Cleburne (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cleburne (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cleburne (AR)
9,917
Total Investors in Cleburne (AR)
5,648
Investor Owned SFR in Cleburne (AR)
3,960(39.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,102
SFR Owned
3,452
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
546
SFR Owned
625
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,960 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor Dominance in Cleburne County: Landlords Command 40% of Housing and Pay Premiums, Led by Mom-and-Pop Buyers
Investors own 39.9% of all single-family homes in Cleburne County, with individual mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 97.9% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors bought 43.6% of all homes sold, atypically paying a 9.6% premium over traditional homeowners. The market is defined by strong, net-buying activity from small investors, with virtually no institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,960 homes, 39.9% of Cleburne County's market, with individuals holding 87.2%.
Cash purchases significantly outweigh financing, with 2,846 properties owned outright versus 1,114 financed. A total of 5,102 individual landlords operate in the county, compared to just 546 company landlords, a ratio of over 9 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 9.6% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $327,030.
The price gap has been extremely volatile, swinging from a massive 57.9% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to an 8.8% discount in Q2. In Q4, landlords paid $28,716 more per property than traditional homeowners ($327,030 vs $298,314).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured an immense 43.6% of all Q4 2025 home purchases in Cleburne County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 96.2% of all investor purchases this quarter. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords own a staggering 97.9% of all investor SFRs in Cleburne County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, controlling just 4 properties, or 0.1% of the investor market. Single-property landlords alone own 80.6% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner over individuals in portfolios of 11-20 properties.
While individuals own 88.6% of single-property portfolios, their share drops to 57.4% for 6-10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies take a 57.4% majority stake.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 72543, 72067, and 72530.
The highest investor ownership rates are found in 72530 (54.3%), 72067 (53.5%), and 72044 (51.0%), where investors own more than half of all SFRs. Zip code 72543 has the highest raw count of investor properties at 1,751.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Cleburne County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with 74 buys versus 8 sells in Q4 2025 and a total of 326 buys versus 45 sells for the full year. Even the single institutional investor was a net buyer in 2025, with 2 purchases and 1 sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 40.7% of all Q4 transactions, dominated by single-property buyers.
Single-property landlords accounted for 64 of the 74 total investor transactions. An unusual pricing pattern emerged, with small landlords (3-5 properties) paying the highest average price at $431,125, far more than any other tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,960 homes, 39.9% of Cleburne County's market, with individuals holding 87.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Cleburne County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 3,960 single-family properties, which constitutes a significant 39.9% of the total 9,917 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the county's rental market, owning 3,452 properties, or 87.2% of all investor-held SFRs, dwarfing the 625 properties (15.8%) held by companies.

The market structure is dominated by small-scale operators, with 5,102 individual landlords compared to only 546 company entities. This nearly 9.4-to-1 ratio underscores the grassroots nature of real estate investment in the area.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with landlords owning 2,846 properties free and clear. This is more than 2.5 times the 1,114 properties that are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 3,916 of the 3,960 investor-owned properties identified as rented, demonstrating a clear investment strategy centered on generating cash flow.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 9.6% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $327,030.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to typical market behavior, landlords in Cleburne County paid a premium for properties in Q4 2025. Their average acquisition price of $327,030 was 9.6% higher than the $298,314 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $28,716 per property.

The pricing dynamic between landlords and homeowners has been highly erratic throughout 2025. The year started with landlords paying a staggering 57.9% premium in Q1 ($391,620 vs $248,045), followed by an 8.8% discount in Q2, before returning to significant premiums in Q3 (24.5%) and Q4 (9.6%).

This volatility suggests investors may be targeting different types of properties or are more aggressive in bidding wars in certain quarters compared to regular homebuyers.

Historical pricing data shows significant appreciation since the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $290,236, which is $36,794 less than the average price of $327,030 paid in Q4 2025.

The consistent premium paid by landlords in three of the last four quarters challenges the assumption that investors always secure discounts and may indicate a highly competitive market for desirable rental properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured an immense 43.6% of all Q4 2025 home purchases in Cleburne County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 51 of the 117 total SFRs sold, capturing a commanding 43.6% of the market share.

The backbone of this purchasing activity is unequivocally the mom-and-pop investor. Landlords in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) acquired 50 of the 51 properties, representing 96.2% of all investor buying activity.

A significant wave of new investors entered the market, with 64 new single-property entities acquiring 45 homes, which alone accounted for 86.5% of all landlord purchases in the quarter.

In stark contrast to the activity from small investors, institutional buyers (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4.

Mid-size investors also had minimal impact, with only two properties purchased by landlords owning more than 10 homes, further cementing the market's reliance on small-scale capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords own a staggering 97.9% of all investor SFRs in Cleburne County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cleburne County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 97.9% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the foundation of the market, owning 3,331 properties, which represents 80.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Conversely, the institutional footprint is virtually nonexistent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own a mere 4 homes, accounting for only 0.1% of the market, defying the narrative of corporate landlord takeover.

The ownership concentration at the small end of the spectrum is profound: 95.5% of all investor-owned properties are held by landlords with five or fewer homes (Tiers 01-03).

Mid-size and large investors combined (11 to 1000+ properties) own just 88 properties in total, highlighting a significant barrier to entry or lack of strategic interest for larger portfolios in this specific market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner over individuals in portfolios of 11-20 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, holding a majority share in portfolios up to 10 properties. They own 88.6% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 81.9% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings.

The ownership structure begins to shift in the 6-10 property tier, where the individual share decreases to 57.4%, indicating this is often where investors begin to incorporate.

The clear crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 27 properties (57.4%) compared to 20 held by individuals (42.6%).

Even though companies gain a majority in larger tiers, individual ownership persists across the spectrum, demonstrating that personal holdings are a significant strategy even for larger-scale local investors.

In the 3-5 property tier, a popular range for growing investors, individuals still maintain strong control with 237 properties (76.0%), while companies hold just 75 properties (24.0%).

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip codes 72543, 72067, and 72530.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated geographically within Cleburne County, with three zip codes accounting for the vast majority of activity. The zip code 72543 leads by volume, with 1,751 investor-owned properties.

Several areas exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates, where landlords own more than half of the housing stock. The highest concentration is in 72530, with a 54.3% investor ownership rate, closely followed by 72067 at 53.5%.

The region with the largest number of investor properties, 72543, has a comparatively lower ownership rate of 35.5%, indicating it's a larger overall housing market where investor presence is still substantial but less dominant than in smaller zips.

The top five zip codes by ownership rate all see investors owning more than a third of homes, with rates ranging from 33.1% in 72131 to the 54.3% peak in 72530.

This geographic clustering suggests investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities, potentially driven by local factors like school districts, rental demand, or property values.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Cleburne County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors are in a strong accumulation phase, demonstrated by a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.25-to-1 in Q4 2025. They purchased 74 properties while only selling 8 during the period.

This net buyer stance has been consistent throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 326 properties and sold only 45, resulting in a net gain of 281 properties and a yearly buy-to-sell ratio of 7.24.

The pace of accumulation in 2025 has outstripped 2024, which saw 292 buys and 32 sells. This shows that investor appetite in Cleburne County is increasing rather than waning.

Even the market's tiny institutional segment is expanding its portfolio. In 2025, the 1000+ tier investor was a net buyer, acquiring 2 properties while selling only 1.

The high volume of net acquisitions signals strong confidence in the local rental market and suggests investors anticipate continued growth in rental demand or property values.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 40.7% of all Q4 transactions, dominated by single-property buyers.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 74 of the 182 total SFR transactions, which amounts to a 40.7% market share.

Activity was overwhelmingly concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were involved in 64 transactions, representing 86.5% of all investor activity for the quarter.

A notable pricing anomaly occurred, with landlords in the 3-5 property tier paying the highest average price at $431,125. This is over $123,000 more than the $307,710 average paid by single-property buyers, suggesting they may be acquiring premium assets.

Inter-landlord transactions were infrequent. Only 4.7% of purchases by single-property landlords (3 of 64) came from another landlord, indicating that most acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market.

The highest rate of landlord-to-landlord sales was in the 3-5 property tier, where 1 of 4 transactions (25.0%) was sourced from another investor, suggesting more strategic portfolio trading among established small landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Cleburne County, Owning 97.9% of Investor Homes and Driving 43.6% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Investors own 3,960 single-family properties in Cleburne County, AR, representing a massive 39.9% of the total market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 3,452 of these homes (87.2%), while companies own 625 (15.8%).
Pricing
In a surprising market inversion, landlords paid 9.6% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average price of $327,030 compared to the homeowner average of $298,314, a premium of $28,716.
Activity
Landlords acquired 43.6% of all homes sold in Q4 (51 properties), with activity driven by new entrants. During the quarter, 64 new single-property landlord entities entered the Cleburne County market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.9% of all investor-owned housing in the county. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, where they hold a 57.4% share.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, with a 9.25x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (74 buys vs 8 sells). This accumulation trend extends to institutional players, who were also net buyers for the year (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Cleburne County, AR is heavily shaped by real estate investors, who own a substantial 3,960 properties, or 39.9% of the entire market. This landscape is not defined by large corporations, but by local, small-scale operators. Individual investors own 87.2% of the investor portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.9% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible 0.1% share.

Investor behavior in Cleburne County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a willingness to pay for desirable assets. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 43.6% of all homes sold and were strong net buyers with a 9.25-to-1 buy/sell ratio. Uncharacteristically, they paid a 9.6% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for rental-grade properties. This activity is fueled by new market entrants, as 64 new single-property landlord entities made purchases in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway is that Cleburne County represents a market deeply penetrated and dominated by a grassroots network of individual investors. The high ownership rates in specific zip codes, some exceeding 50%, indicate that rental housing is a fundamental component of the local real estate ecosystem. The ongoing, aggressive accumulation by small landlords, coupled with the absence of institutional capital, signals a hyper-local market dynamic where individual investors are the primary drivers of demand, competition, and pricing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:31 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCleburne (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail