Crawford (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crawford (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crawford (GA)
2,915
Total Investors in Crawford (GA)
569
Investor Owned SFR in Crawford (GA)
532(18.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
509
SFR Owned
466
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
60
SFR Owned
70
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 532 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Crawford County with 93.5% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 49.2% Discount
Investors own 18.3% of the SFR market in Crawford County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 93.5% of that portfolio versus a negligible 0.2% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 32.3% of all homes sold at a 49.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is defined by new, individual entrants rather than corporate expansion.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 532 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.6%.
Cash purchases dominate investor portfolios, with 88.7% (472 properties) owned outright versus 11.3% (60) financed. The vast majority of these, 96.8% (515 properties), are operated as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired property for 49.2% less than homeowners in Q4, paying an average of $177,313.
The landlord discount has been substantial but volatile, ranging from 17.4% in Q2 to a peak of 56.3% in Q3 before settling at 49.2% in Q4. Data does not differentiate pricing between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 32.3% of all SFR sales in Q4, purchasing 10 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 90.0% of all landlord purchases (9 properties). In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions in Crawford County this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.5% of investor-owned housing.
Institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio (1 property) with no new acquisitions in Q4. Pricing data by tier was not available to compare acquisition costs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers within specific tiers is not available for Crawford County.
Individual investors are the majority in every reported tier, and surprisingly, they represent 100% of ownership in the 6-10 and 21-50 property tiers. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 31078 zip code holding 250 properties at a 28.8% ownership rate.
The 31078 zip code is the clear epicenter for investment, holding 47% of all investor-owned properties in the county. Zip code 31066 follows with the second-highest rate at 20.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Crawford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 40 properties while selling only 6 in 2025.
Acquisition velocity has more than doubled, jumping from 18 purchases in 2024 to 40 in 2025. Data on landlord-to-landlord sales percentage and price comparisons was not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 26.7% of all Q4 transactions, executing 12 deals.
First-time landlords (Tier 1) paid the highest average price at $202,750. The only purchase from another landlord was made by a mid-size mom-and-pop investor, who paid a much lower price of $72,000.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 532 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Crawford County, owning 532 single-family properties, which accounts for 18.3% of the total 2,915 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who own 466 properties, representing 87.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 70 properties (13.2%) held by companies.

A strong rental-focus is evident, as 515 of the 532 investor-owned properties (96.8%) are classified as rented, confirming their use as investment assets rather than secondary homes.

Investors in this market demonstrate high liquidity, with 472 properties (88.7%) owned with cash, while only 60 properties (11.3%) are financed. This indicates a low reliance on leverage for acquisitions.

The market is supported by a large base of small landlords, with 509 individual entities active, compared to only 60 company entities, reinforcing the non-corporate nature of rental ownership in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired property for 49.2% less than homeowners in Q4, paying an average of $177,313.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated an exceptional ability to acquire properties at a discount, paying an average price of $177,313 compared to $348,889 for traditional homeowners. This represents a massive 49.2% price advantage, or a $171,576 savings per property.

This significant discount is not an anomaly but a consistent trend throughout 2025, with landlords securing discounts of 56.3% in Q3, 17.4% in Q2, and 45.8% in Q1, suggesting a strategy of targeting undervalued or distressed assets.

The average acquisition price for landlords in 2025 ($153,411) was notably lower than in 2024 ($174,792), defying typical market appreciation and indicating a shift toward a lower-priced tier of housing inventory.

The wide and fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices suggests that investors and traditional buyers are operating in effectively separate markets, with investors not competing for the same high-value properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 32.3% of all SFR sales in Q4, purchasing 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a major role in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 10 of the 31 total SFRs sold, which constitutes a significant 32.3% market share of all transactions.

The market's growth is fueled by new, small-scale investors, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired 8 of the 10 properties, representing 80.0% of all investor purchase volume.

Activity was almost exclusively from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 9 properties, or 90.0% of all investor acquisitions during the quarter.

The data confirms 10 new landlord entities entered the market to purchase their first rental property, signaling a healthy and active entry-level investment environment.

Large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4 and highlighting the local, non-corporate character of the Crawford County rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.5% of investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Crawford County is dominated by small landlords, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively owning 93.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, as Tier 01 alone accounts for 406 properties, a remarkable 75.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no presence, with a single property representing just 0.2% of the market share.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after the first tier, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding just 5.2% of properties, emphasizing the market's reliance on first-time investors.

The mid-size investor segment (11-100 properties) is extremely small, indicating that few landlords in this county scale their portfolios beyond the 10-property mom-and-pop level.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers within specific tiers is not available for Crawford County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single ownership tier in Crawford County, defying the common trend of corporate ownership in larger portfolios.

A crossover point where companies become the majority owner never occurs. In fact, individual ownership becomes more concentrated in larger tiers, reaching 100.0% for landlords with 6-10 properties and 21-50 properties.

Company ownership is most prevalent, yet still a minority, in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold 14 properties (28.6%). This suggests corporate activity, where it exists, remains small-scale.

Even at the entry level (single-property tier), individuals constitute the vast majority, owning 365 properties (89.0%) compared to just 45 owned by companies.

This unique ownership structure indicates that the path to scaling a rental portfolio in Crawford County is pursued by private individuals rather than through the formation of professional real estate companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 31078 zip code holding 250 properties at a 28.8% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in specific sub-markets, with the 31078 zip code alone containing 250 investor-owned properties, which is nearly half (47.0%) of the county's entire rental stock.

In this top zip code of 31078, the investor ownership rate reaches 28.8%, meaning more than one in every four single-family homes is investor-owned, a rate significantly higher than in other parts of the county.

A clear correlation exists between high property count and high ownership percentage, as the top areas for both metrics are 31078 (250 properties, 28.8% rate) and 31066 (68 properties, 20.1% rate).

Beyond the top two hotspots, several other zip codes show notable investor penetration, including 31030 (15.1% rate) and 31016 (15.0% rate), indicating specific neighborhood-level targeting.

This geographic pattern suggests investors are not spread thinly across the county but are instead focusing capital and acquisition efforts in very specific, high-opportunity zones.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Crawford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 40 properties while selling only 6 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors are in a strong portfolio growth phase, acting as consistent net buyers. In 2025, they acquired 40 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 34 properties and a powerful 6.7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

The pace of acquisitions has accelerated dramatically, more than doubling from 18 purchases in all of 2024 to 40 purchases in 2025, signaling growing confidence and capital deployment in the local market.

While buying activity has surged, selling remains low and stable, with landlords disposing of just 6 properties in both 2024 and 2025. This indicates a prevailing buy-and-hold strategy among local investors.

The net buying trend was consistent throughout the year, with a net gain of 10 properties in Q3 and another 10 in Q4, showing sustained momentum in portfolio expansion.

Institutional investors logged no transaction data, reinforcing that all transactional activity and market growth is being driven by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 26.7% of all Q4 transactions, executing 12 deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were a driving force in market liquidity, participating in 12 of the 45 total SFR transactions, for a 26.7% share of all sales activity.

New entrants dominated buying activity, with first-time, single-property landlords (Tier 01) responsible for 10 of the 12 investor purchases, underscoring that growth is coming from new market participants.

A notable pricing pattern emerged where new investors in Tier 01 paid the highest average price at $202,750. This was significantly more than the $72,000 paid by a more experienced Tier 04 landlord, suggesting newcomers may be paying a premium to enter the market.

The investor market is not self-contained, as only one of the 12 landlord purchases (8.3%) was sourced from another landlord. The vast majority of acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market.

The most experienced buyer in Q4, a Tier 04 landlord, was the one who purchased from another investor and secured the lowest price of the quarter ($72,000), hinting that seasoned local investors find the best deals within their network.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Crawford County with 93.5% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 49.2% Discount
Holdings
In Crawford County, investors own 532 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 18.3% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 466 properties (87.6%), compared to 70 (13.2%) held by companies.
Pricing
Investors in Q4 demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $177,313, which is 49.2% less than traditional homeowners ($348,889). This amounts to a substantial average discount of $171,576 per property.
Activity
Landlord activity accelerated in Q4, with investors purchasing 10 properties, accounting for 32.3% of all market sales. The market's growth is driven by new entrants, with 10 new single-property landlords making acquisitions this quarter.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small-scale ownership, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.5% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes, a unique feature of the Crawford County market. Unlike other regions, there is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type, with individuals even holding 100% of properties in some mid-size tiers.
Transactions
Investors are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers with a 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (12 buys vs 2 sells). This trend is exclusive to smaller investors, as institutional firms recorded zero transactions.
Market Narrative

In Crawford County, Georgia, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. Landlords own a significant 532 properties, comprising 18.3% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This ownership is not corporate; individual 'mom-and-pop' investors dominate, holding 87.6% of the rental portfolio (466 properties). This concentration is further highlighted by tier analysis, which shows landlords with 1-10 properties control 93.5% of investor housing, while large-scale institutional investors have a negligible presence with just 0.2%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition at steep discounts. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 32.3% of all homes sold, demonstrating their impact on market activity. Their primary strategy appears to be value-based purchasing, securing properties for an average of $177,313—a staggering 49.2% below the price paid by traditional homeowners. This activity is overwhelmingly driven by new market entrants, as first-time landlords were responsible for 80% of investor purchases. Throughout 2025, investors have been strong net buyers, acquiring properties at more than six times the rate they sell them.

The key takeaway for Crawford County is that its housing market is heavily influenced by a deeply entrenched and growing base of individual, small-scale landlords, not by Wall Street firms. These investors are adept at acquiring properties far below the typical market rate, suggesting a focus on distressed assets or off-market deals. The continuous entry of new landlords, coupled with a strong buy-and-hold strategy, indicates that the investor-owned share of the housing market is likely to expand further, solidifying the role of rental properties in the local ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 10:38 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCrawford (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail