Boone (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Boone (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Boone (AR)
10,381
Total Investors in Boone (AR)
2,457
Investor Owned SFR in Boone (AR)
1,982(19.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,076
SFR Owned
1,514
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
381
SFR Owned
511
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,982 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Boone County with 97.4% Ownership as Institutions Divest
In Boone County, investors own 1,982 Single-Family properties (19.1% of the market), with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 97.4% of that portfolio. In Q4, landlords purchased 15.2% of all homes sold, securing them at a 47.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While smaller investors are aggressively accumulating properties, institutional players are net sellers, signaling a clear strategic divergence in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,982 SFRs in Boone County, with individuals holding 76.4%.
The investor portfolio is heavily cash-based, with 1,341 properties owned outright versus 641 that are financed. An overwhelming 97.3% of these properties (1,929 of 1,982) are rentals, confirming a strong focus on non-owner-occupied investment.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 47.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $116,165 per property.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from landlords paying a 9.9% premium in Q1 to securing a massive 47.1% discount in Q4. This demonstrates inconsistent pricing dynamics and opportunistic buying throughout the year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 15.2% of all homes sold in Q4, dominated by new investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 95.5% of all investor purchases, acquiring 21 of the 22 properties. Institutional investors made zero purchases, showing a complete lack of large-scale acquisition activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 75.9% of all investor-held housing (1,547 properties). In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the portfolio, or 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 82.5% of single-property holdings and 65.3% of two-property portfolios. The strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 61.8% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Harrison's 72601 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,460 properties.
While Harrison has the highest volume, smaller zip codes show extreme investor penetration, with 72630 at 100.0% and 72600 at 85.7% investor-owned. This highlights a dual concentration of both high volume and high density in different parts of the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are actively divesting.
In 2025, landlords bought 224 properties and sold only 54, a buy/sell ratio of over 4-to-1. In contrast, institutional (1000+) investors were net sellers, purchasing just 2 properties while selling 5.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 12.3% of all Q4 transactions, entirely by purchasing.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 96% of landlord transactions (27 of 28). Strikingly, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,982 SFRs in Boone County, with individuals holding 76.4%.
Detailed Findings

In Boone County, investors hold a significant 19.1% of the Single-Family Residential market, totaling 1,982 properties out of 10,381.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,514 properties, which accounts for 76.4% of all investor-owned SFRs, compared to 511 properties (25.8%) held by companies.

The market is composed of 2,457 distinct landlords, with individual entities (2,076) outnumbering company entities (381) by more than five to one, reinforcing the small-investor landscape.

A strong preference for cash acquisitions is evident, with nearly twice as many properties owned free and clear (1,341) as are financed (641). This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,929 of the 1,982 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This 97.3% rental rate highlights a clear and focused strategy on generating rental income rather than speculative flipping.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 47.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $116,165 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a remarkable display of purchasing power, landlords in Q4 2025 acquired properties for an average price of $130,416, a staggering 47.1% less than the $246,581 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $116,165 average discount per property in Q4 marks a dramatic shift in market dynamics within the same year. The price advantage for landlords fluctuated wildly, from paying a $21,144 premium (9.9%) in Q1 to securing a minor $1,634 discount (0.6%) in Q3.

The extreme volatility in the price gap suggests that landlord purchasing in Boone County is highly opportunistic, likely targeting distressed properties or off-market deals that are not available to the general public.

Comparing recent activity to the 2020-2023 period, where the average landlord acquisition price was $152,594, the Q4 average of $130,416 indicates that investors are currently finding deals below pandemic-era pricing levels.

This pricing behavior highlights a sophisticated acquisition strategy, where investors are able to identify and capitalize on undervalued assets, in stark contrast to the retail prices paid by typical homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 15.2% of all homes sold in Q4, dominated by new investors.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 22 of the 145 total SFRs sold, capturing a 15.2% market share of all transactions.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 95.5% of these purchases, demonstrating that market growth is fueled by local, small-scale players.

New entrants are a primary driver of activity, with 20 new single-property entities acquiring 14 homes, which represents 63.6% of all investor purchases in the quarter.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no presence in the Q4 buying market, acquiring zero properties and underscoring their lack of interest or strategic exit from the region.

The data reveals a clear pattern: the investor market in Boone County is expanding from the ground up, with a constant influx of new, small landlords rather than consolidation by large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Boone County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 97.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market's granular nature is highlighted by the single-property tier, which alone accounts for 1,547 properties, or 75.9% of the entire investor portfolio. This indicates that the vast majority of landlords are individuals with a single rental property.

The influence of large-scale investors is statistically insignificant. Institutional landlords in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) own just 2 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning only 2.5% of the portfolio. This further reinforces the market structure, which is built on small portfolios rather than large, consolidated ones.

This distribution challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market, proving that in Boone County, the quintessential 'mom-and-pop' investor is not just a participant but the primary market force.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner once a portfolio exceeds 5 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear strategic transition from individual to corporate ownership emerges as portfolios scale. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies take majority control starting in the 6-10 property tier with a 61.8% ownership share.

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 1,299 of the single-property rentals (82.5%) and 109 of the two-property rentals (65.3%), indicating that most investors begin their journey personally.

The crossover point from individual to company majority happens precisely between the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers. Individuals still hold a 57.6% majority in the 3-5 property tier, but this flips to a company-led 61.8% in the next tier up.

This pattern suggests that a portfolio of around six properties is the threshold where investors in Boone County see the benefits of incorporation—for liability, financing, or tax purposes—outweighing the simplicity of personal ownership.

Even in larger tiers, individuals remain present. For instance, in the 11-20 property tier, which is 87.0% company-owned, individuals still hold 13.0% of the properties, showing that personal ownership can persist even at a larger scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Harrison's 72601 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,460 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Boone County is heavily concentrated in the 72601 zip code (Harrison), which contains 1,460 investor-owned SFRs, representing 17.3% of its housing stock.

A key finding is the distinction between areas with high investor volume versus those with high investor penetration rates. While Harrison (72601) is the volume leader, it is not the rate leader.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit near-total investor saturation. Zip code 72630 is 100.0% investor-owned, and 72600 has an 85.7% investor ownership rate, suggesting these may be niche markets for vacation rentals or have unique housing characteristics.

Other areas of notable investor concentration include the 72644 zip code, with 261 investor properties making up 31.6% of its market, and the 72662 zip code, with 96 properties at a 17.1% rate.

This geographic analysis reveals that investor strategy is not uniform across the county; it's a mix of large-scale presence in the central hub of Harrison and hyper-focused saturation in smaller, peripheral zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, while institutional investors are actively divesting.
Detailed Findings

A sharp divergence in strategy exists between the overall landlord market and institutional players. Landlords in Boone County are overwhelmingly net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell.

In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 28 properties while selling only 14, a 2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio that signals strong accumulation. This trend is even more pronounced for the full year, with 224 buys versus 54 sells, a ratio of 4.15 to 1.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are in a divestment phase. In 2025, they sold more than twice as many properties as they bought (5 sells vs. 2 buys), making them net sellers.

This trend of institutional retreat is not new, as they were also net sellers in 2024 with 2 sells versus only 1 buy. This indicates a consistent, multi-year strategy of reducing their footprint in the county.

This dynamic paints a clear picture: the growth in investor ownership is being fueled by small, local landlords who are actively accumulating, while the largest national players are strategically exiting the market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 12.3% of all Q4 transactions, entirely by purchasing.
Detailed Findings

During Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 28 of the 227 total SFR transactions in Boone County, accounting for a 12.3% share of market activity.

The activity was one-sided, consisting entirely of acquisitions. An analysis of transaction sources reveals that 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, meaning investors exclusively acquired property from non-investors, likely traditional homeowners.

New, single-property investors were the most active, conducting 20 transactions and paying the highest average price of any tier at $135,089. This suggests new entrants may be paying a premium for move-in ready properties.

Small landlords in the 6-10 property tier demonstrated the most aggressive deal-finding, paying an average of just $76,910, significantly below all other tiers and indicating a focus on value-add or distressed assets.

The complete absence of institutional transactions in Q4, combined with zero inter-landlord trading, portrays a market where small investors are expanding their portfolios by buying from the general public, not by trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.4% of Boone County's investor market while institutional players are net sellers.
Holdings
In Boone County, landlords own 1,982 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 19.1% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 1,514 properties (76.4%), while companies own the remaining 511 (25.8%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing advantages in Q4, paying an average of 47.1% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to a staggering discount of $116,165 per property ($130,416 for landlords vs. $246,581 for homeowners).
Activity
Investors accounted for 15.2% of all SFR purchases in Q4, with 20 new single-property landlords entering the market. Activity was driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, who made up 95.5% of landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
The investor market share is almost completely controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 97.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear professionalization occurs as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier (61.8% share).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 4.15 properties for every one they sold in 2025 (224 buys vs. 54 sells). Conversely, institutional investors are net sellers, disposing of more properties than they acquired (2 buys vs. 5 sells), signaling a strategic retreat.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Boone County, Arkansas, is fundamentally a story of the local investor. Landlords own a substantial 1,982 properties, or 19.1% of the county's SFR housing stock. This market is not driven by Wall Street, but by individuals, who own 76.4% of these investment properties. The ownership structure is highly granular; 'mom-and-pop' investors with 1-10 properties control a commanding 97.4% of the portfolio, while large institutional firms own a mere 0.1%.

Investor behavior underscores this dynamic. In Q4 2025, landlords comprised 15.2% of all homebuyers, with new single-property investors leading the charge. These investors display shrewd purchasing tactics, securing properties at a remarkable 47.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The transaction data reveals a clear divergence in strategy: smaller landlords are aggressive accumulators, buying over four properties for every one they sold in 2025, while the few institutional players in the market are actively divesting their holdings.

The key takeaway for the Boone County housing market is its stability and grounding in local ownership. The growth is organic, fueled by new entrants and small-scale investors expanding their portfolios by purchasing from the homeowner market, not through corporate consolidation. This structure suggests a rental market that is more insulated from the volatile strategies of large-scale institutional capital and is instead shaped by the long-term, community-based objectives of thousands of individual owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 10, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBoone (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail