Conway (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Conway (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Conway (AR)
5,355
Total Investors in Conway (AR)
1,119
Investor Owned SFR in Conway (AR)
1,067(19.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,010
SFR Owned
859
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
109
SFR Owned
234
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,067 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Conway County with 88.1% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 19.9% of SFRs in Conway County, AR, a market overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords who control 88.1% of investor properties versus just 0.3% for institutions. In Q4 2025, landlords bought 30.3% of all homes sold at a steep 48.9% discount, and while small investors remain strong net buyers, institutional capital is retreating from the area as net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,067 SFR properties in Conway County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 80.5% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned homes are held in cash (931 properties) versus financed (136 properties). The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 95.0% of properties being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 48.9% discount in Q4 2025, paying $101,098 versus homeowners at $197,680.
The landlord purchasing discount widened dramatically throughout the year, growing from 22.6% in Q2 to 48.9% in Q4. This suggests investors are increasingly targeting undervalued assets or exercising greater negotiating power.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 30.3% of all Conway County home sales in Q4 2025, purchasing 10 of the 33 SFRs sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the primary drivers of this activity, accounting for 80.0% of all investor purchases (8 properties). In contrast, institutional investors acquired only a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 88.1% of investor-owned homes in Conway County.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.3% (3 properties) of the local investor portfolio. In Q4, new mom-and-pop buyers paid an average of $126,767, while an institutional buyer paid just $28,377.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (72.4%) in the 6-10 property tier.
The transition to corporate ownership solidifies as portfolios scale, with companies owning 98.6% of properties in the 21-50 tier. Individual landlords own 91.8% of all single-property rentals, forming the entry point to the market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Conway County is heavily concentrated in the 72110 zip code, home to 736 investor properties.
While 72110 has the highest volume, the 72031 zip code has the highest investor penetration, with 46.7% of its homes owned by investors. This contrasts with 72110's lower 20.9% rate, showing a key difference between volume and density.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.25x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, signaling continued portfolio accumulation.
This buying trend is in direct opposition to institutional investors (1000+ tier), who were net sellers for the year 2025, selling 4 properties while only buying 3. Overall landlord buying volume has tapered, from 37 buys in Q2 to 13 in Q4.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 27.1% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, purchasing 13 of the 48 total SFRs sold.
A massive price gap exists between tiers: new single-property landlords paid an average of $126,767, while the institutional tier paid 77.6% less at just $28,377. Inter-landlord trades are rare, with only one of 13 purchases sourced from another investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,067 SFR properties in Conway County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 80.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.9% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Conway County, AR, with a total portfolio of 1,067 properties out of 5,355 total SFRs.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by 1,010 individual investors, who own 859 properties (80.5% of the portfolio), while 109 companies own the remaining 234 properties (21.9%).

This investor portfolio is actively generating rental income, as evidenced by the 1,014 properties classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, which accounts for 95.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

A strong indicator of financial stability among local investors is the preference for cash purchases, with 87.2% of the portfolio (931 properties) being owned outright, compared to just 12.8% (136 properties) that are financed.

On average, company landlords hold larger portfolios (2.1 properties per entity) than individual landlords (0.85 properties per entity), highlighting that corporate structures are used for scaling investment operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 48.9% discount in Q4 2025, paying $101,098 versus homeowners at $197,680.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Conway County, AR demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rate, paying an average price of $101,098, which is $96,582 (or 48.9%) less than the $197,680 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage for investors has significantly increased over the past year, widening from a 22.6% discount in Q2 2025 ($41,998) to the current 48.9%, indicating a strengthening negotiating position or a strategic shift toward more distressed assets.

While traditional homeowner prices remained relatively stable throughout 2025, landlord acquisition prices showed a downward trend, falling from $148,290 in Q1 to $101,098 in Q4, signaling a cooling in the investment-grade market segment.

The average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 ($101,098) is returning closer to the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $86,109, after peaking at the beginning of the year.

The widening gap between what landlords and homeowners pay suggests two distinct markets are operating in parallel: a retail market for homeowners and a wholesale or off-market environment where investors are finding substantial discounts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 30.3% of all Conway County home sales in Q4 2025, purchasing 10 of the 33 SFRs sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the Conway County, AR market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 10 of the 33 total SFRs sold, a market share of 30.3%.

The market's growth is being fueled by small-scale investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 80.0% of all investor acquisitions in the quarter.

There is a steady influx of new investors, with 9 new single-property landlord entities entering the market in Q4, who collectively purchased 6 properties, representing 60.0% of all landlord buying activity.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the purchasing market, acquiring only one property, which accounted for just 10.0% of investor purchases.

Activity was highly concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, reinforcing the narrative that the local market is driven by individuals and small businesses rather than large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 88.1% of investor-owned homes in Conway County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Conway County, AR is fundamentally decentralized, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a dominant 88.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 64.5% of the entire investor portfolio with 728 properties.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a nearly non-existent presence, holding just 3 properties, which amounts to only 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 11.6% of the portfolio, further cementing the market's reliance on small operators.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, suggesting that local housing is primarily influenced by the decisions of numerous small, local investors rather than a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners (72.4%) in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear lifecycle of investor ownership is visible in Conway County, AR, where individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 91.8% of single-property portfolios and 86.5% of two-property portfolios.

The 6-10 property tier serves as a critical inflection point where investors transition to corporate structures for scale and liability management, with companies owning 72.4% of properties in this segment.

By the time a portfolio grows to the 21-50 property range, company ownership is nearly absolute, accounting for 98.6% of properties and demonstrating that significant scale is almost exclusively achieved through incorporation.

An interesting anomaly exists in the 11-20 property tier, where individual ownership temporarily resurges to a 62.5% majority, possibly representing high-net-worth individuals who manage larger portfolios without incorporating.

This tier-based analysis shows that while the market is anchored by individuals, growth and professionalization are strongly correlated with the adoption of a corporate entity structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Conway County is heavily concentrated in the 72110 zip code, home to 736 investor properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned properties in Conway County, AR are located in a single zip code, 72110, which contains 736 properties, or 69.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

The market with the highest saturation of investors is the 72031 zip code, where investors own 46.7% of all SFRs, indicating a market profoundly shaped by rental activity.

The top 5 zip codes by property count (72110, 72127, 72157, 72063, 72027) collectively hold 957 properties, representing 89.7% of all investor-owned homes and showcasing extreme geographic concentration.

A key distinction exists between areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage. The volume leader, 72110 (20.9% rate), has less than half the market penetration of the rate leader, 72031 (46.7% rate).

This geographic analysis reveals distinct investment strategies, with some investors focusing on acquiring volume in larger, more populous areas, while others target smaller markets to achieve high density and local market control.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.25x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, signaling continued portfolio accumulation.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Conway County, AR remains in a strong accumulation phase, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 13 properties and sold only 4.

This bullish behavior is consistent throughout the year, as landlords bought 96 properties versus selling only 16 in 2025, a buy-to-sell ratio of 6-to-1.

A major strategic divergence is evident between small and large investors, as the institutional (1,000+ property) tier has been divesting, acting as a net seller in 2025 with 3 buys and 4 sells.

While still net buyers, the pace of acquisitions has slowed for the broader landlord market, declining from 37 purchases in Q2 2025 to 13 in Q4, suggesting a more selective purchasing environment.

The data clearly shows that smaller, local landlords are absorbing market inventory, while the largest institutional players are cautiously reducing their exposure in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 27.1% of all Q4 2025 market transactions, purchasing 13 of the 48 total SFRs sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, with landlord purchases accounting for 13 of the 48 total transactions, a 27.1% share of all sales in Conway County, AR.

Q4 transactions revealed vastly different pricing strategies across investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid the most at $126,767 per property, while the institutional tier paid the least at $28,377, a 77.6% discount.

Transaction volume was driven by mom-and-pop investors, who were responsible for 11 of the 13 landlord purchases (84.6%), further highlighting their importance to market liquidity.

The investor market is not self-contained, as only one landlord purchase (out of 13) came from another landlord. This indicates investors are primarily acquiring inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

The dramatic price difference between small and large investors suggests that mom-and-pop buyers are competing for retail-level properties, while larger, more sophisticated investors are targeting deeply distressed or off-market assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Conway County with 88.1% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Investors own 1,067 SFR properties in Conway County, AR, representing 19.9% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 80.5% of these properties (859 homes) compared to 21.9% for companies (234 homes).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties for 48.9% less than traditional homeowners, representing a significant average discount of $96,582 per property ($101,098 vs. $197,680).
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 30.3% of all SFRs sold (10 properties). This activity was driven by new entrants, with 9 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market in Conway County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 88.1% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors own a mere 0.3%.
Ownership Type
While individual investors own the vast majority of small portfolios, companies become the majority owners (72.4%) in portfolios of 6-10 properties and represent 98.6% of holdings in the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Conway County were strong net buyers in Q4 with 13 purchases versus only 4 sales. However, institutional investors are moving in the opposite direction, acting as net sellers for the year 2025 (3 buys vs. 4 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Conway County, AR is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. They own 1,067 properties, constituting 19.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who hold 80.5% of investor properties, and is highly fragmented. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an 88.1% share, while institutional investors have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.3%, defying the narrative of a corporate takeover.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to a savvy, opportunistic market. Landlords acquired 30.3% of all homes sold, securing them at a staggering 48.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is driven by the smallest players, who remain strong net buyers. In stark contrast, institutional capital is divesting from the area, operating as net sellers. Pricing strategies also diverge significantly, with new mom-and-pop landlords paying market-adjacent prices ($126,767) while larger investors acquire assets for a fraction of that cost ($28,377), indicating a focus on distressed properties.

The key takeaway for the Conway County housing market is the clear divergence between local and institutional sentiment. The market's stability and growth are fueled by the continued accumulation of properties by thousands of small investors who are finding deep value. Meanwhile, the retreat of institutional capital suggests a strategic shift, possibly creating more opportunities for local buyers to absorb inventory. The health of this market is tied not to Wall Street, but to the confidence and financial capacity of its local mom-and-pop landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:33 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyConway (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4