Teller (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Teller (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Teller (CO)
10,705
Total Investors in Teller (CO)
4,750
Investor Owned SFR in Teller (CO)
3,411(31.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,315
SFR Owned
2,949
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
435
SFR Owned
545
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,411 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Teller County with 97.1% Ownership and Aggressive Buying
Investors own 31.9% of Teller County's SFR market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 97.1% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 26.1% of all homes sold, securing a 13.0% discount compared to homeowners and continuing a strong net buying trend.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,411 SFR properties, with individuals holding 86.5% of the portfolio.
Cash ownership (1,959 properties) outpaces financed holdings (1,452), indicating strong investor capital. The portfolio is almost exclusively rental-focused, with 99.5% of investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied (3,393 of 3,411).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 13.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $81,929 per property.
The price gap widened significantly in Q4 (13.0%) from just 4.6% in Q3, marking the second-largest discount of the year. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently paid less than traditional homebuyers each quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 26.1% of all single-family homes sold in Teller County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 95.1% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, highlighting a market completely driven by small-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.1% of investor-owned homes, while institutions own just 0.1%.
Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone owning 85.6% of all investor-held SFRs (2,980 properties). Institutional investors made zero purchases in Q4, showing no growth in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows beyond 6-10 properties.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.5% of single-property holdings. This shifts dramatically in the 6-10 property tier, where companies take a 54.5% majority share, a pattern that strengthens in larger tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 80863, which holds 1,231 investor properties.
While 80863 has the highest count, smaller zip codes show extreme saturation, with 80866 being 100.0% investor-owned and 80860 at 76.5%. The top three zip codes by count hold 76.7% of all investor-owned properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.87 properties for every one sold in Q4.
This net buying trend is consistent, with a 4.8x buy/sell ratio for all of 2025 and a 9.0x ratio in 2024. The data indicates landlords are focused on long-term portfolio growth rather than short-term flipping.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.6% of all Q4 property transactions, totaling 58 deals.
New single-property landlords dominated activity with 54 transactions, paying an average of $468,789. The few active mid-size landlords paid significantly more, with one purchasing at $697,000, suggesting a focus on higher-value assets.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,411 SFR properties, with individuals holding 86.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 31.9% share of the single-family residential market in Teller County, owning 3,411 out of 10,705 total properties.

Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by 4,315 individual landlords who control 2,949 properties (86.5%), compared to 435 companies owning 545 properties (16.0%).

This demonstrates that the local investment landscape is driven by small-scale, individual participants rather than large corporations.

A preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 1,959 properties owned outright versus 1,452 that are financed, suggesting investors have substantial liquidity.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, as 3,393 of the 3,411 investor-owned properties are classified as rented, confirming a near-total focus on providing rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 13.0% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $81,929 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Teller County demonstrated a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, the average landlord purchase price was $546,414, which is 13.0% less than the $628,343 paid by homeowners.

This price advantage translated to a substantial savings of $81,929 per property in the final quarter of the year.

The Q4 discount marked a sharp increase in negotiating power, widening considerably from the 4.6% ($27,925) discount observed in Q3 2025.

This trend of paying less was persistent throughout the year, with landlords also securing discounts of 7.7% in Q2 and a yearly high of 15.6% in Q1.

Overall property values have appreciated significantly since the pandemic era, with the average 2025 landlord acquisition price of $539,379 representing a 21.6% increase over the 2020-2023 average of $443,401.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 26.1% of all single-family homes sold in Teller County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 41 of the 157 total SFR properties sold, which amounts to a 26.1% market share.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) bought 39 of the 41 properties, accounting for 95.1% of all investor acquisitions.

First-time or single-property landlords led the charge, with 54 new entities acquiring 37 properties, representing 90.2% of the investor total and signaling a healthy influx of new participants.

Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4.

Mid-size investors also had a negligible impact, with only two properties being acquired by landlords holding between 21 and 100 properties, reinforcing the dominance of the small investor.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.1% of investor-owned homes, while institutions own just 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Teller County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 97.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market's foundation rests on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 85.6% of the investor-held housing stock, totaling 2,980 properties.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 2 properties, which represents a mere 0.1% of the total.

This distribution defies the common narrative of corporate consolidation, proving the local rental market is sustained by a broad base of small, local investors.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply after the smallest tiers; all investors holding more than 10 properties combined own less than 3% of the entire investor portfolio.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows beyond 6-10 properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when examining ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes: individuals initiate investments, while companies are used for scaling.

Individual landlords are the overwhelming majority in smaller tiers, owning 88.5% of single-property portfolios and 79.2% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

The critical crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, reaching a 54.5% majority share.

This trend toward incorporation intensifies as portfolios grow. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own a commanding 80.0% of the properties.

This data suggests a typical investor lifecycle where individuals enter the market and later transition to a corporate structure to manage larger, more complex portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 80863, which holds 1,231 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Teller County is highly concentrated geographically, with just three zip codes (80863, 80816, and 80813) containing 2,617 properties, or 76.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 80863 is the epicenter of activity by volume, with 1,231 investor-owned properties, though this represents a moderate ownership rate of 24.3% for that area.

A different story is told by ownership rates, which highlight smaller, more saturated markets. Zip code 80866 is fully investor-owned (100.0%), while 80860 (76.5%) and 80813 (61.8%) also show extremely high investor penetration.

This contrast between high-volume and high-penetration areas reveals distinct sub-market dynamics within the county.

The data points to both broad investment appeal in areas like 80863 and niche, rental-heavy communities in zip codes like 80860 and 80866.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.87 properties for every one sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Teller County are clearly in an accumulation phase, consistently acting as strong net buyers of residential property.

In Q4 2025, the trend was particularly pronounced, with landlords purchasing 58 properties while only selling 15, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.87-to-1.

This behavior reflects a long-term strategy of portfolio expansion. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 192 properties and sold just 40, a ratio of 4.8x.

While still very aggressive, the acquisition pace has moderated slightly from 2024, which saw an even more heated 9.0x buy/sell ratio (325 buys vs. 36 sells).

The consistently low number of properties sold by landlords year-over-year signals a strong commitment to a buy-and-hold strategy, focusing on generating rental income rather than quick capital gains.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.6% of all Q4 property transactions, totaling 58 deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a crucial role in market liquidity, participating in 58 of the 269 total SFR transactions for a 21.6% market share.

Transaction volume was overwhelmingly driven by the smallest investors. The single-property tier alone accounted for 54 of the 58 landlord transactions.

A clear pricing difference emerged between investor tiers. New single-property landlords paid an average of $468,789, while the few active mid-size investors paid much higher prices, such as $697,000 in the 21-50 property tier and $577,000 in the 51-100 tier.

This price disparity suggests that smaller, new investors and larger, established landlords are targeting different segments of the market.

Landlord-to-landlord sales are uncommon. Only 5.6% of purchases by single-property investors were from other landlords, indicating that most acquisitions are sourced from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Teller County with 97.1% Ownership, Remain Strong Net Buyers
Holdings
Investors own 3,411 SFR properties, representing 31.9% of the market in Teller County. Ownership is led by individual investors holding 2,949 properties (86.5%), while companies own 545 (16.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 13.0% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average discount of $81,929 per property ($546,414 vs $628,343).
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 41 properties (26.1% of all sales), an activity driven by small investors who made up 95.1% of all landlord acquisitions, including 54 new single-property landlord entities.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.1% of investor housing, while large institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios (88.5% of Tier 1), but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.87x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (58 buys vs 15 sells). Institutional investors were inactive, making zero purchases or sales.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Teller County, Colorado is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 3,411 properties, comprising 31.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street, but by local operators; individual investors own 86.5% of these homes. The market structure is highly granular, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 97.1% of all investor-owned real estate, while large institutional firms have a negligible presence at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by strategic acquisitions and strong market participation. Landlords purchased 26.1% of all homes sold, demonstrating their influence on market demand. They operated with a distinct pricing advantage, paying an average of 13.0% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of $81,929 per property. This activity is part of a broader trend of aggressive portfolio growth, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, acquiring nearly four properties for every one they sold during the quarter. The influx of 54 new single-property landlord entities signals continued and growing interest in the local rental market.

The key takeaway from this data is that Teller County's housing market is heavily influenced by a broad and active base of small-scale landlords who are expanding their holdings. Their ability to secure properties below homeowner market rates and their clear buy-and-hold strategy indicate a long-term confidence in the region. The absence of institutional activity, combined with the dominance of individual investors, suggests that local market dynamics, rather than national corporate trends, will continue to drive the future of rental housing in the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTeller (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail