Park (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Park (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Park (WY)
10,432
Total Investors in Park (WY)
3,550
Investor Owned SFR in Park (WY)
2,691(25.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,930
SFR Owned
2,012
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
620
SFR Owned
759
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,691 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Park County SFR market, aggressively buying at a discount.
Landlords own 2,691 SFR properties (25.8% of Park County's market), with individuals holding 74.8% and mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.3%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 32.1% of sales, securing a 9.2% discount, and are strong net buyers with a 15.5x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,691 SFR properties in Park County, with 74.8% held by individuals.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 2,655 (98.7%), are focused on rental income. The portfolio is primarily cash-financed, with 1,775 (65.9%) properties bought with cash, compared to 916 (34.0%) financed properties. Individual landlords outnumber companies by nearly 5 to 1, with 2,930 individual entities versus 620 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords achieved a 9.2% discount in Q4 2025, paying $462,938 compared to homeowners' $509,804.
The price gap against homeowners showed extreme volatility in 2025, swinging from a 40.8% premium in Q3 to a 27.1% discount in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have steadily risen, appreciating by 18.2% from $391,804 in the 2020-2023 period to $462,938 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 32.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 44 properties in Park County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 activity, making 95.5% (42 properties) of all landlord purchases, vastly outperforming institutional investors who bought just 2 properties (4.5%). The single-property tier (Tier 01) saw 52 entities engage in purchases, driving 79.5% of landlord acquisitions with 35 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFR in Park County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 78.2% of the total investor-owned portfolio, holding 2,152 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) own a minimal 0.1% of the market, representing only 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in Park County for portfolios above 5 properties, dominating Tier 6-10 with 78.9% ownership.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, holding 78.7% of single-property (Tier 01) and 62.7% of two-property (Tier 02) landlord-owned SFR. In contrast, even within the smaller landlord segments, company ownership dramatically increases from 21.3% in Tier 01 to 78.9% in Tier 06-10.
Geographic Distribution
WY-Park-82414 and WY-Park-82435 dominate investor activity, collectively holding 2,439 properties.
These two leading zip codes represent 90.6% of all investor-owned SFR in Park County. While they show moderate investor ownership rates (27.6% and 18.6% respectively), other smaller zip codes like WY-Park-82423 and WY-Park-82450 exhibit 100.0% investor ownership rates.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Park County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 15.5x.
Landlord buying activity significantly outpaced selling throughout 2025, culminating in 209 buys against only 16 sells for the year, a 13.06x buy/sell ratio. The buy/sell ratio has varied, from a high of 21.5x in Q2 to 7.0x in Q3, demonstrating consistent accumulation of properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of Q4 transactions in Park County, completing 62 transactions.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 transaction activity with 52 transactions (83.9% of landlord transactions) at an average purchase price of $462,938. Only Tier 01 and Tier 03-05 recorded inter-landlord purchases, with 33.3% of Tier 03-05 transactions originating from other landlords. Institutional investors participated in only 2 transactions with no reported average purchase price.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,691 SFR properties in Park County, with 74.8% held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Park County collectively own 2,691 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a substantial 25.8% of the total SFR market within the county.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 2,012 properties (74.8% of the total investor portfolio), compared to companies owning 759 properties (28.2%). This trend is further solidified by entity counts, with 2,930 individual landlords versus just 620 company landlords, indicating a strong mom-and-pop foundation.

The investor-owned portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,655 properties (98.7% of landlord-owned SFR) identified as rented, underscoring the focus on generating consistent cash flow.

A significant majority of landlord acquisitions are cash-based; 1,775 properties (65.9% of the investor-owned portfolio) were acquired with cash, while 916 properties (34.0%) were financed. This suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or a strong capital base among investors.

The high percentage of rented and cash-owned properties indicates a stable, income-focused portfolio strategy that may offer resilience against interest rate fluctuations or market downturns in Park County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords achieved a 9.2% discount in Q4 2025, paying $462,938 compared to homeowners' $509,804.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Park County successfully secured a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of $462,938 for SFR properties. This represents a substantial 9.2% discount, or $46,866 less, than the average price of $509,804 paid by traditional homeowners.

The landlord-homeowner price gap exhibited considerable volatility throughout 2025, swinging from a 22.1% premium ($89,019) in Q1 to a 27.1% discount ($121,078) in Q2, then a dramatic 40.8% premium ($182,342) in Q3, before settling at the 9.2% discount in Q4.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, landlord acquisition prices have shown a clear upward trend. Average prices rose from $391,804 during the 2020-2023 pandemic boom period to $443,389 in 2024 (a 13.2% increase), and further to $486,685 for the full year 2025 (a 9.8% increase from 2024).

Comparing Q4 2025 prices to the pandemic era, landlords are now paying $462,938, marking an 18.2% appreciation in acquisition costs from the $391,804 average seen in 2020-2023.

The ability of landlords to secure discounts suggests a strategic advantage or more stringent acquisition criteria in the current market, contrasting with periods where they paid premiums.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 32.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 44 properties in Park County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market in Park County, conducting 44 purchases, which constituted 32.1% of the total 137 SFR properties sold during the quarter.

The vast majority of landlord purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who together acquired 42 properties, representing an overwhelming 95.5% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This highlights their continued market influence over larger players.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, responsible for 35 of the 44 landlord purchases (79.5%) in Q4. This surge in activity from the smallest investor segment indicates a robust entry point for new or expanding individual landlords.

The number of entities participating in the single-property tier stood at 52, suggesting a broad base of new or aspiring small landlords entering the market, further reinforcing the mom-and-pop trend.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made a minimal impact in Q4, acquiring only 2 properties (4.5%) through a single entity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFR in Park County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Park County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control an astounding 99.3% of all investor-owned properties. This signifies a highly decentralized ownership structure.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding 2,152 properties and representing 78.2% of the total investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the significant role of first-time or casual investors.

Small landlords in Tiers 02-04 further solidify this pattern, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) owning 9.4% (259 properties), and landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03-05) controlling 9.6% (264 properties). Even those with 6-10 properties (Tier 06-10) account for 2.1% (57 properties).

In stark contrast to the small landlord prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Park County, owning only 2 properties, which represents a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned portfolio.

The market composition suggests that the SFR rental supply in Park County is almost entirely in the hands of small, localized investors, defying narratives of institutional market takeover.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in Park County for portfolios above 5 properties, dominating Tier 6-10 with 78.9% ownership.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owner type for smaller landlord portfolios in Park County, holding 78.7% of single-property (Tier 01) and 62.7% of two-property (Tier 02) SFR. This pattern reflects individual entry into the rental market.

A notable crossover point occurs as portfolio size increases: while individuals still maintain a majority in the 3-5 property tier (52.8%), company ownership significantly ramps up, accounting for 47.2% of holdings in this segment.

Companies decisively take majority control in the 6-10 property tier, where they own 78.9% of the properties, demonstrating a clear shift in ownership strategy for landlords managing larger portfolios.

The lowest individual concentration is observed in the 6-10 property tier (21.1%), highlighting that individual investors are less likely to manage properties in this size range without incorporating a company entity.

This distribution indicates that while individual efforts fuel the entry-level landlord market, professionalizing and scaling up portfolios in Park County often involves transitioning to corporate ownership structures.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
WY-Park-82414 and WY-Park-82435 dominate investor activity, collectively holding 2,439 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Park County are heavily concentrated in just a few zip codes, with WY-Park-82414 leading significantly with 1,732 properties and WY-Park-82435 following with 707 properties.

These two top zip codes alone account for 2,439 investor-owned SFR properties, representing an overwhelming 90.6% of the entire landlord-owned portfolio in Park County, showcasing extreme geographic concentration.

While WY-Park-82414 and WY-Park-82435 have the highest counts, their investor ownership rates are 27.6% and 18.6% respectively, suggesting they are larger SFR markets with substantial, but not absolute, investor penetration.

In contrast, smaller zip codes like WY-Park-82423 and WY-Park-82450 demonstrate 100.0% investor ownership, indicating these are highly specialized or niche markets where all SFR properties are held by investors.

WY-Park-82433 and WY-Park-82440 represent a blend of high counts and high rates, with 201 properties at 70.0% investor ownership and 29 properties at 87.9% investor ownership respectively, making them intensely attractive sub-markets for investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers in Park County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 15.5x.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Park County consistently exhibit robust net buying behavior, indicating an active expansion of their SFR portfolios across all measured timeframes.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated aggressive accumulation, purchasing 62 properties while selling only 4, resulting in an exceptionally high buy/sell ratio of 15.5x.

This strong net buying trend was sustained throughout 2025, with quarterly buy/sell ratios ranging from a peak of 21.5x in Q2 (43 buys vs. 2 sells) to 7.0x in Q3 (63 buys vs. 9 sells), reinforcing sustained investor confidence.

On an annual basis, landlords escalated their acquisition efforts from 155 properties bought in 2024 to 209 in 2025, while concurrently reducing their selling activity from 20 properties in 2024 to 16 in 2025.

The cumulative net position for 2025 shows landlords were net buyers of 193 properties (209 purchases against 16 sales), a significant increase from 135 net properties in 2024, signaling a growth-oriented market for investor acquisitions. Institutional transaction data for this geography is not available in the provided summary.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.6% of Q4 transactions in Park County, completing 62 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in Park County's Q4 2025 housing market, participating in 62 transactions, which represented 28.6% of the total 217 SFR transactions.

Transaction volume among landlords was heavily concentrated among single-property owners (Tier 01), who accounted for 52 transactions, or 83.9% of all landlord transactions. This reinforces their dominant purchasing activity noted in Section 7.

The average purchase price for single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4 was $462,938, providing a specific benchmark for the most active investor segment. Price data for other tiers in Q4 was not available in the provided summary.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied across tiers; the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03-05) showed the highest percentage of internal market transactions, with 1 out of 3 transactions (33.3%) originating from another landlord.

In contrast, single-property landlords (Tier 01) sourced a smaller proportion of their purchases from other landlords, at 5.8% (3 out of 52 transactions). Institutional investors (Tier 09) were involved in only 2 transactions, with no reported inter-landlord purchases or specific average prices for the quarter.

The mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04) collectively drove 60 of the 62 landlord transactions, emphasizing their overwhelming presence in Q4's market dynamics for both acquisitions and sales.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Park County's SFR market is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords' active growth.
Holdings
Landlords in Park County own 2,691 SFR properties, representing 25.8% of the total market. Individual investors hold the dominant share at 2,012 properties (74.8%), compared to companies owning 759 properties (28.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $462,938 in Q4 2025, securing a 9.2% discount ($46,866) compared to the average homeowner price of $509,804.
Activity
Landlords acquired 44 properties in Q4 2025, comprising 32.1% of all SFR purchases. This activity was led by 52 new single-property landlord entities, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 95.5% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFR housing in Park County, while institutional investors (1000+) own a marginal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the majority of portfolios up to 5 properties, but companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 78.9% of that tier.
Transactions
Overall, landlords in Park County are strong net buyers with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 15.5x (62 buys vs 4 sells), and a year-to-date 2025 ratio of 13.06x. Institutional investor transaction activity data is not available in the provided summary.
Market Narrative

The Single Family Residential (SFR) market in Park County, Wyoming, is predominantly shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords collectively own 2,691 SFR properties, constituting a significant 25.8% of the market. This substantial portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 74.8% of properties and outnumber company entities by nearly five to one. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties, command an astounding 99.3% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property landlords forming the bedrock, owning 78.2% of the market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights a market geared towards growth and strategic acquisitions. Landlords captured 32.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 44 properties while consistently securing a notable pricing advantage, paying 9.2% less than traditional homeowners. This quarter saw a robust entry of 52 new single-property landlord entities, reinforcing the mom-and-pop segment's role as the primary driver of market activity. Furthermore, landlords are strong net buyers, with a Q4 buy-to-sell ratio of 15.5x, demonstrating a consistent appetite for expanding their holdings across Park County.

The data unequivocally portrays Park County as a mom-and-pop investor market, characterized by widespread individual ownership, active property accumulation at competitive prices, and a strong focus on rental income. The minimal presence of institutional investors, owning only 0.1% of the market, signals that local, small-scale investors are the key players influencing housing supply and demand dynamics, indicating a decentralized and resilient rental market structure in Park County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:01 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPark (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions