Screven (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Screven (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Screven (GA)
3,878
Total Investors in Screven (GA)
1,147
Investor Owned SFR in Screven (GA)
1,087(28.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,034
SFR Owned
964
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
113
SFR Owned
125
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,087 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Screven County, Controlling 99.5% of Rental Housing and Actively Buying
Investors own 28.0% of the Single-Family Residential market in Screven County, GA, a share overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (99.5%) versus institutional firms (0.2%). In Q4, these landlords acquired 43.8% of all homes sold, and across 2025 have maintained a strong net buyer position, purchasing nearly 8 properties for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,087 SFRs in Screven County, with individual landlords holding 88.7% of the portfolio.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 973 properties owned outright versus just 114 financed. These holdings are heavily rental-focused, with 1,069 of 1,087 properties (98.3%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 saw landlords pay a 119.6% premium over homeowners, an anomaly in a volatile pricing market.
This massive Q4 premium ($666,000 vs $303,300) is a dramatic reversal from Q3, when landlords secured a 56.3% discount. This extreme quarter-to-quarter fluctuation signals a market driven by unique, low-volume transactions rather than a consistent pricing strategy.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all homes sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors driving 100% of the activity.
All 7 landlord purchases this quarter were made by small investors in the 1-10 property tier. This activity included the entry of 8 new single-property landlord entities, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 2 properties, which is only 0.2% of the investor-owned market. The market's foundation is built on its smallest participants, with single-property landlords alone controlling a massive 82.3% share (914 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
Individuals constitute the vast majority of owners in smaller portfolios, holding 90.7% of single-property assets and over 81% in tiers up to 5 properties. The shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios scale, with companies holding a 66.7% majority in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 30467 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, containing 914 investor-held properties.
While 30467 has the highest volume, other zip codes show higher saturation. The 30449 zip code has a 100% investor ownership rate, and 30426 has a 63.2% rate, indicating pockets of intense investor concentration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Screven County, acquiring 7.67 properties for every one sold in 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, following a strong 2024 where landlords had a 6.2x buy-to-sell ratio. While the overall pace of acquisitions has slowed from 62 purchases in 2024 to 46 in 2025, the net positive position remains robust.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 37.5% of all transactions in Q4, with zero purchases from other landlords.
All 9 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with no institutional activity. New, single-property investors paid less on average ($184,500) than their slightly larger counterparts ($245,000), suggesting a focus on lower-cost entry points.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,087 SFRs in Screven County, with individual landlords holding 88.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 28.0% share of the SFR market in Screven County, GA, with a total of 1,087 properties.

The market is dominated by individual investors, who own 964 properties, constituting 88.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to 125 properties (11.5%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 1,034 of the 1,147 total landlords (90.1%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local market.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. Landlords own 973 properties free of financing, a figure that dwarfs the 114 financed properties, indicating a low reliance on leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 1,069 of the 1,087 properties being rented, representing a massive 98.3% of all investor-owned homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 saw landlords pay a 119.6% premium over homeowners, an anomaly in a volatile pricing market.
Detailed Findings

In a striking Q4 pricing anomaly, landlords paid an average of $666,000 per property, a $362,700 premium over the traditional homeowner price of $303,300. This represents a 119.6% markup, a significant deviation from typical purchasing behavior.

This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from the prior quarter. In Q3 2025, landlords achieved a deep 56.3% discount, paying just $99,763 compared to the homeowner average of $228,521.

Pricing behavior throughout the year has been exceptionally volatile. Landlords also paid a premium in Q2 (33.9%), but secured a large discount in Q1 (53.1%), showing no consistent strategy.

The extreme fluctuations suggest that Screven County's landlord acquisition market is characterized by a very small number of transactions each quarter, where one or two outlier sales can heavily skew the average price.

Historical data shows average acquisition prices during the 2020-2023 period were $103,065, indicating that recent quarterly prices, whether high or low, are part of a highly dynamic and unpredictable local market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all homes sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors driving 100% of the activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a substantial 43.8% share of the market in Q4, purchasing 7 of the 16 total SFR properties sold in Screven County.

Activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors, with 100% of landlord acquisitions made by mom-and-pop landlords who own between 1 and 10 properties.

The market is attracting new entrants, as the single-property tier was the most active segment. A total of 8 new landlord entities entered the market, acquiring 6 of the 7 properties purchased by investors.

In stark contrast to the active small investors, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties were completely absent from the purchasing market this quarter, making zero acquisitions.

The data reinforces the notion of a market fueled by local, small-scale capital, not large corporate investment, with activity concentrated at the entry level of property investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Screven County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, holding 914 properties. This single tier accounts for 82.3% of all investor-owned housing, highlighting the fragmented nature of ownership.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply after the smallest tiers. Landlords with 2 properties hold 7.0%, and those with 3-5 properties hold 8.1%, with all larger tiers falling below 3% market share.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a virtually non-existent presence, owning just 2 properties in the entire county, which represents a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market.

This distribution firmly establishes that the rental market in Screven County is supplied by a large number of very small, local investors rather than a few large, professionalized firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, overwhelmingly owning properties in the smaller portfolio tiers. They hold 90.7% of single-property investments (830 properties) and 81.0% of two-property portfolios.

A clear trend emerges as portfolios grow: the share of company ownership steadily increases with portfolio size, rising from just 9.3% in the single-property tier to 39.1% in the 6-10 property tier.

The critical crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type is in the 11-20 property tier. In this segment, companies own 66.7% of the properties, signaling a threshold for professionalization and incorporation.

Even with this crossover, the vast quantity of investor properties remains in the smaller, individual-dominated tiers, underscoring their overall market control.

This pattern suggests that while landlords in Screven County typically start as individuals, there is a clear motivation to adopt a corporate structure once their portfolio reaches a certain scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 30467 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, containing 914 investor-held properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Screven County is highly concentrated in the 30467 zip code, which alone accounts for 914 landlord-owned properties, an area with a 27.7% investor ownership rate.

There is a clear distinction between areas with high property counts and those with high ownership rates. The 30449 zip code has the highest possible concentration with a 100.0% investor ownership rate.

Another pocket of high saturation is the 30426 zip code, where investors own 12 properties, representing a significant 63.2% of the housing stock in that area.

The zip code with the second-highest count of investor properties, 30446 (102 properties), also boasts a high ownership rate of 29.9%, making it a significant secondary hub for investment.

This geographic distribution reveals a market with one primary volume center (30467) and several smaller, highly saturated sub-markets where investors own a majority or super-majority of the homes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers in Screven County, acquiring 7.67 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Screven County are actively and consistently growing their portfolios, maintaining a strong net buyer position over the last two years.

In 2025, investors demonstrated a clear accumulation strategy by purchasing 46 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a powerful 7.67-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This behavior is not new; in 2024, landlords also acted as net buyers, acquiring 62 properties and selling 10, for a ratio of 6.2-to-1.

While the net buying trend continues, the overall velocity of acquisitions has moderated slightly, with total purchases decreasing from 62 in 2024 to 46 in 2025.

The most recent quarterly data from Q3 2025 reinforces this pattern, with landlords buying 10 homes and selling just 4, further cementing their role as accumulators of local housing stock.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 37.5% of all transactions in Q4, with zero purchases from other landlords.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords were a significant force in the market, participating in 9 of the 24 total SFR transactions for a 37.5% share.

All Q4 investor transaction activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors, with 8 transactions coming from the single-property tier and one from the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier.

A critical finding is the source of these acquisitions: 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring their properties from the traditional homeownership market rather than trading assets among themselves.

Pricing data reveals a potential strategy difference by tier. The newest investors (Tier 1) paid an average of $184,500, whereas the single transaction in the 3-5 property tier was for a higher-priced property at $245,000.

Consistent with other metrics, institutional investors were completely inactive in the Q4 transaction market, reinforcing the small-investor character of Screven County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords dominate Screven County's market with 99.5% ownership while consistently accumulating properties.
Holdings
Investors own 1,087 SFR properties in Screven County, GA, representing 28.0% of the market, with individual landlords holding a commanding 964 properties (88.7%).
Pricing
Q4 pricing showed extreme volatility, with landlords paying an anomalous 119.6% premium over homeowners ($666,000 vs $303,300), a reversal from deep discounts seen in other quarters.
Activity
Landlords acquired 43.8% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (7 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors and the entry of 8 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.5% of investor housing, while institutional firms own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the overwhelming majority, but companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 10 properties, crossing the threshold at the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.67x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (46 buys vs 6 sells), steadily growing their portfolios while institutional investors remain inactive.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Screven County, GA is characterized by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors own 1,087 single-family properties, comprising 28.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), who control 99.5% of all investor-owned homes, leaving a negligible 0.2% for institutional firms. Ownership is primarily individual (88.7%) rather than corporate (11.5%), cementing the market's fragmented, small-scale nature.

Investor behavior is focused on steady accumulation and is driven entirely by these small players. In Q4, landlords acquired a significant 43.8% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop tiers and the creation of 8 new single-property landlords. While Q4 pricing was anomalously high, landlords have shown a pattern of securing discounts in other quarters. Most importantly, landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring nearly 8 properties for every one they sold in 2025, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio growth.

The key takeaway for the Screven County housing market is that it is shaped not by Wall Street but by a large base of local individuals who are consistently growing their holdings. These investors acquire property from the traditional market, not from each other, and rely heavily on cash. The absence of institutional players and the volatile, low-volume nature of quarterly pricing suggest a market driven by unique opportunities and individual decisions rather than scaled, systematic investment strategies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:32 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyScreven (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail