Taylor (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Taylor (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Taylor (WI)
7,816
Total Investors in Taylor (WI)
1,937
Investor Owned SFR in Taylor (WI)
1,610(20.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,661
SFR Owned
1,293
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
276
SFR Owned
329
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,610 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Taylor County with 99.6% Ownership Amidst Total Absence of Institutional Investors
Investors own 1,610 SFR properties in Taylor County, representing 20.6% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.6%), with individuals comprising 80.3% of all holdings. In Q4 2025, investors were strong net buyers, acquiring 25.8% of homes sold while securing an average 21.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,610 SFR properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding a commanding 80.3% share.
The market is heavily cash-driven, with 1,420 properties owned outright versus just 190 financed. A significant 97.4% of investor-owned properties are designated as rentals, confirming their primary use for housing provision.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 21.2% less than homeowners, securing a $41,621 average discount per property.
This discount has narrowed significantly from the 40.0% advantage seen in Q3 2025. The pricing dynamic is volatile; landlords surprisingly paid a 5.8% premium over homeowners earlier in the year in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 25.8% of all homes sold in Taylor County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these 16 purchases, with institutional investors making zero acquisitions. The market saw 19 new single-property landlords enter during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Taylor County.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,318 homes, representing 79.1% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios scale.
While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios (82.7% of Tier 1), companies control 60.0% of properties in the 6-10 property tier. This crossover happens at a relatively small portfolio size.
Geographic Distribution
The 54451 zip code contains the highest volume of investor properties at 602, while 54766 has the highest density at 36.5%.
There is a clear distinction between volume and saturation, as the area with the most investor properties (54451) has a modest 15.0% ownership rate. The top five zip codes by ownership rate all exceed 29%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Taylor County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.67 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with a 6.92x buy/sell ratio for all of 2025 and an even more pronounced 21x ratio in 2024. There is no transaction data for institutional investors, as they are not active in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor-involved transactions comprised 24.2% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
A wide pricing gap exists among buyers, with new single-property investors paying an average of $176,806, while more established small landlords (3-5 properties) paid only $32,500. Just 10.5% of new investor purchases were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,610 SFR properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding a commanding 80.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Taylor County accounts for 1,610 single-family residential properties, making up 20.6% of the total 7,816 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,661 individual landlords who own 1,293 properties, representing 80.3% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, 276 companies own the remaining 329 properties, or 20.4%.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. Investors own 1,420 properties without financing, compared to only 190 that are financed, signaling a market with low leverage and high equity.

The portfolio composition confirms a strong focus on rental housing, with 1,568 of the 1,610 investor-owned properties classified as rented (non-owner-occupied).

The data clearly portrays a market built on small-scale, individual investment rather than large corporate ownership, with a significant portion of assets being held outright.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 21.2% less than homeowners, securing a $41,621 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Taylor County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties at an average price of $154,414, which is 21.2% below the $196,035 average paid by traditional homeowners.

This equates to a substantial average discount of $41,621 per property, indicating a strong ability to identify and secure undervalued assets.

However, this price gap shows significant volatility throughout the year. The Q4 discount of 21.2% is a sharp reduction from the massive 40.0% ($92,967) discount investors achieved in Q3 2025.

Further highlighting market fluctuations, landlords actually paid a 5.8% premium in Q1 2025, with an average acquisition price of $248,673 compared to the homeowner average of $234,968.

This trend suggests that while investors generally buy at a discount, the magnitude of their advantage shifts dramatically with market conditions, and they are willing to pay above market rate for specific opportunities.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 25.8% of all homes sold in Taylor County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Taylor County housing market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 16 of the 62 total SFRs sold, a market share of 25.8%.

The entirety of this acquisition activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) made 100% of the investor purchases, underscoring their role as the primary source of new investment.

First-time and single-property landlords were the most active group, acquiring 13 properties, which constitutes 81.2% of all investor buying activity for the quarter.

This growth at the smallest scale is further evidenced by the entry of 19 new landlord entities into the market, each acquiring their first investment property.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, highlighting a market completely driven by local and small-scale capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Taylor County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Taylor County is unequivocally dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.6% of all investor-held SFRs.

The market's foundation rests on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who own 1,318 properties. This single tier accounts for an overwhelming 79.1% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords are a negligible force, with those owning 11-50 properties controlling just 0.3% of the portfolio combined.

The data reveals a complete absence of large-scale or institutional ownership. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier hold 0.0% of the market, challenging any notion of corporate landlord dominance in this area.

This distribution paints a clear picture of a decentralized rental market, where ownership is widely dispersed among a large number of small, local operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios scale.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Taylor County shows a distinct evolution as portfolios grow. Individual investors form the backbone of the market, owning 82.7% of single-property portfolios and 75.0% of two-property portfolios.

This individual dominance continues into the 3-5 property tier, where they still own a strong majority of 80.3% of the properties.

A significant strategic shift occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, companies become the majority owners, holding 30 properties (60.0%) compared to the 20 properties (40.0%) held by individuals.

This crossover point suggests that as local investors scale beyond five properties, they increasingly turn to formal corporate structures, likely for liability protection, financing advantages, or operational efficiency.

The transition highlights a key stage in the landlord lifecycle within Taylor County, where personal holdings evolve into formalized small businesses.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 54451 zip code contains the highest volume of investor properties at 602, while 54766 has the highest density at 36.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Taylor County is geographically concentrated, with the 54451 zip code hosting the largest number of investor-owned properties at 602 homes.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. The 54766 zip code has the greatest density of investors, with 36.5% of its single-family homes owned by landlords.

This reveals a key pattern: the areas with the highest counts of investor properties are not necessarily the most saturated. The 54451 zip code, despite leading in volume, has an ownership rate of just 15.0%.

In contrast, areas with high investor saturation include 54490 (34.6%), 54459 (33.3%), and 54433 (29.1%), indicating markets where investors have a much stronger proportional presence.

This data allows for targeted analysis, distinguishing between markets with the most raw inventory (like 54451) and those where investor ownership is most concentrated (like 54766).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Taylor County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.67 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Taylor County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 23 SFRs while selling only 3, a net gain of 20 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.67x.

This net-buyer behavior is a persistent trend, not just a quarterly anomaly. Across the full year of 2025, investors bought 83 properties and sold 12, maintaining a strong net-positive ratio of 6.92x.

The acquisition appetite was even more aggressive in the prior year. In 2024, landlords purchased 105 properties while selling only 5, resulting in an overwhelming 21-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This sustained, high-velocity buying activity signals strong long-term confidence in the Taylor County rental market among its active investors.

Reflecting their lack of ownership in the county, institutional-grade investors (1000+ properties) recorded zero buy or sell transactions, leaving the market's dynamics entirely in the hands of smaller players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor-involved transactions comprised 24.2% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a significant force in market liquidity, participating in 23 of the 95 total SFR transactions, which represents a 24.2% share of all activity.

All 23 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, reinforcing their role as the sole drivers of investor activity in Taylor County.

A dramatic price disparity exists between investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $176,806, suggesting they may be buying more market-ready or turnkey homes.

In contrast, investors in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for an average of just $32,500, indicating a strategy focused on deeply distressed or high-value-add opportunities that newer investors may avoid.

The market shows little evidence of investor-to-investor flipping. Only 2 of the 19 purchases made by single-property landlords (10.5%) were from other landlords, suggesting that most acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market for long-term holds.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Taylor County's Housing Market is Defined by Small, Local Landlords Owning 99.6% of Investor Properties
Holdings
Investors own 1,610 single-family residential properties, representing 20.6% of Taylor County's market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,293 properties (80.3%), while companies own the remaining 329 (20.4%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of 21.2% less than traditional homeowners, which translated to a direct savings of $41,621 per property ($154,414 vs. $196,035).
Activity
Landlords acquired 25.8% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop investors. The market welcomed 19 new single-property landlords, signaling healthy grassroots growth.
Market Share
The investor market is entirely controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.6% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but a strategic shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 60.0% share.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 7.67x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025 (23 buys vs. 3 sells), a trend of aggressive accumulation that confirms long-term confidence in the local market. Institutional investors are completely inactive.
Market Narrative

In Taylor County, the investor landscape is unequivocally defined by small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,610 single-family homes, or 20.6% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.6% of all investor-held real estate. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 80.3% of these properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 homes have zero presence, painting a picture of a truly decentralized and community-based rental market.

The behavior of these local investors points to a confident and strategic approach. In the most recent quarter, they acquired 25.8% of all homes sold, demonstrating a significant pricing advantage by paying 21.2% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is part of a larger trend of aggressive accumulation; investors are strong net buyers, purchasing 7.67 homes for every one they sold in Q4 2025. This indicates a long-term hold strategy, with investors primarily buying from the homeowner market rather than trading properties among themselves.

The key takeaway from the data is that Taylor County's rental market is healthy, growing, and driven by grassroots investment. The absence of institutional players, combined with the dominance of cash-heavy individual landlords, suggests a stable market insulated from the volatility of large-scale capital. The path to growth is clear: individuals enter the market and, as they scale beyond five properties, tend to incorporate, creating a sustainable ecosystem of local small businesses providing rental housing to the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:56 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTaylor (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords