Calhoun (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (IA)
3,723
Total Investors in Calhoun (IA)
1,149
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (IA)
1,012(27.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,011
SFR Owned
806
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
138
SFR Owned
221
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,012 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Calhoun County's rental market is dominated by small-scale investors who control 96.1% of stock and are aggressively buying.
Investors own 1,012 SFR properties, a significant 27.2% of the market in Calhoun County. The landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors holding 79.6% of properties, while mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a massive 96.1% share. In Q4, these investors captured 36.5% of all home sales and were strong net buyers throughout 2025, though uncharacteristically paid an 18.3% premium over homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,012 SFR properties in Calhoun County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.6% share.
Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 790 properties owned outright compared to just 222 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 97.6% of investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid an 18.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal of typical discounts.
The Q4 premium of $28,294 marks a stark reversal from Q3, when landlords secured a 36.6% discount ($111,788). This price gap has proven highly volatile, swinging from a modest 4.4% discount in Q1 to the current premium.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 36.5% of all Q4 home sales in Calhoun County, acquiring 19 of 52 available properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 17 of the 19 landlord purchases (89.5%). In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market welcomed 12 new single-property landlords in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 96.1% of all investor-owned housing in Calhoun County.
Single-property landlords represent the largest individual segment, owning 744 properties (71.5% of the total). Institutional investors have zero presence in this market, reinforcing its character as one driven by small, local investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 69.5% of properties in that segment.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate portfolios of up to 5 properties, holding over 75% in each of those tiers. The crossover to company-majority ownership occurs sharply and defines a clear point of strategic incorporation for growing investors.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 50563 and 50579, which together hold 548 properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is found elsewhere, in zip code 50551, where investors own 53.3% of all SFRs. Zip code 50538 stands out for having both high volume (72 properties) and a high ownership rate (33.0%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This strong net buying trend was consistent throughout the year, with a Q4 buy-to-sell ratio of 3.1x (22 buys vs 7 sells). Acquisition volume has remained remarkably stable, with 79 purchases in 2025 nearly matching the 80 purchases in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 31.0% of all Q4 property transactions, participating in 22 of the 71 total sales.
A significant price variation exists among mom-and-pop tiers, with buyers in the 3-5 property tier paying the most ($354,733) and those in the 6-10 property tier paying the least ($54,400). Landlords in the 6-10 tier sourced 20.0% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,012 SFR properties in Calhoun County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.6% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant stake in the Calhoun County housing market, owning 1,012 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 27.2% of the total 3,723 SFRs.

Individual, small-scale investors are the primary drivers of the rental market, owning 806 properties (79.6%), while corporate entities own the remaining 221 properties (21.8%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,011 individual landlords operating in the county compared to only 138 companies.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident across the investor portfolio. 790 properties are owned free and clear, nearly four times the 222 properties that carry financing, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to generating rental income, with 988 of the 1,012 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, a concentration of 97.6%.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid an 18.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal of typical discounts.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of typical market behavior, landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average price of $183,319, which is 18.3% more than the $155,025 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $28,294 premium stands in stark contrast to the preceding quarter, Q3 2025, where landlords enjoyed a massive 36.6% discount, paying $111,788 less than homeowners on average.

The price advantage for landlords has been inconsistent throughout the year, ranging from a 4.4% discount in Q1 to a 9.5% discount in Q2 before shifting to the current premium, signaling volatile market conditions.

The shift from securing substantial discounts to paying a premium suggests an increase in competition for limited housing inventory or a strategic focus by investors on acquiring higher-value properties during the fourth quarter.

Comparing prices to the pandemic era (2020-2023), the Q4 average landlord price of $183,319 reflects a 12.3% appreciation over the $163,293 average from that period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 36.5% of all Q4 home sales in Calhoun County, acquiring 19 of 52 available properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 19 of the 52 single-family homes sold, which translates to a 36.5% market share of all transactions.

The acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties), who were responsible for 17 of the 19 investor purchases, comprising 89.5% of all investor buying activity.

The market continues to attract new participants, with 12 new entities purchasing their first investment property in Q4. These single-property landlords alone accounted for 47.4% (9 properties) of all investor acquisitions.

In stark contrast to the active small investors, large-scale institutional firms (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape this quarter, acquiring zero properties.

Beyond new entrants, landlords in the 6-10 property tier were also notably active, with just 2 entities acquiring 5 properties, demonstrating concentrated purchasing power and representing 26.3% of investor buying volume.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 96.1% of all investor-owned housing in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Calhoun County is definitively shaped by small-scale landlords, as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a massive 96.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 744 properties. This represents 71.5% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, making first-time and small investors the most critical segment.

The market shows extreme fragmentation at the top end, with mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) having a very limited footprint and collectively owning less than 4% of the investor housing stock.

Underscoring the hyper-local nature of the market, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have absolutely no ownership stake, holding zero properties in the county.

This ownership distribution reveals a market composed almost exclusively of individual and small-scale investors, challenging any narrative of large, corporate consolidation in the region.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 69.5% of properties in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, overwhelmingly controlling smaller portfolios. They own 88.1% of all single-property investments and over 75% of portfolios containing 2 to 5 properties.

A distinct strategic shift occurs once a portfolio reaches 6 properties. At the 6-10 property tier, corporate ownership becomes dominant, with companies holding 41 properties (69.5%) compared to just 18 (30.5%) for individuals.

This crossover pattern suggests that as local investors scale their operations, they increasingly adopt a corporate structure for liability protection, financing advantages, or operational efficiency.

While individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers, companies still maintain a foothold, holding 11.9% of single-property portfolios and roughly a quarter of portfolios in the 2-5 property range.

The entire investor landscape, whether individual or company, is composed of smaller entities, as there is zero ownership by institutional-scale firms in Calhoun County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 50563 and 50579, which together hold 548 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership by sheer volume is heavily concentrated in two zip codes: 50563 (Rockwell City) with 284 properties and 50579 (Lake City) with 264 properties. Together, these two areas account for more than half of all investor-owned homes in the county.

However, the highest market penetration is found in smaller communities. Zip code 50551 (Lytton) leads with an investor ownership rate of 53.3%, followed by 50552 (Lohrville) at 41.4%.

This data reveals a key divergence: while the largest number of investor properties are located in the county's more populated towns, investors own a much higher percentage of the housing stock in smaller, surrounding communities.

The zip code 50538 (Fonda) is a notable hotspot, ranking high in both total count (72 properties) and ownership rate (33.0%), indicating it is a primary target for investor activity.

These geographic patterns show that investor strategies are hyper-local, with different zip codes being targeted for either achieving scale or establishing significant market control.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Calhoun County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords are consistently and actively expanding their portfolios in Calhoun County, acting as strong net buyers across all recent timeframes.

For the full year of 2025, investors purchased 79 properties while selling only 12. This translates to a powerful 6.6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio and a net portfolio gain of 67 properties county-wide.

The pace of acquisitions has been remarkably steady year-over-year. The 79 properties bought in 2025 is almost identical to the 80 properties purchased during 2024, signaling sustained investor confidence.

This aggressive accumulation continued through the end of the year, as landlords bought 22 properties and sold just 7 in Q4 2025, a ratio of more than 3 to 1.

Confirming their absence from the market, institutional investors conducted zero transactions, meaning all buying and selling activity is driven by smaller, local market participants.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 31.0% of all Q4 property transactions, participating in 22 of the 71 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a role in nearly one-third of the market's Q4 activity, participating in 22 of the 71 total SFR transactions for a market share of 31.0%.

All 22 of these landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional players, reinforcing the local nature of the transactional market.

A wide pricing disparity is evident even within the mom-and-pop segment. Investors in the 3-5 property tier paid the highest average price at $354,733, while those in the 6-10 property tier paid the lowest at just $54,400.

Inter-landlord trading is present but limited. Investors in the 6-10 property tier were most likely to acquire properties from their peers, with 20.0% of their purchases being sourced from other landlords.

New, single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the market with an average purchase price of $222,864, demonstrating a willingness to pay more than some established small landlords to secure their first rental asset.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Calhoun County's rental market is dominated by small-scale investors who control 96.1% of stock and are aggressively buying.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,012 SFR properties, representing 27.2% of the market in Calhoun County. Individual investors hold a dominant 79.6% (806 properties) compared to 21.8% (221 properties) for companies.
Pricing
In a notable reversal, landlords paid an 18.3% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average price of $183,319 versus $155,025 for traditional buyers.
Activity
Landlords purchased 36.5% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (19 properties), with activity driven by small investors as 12 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 96.1% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors control portfolios up to 5 properties, but companies become the majority owner in the 6-10 property tier, holding 69.5% of assets in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.6 properties for every one sold in 2025 (79 buys vs 12 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive.
Market Narrative

In Calhoun County, investors own 1,012 single-family properties, a significant 27.2% of the total housing market. This landscape is shaped not by large corporations, but by local players. Individual investors own a commanding 79.6% of this portfolio, and smaller 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.1% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have zero footprint in the county, making it a market defined by fragmentation and small-scale ownership.

Investor activity remains robust and bullish. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 36.5% of all homes sold, with 12 new investors buying their first property. Throughout 2025, they were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 6.6 homes for every one they sold. In a surprising turn that suggests intense competition for inventory, these investors paid an 18.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4, a reversal from previous quarters where they typically secured discounts.

The key takeaway from the data is a hyper-local, highly active rental market driven entirely by small, well-capitalized investors who are steadily expanding their holdings. The absence of institutional players combined with the dominance of mom-and-pop landlords creates a unique market dynamic. The willingness of these investors to pay a premium signals strong confidence in the local rental economy, which will likely maintain pressure on housing availability and prices for prospective homeowners in Calhoun County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 12, 2026 at 12:41 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail