Crowley (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crowley (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crowley (CO)
1,051
Total Investors in Crowley (CO)
608
Investor Owned SFR in Crowley (CO)
517(49.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
572
SFR Owned
478
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
36
SFR Owned
40
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 517 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor-Dominated Crowley County Sees Market Activity Grind to a Complete Halt
Investors own a staggering 49.2% of all single-family homes in Crowley County, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 93.8% of that portfolio. However, the market is currently frozen, with zero landlord purchases or transactions recorded in Q4 2025, preventing any analysis of current pricing or market direction.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 49.2% of SFRs, with individuals holding 92.5% of the portfolio.
The financing profile is unique, with 100% of the 517 investor-owned properties held in cash and none reported as financed. Of these, 501 properties are classified as rented, indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases in Q4 2025 means no pricing data is available to compare.
The complete absence of landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025 and throughout 2024 prevents any analysis of pricing trends or the typical price gap between investors and traditional homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity was zero in Q4, a 0.0% share of market purchases.
The halt in acquisitions was total, with zero properties purchased by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) and zero purchased by institutional investors (Tier 09). Consequently, no new landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command 93.8% of investor-owned homes.
This small landlord dominance starkly contrasts with institutional investors (1000+), who control just one property, representing a mere 0.2% share. No tier-based pricing analysis is possible due to the lack of recent sales.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every active portfolio tier.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority; their highest concentration is just 10.9% in the 3-5 property tier. Due to a lack of sales, price differences by owner type cannot be determined.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is pervasive across Crowley County, with rates peaking at 71.8%.
The zip code 81033 has the highest investor penetration rate at 71.8%. The zip code 81063 contains the highest number of investor-owned homes at 196, representing 34.6% of its market.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
The absence of buy/sell data for any timeframe means it is impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or sellers. Similarly, analysis of inter-landlord trading or profit margins is not possible.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord share of Q4 transactions was 0%, reflecting a market with no activity.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from single-property to institutional. This means there was no inter-landlord trading and no way to compare purchase prices between tiers for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 49.2% of SFRs, with individuals holding 92.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Crowley County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 517 of the 1,051 single-family residential properties, a market share of 49.2%.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 478 properties (92.5%), compared to just 40 properties (7.7%) owned by companies. This signifies a strong 'mom-and-pop' character rather than corporate influence.

A total of 608 distinct landlords operate in the county, with individuals comprising 572 (94.1%) of these entities, reinforcing the small-scale nature of the investor base.

Uniquely, the entire investor portfolio of 517 properties is owned outright with cash, as zero properties were recorded as being financed. This suggests either a market with very low acquisition costs or a highly capitalized investor pool.

The vast majority of the portfolio is actively used for rentals, with 501 properties classified as rented, underscoring the primary investment strategy in the region.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases in Q4 2025 means no pricing data is available to compare.
Detailed Findings

A complete halt in investor purchasing activity in Q4 2025 means no average acquisition price can be calculated for landlords during this period. Consequently, a direct price comparison to traditional homeowners is not possible.

This lack of activity extends throughout the recent past, with zero landlord properties purchased recorded for all of 2024. This indicates a prolonged period of market stagnation for investors.

Historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price of $112,645, but without recent transactions, it's impossible to determine current market values or price appreciation.

The absence of transactional data makes it impossible to assess if the market is appreciating or declining, or to analyze the typical discount investors might achieve compared to other buyers.

This data gap is a significant finding in itself, pointing to a market that is either illiquid, in equilibrium, or experiencing a standoff between potential buyers and sellers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity was zero in Q4, a 0.0% share of market purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord purchasing activity in Crowley County came to a complete standstill, with investors acquiring zero of the zero total SFR properties sold. This resulted in a 0.0% market share for the quarter.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who represent the vast majority of owners in the county, made no new acquisitions.

Similarly, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were also inactive, recording zero purchases in the final quarter of the year.

The lack of purchasing activity in the single-property tier signifies that no new landlords entered the Crowley County market during Q4 2025.

This frozen state of acquisitions suggests extreme market illiquidity or a lack of available inventory that meets investor criteria.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command 93.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Crowley County is defined by small-scale owners, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) controlling a combined 93.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant group, owning 390 properties, which alone accounts for 73.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent. The 1000+ property tier contains just one property, making up only 0.2% of the local investor market and challenging any narrative of large-scale corporate dominance.

Mid-size landlords are also scarce, with only two active tiers between 11 and 100 properties, holding a combined 32 properties or 6.1% of the market.

Due to zero recent purchasing activity across all tiers, it is impossible to analyze how acquisition prices may differ between small, mid-size, and institutional investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every active portfolio tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across every single portfolio size in Crowley County, reinforcing their control over the market at all levels.

In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 360 of 390 properties (92.1%), while companies own just 31 (7.9%).

There is no tier where corporate ownership comes close to a majority. The peak for company ownership is in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold only 7 properties, a 10.9% share.

Notably, in several of the larger active tiers, such as those for 6-10, 21-50, and 51-100 properties, ownership is 100.0% individual, with zero company involvement.

The lack of any recent acquisitions by either individuals or companies makes it impossible to compare their purchasing strategies or average acquisition prices.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is pervasive across Crowley County, with rates peaking at 71.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is a defining characteristic of the entire Crowley County real estate market, with penetration rates exceeding 34% in all top five zip codes by volume.

The highest concentration of investor ownership is found in zip code 81033, where landlords own 71.8% of the single-family homes.

Other areas also show remarkably high investor saturation, including 81062 (69.4% investor-owned) and 81076 (64.2% investor-owned), indicating this is a county-wide phenomenon.

The largest volume of investor properties is located in the 81063 zip code, with 196 homes, though its ownership rate of 34.6% is lower than other parts of the county.

This widespread and deeply penetrated investor presence suggests that the rental market is a fundamental component of the housing ecosystem throughout Crowley County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
Detailed Findings

There is no historical transaction data available for landlords in Crowley County, which severely limits insights into market liquidity and investor behavior over time.

Without buy and sell transaction counts, a buy/sell ratio cannot be calculated. It is therefore impossible to determine whether landlords have been a net accumulating or divesting force in the market historically.

The data does not allow for an analysis of inter-landlord transactions, meaning the percentage of properties bought from or sold to other investors is unknown.

Furthermore, without average buy and sell prices over time, it is not possible to analyze potential profit margins or pricing trends for disposition versus acquisition.

This complete lack of historical transaction data mirrors the current quarter's inactivity, suggesting a persistently illiquid or low-velocity market for investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord share of Q4 transactions was 0%, reflecting a market with no activity.
Detailed Findings

Reflecting a completely dormant market, landlords were involved in 0% of the zero total SFR transactions in Crowley County during Q4 2025.

The transactional halt was consistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recording zero transactions.

With no purchases occurring, there was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0% for the quarter.

The lack of sales prevents any analysis of pricing strategies by tier. Average purchase prices for all tiers, including the largest (Tier 01) and the institutional tier (Tier 09), were effectively $0 due to inactivity.

This total absence of transactions underscores a profound lack of liquidity in the investor market at the close of 2025.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors own nearly half of Crowley County's homes, but the market is frozen with zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 517 single-family homes in Crowley County, representing an exceptionally high 49.2% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 478 properties (92.5%), versus 40 (7.7%) for companies.
Pricing
With zero landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, no current pricing data is available, making a comparison between landlord and homeowner acquisition prices impossible.
Activity
Investor acquisition activity completely halted in Q4, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, a 0.0% share of all sales. Consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 93.8% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every single portfolio tier in the county; there is no crossover point at which companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
No landlord buy or sell transactions were recorded in Q4 2025, making it impossible to determine a net buyer/seller status or calculate a buy/sell ratio for any investor segment.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Crowley County, CO, is defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration. Landlords own 517 single-family homes, a staggering 49.2% of the county's entire SFR stock. This market is overwhelmingly composed of small-scale, individual investors who hold 92.5% of the portfolio, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 93.8% of investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.2%, challenging any narrative of corporate control.

Despite this deep ownership, investor behavior is currently characterized by complete inaction. In Q4 2025, there were zero purchases and zero sales transactions involving landlords, bringing market activity to a total standstill. This lack of transactions makes it impossible to analyze current pricing, compare investor purchase prices to those of homeowners, or gauge market direction. The entire investor portfolio is held in cash, with no financed properties, suggesting a unique, highly capitalized, and potentially low-velocity market environment.

The key takeaway for the Crowley County housing market is that it is a deeply penetrated, investor-heavy ecosystem that is currently frozen. While small, individual landlords form the bedrock of nearly half the housing supply, the complete absence of recent activity points to profound illiquidity. This could signal a stable, long-term-hold rental market or a precarious standoff between buyers and sellers, with significant implications for future price discovery and housing availability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:03 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCrowley (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct