Yuma (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Yuma (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Yuma (CO)
3,345
Total Investors in Yuma (CO)
1,096
Investor Owned SFR in Yuma (CO)
1,024(30.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
951
SFR Owned
814
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
145
SFR Owned
218
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,024 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Yuma County, Acquiring 52% of Q4 Homes at a 29% Discount
Investors own 30.6% of all SFRs in Yuma County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 96.5% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, these small investors drove the market, buying 52.0% of all homes sold while securing an average price 29.4% below traditional homeowners. The market is characterized by strong, consistent net buying from local players and a complete absence of institutional capital.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,024 SFRs in Yuma County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.5% share.
Investors overwhelmingly prefer cash acquisitions, with 791 properties (77.2%) owned outright versus 233 financed. Nearly all investor properties (988 of 1,024) are classified as rentals, indicating a strong focus on generating housing supply.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Yuma County landlords paid 29.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking discount of $78,695.
The landlord purchasing advantage has been highly volatile throughout the year, peaking at a massive 49.9% discount in Q2 before settling at 29.4% in Q4. This suggests investors are capitalizing on specific, opportunistic deals rather than a consistent market-wide discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 13 of the 25 SFRs sold for a 52.0% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of landlord purchases this quarter. Eleven new single-property landlords entered the market, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting a purely grassroots market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Yuma County, owning 96.5% of all investor SFRs.
The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 62.0% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence in this market, owning 0.0% of properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization crossover.
Individual investors are the bedrock of smaller portfolios, owning 85.3% of single-property holdings and 84.0% of two-property holdings. There are no institutional-scale companies operating in this market.
Geographic Distribution
The 80758 and 80759 zip codes contain the highest volume of investor-owned properties.
Several smaller zip codes exhibit extreme investor concentration, with ownership rates exceeding 50%, including 80727 (52.3%), 80755 (51.4%), and 80731 (50.0%). The areas with the highest counts are different from those with the highest penetration rates.
Historical Transactions
Yuma County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
The net buying trend has been remarkably consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.1x in 2025 (65 buys vs 16 sells) and an even stronger 8.9x ratio in 2024 (62 buys vs 7 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a driving force in the market, participating in 48.7% of all Q4 SFR transactions.
All 19 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with no institutional activity. New single-property landlords sourced 18.2% of their purchases from existing landlords, indicating some churn within the local investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,024 SFRs in Yuma County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership constitutes a significant portion of the housing market in Yuma County, with 1,024 single-family residences, or 30.6% of the total 3,345 SFRs, held by landlords.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 814 properties, accounting for a 79.5% majority share, compared to 218 properties (21.3%) held by companies.

This fragmentation is further evident in the entity count, where 951 of the 1,096 total landlords are individuals. This points to a market driven by local, small-scale investment rather than large, consolidated players.

Investors in Yuma County display strong financial positioning, with 77.2% of their holdings (791 properties) owned outright in cash, while only 22.8% (233 properties) are financed. This reduces market volatility tied to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards providing rental housing, as 96.5% of investor-owned properties (988 of 1,024) are designated as non-owner-occupied.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Yuma County landlords paid 29.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking discount of $78,695.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Yuma County consistently acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, they paid an average of $189,086, which is $78,695 (29.4%) below the homeowner average of $267,781.

This pricing advantage has fluctuated dramatically throughout 2025, ranging from a low of 11.3% in Q1 to a staggering 49.9% discount in Q2, where the price gap was $174,405. This volatility points to an opportunistic buying strategy focused on specific types of deals.

The data suggests that landlords are not just getting a small edge but are often acquiring properties at substantially lower price points, possibly indicating a focus on distressed, as-is, or off-market properties that require capital investment.

The average landlord acquisition price of $189,086 in Q4 represents a significant drop from the Q3 average of $337,117, highlighting a quarterly shift in the types of properties being targeted by investors.

Despite fluctuating prices, the persistent and substantial discount relative to homeowners remains the most defining characteristic of the investor acquisition strategy in Yuma County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 13 of the 25 SFRs sold for a 52.0% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary buyers in Yuma County's Q4 2025 market, acquiring a majority share of 52.0% of all SFR properties sold (13 out of 25).

The market's growth is driven entirely by small investors, with 100.0% of the 14 properties purchased by landlords (some co-owned) going to mom-and-pop tiers (1-10 properties).

New market entrants are a key feature of the local landscape. The single-property tier alone saw 11 new entities acquire 8 properties, representing 57.1% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of investor activity in the county.

Existing small landlords are also actively expanding, with those in the 3-5 property tier acquiring 5 properties (35.7% of landlord purchases), indicating both new entry and organic growth within the mom-and-pop segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Yuma County, owning 96.5% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Yuma County's investor market is unequivocally dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 96.5% of the 1,024 investor-held SFRs.

The single-property tier is the largest segment by a wide margin, with 664 properties comprising 62.0% of the entire investor portfolio, demonstrating that first-time and small-scale investment is the market's foundation.

Ownership is intensely concentrated at the small end of the spectrum, with Tiers 1 through 3 (portfolios of 1-5 properties) together controlling 92.8% of all investor properties.

There is virtually no large-scale investor presence in the county. Portfolios of more than 20 properties are negligible, and institutional investors (Tier 09) own zero properties.

This distribution paints a picture of a hyper-local rental market driven by individual community members and small local businesses, not large, out-of-state corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization crossover.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios grow: individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, while companies take over in the larger mom-and-pop segments.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owners occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where they hold a 56.4% stake. This is a sharp contrast to the single-property tier, where companies own just 14.7%.

Individual investors represent the vast majority of smaller landlords, holding 85.3% of single-property portfolios (569 properties) and 84.0% of two-property portfolios (100 properties).

Even in the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, ownership is nearly split, with individuals still holding a 52.8% majority, showcasing their persistence even as portfolios begin to scale.

This trend suggests that as local investors expand beyond a handful of properties, they often choose to incorporate their holdings, likely for liability protection, financing, or operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 80758 and 80759 zip codes contain the highest volume of investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is geographically concentrated in Yuma County, with the 80758 and 80759 zip codes together accounting for 770 investor-owned properties, or 75.2% of the county's total investor-held SFRs.

A clear distinction exists between areas of high volume and areas of high penetration. The highest-volume zip codes, 80758 and 80759, have substantial but lower ownership rates of 29.6% and 26.2% respectively.

In contrast, smaller zip codes demonstrate much higher investor saturation. In 80727, 80755, and 80731, landlords own more than half of all single-family residences, with rates of 52.3%, 51.4%, and 50.0%.

This pattern suggests two different investment strategies are at play: a broad-based approach in larger population centers and a highly targeted, dominant approach in smaller, possibly more rural or niche markets within the county.

The top five zip codes by ownership rate all have investor penetration above 33.3%, indicating a widespread and significant investor presence that shapes the character of local housing markets across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Yuma County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 19 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Yuma County are in a sustained accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell, signaling strong confidence in the local real estate market.

In Q4 2025, this trend was exceptionally clear, with 19 properties purchased versus only 2 sold. This resulted in a net gain of 17 properties for the investor community in a single quarter.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term pattern, not a short-term anomaly. For the full year 2025, landlords bought 65 properties and sold only 16, and in 2024, the ratio was even more skewed with 62 buys versus just 7 sells.

The high buy-to-sell ratio indicates that local investors are focused on expanding their rental portfolios rather than divesting assets or flipping properties.

The complete absence of transactions from institutional investors (1,000+ tier) confirms that all market momentum and transaction volume are driven by smaller, local players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a driving force in the market, participating in 48.7% of all Q4 SFR transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity was a major driver of the Q4 market, with investors participating in 19 of the 39 total SFR transactions for a 48.7% share of all activity.

The market is fueled exclusively by smaller investors, as 100% of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords operating in Tiers 01-04.

Pricing strategies vary by tier even among small investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier secured the lowest average price at $161,875, while the two-property tier paid the most at $230,000 per transaction.

New market entrants (single-property tier) are actively participating in inter-landlord trading, with 18.2% of their 11 purchases (2 properties) coming from other landlords, providing liquidity to the local market.

The lack of any institutional transactions underscores that market dynamics, deal flow, and pricing are entirely contained within the small investor ecosystem of Yuma County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Define Yuma County's Market, Owning 30.6% of Homes and Driving 52% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
In Yuma County, Colorado, landlords own 1,024 SFR properties, representing a significant 30.6% of the market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 814 of these properties (79.5%) compared to just 218 (21.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of 29.4% less than traditional homeowners. This translated to a substantial discount of $78,695 per property ($189,086 for landlords vs. $267,781 for homeowners).
Activity
Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 13 properties and capturing 52.0% of all sales. The market is fueled by new entrants, with 11 new single-property landlords making their first acquisition this quarter.
Market Share
The investor landscape is controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 96.5% of all investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
While individual investors form the base of the market, companies become the majority owners once a portfolio scales to the 6-10 property tier (56.4% company-owned). This indicates a trend of professionalization as landlords expand.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers with a 9.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (19 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Yuma County, Colorado is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. Landlords own a substantial 1,024 properties, accounting for 30.6% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This ownership is not concentrated in corporate hands; instead, it's overwhelmingly driven by individuals, who own 79.5% of all investor properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.5% of the investor-owned supply, while large-scale institutional investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights their influence and strategy. They were the primary market movers, purchasing 52.0% of all homes sold while leveraging a significant pricing advantage, paying 29.4% less on average than traditional homeowners. This activity is characterized by accumulation, not speculation, as landlords acted as strong net buyers with a 9.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This growth is fueled by new entrants, with 11 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway for Yuma County is that its rental housing market is a classic example of a locally controlled ecosystem, free from the influence of large institutional capital. The high penetration rate, combined with the dominance of individual and mom-and-pop owners, indicates a stable market where rental supply is provided by community-based investors. Future trends will likely be dictated by the financial health and confidence of these local players rather than shifts in national corporate strategy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyYuma (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail