Siskiyou (CA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Siskiyou (CA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Siskiyou (CA)
13,630
Total Investors in Siskiyou (CA)
7,288
Investor Owned SFR in Siskiyou (CA)
5,201(38.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,546
SFR Owned
4,648
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
742
SFR Owned
823
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,201 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Siskiyou County, Owning 99.1% of Investor SFRs and Driving 47% of Q4 Purchases
Investors own a significant 38.2% of the Single-Family Residential market in Siskiyou County, CA, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 99.1% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 46.6% of all homes sold while securing an average 5.7% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. Institutional investors have a negligible presence, holding just 0.1% of the investor market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,201 SFRs in Siskiyou County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.4% share.
Of the investor-owned properties, 3,102 were purchased with cash, outpacing the 2,099 that are financed. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 5,182 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. The market consists of 7,288 distinct landlords, 6,546 of whom are individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, investors paid 5.7% less than homeowners, an average discount of $17,713 per property.
The price advantage for landlords has narrowed significantly throughout the year, down from a high of 22.4% ($70,480) in Q1 2025. Across all of 2025, investor acquisition prices averaged $284,596, a slight increase from the 2024 average of $275,070.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 46.6% of all SFR properties sold in Siskiyou County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for a staggering 98.6% of all investor purchases. The market saw an influx of 101 new single-property landlords, who acquired 67 of the 69 total investor-purchased properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Siskiyou County.
Landlords with just one property represent the largest single segment, owning 4,575 homes, or 85.4% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own a mere 5 homes, comprising only 0.1% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the majority of properties across all small to mid-size tiers in Siskiyou County.
Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain strong control with an 87.2% ownership share. The crossover point where companies might become majority owners is not present in the data, as individuals dominate all significant tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific Siskiyou County zip codes like 96067 and 96094.
Certain zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration, with 96023 at 80.3% and 96037 at 79.5%. The zip code with the highest count of investor properties is 96067, with 710 homes, representing a 26.3% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Siskiyou County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 110 properties while selling only 16 in Q4 2025.
This trend of strong net acquisition has been consistent all year, with a total of 371 properties bought versus only 51 sold in 2025. Institutional investors were neutral in Q4, with one purchase and one sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 43.0% of all real estate transactions in Siskiyou County during Q4 2025.
In Q4 transactions, institutional investors paid 12.1% less than new single-property landlords ($261,307 vs $297,444). Inter-landlord trades were most common in the small landlord tiers (33.3% of purchases) and the institutional tier (100%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,201 SFRs in Siskiyou County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 38.2% of the total Single-Family Residential market in Siskiyou County, with an inventory of 5,201 properties out of 13,630 total SFRs.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, owning 4,648 properties, which constitutes 89.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, dwarfing the 823 properties (15.8%) held by companies.

The landlord entity landscape mirrors this property distribution, with 6,546 individual landlords making up the vast majority compared to just 742 company landlords.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in the region, with 3,102 properties owned outright, compared to 2,099 properties that carry financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, as evidenced by the 5,182 properties identified as rented, underscoring the primary business focus of property owners in Siskiyou County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, investors paid 5.7% less than homeowners, an average discount of $17,713 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Siskiyou County consistently purchase properties at a discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $291,793, which is 5.7% or $17,713 less than the homeowner average of $309,506.

The investor discount has been a consistent feature of the market but has tightened considerably over the year. The 5.7% Q4 discount is a sharp reduction from the 16.1% gap ($57,210) in Q3 and the substantial 22.4% gap ($70,480) seen in Q1 2025, signaling increased price competition.

Overall property values have appreciated modestly year-over-year. The average landlord acquisition price for all of 2025 was $284,596, up from $275,070 in 2024.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $276,507 is closely aligned with the 2024 average, indicating that price growth has been more recent, primarily occurring within 2025.

This consistent ability to acquire properties below the typical market rate paid by homeowners is a key strategic advantage for investors operating in Siskiyou County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 46.6% of all SFR properties sold in Siskiyou County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 69 of the 148 total SFRs sold, capturing a significant 46.6% of the market's transaction volume.

The small, independent investor is the primary driver of this activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 73 properties, representing 98.6% of all Q4 investor acquisitions.

The market is seeing robust growth at the entry-level, with 101 new single-property landlords making purchases in Q4. These new entrants alone acquired 67 properties, or 90.5% of all investor-bought homes.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, purchasing just a single property, which accounted for only 1.4% of the investor total.

This data illustrates a market dominated not by large corporations but by a high volume of new and existing small-scale landlords actively expanding their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Siskiyou County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Siskiyou County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 4,575 properties alone. This single tier accounts for 85.4% of all investor-owned housing in the county.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off dramatically. Landlords with 2-10 properties collectively own just 734 homes (13.7% of the total).

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible footprint, with their total holdings amounting to just 5 properties, or 0.1% of the investor market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) are also exceedingly rare, collectively owning only 44 properties, further cementing the market's reliance on small, independent investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the majority of properties across all small to mid-size tiers in Siskiyou County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors, not companies, are the primary owners across every significant portfolio tier in Siskiyou County. In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 4,158 homes (86.8%) compared to 635 for companies.

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolio sizes grow. For two-property owners, individuals hold an 84.1% share. In the 3-5 property tier, they hold 75.5%, and in the 6-10 property tier, they still own a commanding 87.2% of the properties.

Unlike in many other markets, there is no observable crossover point where company ownership overtakes individual ownership. The data clearly shows that the entire rental landscape, from single rentals to small portfolios, is managed by individual people.

Company ownership is most concentrated in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold a 24.5% share (68 properties), but they remain the minority owner group in all segments.

This structure indicates that the investment market in Siskiyou County is characterized by personal capital and local management rather than corporate strategy.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific Siskiyou County zip codes like 96067 and 96094.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Siskiyou County, with specific zip codes showing significant concentration. The zip code 96067 holds the highest number of investor-owned homes at 710, followed by 96094 with 623 properties and 96097 with 597.

While some areas have high counts, others are defined by an extremely high density of investor ownership. The top 5 zip codes by investor ownership rate all exceed 75%, led by 96023 (80.3%), 96037 (79.5%), and 96039 (75.7%).

There is a clear distinction between areas with the highest raw count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage. For example, 96067 has the most investor properties (710) but an ownership rate of 26.3%, whereas 96023 has a much smaller count but an 80.3% rate, indicating nearly four out of five homes are investor-owned.

This geographic data points to distinct sub-markets within the county, some being primary hubs for rental inventory and others being almost entirely dominated by non-owner-occupants.

The zip code 96086 stands out with 67 investor properties, representing a 74.4% ownership rate, blending both a notable count with a very high penetration level.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Siskiyou County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 110 properties while selling only 16 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Siskiyou County is in a strong expansion phase, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 110 properties and sold only 16, resulting in a net gain of 94 homes to their portfolios.

This aggressive acquisition strategy is not a recent phenomenon but a year-long trend. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 371 SFRs while divesting only 51, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 7-to-1.

The transaction volume in 2025 (371 buys) is slightly ahead of the pace set in 2024, when 366 properties were purchased, indicating sustained and stable demand from investors.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are not a factor in this growth. In Q4, this tier was perfectly balanced with one acquisition and one disposition. For the full year, they were minor net buyers, adding just 3 properties to their holdings.

The data clearly portrays a market where small, independent landlords are consistently and actively growing their portfolios, signaling confidence in the local rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 43.0% of all real estate transactions in Siskiyou County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in market liquidity during Q4 2025, participating in 110 of the 256 total SFR transactions, a share of 43.0%.

The vast majority of this activity came from the smallest investors. Single-property landlords were involved in 103 transactions, dwarfing the combined activity of all other tiers.

A clear pricing advantage exists for larger, more experienced buyers. The single institutional purchase in Q4 was at $261,307, a 12.1% discount compared to the $297,444 average price paid by new single-property buyers.

Trading between landlords is a feature of the market, especially for more established investors. While only 11.7% of purchases by new single-property landlords came from other investors, 33.3% of acquisitions by two-property and small landlords (3-5 properties) were sourced from existing landlords.

The single institutional purchase in Q4 was a landlord-to-landlord transaction, indicating a preference for off-market or targeted acquisitions from known entities.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Siskiyou County's Housing Market Heavily Shaped by Small Investors Owning 38% of Homes and Driving 47% of Sales
Holdings
In Siskiyou County, CA, landlords own 5,201 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 38.2% of the total market. The ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 4,648 properties (89.4%), compared to just 823 (15.8%) for companies.
Pricing
Investors consistently purchased at a discount, paying 5.7% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, which translated to an average savings of $17,713 per property ($291,793 vs. $309,506).
Activity
Investor activity was robust in Q4 2025, accounting for 46.6% of all SFR purchases (69 properties). The market saw significant growth from new entrants, with 101 new single-property landlords acquiring 67 of these homes.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a commanding 99.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners across all portfolio sizes, holding 86.8% of single-property rentals and 87.2% of portfolios with 6-10 properties. There is no tier in Siskiyou County where company ownership surpasses individual ownership.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 6.88x buy/sell ratio (110 buys vs. 16 sells), signaling aggressive portfolio expansion. The sole institutional investor in the market was neutral, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential market in Siskiyou County, CA, is uniquely characterized by a deep and dominant presence of small, individual investors. Landlords own a substantial 5,201 homes, constituting 38.2% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by individuals, who own 89.4% of these properties, rather than corporations. The structure is firmly rooted in 'mom-and-pop' operations, as investors with 1-10 properties control a staggering 99.1% of the rental inventory, while large-scale institutional firms have a nearly non-existent footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 underscored their market influence and strategic advantages. They were highly active, purchasing 46.6% of all homes sold, and demonstrated a clear expansionist mindset as strong net buyers with a 6.88-to-1 buy/sell ratio. This activity was fueled by an influx of 101 new single-property landlords. Financially, investors maintained an edge, acquiring properties for 5.7% less than traditional homeowners in Q4, a consistent trend throughout the year. Experienced investors appear to secure even better deals, with institutional-tier buyers paying over 12% less than new entrants.

The key takeaway from the data is that Siskiyou County's housing market is not being shaped by Wall Street, but by a large and growing base of local and individual investors. Their significant market share in both ownership and new purchases gives them considerable influence over housing availability and pricing. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes, some exceeding 80%, suggests that rental housing is a critical component of the local ecosystem. The market's health and future direction are therefore intrinsically tied to the financial stability and strategic decisions of these thousands of small-scale landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 06:27 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySiskiyou (CA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail