Calhoun (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (AR)
1,450
Total Investors in Calhoun (AR)
478
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (AR)
398(27.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
429
SFR Owned
338
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
49
SFR Owned
62
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 398 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Calhoun County with 27.4% Market Share, Acquiring Properties at 99% Discounts
Investors own 398 SFR properties in Calhoun County, AR, representing 27.4% of the total market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 96.5% of this portfolio. In Q4, investor activity was minimal but impactful, securing a property for 99.4% less than the typical homeowner price. Overall, local landlords are consistent net buyers, steadily accumulating properties while institutional investors remain entirely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 398 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.9% share.
Landlord portfolios are overwhelmingly owned outright, with 357 properties held as cash assets versus only 41 being financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 391 of 398 properties (98.2%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords acquired property for just $1,200, a staggering 99.4% discount compared to homeowners.
This pattern of securing deep discounts is consistent, with landlords paying 26.5% less than homeowners in Q3 and 72.7% less in Q2. The extreme Q4 discount of $199,800 ($1,200 vs $201,000) highlights a strategy of purchasing distressed or non-market assets.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 14.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
All landlord purchase activity came from the smallest investors, with 100% of acquisitions made by mom-and-pop (1-10 properties) landlords. This activity resulted in one new single-property landlord entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 85.1% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties own just one property, a mere 0.2% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every small and mid-size portfolio tier in the county.
There is no tier where companies become the majority owner; their highest penetration is 22.2% in the 6-10 property bracket. In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 88.1% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 71744 zip code containing 73% of all investor-owned properties.
Investor ownership rates are significant across the county, with the 71745 zip code reporting a 31.1% ownership rate and 71744 following closely at 30.3%. These high penetration rates indicate that specific neighborhoods are investor hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend has been consistent, with a strong net-buyer position in both 2025 (23 buys vs. 2 sells) and 2024 (21 buys vs. 5 sells). Institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity during these periods.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 10.0% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
The single landlord transaction was by a first-time investor who paid an exceptionally low price of $1,200. There was no inter-landlord trading during the quarter, as this purchase came from a non-landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 398 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 27.4% of the Single-Family Residential market in Calhoun County, AR, with a total of 398 properties under their ownership.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 338 properties, accounting for 84.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to just 62 properties (15.6%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash purchases. An overwhelming 89.7% of investor-owned properties (357) are held as cash assets, while only 10.3% (41) are financed, signaling a market with low leverage and high equity.

The entity count mirrors the property ownership split, with 429 individual landlords making up 90.0% of all investors, compared to just 49 company landlords.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 391 of the 398 properties (98.2%) being rented out, underscoring the high rental focus of investors in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords acquired property for just $1,200, a staggering 99.4% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Calhoun County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties far below typical market rates. In Q4 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was a mere $1,200, representing a 99.4% discount compared to the $201,000 average paid by traditional homeowners.

This massive $199,800 price gap in Q4, while extreme, is part of a larger trend. In Q3, landlords paid 26.5% less ($105,167 vs. $143,125), and in Q2 they secured a 72.7% discount ($49,667 vs. $181,880), indicating a sustained strategy of targeting undervalued assets.

The extremely low purchase price in Q4 suggests the acquisition was likely a distressed property, a land parcel, or an off-market transaction, rather than a typical home sale.

While historical data shows price appreciation for the overall market, landlord acquisition prices fluctuate dramatically, reflecting an opportunistic buying strategy rather than a response to general market trends.

Given the low transaction volume for landlords in any given quarter, these averages highlight a focus on high-value deals rather than high-volume purchasing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 14.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity represented a 14.3% share of the Calhoun County market in Q4, with landlords acquiring 1 of the 7 total SFR properties sold.

The entirety of Q4 landlord buying activity was driven by the smallest investor segment. A single-property landlord made the sole purchase, meaning 100% of acquisitions were by mom-and-pop investors.

The market saw the entry of one new landlord in Q4, who purchased their first investment property and immediately established the Tier 01 (single-property) category as the only active buyer group.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had zero purchasing activity, holding 0.0% of the Q4 acquisition share and underscoring their complete absence from this market.

This low-volume, high-impact purchase highlights a market where individual actions, rather than large-scale acquisitions, shape investor trends.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Calhoun County is defined by small-scale owners, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 96.5% of the investor-owned SFR housing stock.

Market concentration is virtually non-existent at the top. Institutional investors from Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property which accounts for only 0.2% of the total investor portfolio.

The foundation of the rental market is built on the smallest investors. Landlords with just one property (Tier 01) represent the largest group by a wide margin, owning 344 properties, or 85.1% of all investor holdings.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also have a very small presence, collectively owning only 14 properties or 3.7% of the total.

This distribution reveals a hyper-fragmented market, where the dynamics are dictated by hundreds of small, local owners rather than a few large, professionalized entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every small and mid-size portfolio tier in the county.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across all portfolio sizes in Calhoun County, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the market. In the single-property tier, individuals own 304 of the 344 properties (88.1%).

The data shows no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Their presence remains in the minority across all measured tiers, from 9.1% in the two-property tier to a peak of only 22.2% in the 6-10 property tier.

Even as portfolio sizes increase slightly, individual ownership remains robust. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals hold 80.0% of the homes.

This pattern indicates that even landlords who expand their portfolios tend to do so as individuals rather than forming corporate entities, at least within the small-to-mid-size range.

The lack of corporate consolidation is a key feature of the county's investor landscape, suggesting a market driven by personal investment rather than scaled business operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 71744 zip code containing 73% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of real estate investor activity in Calhoun County is concentrated in a single area. The 71744 zip code is home to 290 investor-owned properties, which represents 72.9% of all such properties in the county.

Investor penetration is notably high in key areas, surpassing 30% in two zip codes. The 71745 zip code leads with a 31.1% investor ownership rate, followed by the high-volume 71744 zip code at 30.3%.

The top five zip codes by investor property count are 71744 (290 properties), 71766 (46), 71701 (23), 71745 (23), and 71742 (15), which together account for 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

There is a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and the highest investor ownership rates, indicating deep-rooted and focused investment in specific communities.

This geographic concentration suggests that local knowledge and targeted strategies play a significant role for investors operating within Calhoun County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.5 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Calhoun County are actively growing their portfolios, demonstrating a clear net-buyer status over the last two years. In 2025, landlords purchased 23 properties while selling only 2, a buy-to-sell ratio of 11.5x.

The trend of accumulation was also evident in 2024, when investors bought 21 properties and sold just 5, resulting in a net gain of 16 properties and a 4.2x buy-to-sell ratio.

Transaction volume remained steady year-over-year, with 23 purchases in 2025 and 21 in 2024, signaling a consistent and ongoing strategy of market expansion by local investors.

In stark contrast, institutional-grade investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive. They recorded zero buy or sell transactions in the provided timeframes, indicating they are not a factor in the county's property market dynamics.

This sustained buying pressure from small, local landlords is a primary driver of the increasing investor market share within the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 10.0% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlords were involved in 1 of the 10 total SFR transactions in Calhoun County, capturing a 10.0% share of market activity.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated in the smallest tier. The lone purchase was made by a single-property (Tier 01) landlord, representing 100% of the quarter's investor transactions.

The average purchase price for this transaction was just $1,200, an outlier price that suggests the acquisition of a distressed asset, land, or a deal made outside of typical market channels.

There was no trading between investors this quarter. Data shows that 0% of the landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, indicating the new supply of rental properties came from the owner-occupied market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely dormant, with zero transactions and a $0 average purchase price, reaffirming their absence from the county's transactional market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Calhoun County, Controlling 96.5% of Investor Homes and Driving Market with Net-Buying Spree
Holdings
Landlords own 398 SFR properties, representing a significant 27.4% of Calhoun County's market. The landscape is dominated by individual investors, who hold 338 properties (84.9%) compared to companies owning 62 (15.6%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage, paying an average of just $1,200, which is 99.4% less than the $201,000 paid by traditional homeowners—a staggering discount of $199,800.
Activity
Landlord activity accounted for 14.3% of Q4 sales with the purchase of 1 property. This single transaction created 1 new single-property landlord, as 100% of buying activity came from the smallest mom-and-pop tier.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 96.5% of properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with companies failing to gain a foothold. There is no crossover point; companies' highest share is just 22.2% in the 6-10 property bracket.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 23 properties while selling only 2 in 2025 (an 11.5x ratio). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero buys or sells, showing no signs of accumulation or divestment.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Calhoun County, AR, is fundamentally a grassroots phenomenon, defined by the overwhelming presence of small, local players. Investors own a substantial 27.4% of the county's single-family housing stock, totaling 398 properties. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 84.9% of these homes. The market structure is hyper-fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.5% of the inventory, while institutional capital is virtually nonexistent with a mere 0.2% share.

Investor behavior in the county is characterized by opportunistic acquisition and steady accumulation. In Q4, landlord activity, though minimal at 14.3% of sales, highlighted a strategy of acquiring assets at extreme discounts, paying 99.4% less than a typical homeowner. This suggests a focus on distressed or off-market opportunities. Over the long term, these investors are aggressive net buyers, with an 11.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, consistently expanding their local footprint while large-scale investors remain on the sidelines.

The key takeaway for the Calhoun County housing market is that its investment landscape is driven not by corporate strategy but by the collective actions of hundreds of individual owners. This results in a market with high rental penetration, fueled by cash-heavy purchases and a continuous search for undervalued properties. The dynamics are localized and insulated from the trends of institutional investment, creating a stable, if highly concentrated, rental market shaped by its own community of small-scale landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail