Decatur (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Decatur (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Decatur (IA)
1,198
Total Investors in Decatur (IA)
6
Investor Owned SFR in Decatur (IA)
5(0.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4
SFR Owned
3
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2
SFR Owned
2
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor activity in Decatur County is minimal, with just 5 properties owned by 6 local landlords.
The real estate investor market in Decatur County, IA is exceptionally small, comprising only 5 properties, or 0.4% of the total 1,198 SFRs. The market is entirely controlled by 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), with individuals owning 60.0% of the portfolio. There was no recorded landlord purchase or transaction activity in Q4 2025, signaling an illiquid and stable micro-market with no institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5 SFR properties in Decatur County, with individuals holding a 60.0% majority.
The small portfolio is predominantly held in cash, with 4 of the 5 properties owned outright. Of the 6 total landlords in the county, 4 are individuals and 2 are companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisition price data is available for Decatur County due to a lack of recent transaction activity.
There were no recorded landlord purchases in any recent quarter, preventing a price comparison against traditional homeowners. Historical data from 2020-2023 also shows zero landlord acquisitions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0% of the 10 total market sales.
There was no new market entry from single-property landlords, and neither mom-and-pop nor institutional tiers recorded any buying activity during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
'Mom-and-pop' investors control 80.0% of the landlord-owned SFRs in Decatur County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 60.0% of all investor holdings. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 100% of properties in the small landlord tier (3-5 units).
In the single-property tier, ownership is split, with individuals holding 2 properties (66.7%) and a company holding 1 (33.3%). No pricing data is available to compare buying patterns.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Decatur County is concentrated in zip code 50144, with 3 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is in zip code 50262 at 1.3%. However, this represents just 1 investor-owned property.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a highly illiquid market for investor properties.
The absence of buy or sell transactions for all landlords, including institutional investors, prevents analysis of market trends, pricing, or net-buyer status.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0% of the 18 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from single-property landlords to institutional firms. As a result, there is no data on inter-landlord trading or purchase prices for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5 SFR properties in Decatur County, with individuals holding a 60.0% majority.
Detailed Findings

The investor footprint in Decatur County, IA is minimal, with landlords owning just 5 single-family residential properties, which constitutes only 0.4% of the 1,198 total SFRs in the market.

Ownership is led by individual investors, who control 3 properties (60.0%), compared to companies which own the remaining 2 properties (40.0%).

This small-scale ownership is reflected in the landlord entity count, where 4 individual landlords operate alongside 2 company landlords.

A significant majority of the investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 4 of the 5 properties (80.0%) being cash-owned, while only 1 is financed.

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 3 of the 5 properties identified as rented, underscoring the primary strategy for the few investors in this market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisition price data is available for Decatur County due to a lack of recent transaction activity.
Detailed Findings

Due to extremely low transaction volume, there is no available data on landlord acquisition prices for Q4 2025 or preceding quarters in Decatur County.

The absence of landlord purchase activity makes it impossible to compare their acquisition costs against those of traditional homeowners or to establish any pricing trends.

Historical data for the 2020-2023 period also indicates a complete lack of purchase activity, with 0 properties acquired by landlords during that time.

This lack of data is itself an insight, highlighting a market that is not currently active for investor acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0% of the 10 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw no acquisition activity from real estate investors in Decatur County, with 0 properties purchased by this group.

This lack of activity means landlords accounted for 0.0% of the 10 total SFR properties that were sold in the county during Q4.

Consequently, there were no new entrants into the market, as the single-property (Tier 01) landlord count for new purchases was zero.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes, with both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) segments recording 0 purchases.

The data points to a dormant quarter for investor buying in a market characterized by very low velocity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
'Mom-and-pop' investors control 80.0% of the landlord-owned SFRs in Decatur County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Decatur County is exclusively composed of small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 4 of the 5 investor-held SFRs, an 80.0% share.

Single-property landlords form the largest segment, controlling 3 properties for a dominant 60.0% share of the total investor portfolio.

The remaining ownership is split between a small landlord (3-5 properties) and a small-medium landlord (21-50 properties), each holding 1 property (20.0%).

There is no presence from large-scale or institutional investors (Tier 09), underscoring the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment in the county.

Due to the lack of transactions, no meaningful price analysis by tier is possible for any recent timeframe.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors own 100% of properties in the small landlord tier (3-5 units).
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across the smallest portfolio tiers in Decatur County. They own 100% of the properties in the small landlord (3-5 properties) category.

Even in the single-property tier, individuals hold the majority, owning 2 of the 3 properties (66.7%), while a company owns the remaining property (33.3%).

This distribution highlights that company ownership is present but does not dominate at any portfolio size within this market.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, as the market scale is too small to support larger portfolio tiers where this typically occurs.

No pricing data is available to compare acquisition strategies or price points between individual and company investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Decatur County is concentrated in zip code 50144, with 3 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration of investor properties in Decatur County is minimal and localized. The zip code IA-Decatur-50144 contains the highest number of investor-owned homes, with a total of 3 properties.

This count in 50144 represents an investor ownership rate of just 0.7%, indicating a very low penetration rate even in the most active area.

The highest rate of investor ownership is found in zip code IA-Decatur-50262, at 1.3%, though this is based on a single investor-owned property in that area.

The data illustrates that investor ownership is not widespread, but rather confined to a few properties scattered across a couple of zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a highly illiquid market for investor properties.
Detailed Findings

There is no recorded historical transaction data for landlords in Decatur County, which points to a market with very low or nonexistent liquidity for investment properties.

Without transaction records, it is impossible to determine if landlords have been net buyers or net sellers over time.

Similarly, analysis of landlord-to-landlord transactions cannot be performed, as there is no data on the source of purchases or destination of sales.

The lack of data extends to all investor types, including the institutional (1000+ tier), confirming their absence from the transactional market.

This data gap is a key characteristic of the market, defining it as one where investment properties are rarely traded.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0% of the 18 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the investor community was completely inactive in the Decatur County transaction market, accounting for 0 of the 18 total SFR transactions.

This lack of participation resulted in a 0% market share of transactions for landlords during the quarter.

Transactional inactivity was consistent across all portfolio sizes, with 0 transactions recorded for mom-and-pop tiers and 0 for institutional tiers.

Consequently, there is no data to analyze inter-landlord trading activity, as no landlords were recorded buying from other investors.

The absence of purchases also means there is no Q4 average purchase price data to analyze buying strategies or price points by tier.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Decatur County's investor market is microscopic, with 5 properties owned by local landlords and no recent sales activity.
Holdings
In Decatur County, IA, landlords own 5 SFR properties, representing 0.4% of the market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 3 properties (60.0%), while companies own the remaining 2 (40.0%).
Pricing
No landlord acquisition price data is available for Q4 2025 in Decatur County due to a complete lack of purchasing activity, making a comparison to homeowner prices impossible.
Activity
Investors were inactive in Q4 2025, purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small landlords, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) owning 80.0% of investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force, holding a majority of properties in the smallest tiers. There is no portfolio size in Decatur County where companies are the majority owners.
Transactions
There were no recorded landlord buy or sell transactions in Q4 2025, indicating an illiquid market. Both the overall landlord pool and the institutional tier were completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Decatur County, IA is exceptionally small and locally focused. Investors own a mere 5 single-family properties, accounting for just 0.4% of the county's 1,198 SFRs. The market structure is defined by individuals, who own 60.0% of these properties. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, those with 1-10 properties, control 80.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Decatur County is characterized by stability and a lack of transactional activity. During Q4 2025, landlords made zero purchases, representing 0% of market sales and signaling a dormant period for acquisitions. This inactivity means there is no pricing data to compare investor purchasing power against traditional homeowners. The existing small portfolio is financially stable, with 4 of the 5 properties owned with cash.

The key takeaway for Decatur County is its status as a non-traditional, illiquid micro-market for real estate investment. The landscape is not shaped by broad market trends but by the buy-and-hold strategies of a handful of local individuals. The absence of transactions, new market entrants, and institutional players suggests a stable rental environment where properties rarely change hands, offering little opportunity for scalable investment strategies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 12:48 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDecatur (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price