Macon (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Macon (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Macon (GA)
3,315
Total Investors in Macon (GA)
1,342
Investor Owned SFR in Macon (GA)
1,273(38.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,207
SFR Owned
1,082
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
135
SFR Owned
194
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,273 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Macon County, GA, Acquiring 37% of Homes at an 80% Discount
Investors own 1,273 SFR properties in Macon County (38.4% of the market), with individuals comprising 85.0% of this ownership. In Q4, landlords purchased 36.8% of all homes sold, paying an average of 80.3% less than traditional homeowners. The market is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop investors (95.1% of holdings), who are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors have zero presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,273 SFR properties in Macon County, with individuals holding 85.0%.
Investor portfolios are overwhelmingly purchased with cash, with 1,174 cash-bought properties versus only 99 financed ones. A total of 1,244 investor-owned properties are rented, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income within the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 80.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $181,204 discount per property.
This massive price gap represents a widening trend, increasing from a 73.8% discount in Q3 and a 18.9% discount in Q2. Landlords consistently secured properties far below typical market rates throughout 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Macon County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 71.4% of all landlord purchases, acquiring 5 of the 7 properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,001 properties, representing 76.6% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 97.8% of homes.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 90.3% of single-property holdings and 66.7% of 6-10 property portfolios. The 11-20 property tier marks a clear crossover point to corporate ownership structures.
Geographic Distribution
The 31063 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 552 investor-owned homes.
While 31063 has the highest count, the 31081 zip code has the highest concentration, with 75.0% of its homes owned by investors. The 31041 zip code is also a hotspot, with 114 investor properties representing a 48.3% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Macon County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4.
This trend of accumulation has been consistent, with a full-year 2025 ratio of 71 properties bought versus only 5 sold. The buy-to-sell ratio was even higher in Q3 at 10-to-1 (20 buys vs 2 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of all residential property transactions in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, conducting 6 of the 8 landlord transactions. Notably, the smallest single-property investors paid the highest average price among all buyers at $85,000.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,273 SFR properties in Macon County, with individuals holding 85.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 38.4% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Macon County, controlling 1,273 out of 3,315 total properties.

The investor landscape is dominated by 1,207 individual landlords, who own 1,082 properties, accounting for 85.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, 135 company landlords own the remaining 194 properties (15.2%).

This market shows a strong preference for all-cash acquisitions, a strategy that likely enables investors to secure significant discounts. Cash purchases (1,174 properties) outnumber financed ones (99 properties) by nearly 12-to-1.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 1,244 of the 1,273 investor-owned homes classified as rented. This indicates a near-total focus on non-owner-occupied investment strategies.

The ownership structure underscores a classic 'mom-and-pop' market, where local, individual investors, rather than large corporations, form the backbone of the rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 80.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $181,204 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors in Macon County acquired properties at an average price of $44,333, a remarkable 80.3% less than the $225,537 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial average discount of $181,204 per home.

The price advantage for landlords has widened dramatically throughout the year. The discount grew from 18.9% in Q2 ($39,704 difference) to 73.8% in Q3 ($196,399 difference), culminating in the 80.3% gap in Q4, signaling investors' increasing purchasing power or focus on lower-priced inventory.

This consistent, deep discount suggests that landlords are not competing for the same properties as traditional homebuyers, instead targeting distressed assets, off-market deals, or lower-value homes that are not reflected in the broader market average.

Comparing prices from the 2020-2023 period ($143,478) to Q4 2025 ($44,333) reveals a significant downward shift in the average price point of investor acquisitions, contrasting with typical market appreciation trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Macon County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity remained strong in Q4, with landlords purchasing 7 of the 19 total SFRs sold, capturing a 36.8% market share of all residential sales in Macon County.

The purchasing activity was entirely driven by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) acquired 5 properties, accounting for 71.4% of all investor buys this quarter.

New investors continue to enter the market, with 5 new single-property landlord entities making purchases in Q4. This group alone bought 4 properties, representing 57.1% of all investor acquisitions.

Mid-size investors in the 21-50 property tier also showed activity, with one entity purchasing 2 properties, making up the remaining 28.6% of landlord acquisitions.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties were completely inactive, making zero purchases and underscoring the hyper-local, small-investor nature of this market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Macon County is definitively controlled by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) hold a combined 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the foundation of this market. Landlords with just one property (Tier 01) own 1,001 homes, which constitutes 76.6% of the total investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership concentration drops off significantly. Landlords with 2 properties own 9.8% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties own 7.1%.

Mid-size investors (11-50 properties) represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 4.8% of all investor-held homes.

There is a complete absence of large-scale and institutional ownership. No investors in this market own more than 1,000 properties, highlighting a lack of corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 97.8% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Macon County rental market, dominating the smaller portfolio tiers. They own 90.3% of all single-property investments and 85.2% of two-property portfolios.

Even as portfolios grow to the 6-10 property range, individuals maintain a strong majority, holding 14 properties (66.7%) compared to 7 held by companies (33.3%).

A distinct shift to corporate ownership occurs for portfolios larger than 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 45 of the 46 properties, a commanding 97.8% share, while only a single property is held by an individual.

This crossover point clearly indicates that as investment scales into the double digits, landlords in Macon County transition to formal business structures like LLCs for liability and operational efficiency.

The data reveals two separate investor worlds: a vast base of individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords and a small, concentrated group of professionalized, company-run mid-size portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 31063 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 552 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated geographically within Macon County. The top five zip codes by property count hold a combined 1,228 properties, representing 96.5% of all investor-owned homes in the area.

The 31063 zip code is the largest hub for investors, containing 552 properties, where the investor ownership rate is 36.3%.

Some areas exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates. The 31081 zip code leads the county with a 75.0% investor ownership rate, meaning 3 out of every 4 SFRs there is investor-owned.

The zip codes 31068 and 31057 also show significant investor presence, with 337 properties (41.8% rate) and 202 properties (38.3% rate), respectively.

The 31041 zip code stands out for having both a high property count (114) and one of the highest ownership rates in the county at 48.3%, making it a key focus area for rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors in Macon County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 homes for every 1 they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Macon County are heavily in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they were strong net buyers, with 8 acquisitions against only 1 sale.

This net-buyer behavior has been a defining characteristic of the entire year. Across all of 2025, investors purchased 71 properties while selling only 5, demonstrating a firm commitment to expanding their local portfolios.

The acquisition momentum was particularly strong in Q3 2025, which saw 20 purchases and only 2 sales, a buy-to-sell ratio of 10-to-1.

The data for 2024 shows a similar pattern, with 43 buys and 11 sells, confirming a multi-year trend of investor-led housing accumulation in the county.

As institutional investors are completely absent from this market, this aggressive net-buying activity is driven entirely by small and mid-size local landlords expanding their footprint.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of all residential property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords participated in 8 out of 28 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 28.6% share of all market activity in Macon County.

The market's smallest investors were the most active. Landlords in the single-property tier conducted 5 of the 8 transactions, underscoring the importance of new and small-scale buyers.

Interestingly, these single-property investors paid the highest average price of any tier at $85,000. This contrasts sharply with investors in the 6-10 property tier, who paid just $8,000, and the 21-50 tier, who paid $40,000, suggesting different acquisition strategies or property targets.

There was no inter-landlord trading this quarter. All 8 properties acquired by investors were purchased from non-landlord sellers, indicating that new inventory is entering the rental market rather than being traded among existing players.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions, reinforcing that all Q4 transactional activity originated from the mom-and-pop and mid-size segments of the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Macon County's housing is dominated by small landlords who own 38.4% of homes and buy at an 80% discount.
Holdings
In Macon County, GA, landlords own 1,273 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 38.4% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,082 properties (85.0%), compared to 194 (15.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 demonstrated immense pricing power, paying an average of $44,333, which is 80.3% less than the $225,537 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a staggering $181,204 discount per property.
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4, purchasing 36.8% of all homes sold (7 properties). This activity was driven by new entrants, as 5 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
The market is the exclusive domain of small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.1% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but a clear professionalization threshold exists. Companies take majority control in portfolios above 10 properties, owning 97.8% of homes in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Macon County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4. For the full year, the buy-to-sell ratio was over 14-to-1 (71 buys vs. 5 sells), with institutional investors making no transactions.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential market in Macon County, GA is fundamentally shaped by a large and active base of local investors. These landlords own 1,273 properties, a commanding 38.4% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The market structure is definitively 'mom-and-pop,' with individual investors owning 85.0% of the rental portfolio (1,082 properties). This is further confirmed by tier analysis, which shows landlords with 1-10 properties control 95.1% of investor housing, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have no footprint whatsoever.

Investor behavior in Macon County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and highly advantageous pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 36.8% of all homes sold and were strong net buyers, purchasing 8 properties for every 1 they sold. Their most significant strategic advantage is pricing; they secured properties for an average of $44,333 in Q4, a remarkable 80.3% discount compared to the $225,537 paid by traditional homeowners. This suggests a focus on off-market deals or distressed assets not typically pursued by retail buyers.

The key takeaway for the Macon County housing market is its operation as a distinct ecosystem dominated by hyper-local, small-scale entrepreneurs. The absence of institutional capital, combined with the deep purchasing discounts and high ownership concentration in specific zip codes like 31081 (75.0% investor-owned), indicates that a significant portion of the housing market functions primarily as a source of rental inventory controlled by seasoned local players. This dynamic creates both opportunities for savvy investors and potential challenges for traditional homebuyers competing for affordable properties.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:13 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMacon (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail