Scott (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (AR)
2,273
Total Investors in Scott (AR)
636
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (AR)
512(22.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
580
SFR Owned
458
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
56
SFR Owned
67
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 512 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 93.5% of Scott County's Investor Market as Institutions Exit
In Scott County, AR, investors own 22.5% of SFRs (512 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 93.5% versus a mere 0.4% for institutions. In Q4, landlords purchased 37.5% of homes sold at a 14.0% discount to homeowners. The market dynamic is clear: small landlords are accumulating properties as net buyers, while institutional players are retreating as net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 512 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.5%.
Cash is the preferred method of acquisition, with 454 properties (88.7%) owned outright versus only 58 financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 96.5% of all investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 14.0% discount in Q4, paying $12,950 less per home than homeowners.
The 14.0% Q4 discount represents a significant narrowing from the massive 69.1% gap observed in Q3. Despite the volatility, investors have consistently paid less than homeowners throughout 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 6 of the 16 available homes.
Mom-and-pop investors were the only active buyers, accounting for 100% of landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, underscoring a complete lack of large-scale activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 93.5% of investor-owned homes in Scott County.
The market structure is extremely bottom-heavy, with single-property landlords alone owning 73.6% of all investor SFRs. Institutional investors have a negligible footprint at just 0.4%, and historical data shows they are net sellers, indicating a shrinking presence.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every single ownership tier, with no crossover point where companies become the majority.
Even in larger portfolios of 11-20 properties, individuals maintain an 84.6% ownership share. Companies have their strongest, yet still minority, presence in the 3-5 property tier, where they own 32.4% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 72958 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, holding 371 properties, 72.5% of the county's total.
While 72958 has the most properties, the 72927 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 29.2%. This distinction highlights that some smaller areas have a higher density of rentals.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 10-to-1 buy/sell ratio, while institutions are net sellers.
This trend of accumulation by smaller investors contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who were net sellers in 2025 (1 buy vs. 2 sells). Overall acquisition volume has slowed from 45 buys in 2024 to 28 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 38.5% of all Q4 market transactions, participating in 10 of 26 total sales.
A significant price gap exists among buyers: new, single-property landlords paid $43,500 on average, while more established small landlords paid $115,000. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are buying from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 512 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Scott County, owning 512 SFRs, which constitutes 22.5% of the total 2,273 SFR properties in the market.

The local rental market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' style investors, who own 458 properties (89.5%), compared to just 67 properties (13.1%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 580 individual landlords making up the vast majority of the market compared to only 56 company landlords.

Investors in this market demonstrate a strong preference for liquidity and low leverage, with 88.7% of their portfolio (454 properties) owned with cash, while only 11.3% (58 properties) are financed.

The purpose of these holdings is clear: 494 of the 512 properties (96.5%) are non-owner-occupied, confirming that the portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to providing rental housing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 14.0% discount in Q4, paying $12,950 less per home than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $79,250, which is 14.0% less than the $92,200 paid by traditional homeowners—a savings of $12,950 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, contracting sharply from an enormous 69.1% discount in Q3 2025. This suggests changing market dynamics or a shift in the type of properties being acquired by investors toward the end of the year.

Despite this volatility, landlords have maintained a consistent purchasing advantage, securing properties below the homeowner average in every quarter of 2025.

Landlord acquisition prices saw a notable increase in the last quarter, with the Q4 average of $79,250 being the highest of the year, up from just $33,000 in Q3.

In contrast, homeowner prices were more stable, moving from $106,776 in Q3 to $92,200 in Q4, indicating that the primary pricing shift was on the investor side of the market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 6 of the 16 available homes.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 6 of the 16 total SFRs sold and capturing a 37.5% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties), who accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions during the quarter.

The market saw an influx of new participants, with 6 new single-property landlords entering the market and collectively purchasing 4 homes.

This grassroots activity stands in stark contrast to the institutional segment, where investors owning 1,000+ properties made zero purchases, highlighting their complete absence from the local buying scene.

Single-property landlords were the most active group, responsible for purchasing 4 of the 6 properties acquired by investors, signaling that the newest market entrants are driving a majority of the demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a massive 93.5% of investor-owned homes in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Scott County is defined by the dominance of small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a commanding 93.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the bedrock of this market, with the 'single-property' tier alone accounting for 409 properties, or 73.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The presence of large-scale investors is minimal to non-existent. Institutional landlords (1,000+ properties) own just 2 properties, representing a mere 0.4% of the investor market share.

There is a steep decline in ownership as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) control only 5.4% of properties, emphasizing the lack of consolidation by larger players.

This distribution pattern reveals a highly fragmented market composed of many small landlords rather than a consolidated one controlled by a few large entities, suggesting a stable, community-based rental environment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every single ownership tier, with no crossover point where companies become the majority.
Detailed Findings

In Scott County, individual investors are the majority property owners across every portfolio size, a pattern that defies trends seen in more corporatized markets. There is no tier where company ownership surpasses individual ownership.

The highest concentration of company ownership is found in the 3-5 property tier, yet even there, companies own just 11 properties, a 32.4% minority share.

At the smallest scale, which represents the largest part of the market, individual ownership is nearly absolute. In the single-property tier, individuals own 379 of 409 properties (91.8%).

The data shows no evidence of corporate consolidation in larger portfolios. In the 11-20 property tier, individuals still own a commanding 84.6% of the properties (22 homes).

This consistent pattern across all tiers reinforces the deeply-rooted 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market, where ownership remains with individuals regardless of portfolio growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 72958 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, holding 371 properties, 72.5% of the county's total.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Scott County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 72958 zip code serving as the primary hub, containing 371 investor-owned properties.

This single area accounts for a staggering 72.5% of the county's entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, making it the clear center of rental market activity.

A key finding is the difference between volume and density. While 72958 has the highest count, the 72927 zip code reports the highest investor ownership rate at 29.2%, indicating that nearly one in three homes there is investor-owned.

Beyond the main hub, secondary clusters of investor activity exist in zip codes 72944 (56 properties) and 72926 (24 properties).

Several areas exhibit high investor penetration, with the top three by rate—72927 (29.2%), 72841 (27.6%), and 71953 (26.7%)—all showing more than a quarter of their housing stock is owned by investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 10-to-1 buy/sell ratio, while institutions are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall landlord market in Scott County is in a strong accumulation phase. In Q4 2025, investors demonstrated a 10-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 10 properties while only selling one.

A clear divergence in strategy exists between small and large investors. While the broader market is buying, institutional-tier investors (1,000+ properties) are actively divesting, having sold more properties than they purchased in 2025 (2 sells vs. 1 buy).

This indicates that the largest players are strategically retreating from Scott County while smaller, local investors are expanding their portfolios.

Although landlords remain strong net buyers, the overall pace of acquisitions has moderated. The 45 properties purchased in 2024 decreased to 28 properties purchased in 2025.

Despite the annual slowdown, buying pressure from landlords remained consistent throughout 2025, with positive net acquisitions recorded in every quarter with available transaction data.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 38.5% of all Q4 market transactions, participating in 10 of 26 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a powerful force in the Q4 market, participating in 10 of the 26 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 38.5% share of all activity.

A stark pricing difference emerged between different types of small investors. First-time or single-property landlords acquired homes for an average of $43,500, whereas small landlords in the 3-10 property tiers paid an average of $115,000, suggesting they target entirely different segments of the market.

Investors sourced 100% of their new properties from outside the existing investor pool in Q4. With 0% of transactions coming from other landlords, it's clear they are purchasing from traditional homeowners, thereby expanding the overall rental supply.

The market's transaction volume was driven by the smallest players, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 60% of all investor transactions (6 out of 10).

Consistent with their net-seller status, institutional investors recorded zero transactions in Q4, ceding all market activity to the dominant mom-and-pop investor base.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Scott County with 93.5% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 512 SFR properties in Scott County, AR, representing 22.5% of the market. Individual investors hold a commanding 458 of these properties (89.5%), with companies owning the remaining 67 (13.1%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid 14.0% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for an average of $79,250 compared to the homeowner price of $92,200—a discount of $12,950 per home.
Activity
Landlords purchased 37.5% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (6 properties), with activity driven entirely by small investors. The market welcomed 6 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 93.5% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.4% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single portfolio size tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type, reinforcing the market's mom-and-pop character.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 10-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors are divesting, positioning themselves as net sellers for the year (1 buy vs. 2 sells in 2025).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Scott County, Arkansas is fundamentally driven by small, individual owners. Landlords control 512 single-family homes, comprising 22.5% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals (89.5%) rather than companies (13.1%). The market structure analysis reveals that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate with 93.5% of holdings, while large-scale institutional investors have a nearly non-existent footprint at just 0.4%.

Investor behavior in Q4 underscores this trend, with landlords acquiring 37.5% of all homes sold. This activity was exclusively conducted by mom-and-pop buyers, who demonstrated a keen ability to secure discounts, paying 14.0% less than traditional homeowners. Transaction data reveals a clear divergence in strategy: smaller landlords are aggressive net buyers (10 buys vs. 1 sell in Q4), while the few institutional players are net sellers, actively reducing their small local presence.

The key takeaway for the Scott County housing market is its insulation from large corporate influence and its reliance on local, small-scale investment. The dominance of individual, cash-heavy buyers and the retreat of institutional capital suggest a stable, community-oriented rental market rather than one subject to large-scale, speculative pressures. Future market dynamics will be shaped by the continued entry of new mom-and-pop landlords, not by the actions of Wall Street investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyScott (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail