Hendry (FL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hendry (FL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hendry (FL)
8,669
Total Investors in Hendry (FL)
2,182
Investor Owned SFR in Hendry (FL)
1,890(21.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,855
SFR Owned
1,377
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
327
SFR Owned
567
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,890 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hendry County with 89.4% Ownership, Securing 13.3% Discounts as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 1,890 Single-Family Residential properties in Hendry County, representing 21.8% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (89.4%) while institutional investors hold just 0.5%. In Q4 2025, landlords were active net buyers, capturing 27.1% of all purchases and paying an average 13.3% less than traditional homeowners, while institutional investors were net sellers for the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,890 SFR properties in Hendry County, with individuals holding 72.9% of the portfolio.
Cash purchases heavily outweigh financing, with 1,368 properties owned outright compared to 522 financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 1,863 properties (98.6%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 13.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $42,334 per property.
The pricing advantage for landlords is volatile, swinging from a 6.8% premium in Q3 to a 13.3% discount in Q4. This demonstrates an opportunistic purchasing strategy rather than a consistent discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 27.1% of all SFR properties sold in Hendry County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of landlord purchases this quarter. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete lack of activity from large-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 89.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Hendry County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 9 homes, representing a mere 0.5% of the investor market. This challenges the narrative of large corporate dominance in the local rental scene.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties, despite individuals owning 72.9% of all investor SFRs.
The crossover occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 82.8% of properties. For smaller portfolios of 1-5 properties, individual ownership is the strong majority.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Hendry County is highly concentrated, with two zip codes accounting for 98.7% of all rental homes.
The zip code 33935 is the epicenter, containing 1,253 investor-owned properties, which is 66.3% of the county's entire investor portfolio. The second-largest, 33440, holds another 612 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Hendry County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.8 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend is driven entirely by smaller investors, as institutional landlords (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2025, divesting more properties than they acquired. Overall transaction volume for landlords in 2025 (236 buys) is down 15.4% from 2024 (279 buys).
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 25.7% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords.
New, single-property landlords paid an average of $273,852, closely tracking the overall landlord average. Only 6.9% of their purchases came from other landlords, suggesting they primarily buy from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,890 SFR properties in Hendry County, with individuals holding 72.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties comprise a significant 21.8% of the total Single-Family Residential market in Hendry County, totaling 1,890 homes.

Individual investors are the primary owners, controlling 1,377 properties, which accounts for 72.9% of the investor-owned market, compared to 567 properties (30.0%) held by companies.

Cash is the dominant financing method for landlords in the region, with cash-owned properties (1,368) outnumbering financed ones (522) by a ratio of more than 2.6 to 1, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 1,863 out of 1,890 properties being non-owner-occupied, a rate of 98.6%.

By entity count, the market is even more skewed towards individuals, with 1,855 individual landlords compared to just 327 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 13.3% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $42,334 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $275,050, which is 13.3% less than the $317,384 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage translates to a substantial average discount of $42,334 per property, highlighting a key financial benefit for investors in the current market.

The landlord discount is not consistent, revealing a pattern of opportunistic buying. After paying a premium over homeowners in Q3 2025 (6.8%) and Q1 2025 (4.9%), investors capitalized on favorable conditions in Q4 to secure deep discounts.

This volatility contrasts with Q2 2025, where landlords also achieved a strong 13.0% discount ($44,304), suggesting investors are adept at timing their acquisitions for maximum value.

Comparing year-over-year acquisition prices, the average landlord purchase price in 2025 ($305,873) is 19.7% higher than in 2024 ($255,606), indicating significant market appreciation despite quarterly fluctuations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 27.1% of all SFR properties sold in Hendry County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for over a quarter of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 23 of the 85 total SFRs sold, a market share of 27.1%.

The market for new acquisitions was exclusively driven by small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 100% of all investor purchases, totaling 24 properties.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, acquiring 19 properties, which represents 79.2% of all investor purchases and signals a healthy influx of new participants into the rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4, underscoring their complete absence from the recent acquisition landscape in Hendry County.

The data shows a surge of 29 new landlord entities entering the market by purchasing their first rental property, further emphasizing the growth at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 89.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Hendry County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Hendry County is dominated by small-scale landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling a commanding 89.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone constitute the largest segment, owning 1,376 properties, or 70.2% of the entire investor portfolio, making them the backbone of the rental market.

Conversely, institutional ownership is negligible. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) hold only 9 properties, accounting for just 0.5% of the total, a clear indication that 'Wall Street' has a minimal footprint in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own the remaining 10.1% of the portfolio, filling the gap between the dominant mom-and-pop sector and the tiny institutional segment.

This distribution highlights a highly fragmented market structure, heavily reliant on a large number of small, local investors rather than a few consolidated corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties, despite individuals owning 72.9% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own the vast majority of rental properties overall (72.9%), a clear pattern emerges as portfolios grow: companies become the dominant ownership structure for larger landlords.

The tipping point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership surges to 82.8%, compared to just 17.2% for individuals. This marks the transition from personal holdings to professionalized, corporate structures.

In the smallest tiers, individuals are firmly in control. They own 83.4% of single-property portfolios and 75.3% of two-property portfolios.

The trend of corporate dominance continues to strengthen in larger tiers. Companies own 84.8% of properties in the 11-20 tier and 72.6% in the 21-50 tier.

This data reveals a distinct lifecycle for investors in Hendry County: they typically start as individuals and transition to corporate entities as their portfolios scale beyond five properties to manage liability and operations more formally.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Hendry County is highly concentrated, with two zip codes accounting for 98.7% of all rental homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals extreme concentration of investor ownership in Hendry County. The top two zip codes, 33935 and 33440, together contain 1,865 of the 1,890 total investor-owned properties, representing a staggering 98.7% of the portfolio.

The 33935 zip code is the primary hub for investors, with 1,253 properties, where the investor ownership rate is 22.2% of all SFRs.

The 33440 zip code is the second major investor market, holding 612 properties with an ownership rate of 21.1%.

While the 34142 zip code shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, this is a statistical anomaly based on a single property, highlighting the importance of looking at both count and percentage for true market insight.

This intense geographic focus suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities with desirable rental characteristics, rather than spreading their holdings evenly across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Hendry County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.8 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The landlord community as a whole remains in a strong accumulation phase, evidenced by a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.83 in Q4 2025 (35 buys vs. 6 sells). This net buyer position has been consistent throughout the year.

For the full year 2025, landlords have purchased 236 properties while selling only 51, making them significant net buyers and expanding their collective portfolio in the county.

However, a critical divergence appears at the institutional level. Large investors in the 1,000+ property tier were net sellers in 2025, with 2 sales against only 1 purchase, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.

This contrasts with their position in 2024, when the same institutional tier was a net buyer (3 buys vs. 1 sell), indicating a recent shift in strategy for the largest players.

While net buying activity is strong, the overall pace of acquisitions has slowed. The 236 properties bought by landlords in 2025 represent a 15.4% decrease from the 279 properties acquired in 2024.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 25.7% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 35 of the 136 total transactions, a share of 25.7%.

All 35 of these landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity recorded from institutional buyers, mirroring the trend seen in property acquisitions.

First-time landlords (Tier 01) dominated transaction volume with 29 deals, paying an average price of $273,852, which aligns closely with the overall Q4 landlord average of $275,050.

Inter-landlord trading appears infrequent among smaller investors. Only 2 of the 29 properties (6.9%) purchased by single-property landlords were acquired from another investor, indicating they are primarily sourcing deals from the traditional homeowner market.

In a notable outlier, the single transaction in the 6-10 property tier was a landlord-to-landlord deal, though the small sample size makes it difficult to draw broad conclusions about larger investors' sourcing strategies.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Hendry County with 89.4% Ownership as Institutions Become Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 1,890 SFR properties, representing 21.8% of the total market in Hendry County. Individual investors hold a commanding 72.9% of these properties (1,377 homes), while companies own the remaining 30.0% (567 homes).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 13.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $42,334 per property by paying $275,050 versus the homeowner average of $317,384.
Activity
Landlords purchased 23 properties in Q4 2025, accounting for 27.1% of all market sales. This activity was driven by small investors, including 19 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 89.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, capturing 82.8% of properties at that level and dominating larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 5.83x buy-to-sell ratio (35 buys vs. 6 sells). Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers for the year 2025, signaling a strategic retreat (1 buy vs. 2 sells).
Market Narrative

In Hendry County, Florida, the single-family rental market is defined by the overwhelming presence of small, individual investors. Landlords own 1,890 SFR properties, a significant 21.8% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by distant corporations but by local entrepreneurs; mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) command an 89.4% share, while institutional giants (1,000+ properties) hold a mere 0.5%. Ownership is further skewed towards individuals, who hold 72.9% of all investor properties, though a transition to corporate structures occurs as portfolios grow beyond five homes.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased both aggression and strategic precision. Landlords were involved in 27.1% of all home purchases, acting as decisive net buyers with a 5.83-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. They leveraged their market position to secure a notable 13.3% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $42,334 per transaction. This activity was fueled by an influx of new market participants, with 19 first-time landlords making purchases. In a telling divergence, while small investors were accumulating properties, institutional firms were net sellers for the year, signaling a divestment from the region.

The key takeaway from this data is a story of a bifurcated market. The dominant narrative in Hendry County is one of growing, small-scale, local landlordism, where individuals and small companies are actively expanding their portfolios and capitalizing on pricing advantages. Meanwhile, the largest institutional players are quietly reducing their exposure. This dynamic suggests a healthy, decentralized, and competitive rental market, where opportunities are primarily being seized by local investors rather than large, national firms. The high geographic concentration, with 98.7% of investor properties in just two zip codes, further indicates that this growth is highly targeted to specific local communities.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 07:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHendry (FL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail