Sublette (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sublette (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sublette (WY)
3,342
Total Investors in Sublette (WY)
3,681
Investor Owned SFR in Sublette (WY)
2,513(75.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,454
SFR Owned
2,313
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
227
SFR Owned
259
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,513 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 75.2% of Sublette County SFR Market as Robust Net Buyers
Landlords in Sublette County own 2,513 SFR properties, representing 75.2% of the market, with individual investors holding a dominant 92.0%. These mom-and-pop landlords are strong net buyers, capturing 80.0% of Q4 purchases and often securing significant discounts against homeowner prices, even amid volatile quarterly pricing.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 92.0% of Sublette County's 2,513 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Nearly all investor-owned properties (2,512 of 2,513) are rented, indicating a highly rental-focused market. Cash purchases significantly outweigh financed properties, comprising 1,720 vs 793, respectively.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured a $302,063 (37.7%) Discount vs. Homeowners in Q4 Comparative Prices
The comparative price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile in 2025, swinging from a 45.1% premium in Q2 to a 37.7% discount in Q4. Overall 2025 comparative landlord prices averaged $480,508, a 42.3% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $337,480.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 80.0% of All SFR Purchases in Q4, Dominated by Mom-and-Pops
All 40 landlord purchases in Q4 were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), with single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing 90.0% of these. The Q4 market saw 52 new entities entering the single-property landlord tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.8% of Sublette County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominate, owning 87.5% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no ownership presence in the county, emphasizing a market exclusively for smaller investors. Tier-specific pricing data is not available for this section.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest tiers, holding 92.0% of single-property and 87.8% of two-property portfolios. Companies lead in the 6-10 property tier with 54.2% ownership. No institutional company data is provided for comparison across larger tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor-Owned Properties Highly Concentrated in Sublette County's 82941 Zip Code, Totaling 1,583
Zip code 82923 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 82.9%, closely followed by 82922 at 79.9%. The top five zip codes by count collectively represent 89.2% of the county's total investor-owned SFR properties, demonstrating significant geographic concentration.
Historical Transactions
Sublette County Landlords Are Aggressive Net Buyers with a 9.68x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025; Institutions Absent
Landlord buy activity increased 38.3% year-over-year from 133 purchases in 2024 to 184 in 2025, demonstrating sustained market expansion. There is no recorded transaction activity from institutional investors in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Drove 75.0% of Q4 Transactions, With All Activity by Mom-and-Pop Investors
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led activity with 52 transactions at an average price of $502,697. Inter-landlord trades comprised 50.0% of Tier 03-05 transactions, significantly higher than Tier 01's 11.5%.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 92.0% of Sublette County's 2,513 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Investors control a substantial 75.2% of the SFR market in Sublette County, owning 2,513 out of 3,342 total SFR properties, establishing it as a highly landlord-centric market.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the ownership landscape, holding 2,313 properties (92.0% of investor-owned SFR) compared to companies with 259 properties (10.3%). This highlights the strong presence of mom-and-pop investors.

The landlord entity count further reinforces individual dominance, with 3,454 individual landlords representing 93.8% of the total 3,681 landlords in the county.

The market is highly rental-focused, with 2,512 of the 2,513 investor-owned SFR properties (99.96%) identified as rented, underscoring the primary purpose of these holdings.

A significant preference for cash acquisitions is evident, with 1,720 properties held outright compared to 793 properties that are financed, suggesting a strategy to reduce leverage or capitalize on opportunistic pricing.

The proportion of company-owned properties (10.3%) is higher than their share of landlord entities (6.2%), indicating that on average, company portfolios are larger than those of individual landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured a $302,063 (37.7%) Discount vs. Homeowners in Q4 Comparative Prices
Detailed Findings

In 2025-Q4, comparative landlord acquisition prices averaged $500,193, securing a substantial 37.7% discount, or $302,063 per property, compared to traditional homeowners who paid $802,256.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners in Sublette County has been inconsistent throughout 2025; landlords paid a 45.1% premium in Q2 ($402,145 vs $277,083) but a 2.2% discount in Q1 and Q4, and a 2.2% premium in Q3, suggesting a highly volatile market or opportunistic buying.

Longer-term pricing trends reveal significant appreciation: the average comparative landlord acquisition price for 2025 stood at $480,508, a 42.3% increase compared to the 2020-2023 average of $337,480.

While the data indicates 0 properties were recorded as 'landlord acquisitions' in section 6-1 for 2025, the comparative prices provided in section 6-2 still reflect broader market dynamics where landlords are either achieving significant savings or paying premiums depending on market conditions.

The year 2025 average comparative price of $480,508 significantly outpaced 2024's $412,240, indicating continued upward pressure on prices for investor acquisitions in the region.

The extreme quarterly fluctuations in the landlord-homeowner price differential, ranging from a $125,062 landlord premium in Q2 to a $302,063 discount in Q4, highlight the localized and opportunistic nature of the Sublette County market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 80.0% of All SFR Purchases in Q4, Dominated by Mom-and-Pops
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in the Q4 2025 market, accounting for 40 of 50 total SFR purchases, representing an impressive 80.0% market share.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all landlord buying activity in Q4, purchasing 40 properties and demonstrating a complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) involvement.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove the majority of this activity, acquiring 36 properties, which represents 90.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4.

The market saw a significant influx of new or expanding small investors, with 52 entities active in the single-property landlord tier during Q4, collectively purchasing 36 properties.

Average properties per entity varied, with Tier 01 entities purchasing 0.69 properties on average (36 properties by 52 entities), while Tier 03-05 entities showed a higher buying intensity at 1.0 property per entity (2 properties by 2 entities).

The overwhelming concentration of Q4 purchase activity in Tier 01 underscores the foundational role of first-time or single-property investors in the Sublette County SFR market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.8% of Sublette County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) maintain an overwhelming control of 99.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Sublette County, totaling 2,574 properties, effectively defining the market structure.

The market is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) owning 2,258 properties, representing 87.5% of the total investor-owned portfolio.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no ownership presence in Sublette County, with 0.0% of investor-owned properties, contrary to broader national narratives of institutional dominance.

Even within the mom-and-pop segment, the concentration is extreme, with tiers 05-08 collectively holding only 6 properties, highlighting a minimal presence of mid-size landlords.

The distribution reveals a profoundly fragmented market where the vast majority of rental housing is managed by local, small-scale operators.

The lack of data regarding acquisition prices by tier within this section prevents an analysis of whether larger or smaller investors pay different average prices for their holdings over time.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, holding 2,122 properties (92.0%) in the single-property (Tier 01) category and 158 properties (87.8%) in the two-property (Tier 02) category.

A clear crossover point occurs within the mom-and-pop segment: individual investors still hold a 75.6% majority (68 properties) in the 3-5 property tier, but companies become the majority in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), owning 54.2% (26 properties).

This shift signifies that as portfolios grow from small to small-medium size, corporate structures increasingly become the preferred ownership vehicle in Sublette County.

The relative shares demonstrate that while individuals are the backbone of the overall market, companies strategically scale within the larger mom-and-pop categories.

The absence of data for larger tiers (05-09) and specific pricing by owner type prevents a comprehensive analysis of individual versus company strategies and growth patterns beyond Tier 04.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor-Owned Properties Highly Concentrated in Sublette County's 82941 Zip Code, Totaling 1,583
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes within Sublette County, with WY-Sublette-82941 alone accounting for 1,583 properties, which is 62.9% of the county’s total investor-owned SFR.

The top three zip codes by investor property count—82941, 83113, and 82923—collectively hold 2,242 investor-owned properties, comprising a significant 89.2% of the total investor-owned SFR in Sublette County.

Beyond sheer volume, investor ownership rates are remarkably high across key areas; WY-Sublette-82923 leads with 82.9% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, and WY-Sublette-82922 follows with 79.9%.

A strong correlation exists between high property counts and high ownership percentages, indicating that major population centers or areas with more housing stock are also more investor-dominated within Sublette County.

The lowest investor ownership rate among the top five by percentage is still substantial at 56.4% (WY-Sublette-82925), reinforcing the county’s overall status as a predominantly landlord-centric market.

The data does not include acquisition prices or entity counts at the sub-geography level, limiting insights into pricing variations or landlord density across these highly concentrated regions.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Sublette County Landlords Are Aggressive Net Buyers with a 9.68x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025; Institutions Absent
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sublette County are strong net buyers, accumulating properties with a remarkable 2025 year-to-date buy/sell ratio of 9.68x (184 properties bought vs 19 sold), signaling robust market confidence.

Q4 2025 continued this trend, with landlords buying 57 properties and selling only 6, resulting in a net acquisition of 51 properties and an exceptionally high quarterly buy/sell ratio of 9.50x.

Overall landlord buy activity has accelerated significantly, increasing by 38.3% from 133 purchases in 2024 to 184 purchases in 2025, indicating a growing landlord presence.

The consistent net buying behavior across all reported quarters in 2025 (Q2: 34 net, Q3: 52 net, Q4: 51 net) underscores a sustained strategy of property accumulation by landlords.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no recorded buy or sell transactions in Sublette County for any timeframe, reinforcing the market's complete reliance on smaller, local investors.

The absence of data on inter-landlord transactions and average buy/sell prices prevents a deeper analysis of market liquidity, transaction profitability, or the flow of properties between investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Drove 75.0% of Q4 Transactions, With All Activity by Mom-and-Pop Investors
Detailed Findings

Landlords dominated the Q4 2025 transaction landscape in Sublette County, participating in 57 out of 76 total SFR transactions, representing a substantial 75.0% market share.

All landlord transaction activity in Q4 was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), who collectively completed 57 transactions, indicating no institutional involvement in recent market movements.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, executing 52 transactions at an average purchase price of $502,697, reflecting their foundational role in the market.

Inter-landlord trading varied considerably by tier: 50.0% of transactions by small landlords (Tier 03-05) were sourced from other landlords, contrasting with just 11.5% for single-property landlords (Tier 01).

Average purchase prices in Q4 showed a notable spread, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) paying the highest average at $598,500, while small landlords (Tier 03-05) paid the lowest at $319,286.

The higher average purchase price for single-property landlords compared to Tier 03-05 suggests that newer or smaller-scale investors might be acquiring properties at a premium or targeting different market segments in Q4.

The complete absence of institutional transactions in Q4 further solidifies the view of Sublette County as a market fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Sublette County SFR Market Heavily Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Who Are Active Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords in Sublette County own 2,513 SFR properties, representing 75.2% of the market. Individual investors hold a commanding 2,313 properties (92.0%) of this portfolio, with company ownership at 259 properties (10.3%).
Pricing
Landlords secured an average $302,063 discount in Q4 comparative pricing, paying $500,193 versus homeowners at $802,256, a 37.7% reduction. However, quarterly price gaps have been highly volatile, swinging from premiums to discounts.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 80.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 (40 properties), with 52 new entities entering the single-property landlord tier. All Q4 landlord activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of investor-owned SFR housing, with single-property owners alone holding 87.5%. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no market share in Sublette County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios (92.0% in Tier 01), but companies achieve majority control in portfolios of 6-10 properties (54.2%), indicating a shift towards corporate structures for slightly larger holdings.
Transactions
All landlords are robust net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 9.68x (184 buys vs 19 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no transaction activity, reinforcing their complete absence from this market.
Market Narrative

The Sublette County SFR market is profoundly shaped by landlord activity, with investors owning 2,513 properties, which constitutes a substantial 75.2% of the total SFR stock. This ownership is almost entirely held by mom-and-pop investors, who command 99.8% of the market, driven by individual landlords who own 92.0% of all investor-held properties. Contrary to national narratives, institutional investors are entirely absent from the ownership landscape in Sublette County, solidifying its identity as a locally-driven, small-investor market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights aggressive acquisition, with landlords responsible for 80.0% of all SFR purchases (40 properties). These landlords, predominantly single-property owners, often secure advantageous pricing, as evidenced by a significant 37.7% discount compared to homeowner acquisition prices in Q4, though comparative price gaps have fluctuated dramatically throughout the year. Overall, landlords remain strong net buyers, demonstrating a 9.68x buy/sell ratio in 2025, signaling continued confidence and growth within the market.

This market structure points to a highly localized and accessible investment environment, predominantly serving as a rental market given that 99.96% of investor-owned properties are rented. The sustained accumulation by small, independent landlords and the complete lack of institutional presence underscore a unique market dynamic where local individuals are the primary drivers of real estate investment and the rental housing supply in Sublette County, Wyoming.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:05 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySublette (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional