Calhoun (FL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (FL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (FL)
3,240
Total Investors in Calhoun (FL)
782
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (FL)
664(20.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
728
SFR Owned
612
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
54
SFR Owned
61
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 664 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Calhoun County, Controlling 99% of Rentals and Driving 36% of Q4 Sales
In Calhoun County, investors own 664 single-family homes, representing 20.5% of the total market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.0% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 35.8% of all homes sold while institutional investors remained completely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 664 SFRs, with individuals overwhelmingly holding 92.2% of the portfolio.
Cash is the preferred financing method, funding 562 properties compared to just 102 with financing. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 645 of the 664 properties (97.1%) being non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (728) vastly outnumber company landlords (54).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 1.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a narrow discount of just $2,914 per home.
This small Q4 price advantage marks a significant tightening from Q3, when landlords secured a massive 41.0% discount ($113,824). Throughout 2025, the landlord discount has been highly volatile, fluctuating between 12.3% and 41.0% in preceding quarters.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors acquired 35.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4, purchasing 19 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 85.0% of all landlord purchases (17 properties). The market saw an influx of 19 new, single-property landlords, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in Calhoun County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the vast majority, owning 539 properties for a 79.1% share. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence in this market, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across every investor tier, with no crossover to company control.
Even in the largest active local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 81.0% of the homes. In the dominant single-property tier, individuals own 93.4% of the portfolio, while companies hold just 6.6%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 32424, home to 374 landlord-owned SFRs.
While 32424 leads by volume, zip code 32442 has the highest investor penetration rate at 42.1%. Three zip codes—32442, 32438, and 32424—all show high investor ownership rates of 22.6% or more.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.65 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This net buying activity resulted in the acquisition of 93 properties versus the sale of only 20 throughout 2025. In contrast, institutional investors have been effectively neutral, with their only recent activity being one purchase and one sale in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 27.7% of all single-family home transactions in Q4 2025.
New, single-property investors were the most active, conducting 19 transactions at an average price of $280,300. A mid-size investor's single purchase came from another landlord, indicating strategic portfolio acquisitions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 664 SFRs, with individuals overwhelmingly holding 92.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investors hold a significant 20.5% share of the single-family residential market in Calhoun County, FL, with a total of 664 properties under their ownership.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 612 properties, accounting for 92.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to just 61 properties (9.2%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 728 individual landlords operate in the market, far surpassing the 54 registered company investors.

Cash is the primary acquisition strategy for investors in this market. A clear majority of 562 properties are owned outright without financing, while only 102 properties carry a mortgage, demonstrating a strong preference for cash transactions.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes. Of the 664 investor-owned homes, 645 are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming a 97.1% focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 1.2% less than homeowners in Q4, a narrow discount of just $2,914 per home.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the pricing advantage for landlords narrowed significantly, with investors paying an average of $239,533 per property compared to $242,447 for traditional homeowners. This represents a marginal discount of just 1.2%, or $2,914.

This minimal Q4 discount is a sharp departure from the previous quarter. In Q3 2025, landlords benefited from a substantial 41.0% price advantage, paying $113,824 less than homeowners on average ($163,469 vs. $277,293).

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable volatility throughout the year. In Q2, the discount was 12.8% ($28,806), and in Q1, it was 12.3% ($16,117), indicating that negotiation power and market conditions can shift dramatically from quarter to quarter.

Despite the tightening in the most recent quarter, the historical data from 2025 demonstrates a consistent pattern of landlords acquiring properties at a lower cost basis than the general home-buying public.

The significant price appreciation seen between the 2020-2023 average ($126,337) and the Q4 2025 average ($239,533) highlights a near doubling of acquisition costs for investors in Calhoun County over the past few years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors acquired 35.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4, purchasing 19 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 19 of the 53 available single-family homes and capturing a 35.8% share of all sales.

The acquisition activity was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 17 of the 19 properties, representing 85.0% of the total investor purchase volume.

Growth in the investor market is being fueled by new entrants. The single-property tier saw the most activity, with 19 distinct entities purchasing 14 properties, signaling a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

In stark contrast to the active small investors, large institutional buyers (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Calhoun County this quarter, acquiring zero properties.

Beyond the smallest tier, purchasing was sparse, with only one property each being acquired by investors in the 11-20, 21-50, and 101-1,000 property tiers, reinforcing the market's reliance on small-scale activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Calhoun County is the epitome of a small-investor landscape, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.0% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time and single-property investors form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 539 properties, representing a commanding 79.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. Two-property landlords hold a 5.3% share, and those with 3-5 properties hold 11.5%, but all tiers above 10 properties combined control less than 1% of the market.

The narrative of large corporations buying up housing does not apply here. Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have absolutely no footprint in Calhoun County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned inventory.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with a broad base of small landlords rather than a consolidated group of large players, indicating a decentralized and community-level rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across every investor tier, with no crossover to company control.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners in Calhoun County's rental market, maintaining majority control across every single portfolio tier. Unlike other markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type.

In the most populous single-property tier, individual ownership is at its peak, with private landlords holding 510 of the properties (93.4%) compared to just 36 (6.6%) owned by companies.

This pattern of individual dominance persists even as portfolio sizes increase. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals control 88.6% of the assets. In the 6-10 property tier, they still hold a commanding 81.0% share.

Corporate ownership remains a niche strategy in this market, representing a small fraction of holdings within each tier and failing to establish a majority even among the larger local portfolios.

The data clearly illustrates that the rental housing stock in Calhoun County is provided and managed primarily by local, private individuals rather than by corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 32424, home to 374 landlord-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Calhoun County is geographically concentrated, with zip code 32424 serving as the primary hub, containing 374 landlord-owned properties.

The highest rate of investor penetration occurs in zip code 32442, where landlords own 42.1% of the single-family housing stock, indicating a highly targeted area for rental investment.

Zip code 32424 not only leads in total count but also has a high ownership rate of 22.6%, matching the rate in zip code 32438 and signaling significant investor presence in both areas.

Following the leader, zip code 32421 shows substantial investor activity with 175 properties, representing a 17.2% ownership rate.

The data highlights a clear strategy among investors of targeting specific zip codes, with areas like 32424, 32421, and 32442 being the focal points for rental property acquisition in Calhoun County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.65 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Calhoun County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2025, landlords purchased 93 SFRs while only selling 20, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.65 to 1.

This trend of net buying was also evident in 2024, when investors acquired 140 properties and sold 42, demonstrating a sustained, multi-year strategy of portfolio expansion.

The most recent quarter, Q4 2025, shows an acceleration of this trend, with 26 properties bought and only 4 sold, yielding a powerful 6.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This aggressive buying behavior from the general landlord population stands in stark contrast to the institutional tier. Large investors (1,000+ properties) have been inactive, with their only recorded transactions in the last two years being a single purchase and a single sale in 2024, resulting in zero net growth.

The data confirms that the growth of rental housing supply in Calhoun County is being driven entirely by small and mid-size landlords, not by large institutional capital.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 27.7% of all single-family home transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a crucial role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 26 of the 94 total SFR transactions, which translates to a significant 27.7% market share.

Activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market. The single-property tier was responsible for 19 of the 26 investor transactions, highlighting an influx of new landlords.

New investors appear to be paying a premium to enter the market. The average purchase price for single-property landlords was $280,300, considerably higher than the $166,250 average paid by landlords in the 3-5 property tier.

Inter-landlord trading is an active part of the market. While new investors sourced 15.8% of their purchases from other landlords, one mid-size investor (11-20 tier) made a strategic acquisition where 100% of their single transaction came from another landlord.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions in Q4, reinforcing their absence from the active trading market in Calhoun County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Calhoun County, Controlling 99% of Rentals and Driving 36% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Investors own 664 single-family residential properties in Calhoun County, FL, representing a 20.5% share of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 612 properties (92.2%), versus companies, which own 61 (9.2%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $239,533, a slight 1.2% discount compared to the $242,447 paid by traditional homeowners. This marks a significant tightening of the price gap from Q3, when investors enjoyed a 41.0% discount.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 19 homes, which accounted for 35.8% of all market sales. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 19 entities becoming single-property landlords.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.0% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Calhoun County. There is no crossover point; even in the largest local tiers, individuals maintain majority ownership over companies.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.5 properties for every one they sold in Q4 (26 buys vs. 4 sells). Institutional investors, however, are inactive, having been net neutral in their only recent activity (1 buy vs. 1 sell in 2024).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Calhoun County, FL, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors, not large corporations. Investors own a significant 664 homes, representing 20.5% of the county's SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.0% of all investor properties, while institutional investors have no presence. Ownership is deeply personal, with 92.2% of these homes held by individuals rather than companies, painting a picture of a decentralized, community-based rental market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and a powerful market presence. Landlords purchased 35.8% of all homes sold, driven by an influx of 19 new, single-property investors. While their pricing advantage over homeowners narrowed to just 1.2% in Q4, this followed a quarter where they enjoyed a massive 41.0% discount. Overall, investors are in a clear accumulation phase, operating as strong net buyers with a 6.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the last quarter, steadily expanding the local rental housing supply.

The key takeaway for the Calhoun County housing market is that its investment landscape is the antithesis of the national narrative of corporate consolidation. Growth is organic, fueled by new, local entrants who are actively expanding their holdings. This highly fragmented market structure, with investment concentrated in specific zip codes like 32424 and 32442, suggests that local knowledge and small-scale operations are the keys to success, creating a stable but competitive environment for rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:46 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (FL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail