St. Francis (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the St. Francis (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in St. Francis (AR)
6,030
Total Investors in St. Francis (AR)
1,765
Investor Owned SFR in St. Francis (AR)
1,868(31.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,583
SFR Owned
1,568
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
182
SFR Owned
308
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,868 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate St. Francis County, Controlling 93% of Rentals as Institutions Exit
Investors own 1,868 SFRs (31.0% of the market) in St. Francis County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 93.4% versus a mere 0.2% for institutions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 36.0% of homes sold at a remarkable 57.4% discount to homeowners, acting as strong net buyers while the few institutional players were net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,868 properties in St. Francis County, with individuals holding a dominant 83.9%.
Cash is the overwhelmingly preferred method of holding, with 1,680 properties owned outright versus just 188 financed properties. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 96.5% of investor-owned properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 57.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $71,299 average discount.
This massive discount has been a consistent trend all year, exceeding 81.3% in Q3 and 71.5% in Q2. This suggests investors are targeting a fundamentally different, lower-cost segment of the housing market than traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.0% of all SFR properties sold in St. Francis County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 94.4% of these purchases. In a stark contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting a market driven entirely by small-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in St. Francis County.
In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the investor-held housing stock. The market's foundation is the single-property landlord, who alone owns 58.2% of all units.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owner in every landlord tier, from single-property up to 20 properties.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner. Even in the 11-20 property tier, individuals still own 62.0% of the properties, demonstrating the deeply personal nature of investment in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Forrest City (72335), which holds 1,348 investor-owned properties.
While Forrest City has the highest volume, Hughes (72359) has the highest investor penetration rate at 46.5%. This reveals two distinct investor strategies: high-volume in urban centers and high-density in smaller towns.
Historical Transactions
St. Francis County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 5.2 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This trend of accumulation is not new; for the full year of 2025, landlords bought 126 properties while selling only 22. In stark contrast, institutional investors have been net sellers over the past two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 36.6% of all Q4 2025 property transactions in St. Francis County.
New landlords in the single-property tier drove this activity, paying the highest average price ($72,908). Mid-size landlords (3-5 properties) sourced two-thirds of their purchases from other investors, indicating an active secondary market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,868 properties in St. Francis County, with individuals holding a dominant 83.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in St. Francis County, owning 1,868 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 31.0% of the total SFR market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,583 individual landlords, who own 1,568 properties (83.9% of the investor portfolio), compared to 182 companies owning 308 properties (16.5%).

Cash is king for local investors, who own 1,680 properties outright. This represents 89.9% of all investor-owned properties, dwarfing the 188 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rentals, with 1,803 of the 1,868 properties being non-owner-occupied, a rental concentration of 96.5%.

On average, individual landlords own close to one property each, while the average company portfolio holds approximately 1.7 properties, indicating a market composed of very small-scale operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 57.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $71,299 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in St. Francis County acquire properties at a massive discount, paying an average of $52,954 in Q4 2025, which is 57.4% less than the $124,253 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage is not a one-time event but a consistent market feature. The discount was even more pronounced earlier in the year, reaching an incredible 81.3% ($154,371) in Q3 and 71.5% ($147,741) in Q2.

The substantial and persistent price gap indicates that landlords are not competing directly with homeowners for the same properties but are instead focusing on lower-priced inventory that may require repairs or is otherwise less desirable for retail buyers.

Landlord acquisition prices have fluctuated throughout 2025, ranging from a low of $35,423 in Q3 to a high of $58,881 in Q2, showing adaptability to market conditions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.0% of all SFR properties sold in St. Francis County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 18 of the 50 total SFRs sold, capturing a 36.0% market share of all acquisitions.

The acquisition activity is completely dominated by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 17 of the 18 investor purchases (94.4%).

New market entrants were the primary drivers of activity, as single-property landlords alone purchased 12 properties, making up 66.7% of all investor buying volume.

The data shows 19 new entities entered the market to acquire those 12 properties, signaling a fresh wave of first-time landlords in St. Francis County.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties were entirely absent from the acquisitions market in Q4, underscoring their lack of interest in the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in St. Francis County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in St. Francis County is defined by small-scale ownership, with landlords holding 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling a commanding 93.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, collectively owning 1,147 homes, which accounts for 58.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of large corporate ownership does not apply here; institutional investors (Tier 09) have a nearly nonexistent presence, holding just 3 properties for a 0.2% market share.

Ownership is highly fragmented at the top and concentrated at the bottom. After the single-property tier, ownership drops significantly, with the two-property tier holding just 9.2% of properties.

The entire 'mid-size' landlord segment (11-1,000 properties) is remarkably small, collectively owning just 6.4% of the investor-held housing, further cementing the market's mom-and-pop character.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owner in every landlord tier, from single-property up to 20 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners across all small-to-medium portfolio sizes in St. Francis County, holding 89.7% of properties in the single-property tier.

While company ownership increases with portfolio size—from 10.3% in the single-property tier to 38.0% in the 11-20 property tier—it never surpasses individual ownership.

The data shows no 'crossover point' where corporate ownership becomes dominant, a strong indicator that the local rental market is fueled by personal capital, not institutional funds.

Even among landlords who have begun to scale, such as those in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still own a commanding 85.1% of the homes.

This pattern suggests that while landlords may choose to incorporate as they grow, the underlying ownership structure remains with local individuals rather than larger, out-of-market companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Forrest City (72335), which holds 1,348 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor activity in St. Francis County is centered in a single zip code, 72335 (Forrest City), which contains 1,348 investor-owned properties—72.2% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

The market shows a clear distinction between volume and penetration. While Forrest City is the leader in raw numbers, the small community of Hughes (72359) has the highest rate of investor ownership, with 46.5% of its SFR housing owned by investors.

Other areas with significant investor penetration include Palestine (72372) at 24.2% and Colt (72326) at 20.5%, indicating a broader strategy of targeting smaller communities alongside the main city.

The dramatic drop-off in volume from the top zip code (1,348 properties) to the second (105 properties) highlights an unparalleled focus on the Forrest City market.

This geographic distribution points to a dual-pronged investment strategy in the county: dominating the core urban market by volume while establishing high-density ownership in surrounding rural areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
St. Francis County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 5.2 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in St. Francis County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio expansion, demonstrated by a 5.2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025, with 26 properties purchased and only 5 sold.

This net buying behavior has been consistent all year. Across 2025, investors acquired 126 properties and sold just 22, resulting in a net gain of 104 properties for their portfolios.

A clear divergence in strategy exists between small and large investors. While the broader landlord market is accumulating, institutional (1000+ tier) players are divesting, having sold more properties than they purchased over 2024 and 2025.

Investor demand remains robust and is slightly increasing, with 126 purchases in 2025 compared to 116 in 2024.

The market dynamic is unambiguous: small, local investors are actively and confidently growing their holdings, while the few large, institutional owners are reducing their already minimal exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 36.6% of all Q4 2025 property transactions in St. Francis County.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a crucial role in market liquidity during Q4 2025, participating in 26 of the 71 total SFR transactions for a 36.6% share.

Activity was spearheaded by the smallest investors, with those in the single-property tier accounting for 19 transactions and paying the highest average price of any group at $72,908.

A distinct sourcing pattern emerges by tier. New landlords (Tier 1) did not acquire any properties from other investors, suggesting they buy from homeowners.

In contrast, more established small landlords (3-5 property tier) are active in the secondary investor market, sourcing 66.7% of their Q4 acquisitions from other landlords.

Institutional investors remained entirely on the sidelines with zero transactions, confirming that all Q4 market activity was driven by local, small-scale players trading amongst themselves and buying from the public.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.4% of St. Francis County rentals as institutional investors divest.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,868 SFR properties, representing 31.0% of the market in St. Francis County, with individual investors holding a commanding 1,568 properties (83.9%) compared to 308 for companies (16.5%).
Pricing
Landlords achieved a massive 57.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q4, paying an average of $52,954 while homeowners paid $124,253, a difference of $71,299 per property.
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 18 properties, capturing 36.0% of all market sales, with activity driven by new and small investors in the single-property tier.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 93.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, holding 89.7% in the single-property tier, with no crossover point where companies take majority control.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (26 buys vs 5 sells), while institutional investors are net sellers, having sold more properties than they bought over the last two years.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in St. Francis County, Arkansas is defined by the dominance of small, local operators. Investors own 1,868 properties, a significant 31.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 83.9% of these properties. The ownership structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 93.4% of the rental supply, while large-scale institutional investors have a negligible presence at just 0.2%.

Investor behavior is characterized by savvy acquisition strategies and aggressive growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, purchasing 36.0% of all homes sold while securing a remarkable 57.4% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. This indicates a focus on a different class of asset, likely properties that require renovation. This activity is part of a broader trend of accumulation; landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.2-to-1 buy/sell ratio, a stark contrast to institutional players who are net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.

The key takeaway for the St. Francis County housing market is that it is fundamentally a grassroots ecosystem, not a corporate one. The growth, liquidity, and character of the rental market are driven by thousands of individual decisions made by local players. The divergence between bullish local investors and bearish institutional funds suggests that market opportunity is perceived very differently depending on scale, with small operators finding significant value where larger players do not.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 01:05 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySt. Francis (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4