Calhoun (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (GA)
1,380
Total Investors in Calhoun (GA)
510
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (GA)
473(34.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
451
SFR Owned
410
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
59
SFR Owned
66
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 473 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Calhoun County's High-Penetration Market, Paying a Premium for 50% of Q4 Home Sales
Investors own a significant 34.3% of all SFR properties in Calhoun County, a market completely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (97.3% of holdings). In Q4, these small investors purchased half of all homes sold, paying a surprising 23.2% premium over traditional homeowners. The market is characterized by strong net buying from individuals, with zero institutional presence recorded.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 473 SFR properties in Calhoun County, with individuals holding a dominant 86.7%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are purchased with cash, with 431 cash-owned properties compared to just 42 that are financed. This portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, as 470 of the 473 properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Calhoun County investors paid a 23.2% premium over homeowners in Q4, reversing typical discount trends.
This Q4 premium of $13,242 marked a shift from Q1 when landlords secured a 70.8% discount. Pricing behavior has been volatile, with landlords paying significant premiums in Q2 ($9,458) and Q3 ($265,547) as well.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired half of all homes sold in Calhoun County in Q4, capturing 50.0% of the market.
All 100.0% of landlord purchases this quarter were made by mom-and-pop investors. This activity was driven entirely by new entrants, with 4 new single-property landlords joining the market. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Calhoun County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 85.8% of all investor-owned housing, with 410 properties. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1,000+ properties), underscoring a market completely free of large-scale corporate presence.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single tier, with no company crossover.
Even in the largest active tier (51-100 properties), individuals own 100% of the holdings. Companies have their highest concentration in the 3-5 property tier, where they own 31.6% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Calhoun County, with two zip codes, 39813 and 39866, sharing the top ownership rate of 38.3%.
The zip code 39846 has the highest absolute number of investor-owned homes at 158, but a lower rate of 30.2%. The top four zip codes all have investor ownership rates exceeding 33%, showcasing deep penetration in specific areas.
Historical Transactions
Calhoun County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This net buyer trend is consistent over time, with a 9.5x buy-to-sell ratio for the full year 2025 (19 buys vs. 2 sells). Activity in 2024 was similar, with 19 properties bought and only 1 sold.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity coming from new single-property investors.
These new mom-and-pop investors paid an average price of $70,333 per property. Notably, 0% of their purchases were from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 473 SFR properties in Calhoun County, with individuals holding a dominant 86.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Calhoun County, owning 473 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 34.3% of the total 1,380 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 410 properties, or 86.7% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 66 properties (14.0%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 451 of the 510 total landlords (88.4%) are individuals.

A key strategic insight is the preference for all-cash acquisitions. A staggering 431 investor-owned properties (91.1%) are owned outright without financing, compared to only 42 properties that carry a mortgage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 470 of the 473 properties being non-owner-occupied, underscoring a strong business focus for these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Calhoun County investors paid a 23.2% premium over homeowners in Q4, reversing typical discount trends.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of the national trend where investors typically secure discounts, landlords in Calhoun County paid a 23.2% premium for homes in Q4 2025. They paid an average of $70,333, which was $13,242 more than the $57,091 paid by traditional homeowners.

This premium-paying behavior has been a consistent theme throughout most of 2025. In Q3, landlords paid an extraordinary 223.7% premium ($384,247 vs. $118,700), and in Q2 they paid a 9.9% premium ($105,333 vs. $95,875).

The only recent quarter where investors achieved a discount was Q1 2025, when they purchased properties for an average of $26,250, a deep 70.8% discount compared to the homeowner price of $89,767.

This pricing volatility suggests a market where investors may be targeting specific, higher-value properties or competing aggressively for limited inventory, leading them to pay above homeowner market rates.

The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $137,455, indicating that recent quarterly prices fluctuate significantly around this historical baseline.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired half of all homes sold in Calhoun County in Q4, capturing 50.0% of the market.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 4 of the 8 total SFRs sold in Calhoun County, capturing a 50.0% market share for the quarter.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, with institutional investors (Tier 09) showing no activity.

Specifically, all 4 properties were acquired by new, single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating fresh capital entering the rental market at the smallest scale.

These 4 new landlords entering the market signal grassroots growth in the local rental sector, rather than consolidation by larger players.

The absence of purchasing from mid-size or institutional tiers highlights that the competitive landscape in Q4 was defined exclusively by new, small-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Calhoun County is defined by the complete dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 97.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), a group that alone owns 410 properties, representing a remarkable 85.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership drops off dramatically. Landlords with 2 properties hold 7.3% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties hold just 4.0%.

In stark contrast to national headlines, there is absolutely no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09). The largest landlords in the county fall into the 51-100 property tier, and they control only 1.3% of the market.

This ownership structure reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, powered almost exclusively by local, small-scale entrepreneurs rather than large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single tier, with no company crossover.
Detailed Findings

In a significant local trend, individual investors in Calhoun County maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio size, defying the common pattern where companies dominate larger tiers. There is no crossover point; individuals lead in all categories.

The dominance of individuals is most pronounced among single-property landlords, where they own 366 of 410 properties (88.6%).

Even as portfolios grow, individuals retain control. They own 85.7% of two-property portfolios and 68.4% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

Most strikingly, in the highest tier represented in the county (51-100 properties), all 6 properties are owned by individuals, meaning companies have zero presence at the top of this market.

The highest penetration for company ownership is in the small 3-5 property tier, where they hold 6 properties (31.6%), indicating their activity is confined to a very small scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Calhoun County, with two zip codes, 39813 and 39866, sharing the top ownership rate of 38.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Calhoun County is not evenly distributed, but rather highly concentrated in a few key zip codes. Two zip codes, 39813 and 39866, lead the county with the highest investor ownership rate at 38.3%.

While not the highest in percentage, the zip code 39846 contains the largest number of investor-owned properties, with 158 homes, corresponding to a 30.2% ownership rate.

High investor penetration is a common theme across the top areas. The zip codes 39862 (33.8%) and 39842 (37.5%) also demonstrate significant investor presence, indicating these are prime targets for rental investment.

The top five zip codes by property count (39846, 39813, 39862, 39866, and 39842) collectively account for 462 of the 473 investor properties, representing 97.7% of all investor holdings in the county.

This geographic concentration suggests that investor strategy is hyper-local, focusing intensely on specific neighborhoods or communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Calhoun County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Calhoun County are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently operating as net buyers. In Q4 2025, they demonstrated a strong accumulation trend, purchasing 4 properties while selling only 1.

This pattern of net acquisition has been consistent throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords purchased 19 properties and sold only 2, resulting in a net gain of 17 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.5-to-1.

The acquisition momentum was equally strong in the prior year. In 2024, investors also purchased 19 properties while selling just one, showing a sustained, multi-year strategy of portfolio growth.

In Q3 2025, the buying activity was even more pronounced, with 7 properties purchased and only 1 sold.

With no institutional activity to analyze, this data confirms that the market's growth is being driven entirely by smaller, local landlords who are consistently adding to their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity coming from new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a major role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 4 of the 9 total transactions, for a market share of 44.4%.

All landlord transaction activity was concentrated at the entry level of the market. Single-property investors (Tier 01) were responsible for 100% of the 4 landlord transactions, with no activity from larger tiers.

These new landlords paid an average of $70,333 for their properties in Q4, establishing a new price point for entry-level investment in the county.

A key finding is the source of these properties: none of the 4 homes purchased by landlords came from other investors. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that new investors are acquiring their inventory from homeowners or new construction, not from existing rental stock changing hands.

The absence of institutional transactions further solidifies the narrative of a market driven by grassroots growth, where new small investors are the primary drivers of activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords dominate Calhoun County with 34.3% market share, buying half of Q4 homes at a premium.
Holdings
In Calhoun County, landlords own 473 SFR properties, representing a significant 34.3% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 410 properties (86.7%) compared to 66 (14.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords in Calhoun County paid a 23.2% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $70,333 versus the homeowner price of $57,091.
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4, purchasing 4 of the 8 homes sold for a 50.0% market share. This activity was driven entirely by 4 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The investor market is exclusively controlled by small landlords, with mom-and-pop owners (1-10 properties) holding 97.3% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier in Calhoun County, a rare market with no crossover point where companies become dominant. Even in the largest portfolios (51-100 properties), individuals own 100% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 sold in Q4. With no institutional investors active, all net buying is driven by small, individual landlords expanding their holdings.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Calhoun County, GA is characterized by an exceptionally high level of investor penetration and complete dominance by small, individual landlords. Investors own 473 properties, a remarkable 34.3% of the total SFR market. This ownership is highly decentralized, with 86.7% of these properties held by individuals, not corporations. Underscoring this structure, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.3% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence.

In Q4 2025, investor behavior was aggressive and counter-cyclical to national trends. Landlords purchased half of all homes sold in the county, with all acquisitions made by new, single-property investors. In a striking market anomaly, these investors paid an average 23.2% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for limited inventory. This buying activity is part of a sustained trend of portfolio growth, as landlords operated as strong net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025, with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the most recent quarter.

The key takeaway for Calhoun County is that its rental market is a robust, growing ecosystem powered entirely by grassroots investment. The absence of large corporate players and the willingness of new, small investors to pay a premium suggest a market with strong perceived rental demand and future growth potential. This dynamic, coupled with high investor concentration in specific zip codes (up to 38.3%), points to a housing landscape significantly shaped by local, entrepreneurial capital rather than institutional forces.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 10:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail