Crawford (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crawford (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crawford (AR)
15,880
Total Investors in Crawford (AR)
3,020
Investor Owned SFR in Crawford (AR)
2,988(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,656
SFR Owned
2,273
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
364
SFR Owned
789
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,988 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Crawford County, Buying at a 55.8% Discount as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 18.8% of Single-Family Residential properties in Crawford County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 85.3% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 17.7% of homes sold, securing them at a 55.8% average discount compared to traditional homeowners. While small investors are actively buying, institutional players were net sellers, signaling a shift toward a more localized rental market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,988 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 76.1%.
The majority of investor-owned properties, 2,434 (81.5%), are held free and clear as cash properties, compared to just 554 that are financed. The market consists of 3,020 landlords, with individual investors outnumbering companies by more than 7-to-1 (2,656 individuals vs. 364 companies).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords purchased Q4 properties at a stunning 55.8% discount, paying $132,810 less than homeowners.
This massive price advantage for landlords ($105,076 vs. $237,886 for homeowners) widened significantly from the 37.0% discount observed in Q3 2025. This deep discount has been a consistent market feature throughout the past year, remaining above 28% in every quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 17.7% of all single-family homes sold in Crawford County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 36 of the 37 landlord purchases (97.3%). In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties purchased just 2 homes, highlighting the dominance of small-scale buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
This local dominance stands in stark contrast to institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who own a mere 0.4% of the investor housing stock. During Q4, institutional buyers paid 6.3% less per property than new single-property landlords ($114,421 vs. $122,179).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio grows beyond 6 properties.
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 89.9% of single-property holdings, companies own 52.2% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier. This trend accelerates in larger tiers, with companies owning 74.1% of properties in the 11-20 unit bracket.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with a single zip code, 72956, containing 61.6% of all investor-owned homes.
While 72956 leads in volume with 1,841 investor properties, other zip codes show higher market penetration. For example, investors own 37.3% of the SFR stock in 72934 and 35.1% in 72935, indicating pockets of intense investor focus.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4, while institutions are net sellers.
This trend of accumulation by the broader landlord community has been consistent, with 247 purchases versus 87 sales in 2025. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are divesting, having sold 13 properties while buying only 9 over the same period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 17.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with new landlords paying the highest prices.
Single-property landlords paid an average of $122,179 per home, 6.3% more than institutional investors, who paid $114,421. More established investors in the 21-50 property tier were most likely to buy from other landlords, sourcing 33.3% of their deals from within the investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,988 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding 76.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 18.8% share of the 15,880 Single-Family Residential properties in Crawford County. The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 2,656 individual investors who own 2,273 properties, representing 76.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.

In contrast, 364 company investors own the remaining 789 properties (26.4%), indicating that the rental market is primarily supplied by local, small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

A defining characteristic of the Crawford County investor market is its low reliance on debt. A remarkable 81.5% of investor-owned homes (2,434 properties) are owned outright with no financing, compared to only 18.5% (554 properties) that carry a mortgage. This signals a financially stable and cash-heavy investor base.

The portfolio composition reveals a strong focus on rental income, with 2,890 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the primary business model for investors in the region.

The ratio of individual landlords to company landlords stands at over 7-to-1, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the market. While companies own more properties on average (2.2 per entity), the sheer volume of individual landlords defines the local market structure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords purchased Q4 properties at a stunning 55.8% discount, paying $132,810 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Crawford County demonstrate a profound pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $105,076, which is 55.8% less than the $237,886 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a staggering $132,810 discount on the typical home purchase.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been widening, increasing from a 37.0% discount in Q3 to 55.8% in Q4. This suggests that investors are increasingly targeting undervalued or distressed assets that are less competitive in the traditional retail market.

This trend is not isolated to the recent quarter. Throughout 2025, landlords have consistently paid substantially less, with discounts of 55.0% in Q2 and 28.5% in Q1, indicating a sustained strategy of acquiring properties well below market rate.

The ability to secure such deep discounts is a key driver of investor activity, allowing for stronger potential returns and creating a distinct sub-market for investment properties separate from the primary housing market.

This pricing behavior suggests investors are not directly competing with typical homebuyers for the same turn-key properties, but are instead focusing on opportunities requiring capital for repairs, off-market deals, or other special situations that result in a lower acquisition cost.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 17.7% of all single-family homes sold in Crawford County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 17.7% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 37 of the 209 single-family homes sold in Crawford County. This solidifies their role as a consistent source of demand in the local housing market.

The acquisition landscape is almost entirely controlled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 36 of the 37 properties bought by investors, representing 97.3% of landlord purchase volume.

New entrants and the smallest landlords were the most active group. Investors in the single-property tier alone purchased 23 properties, making up 54.8% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

Institutional activity was minimal, with investors in the 1,000+ property tier acquiring only 2 properties. This demonstrates a market dynamic fueled by local entrepreneurs rather than large, national corporations.

The data shows a healthy influx of new participants, with 34 distinct entities making purchases in the single-property tier, signaling sustained interest in real estate investment at the entry level in Crawford County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a commanding 85.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Crawford County's rental market is overwhelmingly decentralized. Small, mom-and-pop landlords who own between 1 and 10 properties control a formidable 85.3% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time and single-property landlords are the backbone of the market. This tier alone accounts for 1,962 properties, representing 63.5% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Despite common narratives about corporate ownership, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in the county, owning just 12 properties, or 0.4% of the investor total. This underscores a market driven by local capital and small-scale operations.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a combined 14.2% of the market, indicating a stable but much smaller segment of more professionalized investors.

The data clearly refutes the idea of a market consolidated by large players. Instead, it highlights a highly fragmented ownership base, with thousands of small investors providing the bulk of the rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio grows beyond 6 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear organizational shift occurs as investors scale their portfolios in Crawford County. While individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property mark, holding a 52.2% share in that segment.

For portfolios of 1 to 5 properties, individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 89.9% of single-property investments and 62.6% of portfolios sized 3-5, highlighting the personal nature of small-scale real estate investing.

The trend toward incorporation strengthens significantly as portfolio sizes increase. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership climbs to 74.1%, and it remains the majority in all subsequent tiers, reflecting a move towards more formal business structures to manage larger assets.

This crossover point at the 6-10 property tier signals a key transition in an investor's journey, from a personal investment or side business to a more professionalized real estate operation under a corporate entity.

Even in the largest local tiers, such as the 51-100 property segment, individuals maintain a notable presence, owning 32.6% of properties. This indicates that some substantial portfolios continue to be managed without formal incorporation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with a single zip code, 72956, containing 61.6% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Crawford County is exceptionally concentrated. The 72956 zip code is the epicenter of activity, containing 1,841 properties, which accounts for 61.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the entire county.

The second most active area, zip code 72921, holds 564 investor properties, a significant number but less than a third of the volume seen in the primary investment zone.

A key distinction exists between areas with high volume and areas with high penetration rates. Zip codes like 72934 (37.3% investor-owned) and 72935 (35.1% investor-owned) have the highest rates of investor ownership, suggesting these smaller markets are heavily influenced by landlord activity.

Notably, the area with the highest count of investor properties (72956) has a more moderate ownership rate of 18.6%, indicating it is a large housing market with significant investor presence, but not one completely dominated by them.

This analysis reveals two types of investment hubs: large, high-volume zones that attract the most capital, and smaller, high-saturation zones where investors own a larger piece of a smaller pie.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.4 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4, while institutions are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Crawford County is in a strong accumulation phase. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 58 properties while only selling 17—a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.4-to-1.

This buying momentum is a consistent, year-long trend. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 247 single-family homes and sold just 87, resulting in a net gain of 160 properties for the investor community.

However, a critical divergence in strategy is evident at the institutional level. Large investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties are actively selling, not buying. In 2025, they sold 13 properties and purchased only 9, making them net sellers with a negative net position of -4 properties.

This split indicates that market growth is being fueled from the bottom up by smaller, local investors, while the largest players are either rebalancing their portfolios or exiting the Crawford County market.

The data paints a clear picture of a market where local capital is being deployed to expand rental portfolios, directly countering the activity of a handful of institutional owners who are reducing their exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 17.4% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with new landlords paying the highest prices.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 58 of the 334 total SFR transactions in Crawford County, capturing a 17.4% share of all market activity.

A distinct pricing hierarchy emerged among different investor tiers. New and single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $122,179, suggesting they may be paying a premium to enter the market or buying more move-in-ready properties.

In contrast, institutional investors demonstrated their purchasing power by acquiring properties for an average of just $114,421, a 6.3% discount compared to their smallest counterparts. This suggests an advantage gained through scale, experience, or targeting different types of assets.

The data also reveals a liquid secondary market among investors. While new landlords sourced only 17.6% of their purchases from other investors, more established players in the 21-50 property tier acquired 33.3% of their new properties from fellow landlords, indicating active portfolio trading.

Mom-and-pop investors dominated transaction volume, with their 50 transactions far outpacing the 4 transactions conducted by institutional firms, reinforcing that small investors are the primary market movers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small local landlords control 85% of Crawford County's rental market, buying at deep discounts as institutions sell.
Holdings
In Crawford County, investors own 2,988 single-family homes, representing 18.8% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 76.1% of these properties compared to 26.4% owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 purchased properties for 55.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $132,810 per property ($105,076 vs. $237,886).
Activity
Landlords acquired 17.7% of all homes sold in Q4 (37 properties), with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 36 of those purchases and 34 new landlord entities entering the single-property tier.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with an 85.3% share of investor-owned housing, while large institutional investors own a marginal 0.4%.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4, but institutional investors are bucking the trend as net sellers for the year (9 buys vs. 13 sells in 2025).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Crawford County is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. Landlords own 2,988 properties, comprising a significant 18.8% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is not controlled by Wall Street; rather, it's dominated by individuals who own 76.1% of investor properties. The ownership structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) commanding an 85.3% share, while institutional giants hold a mere 0.4%, underscoring a truly grassroots rental ecosystem.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive, discounted acquisitions. Landlords purchased 17.7% of all homes sold, securing them at an extraordinary 55.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This indicates a focus on undervalued or distressed assets. A stark divergence in strategy is clear: the overall landlord community is in a strong accumulation phase, buying 3.4 homes for every one sold. In direct contrast, institutional investors are net sellers, signaling a retreat from the market and leaving acquisitions to smaller, more localized operators.

The key takeaway for the Crawford County housing market is the resilience and dominance of the mom-and-pop investor. These local players are actively growing their portfolios and providing the vast majority of rental housing, stepping in as larger institutions exit. This dynamic suggests the future of the local rental market will be driven by individual capital and deep market knowledge, rather than large-scale corporate consolidation. The market's health is tied to the ability of these small investors to continue finding and funding deals at a significant discount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:33 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCrawford (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail