Long (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Long (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Long (GA)
4,860
Total Investors in Long (GA)
1,028
Investor Owned SFR in Long (GA)
921(19.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
943
SFR Owned
784
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
85
SFR Owned
138
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 921 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Long County's Rental Market with 92% Share and Deep Purchase Discounts
Investors own 19.0% of all single-family homes in Long County, GA, with small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 92.0% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors purchased 22.0% of homes sold, paying a remarkable 43.9% less than traditional homeowners, while large institutional investors remained inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 921 SFR properties in Long County, with individuals holding a dominant 85.1% share.
Cash is the preferred financing method, with 648 properties owned outright compared to 273 with financing. The investor portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 96.7% of properties (891 of 921) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 43.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a massive $120,059 average discount per property.
The landlord discount has widened dramatically throughout 2025, growing from 27.0% in Q1 to its current high of 43.9% in Q4. This indicates investors are increasingly targeting undervalued assets or exercising superior negotiating power.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.0% of all single-family homes sold in Long County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove acquisition activity, accounting for 81.8% of all landlord purchases (9 of 11 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 92.0% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 1.2% of the rental stock (11 properties). The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone owning 78.9% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of small portfolios, but companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier.
The strategic crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where company ownership jumps to 78.9%. In portfolios of 10 or fewer properties, individuals maintain at least 80% ownership in each tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Long County is highly concentrated, with zip code 31316 alone holding 614 investor-owned properties.
While 31316 has the highest volume, zip code 30427 has the highest saturation, with a 43.0% investor ownership rate. This contrasts sharply with the 15.4% rate in the highest-count zip code, highlighting different market dynamics.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Long County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
This accumulation trend has been consistent all year, with landlords buying 80 properties and selling only 12 in 2025. However, the pace of acquisitions has slowed from a high of 33 purchases in Q2 to 13 in Q4.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all single-family home transactions in Long County during Q4 2025.
Smaller mom-and-pop investors paid less per property, with single-property buyers averaging $167,500, well below the $211,806 paid by larger landlords. Larger investors also sourced 50.0% of their deals from other landlords, compared to just 12.5% for new investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 921 SFR properties in Long County, with individuals holding a dominant 85.1% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.0% share of the single-family residential market in Long County, owning 921 out of 4,860 total SFR properties.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 784 properties (85.1%), compared to just 138 properties (15.0%) held by companies. This signifies a market driven by small-scale, local landlords rather than large corporations.

By entity count, the disparity is even greater, with 943 individual landlords compared to only 85 company landlords, a ratio of more than 11 to 1.

Cash is the dominant form of ownership, with 70.4% of the investor-owned portfolio (648 properties) held free of financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is intensely focused on rental income, as evidenced by the 891 rented properties, which account for 96.7% of all investor-owned homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 43.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a massive $120,059 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Long County demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market value in Q4 2025, paying an average price of $153,312. This represents a staggering 43.9% discount compared to the $273,371 average paid by traditional homeowners.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been consistently widening throughout the year. The discount grew from 27.0% in Q1 to 29.2% in Q2, expanded to 40.7% in Q3, and peaked at 43.9% in Q4.

This trend suggests that as the market has evolved through 2025, investors have become more adept at sourcing deals far below the prices typical retail buyers pay, or that they are focusing on a different class of property altogether.

Investor acquisition prices have also trended downwards, with the Q4 average of $153,312 being significantly lower than the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $181,822.

The massive $120,059 price difference in Q4 highlights a clear strategic advantage for investors, allowing them to build portfolios at a much lower capital cost basis than the general home-buying public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.0% of all single-family homes sold in Long County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 11 of the 50 total SFRs sold, capturing a 22.0% market share of all acquisitions.

The market's growth is fueled by new, small-scale investors. The single-property tier was the most active, with 8 new landlord entities acquiring 6 properties, comprising 54.5% of all investor purchases.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the engine of Q4 activity, responsible for 81.8% of all investor acquisitions. This reinforces the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, making zero acquisitions.

While small investors dominated, there was some activity from larger players, with a single entity in the 101-1,000 property tier acquiring 2 properties, showing that portfolio expansion is occurring across multiple investor sizes, excluding the very largest.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 92.0% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Long County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own a combined 92.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market's foundation is built on first-time and small landlords. The single-property tier alone accounts for 738 properties, representing an astounding 78.9% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

In sharp contrast, the influence of large institutional investors is negligible. The 1,000+ property tier holds just 11 properties, or 1.2% of the total, challenging any narrative of Wall Street dominance in this market.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) occupy a small niche, collectively owning the remaining 6.8% of the portfolio.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, where the vast majority of investment properties are managed by local, small-portfolio owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of small portfolios, but companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type: individuals dominate smaller portfolios while companies control larger ones. For single-property landlords, individuals own 93.6% of the homes.

As portfolios grow, company ownership steadily increases, rising from 6.4% in the single-property tier to 20.0% in the 6-10 property tier.

The market reaches a distinct inflection point at the 11-20 property tier. Here, the ownership structure dramatically flips, with companies owning 78.9% of properties in the segment, compared to just 21.1% for individuals.

This trend suggests that scaling a rental portfolio beyond 10 properties is a key trigger for investors to incorporate, likely for liability protection, financing advantages, or operational efficiency.

Even so, the presence of individual owners in every tier indicates that incorporating is a strategic choice rather than an absolute necessity for growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Long County is highly concentrated, with zip code 31316 alone holding 614 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Long County but is instead heavily concentrated in specific areas. The 31316 zip code is the clear epicenter, containing 614 properties, which is 66.7% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

A key distinction exists between the areas with the highest raw count of investor properties and those with the highest market penetration. While 31316 leads in volume, zip code 30427 boasts the highest density of investors, with 43.0% of its SFR stock owned by landlords.

This divergence indicates different market characteristics. 31316 is likely a larger overall housing market attracting more total investors, whereas 30427 is a smaller market where rental properties are a much more dominant feature of the local housing landscape.

Investor presence is strong across several zip codes, with 31301 (33.6%) and 31313 (24.4%) also showing high rates of investor ownership.

The data shows that all 921 investor-owned properties are located within just four zip codes, indicating that investor activity is focused on these specific communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Long County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Throughout 2025, landlords have consistently been in an accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong appetite to expand their portfolios. In Q4, they were strong net buyers, with 13 purchases against only 3 sales.

This pattern holds for the entire year, during which landlords acquired 80 SFR properties and sold just 12, resulting in a net gain of 68 properties and a powerful 6.7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

While the direction is positive, the velocity of acquisitions has cooled in the second half of the year. The 13 purchases in Q4 are a marked decrease from the 33 purchases made in Q2, signaling a more selective or constrained buying environment.

In a stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are not expanding their local footprint. Their activity for the year was perfectly balanced, with one purchase and one sale, indicating a neutral or divesting stance in Long County.

The combination of aggressive buying from the broader landlord community and neutrality from institutions suggests that market growth is being driven entirely by small and mid-size investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all single-family home transactions in Long County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords were a significant driver of market activity, participating in 13 of the 73 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 17.8% share of all transactions.

A clear pricing difference emerged based on investor size. The newest landlords (single-property tier) acquired properties at an average price of $167,500, while larger landlords (101-1,000 tier) paid a premium, averaging $211,806 per purchase.

This price spread suggests differing acquisition strategies, with new entrants focusing on lower-cost entry points while more established players may be targeting higher-value or better-condition assets.

Larger investors appear more integrated into the investor community, with 50.0% of their Q4 acquisitions coming from other landlords. This points to a liquid secondary market for existing rental properties.

In contrast, new landlords sourced the vast majority of their properties from the open market, with only one of their eight transactions (12.5%) coming from an existing landlord. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded zero transactions in Q4.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Long County with 92.0% ownership while securing massive 43.9% discounts on home purchases.
Holdings
Landlords own 921 SFR properties in Long County, GA (19.0% of the market), with individual investors holding a commanding 784 properties (85.1%) compared to 138 (15.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid an average of $153,312, a staggering 43.9% less than traditional homeowners ($273,371), securing a discount of $120,059 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 11 properties in Q4 (22.0% of all sales), with market entry driven by 8 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 92.0% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 1.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner (78.9%) once a portfolio grows to the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers with 13 purchases versus 3 sales in Q4, while institutional investors were neutral for the year with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The market structure in Long County, GA is defined by a strong investor presence and the dominance of small, individual operators. Landlords own 921 single-family homes, representing 19.0% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 85.1% of these properties (784 homes). The market is highly fragmented; "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.0% of all investor-owned housing, while large-scale institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint of just 1.2%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrates a focus on value acquisition by smaller players. Landlords purchased 22.0% of all homes sold (11 properties), with 8 new single-property landlords entering the market. Their primary strategy appears to be securing significant discounts, paying an average of just $153,312—a staggering 43.9% below the average homeowner price of $273,371. While overall acquisition volume has slowed from earlier in the year, landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring over four properties for every one they sold in Q4.

The key takeaway for Long County's housing market is that it is shaped not by large corporations, but by a broad base of local, small-scale investors. The widening price discount suggests these landlords are adept at finding off-market deals or distressed properties, which may not be accessible to traditional buyers. The complete absence of institutional buying, contrasted with the continued entry of new mom-and-pop landlords, signals a healthy, grassroots rental market that is expanding from the bottom up rather than being consolidated from the top down.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLong (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail