entrepreneurs and small investors. Their strategy of targeting deeply discounted properties indicates they are likely adding value to the housing stock through renovation and improvement, serving a segment of the market that may be overlooked by traditional homebuyers. The market's future will be shaped by the continued activity of these community-based investors, not by large-scale institutional capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 12:55 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFayette (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail