Walworth (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Walworth (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Walworth (WI)
37,056
Total Investors in Walworth (WI)
10,986
Investor Owned SFR in Walworth (WI)
8,368(22.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,178
SFR Owned
5,666
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,808
SFR Owned
2,963
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 8,368 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Walworth County, Paying a 48.6% Premium for Properties
In Walworth County, investors own 8,368 SFR properties, 22.6% of the market. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.4% of this portfolio. In Q4, landlords paid a surprising 48.6% premium over homeowners, and remain strong net buyers while the area's few institutional investors are net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 8,368 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 67.7% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, used for 5,947 properties compared to 2,421 financed properties. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 8,227 properties identified as non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (8,178 entities) vastly outnumber company landlords (2,808 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a $213,264 premium over homeowners in Q4, a staggering 48.6% more per property.
This premium represents a sharp increase from Q3, when landlords paid 7.4% more ($33,347) than homeowners. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently paid more than traditional buyers, defying typical market behavior. In Q4, the average landlord acquisition price was $652,250 compared to the homeowner average of $438,986.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these 70 investor purchases. Single-property landlords were the most active, acquiring 55 properties. No institutional investors (1000+ properties) made any purchases in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 8 properties, a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 6,868 properties, or 80.4% of all investor housing stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization crossover.
While individuals own 71.1% of single-property portfolios, companies control 68.4% of portfolios in the 6-10 property tier and 86.2% in the 11-20 tier. This shows a clear trend of incorporation as investors scale their operations.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 53125 having a 48.9% investor ownership rate.
The top five zip codes by investor-owned count hold 6,320 properties, representing 75.5% of all investor properties in the county. Zip code 53147 has the highest volume with 2,082 investor-owned homes. There is a strong overlap between areas with high counts and high ownership rates, indicating deep investor penetration in key markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.5 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
In 2025, landlords purchased 454 properties while selling only 82. In contrast, the area's few institutional investors were net sellers in 2024, divesting 5 properties while acquiring only 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.8% of all Q4 property transactions, acquiring 105 homes.
First-time landlords paid the highest average price at $649,319 per property. Inter-landlord trading is very low; only 3.6% of properties bought by single-property investors came from other landlords, indicating most purchases are from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 8,368 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 67.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 22.6% share of the single-family residential market in Walworth County, with a total portfolio of 8,368 properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 5,666 properties, which accounts for 67.7% of all investor-owned SFRs. Company-owned portfolios, while smaller, still represent a substantial 2,963 properties (35.4%).

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for investors in this market, with cash purchases (5,947 properties) outnumbering financed ones (2,421 properties) by a ratio of nearly 2.5-to-1. This signals a well-capitalized investor base that can move quickly on transactions.

The rental focus of the investor portfolio is clear, with 8,227 properties—98.3% of all investor-owned SFRs—classified as non-owner-occupied. This highlights the critical role investors play in providing rental housing supply in the county.

The market structure is defined by small operators, as evidenced by the entity count. There are 8,178 individual landlords compared to 2,808 company landlords, showing that the vast majority of rental providers are local individuals rather than large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a $213,264 premium over homeowners in Q4, a staggering 48.6% more per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Walworth County paid a significant premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $652,250. This was 48.6% higher than the $438,986 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $213,264 per property.

This trend of landlords paying more is not an anomaly but a consistent pattern throughout the past year. In Q3, the premium was 7.4% ($33,347), and in Q1 it was 39.2% ($158,646), indicating strong competition for desirable properties, possibly in vacation or luxury segments.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened dramatically in Q4. The 48.6% premium is substantially higher than in any other quarter in 2025, suggesting an acceleration of this unusual trend toward the end of the year.

Overall property values have shown significant appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $422,111, which climbed to $519,330 in 2024 and $537,983 for the full year 2025. This reflects strong, sustained price growth in the county's housing market.

This unusual pricing behavior suggests that investors are targeting a different class of properties than typical homeowners, likely high-demand vacation rentals or lakefront real estate where they are willing to outbid traditional buyers to secure assets with high potential returns.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 70 single-family properties, which accounts for 19.8% of all 353 transactions in Walworth County.

The entirety of this Q4 purchasing activity came from small-scale mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who acquired all 70 properties. This highlights a market completely driven by local, smaller investors rather than large-scale corporate buyers.

New investors flooded the market, with 81 new single-property entities acquiring 55 properties, representing 77.5% of all landlord purchases. This indicates a strong and growing interest from first-time landlords in entering the Walworth County rental market.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape in Q4. Zero properties were acquired by investors with portfolios larger than 10 properties, reinforcing the dominance of the small landlord.

In contrast to the influx of new investors, institutional players (Tier 09) made no acquisitions, continuing a trend of non-participation and underscoring the hyper-local nature of this real estate market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Walworth County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively control 8,328 SFRs, which constitutes 97.4% of all investor-owned housing.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 6,868 properties. This single tier accounts for 80.4% of all investor-owned homes, demonstrating that the market is composed primarily of individuals with a single rental property.

The presence of large-scale institutional investors is negligible. The 1000+ property tier holds only 8 properties in the entire county, making up just 0.1% of the investor market. This finding directly counters the narrative of a corporate takeover of residential housing in this area.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning only 219 properties or 2.6% of the investor market share. Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly as portfolio sizes increase.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, where thousands of small, local landlords, rather than a few large corporations, provide the vast majority of the county's rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a professionalization crossover.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the base of the market, overwhelmingly controlling smaller portfolios. They own 71.1% of all single-property investments (5,041 properties) and 54.3% of two-property portfolios (338 properties).

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios grow: companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier. In this tier, companies own 119 properties (68.4%), compared to just 55 (31.6%) for individuals.

This trend toward corporate ownership intensifies at larger scales. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership is even more dominant, accounting for 69 properties, or 86.2% of the tier's holdings.

The data suggests a clear pattern of professionalization. As landlords expand their portfolios beyond a handful of properties, they increasingly turn to corporate structures like LLCs for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, the split is nearly even, with individuals holding a slight majority at 52.7% (356 properties) and companies holding 47.3% (320 properties), marking this as the transition zone before companies take over.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 53125 having a 48.9% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Walworth County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes, many associated with Lake Geneva. The top five zip codes by property count (53147, 53115, 53121, 53190, 53125) contain 6,320 properties, or 75.5% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 53125 stands out with the highest investor penetration rate in the county, where nearly half of all SFRs (48.9%) are investor-owned. This suggests a market heavily influenced by second homes and vacation rentals.

The area with the largest absolute number of investor-owned properties is 53147, with 2,082 homes, which also has a high ownership rate of 29.5%. This demonstrates that some areas have both a high volume and a high density of investment properties.

Other areas with exceptionally high investor concentration include 53176 (44.4%), 53191 (34.6%), and 53156 (33.3%), further highlighting that investor activity is targeted at very specific communities within the county.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting areas with specific amenities, likely related to tourism and recreation, rather than applying a broad strategy across the entire county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.5 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Walworth County have been in a strong accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 454 properties while only selling 82, resulting in a net gain of 372 properties and a powerful 5.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This aggressive buying behavior was consistent throughout the year, with a net gain of 85 properties in Q4, 142 in Q3, and 89 in Q2. This demonstrates sustained confidence in the local market.

The transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) reveals a completely opposite strategy. In 2024, these large players were net sellers, acquiring only 1 property while selling 5. This divergence highlights a market where small, local investors are expanding while large, national players are absent or retreating.

The momentum for acquisitions has been robust over the last two years. In 2024, landlords were also strong net buyers, with 506 purchases against 79 sales for a net gain of 427 properties.

This sustained net buying activity from the dominant mom-and-pop segment signals a long-term bullish outlook on the Walworth County rental market, even as larger institutional capital looks elsewhere.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.8% of all Q4 property transactions, acquiring 105 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investors accounted for 18.8% of all market activity in Q4 2025, with 105 transactions out of a total of 558. This solidifies their role as a significant and active segment of the market.

All 105 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional-scale investors. Single-property landlords were the most active, responsible for 84 of these transactions.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among tiers, with new, single-property investors paying the most at an average of $649,319 per purchase. In contrast, more established small landlords in the 3-5 property tier paid a lower average of $428,387, suggesting different acquisition strategies or target property types.

The market for inter-landlord transactions is thin. For the most active single-property tier, only 3.6% of their purchases (3 out of 84) were from another landlord. This shows that the vast majority of new rental inventory is being sourced from the traditional homeowner market.

Investors in the 6-10 property tier secured properties at the lowest price point, averaging just $155,125. The wide price spread across tiers, from $155,125 to $963,300, indicates that different investor segments are operating in entirely different sub-markets within the county.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Walworth County, Paying a 48.6% Premium Amidst an Institutional Retreat
Holdings
Landlords own 8,368 single-family residential properties, representing a significant 22.6% of the market in Walworth County. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 5,666 properties (67.7%), while companies own the remaining 2,963 (35.4%).
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords in Q4 2025 paid a substantial 48.6% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average purchase price of $652,250 compared to the homeowner's $438,986—a difference of $213,264 per home.
Activity
Investor activity accounted for 19.8% of all Q4 sales, with 70 properties purchased exclusively by mom-and-pop landlords. The market saw an influx of new entrants, with 81 new single-property landlord entities making purchases.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 97.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, holding just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear professionalization trend emerges as companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier. This signals that investors tend to incorporate as they scale their operations beyond five properties.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (105 buys vs 20 sells). This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who were net sellers in the most recent annual data (1 buy vs 5 sells in 2024), indicating a retreat from the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Walworth County, Wisconsin, is characterized by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale investors. Landlords own a significant 8,368 properties, or 22.6% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties), who control 97.4% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have a nearly non-existent share of 0.1%. The ownership base consists primarily of individuals, who hold 67.7% of the properties, with a clear trend toward incorporation as portfolios grow beyond five properties.

Investor behavior in Walworth County defies conventional wisdom, particularly in pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords paid a staggering 48.6% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for high-value assets, likely in the county's vibrant vacation and second-home markets. This aggressive purchasing is reflected in their transaction patterns; landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.25-to-1 buy-sell ratio in Q4. This contrasts with the area's few institutional investors, who have been net sellers, signaling a divergence between local confidence and national capital allocation.

The key takeaway is that Walworth County's housing market is a distinct ecosystem driven by well-capitalized local investors who are willing to pay a premium to acquire desirable properties, likely for high-yield vacation rentals. The market is defined not by corporate consolidation but by geographic concentration in key zip codes and a continuous influx of new, small-scale landlords. This dynamic suggests that housing affordability challenges in the area are more likely linked to tourism-driven demand from local investors than to a 'Wall Street' takeover.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:55 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWalworth (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison