Winnebago (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Winnebago (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Winnebago (WI)
47,127
Total Investors in Winnebago (WI)
3,230
Investor Owned SFR in Winnebago (WI)
3,016(6.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,578
SFR Owned
1,944
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
652
SFR Owned
1,107
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,016 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Winnebago County's Rental Market with 89% Ownership, Securing Deep Discounts
Investors own 6.4% of Single-Family Residential properties in Winnebago County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 89.4% of that portfolio versus a negligible 0.4% for institutional investors. In Q4 2025, landlords were net buyers, acquiring properties at a significant 38.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners, reinforcing the market's reliance on small, local capital.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,016 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 64.5% majority share.
Within the investor portfolio, cash-owned properties (1,799) outnumber financed ones (1,217). The vast majority of these holdings, 2,823 properties, are utilized as rentals, indicating a strong investment focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 38.2% discount in Q4, paying $120,233 less than homeowners on average.
The landlord purchasing advantage has been highly volatile, swinging from a 6.4% premium in Q1 2025 to a 45.1% discount in Q3 before settling at 38.2% in Q4. This suggests a market where deal-finding ability varies greatly by quarter and transaction type.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 8.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, a total of 44 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the driving force, accounting for 42 of the 44 purchases (93.3%). Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting their absence from the local market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords own 89.4% of investor SFRs, showcasing a highly fragmented market.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, alone controlling 2,040 properties (66.6%). Institutional investors have a minimal presence, owning just 12 properties, or 0.4% of the investor-held housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The transition to corporate ownership occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where companies hold a 53.2% majority.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 81.2% of single-property rentals, corporate structures become standard for scaling. Companies own 81.9% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier and 89.4% in the 11-20 unit tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 54901 zip code, with 1,003 properties at a 12.7% rate.
The top three zip codes by property count—54901, 54956, and 54902—contain 2,491 properties, representing a staggering 82.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. Zip code 54927 has the second-highest penetration rate at 9.8%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring over two properties for every one sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with 225 properties purchased versus 97 sold for the full year of 2025. In contrast, institutional investors were effectively dormant, with only one purchase and one sale all year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 7.3% of all market transactions in Q4, totaling 55 purchases.
New single-property landlords were the most active, completing 33 transactions at an average price of $201,065. In contrast, more experienced landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid significantly less at $147,913, suggesting a more value-oriented acquisition strategy.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,016 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 64.5% majority share.
Detailed Findings

In Winnebago County, investors own 3,016 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 6.4% of the total 47,127 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is dominated by 2,578 individual landlords who control 1,944 properties (64.5%), compared to 652 company investors holding 1,107 properties (36.7%). This highlights a market driven by small-scale, personal investment rather than large corporate entities.

Financial analysis of the portfolio reveals a preference for liquidity, with 1,799 properties owned outright in cash, surpassing the 1,217 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,823 properties classified as rented. This accounts for over 93% of all investor-owned homes, underscoring their primary function as investment assets rather than secondary homes.

The data clearly illustrates a market characterized by a large base of individual investors, a conservative financial approach favoring cash, and a focused strategy on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 38.2% discount in Q4, paying $120,233 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage, acquiring properties at an average price of $194,387 compared to the $314,620 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial 38.2% discount, or $120,233 per property.

This pricing gap has shown extreme volatility throughout the year. The Q4 discount followed a massive 45.1% discount in Q3 ($180,903 vs. $329,235) and a 12.6% discount in Q2.

Strikingly, the trend was reversed in Q1 2025, when landlords paid a 6.4% premium over homeowners ($341,989 vs. $321,345), indicating that landlord purchasing strategy and market opportunities can shift dramatically from quarter to quarter.

Despite the zero reported transaction volume for recent periods in the source data, the price points indicate a market where landlords can find deep value, likely by targeting off-market or distressed assets unavailable to typical homebuyers.

Over a longer horizon, average acquisition prices have appreciated from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $236,079, reflecting broader market trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 8.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, a total of 44 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity constituted 8.8% of the total market in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 44 of the 501 SFR properties sold.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) purchased 42 properties, representing 93.3% of all investor buying activity.

A significant influx of new investors was observed, with 32 new single-property entities entering the market. This group alone purchased 26 properties, accounting for 57.8% of all landlord acquisitions in the quarter.

Mid-size investors (11-20 properties) also participated, acquiring 3 properties, but their activity was minimal compared to the smaller tiers.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties made no purchases in Q4, underscoring a market dynamic dominated by local, small-scale capital rather than large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords own 89.4% of investor SFRs, showcasing a highly fragmented market.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Winnebago County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 89.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

Market ownership is extremely fragmented, with the single-property tier alone accounting for two-thirds (66.6%) of the entire investor portfolio, totaling 2,040 properties.

The data decisively refutes any narrative of large-scale corporate control. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, with a portfolio of only 12 properties, representing just 0.4% of the market.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also play a minor role, collectively holding only 10.2% of investor-owned homes. This indicates a lack of consolidation in the middle of the market.

The ownership structure clearly shows that the local rental market is supported by a large number of small, independent investors rather than a few dominant players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The transition to corporate ownership occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where companies hold a 53.2% majority.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios scale. Individuals are the primary owners in the smallest tiers, holding 81.2% of single-property portfolios and 54.3% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic crossover point from individual to company ownership occurs in the 3-5 property tier. At this level, companies take a slight majority, controlling 174 properties (53.2%) versus 153 held by individuals.

This trend accelerates in larger tiers, signaling that incorporating becomes standard practice for growth. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own a commanding 81.9% of properties.

For investors with 11-20 properties, corporate ownership is nearly universal, accounting for 89.4% of the properties in that segment.

This transition highlights a common investor lifecycle: starting as an individual and formalizing into a business entity to manage the increased complexity, liability, and financial needs of a growing portfolio.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 54901 zip code, with 1,003 properties at a 12.7% rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Winnebago County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by investor-owned property count (54901, 54956, and 54902) contain a combined 2,491 properties, which is 82.6% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

The 54901 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, leading in both absolute count with 1,003 properties and ownership penetration with a 12.7% rate—double the county average of 6.4%.

While some areas lead in both count and rate, others show different patterns. For instance, the 54927 zip code has the second-highest investor ownership rate at 9.8% but is not in the top five by count, suggesting it's a smaller market with high rental density.

Conversely, the 54952 zip code ranks fourth by count with 226 properties but has a low ownership rate of 3.7%, indicating a larger area with less investor focus.

This geographic clustering reveals specific neighborhoods targeted by investors, likely due to factors like housing stock, affordability, and proximity to local amenities or employment centers.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring over two properties for every one sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Winnebago County are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as net buyers across all recent timeframes. In Q4 2025, they purchased 55 properties while selling only 24, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.29x.

This pattern of net accumulation held throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 225 properties and disposed of 97, resulting in a net gain of 128 properties for the rental market.

However, the pace of acquisitions has moderated. The 225 purchases in 2025 represent a decrease from the 356 properties bought in 2024, signaling a potential cooling in buying velocity.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) demonstrated no strategic accumulation or divestment, with their activity limited to a single purchase and a single sale for the entire year of 2025.

The data paints a clear picture of a market where small and mid-size investors are the primary drivers of portfolio growth, steadily increasing the county's supply of rental housing.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 7.3% of all market transactions in Q4, totaling 55 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 7.3% of the 756 total SFR transactions in Winnebago County, executing 55 purchases.

Transaction activity was heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 51 of the 55 total transactions, while institutional investors recorded zero.

A notable pricing difference emerged between investor tiers. First-time landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group with 33 transactions and paid an average of $201,065 per property.

Meanwhile, more established small landlords (Tier 03, 3-5 properties) acquired 8 properties at a much lower average price of $147,913. This $53,152 price gap suggests that more experienced small investors may be more effective at sourcing deals or target different asset types.

Inter-landlord trading provided a portion of the inventory, with 12.1% of properties purchased by new landlords being acquired from existing investors, indicating a degree of liquidity within the rental market itself.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 89.4% of Winnebago Rentals, Acquiring Properties at 38% Below Market Rate
Holdings
In Winnebago County, investors own 3,016 Single-Family properties, representing 6.4% of the total market. The portfolio is primarily held by individual investors, who own 1,944 properties (64.5%), compared to companies which own 1,107 (36.7%).
Pricing
Landlords in Q4 2025 demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $194,387 per property—a 38.2% discount compared to the $314,620 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors acquired 8.8% of all homes sold in Q4, with 32 new single-property landlords entering the market. Activity was driven entirely by small investors, as institutional buyers made zero purchases.
Market Share
The investor market is highly fragmented, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 89.4% of rental housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.4%.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate entry-level investing, companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier (53.2%). This signals a strategic shift to formal business structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers with a 2.29x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (55 buys vs. 24 sells), steadily adding to the rental supply. Institutional investors were neutral for the year, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Winnebago County, WI, is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale investors, not large corporations. Investors own 3,016 properties, making up 6.4% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 89.4% share. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 0.4%. The market is further defined by individual ownership, with private investors holding 64.5% of the properties compared to 36.7% for companies.

In terms of recent activity, these small investors continue to be the market's primary drivers. In Q4 2025, they acquired 8.8% of all homes sold, with 32 new single-property landlords entering the market. These investors exhibit significant purchasing savvy, securing properties for an average price of $194,387—a remarkable 38.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Furthermore, landlords are consistently expanding their holdings, acting as net buyers with a 2.29-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the last quarter, signaling confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway for the Winnebago County housing market is its stability and fragmentation. The reliance on a broad base of local landlords, who tend to use more cash than financing and are steadily acquiring properties, creates a resilient rental ecosystem. The absence of institutional players means the market is less susceptible to national strategic shifts and is instead driven by local economic conditions. This dynamic fosters a competitive environment for acquisitions, where deep market knowledge allows experienced small investors to secure properties at significant discounts, ensuring a continued supply of rental housing managed at a local level.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWinnebago (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4