Sauk (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sauk (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sauk (WI)
15,621
Total Investors in Sauk (WI)
93
Investor Owned SFR in Sauk (WI)
72(0.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
77
SFR Owned
55
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
16
SFR Owned
18
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 72 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sauk County's Investor Market: Mom-and-Pop Landlords Own 89%, Yet Institutions Drove All Q4 Buying
Investors own just 72 SFR properties in Sauk County (0.5% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 88.9% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investor activity was minimal, with a single institutional purchase accounting for 100% of landlord acquisitions and setting a price 16.6% above traditional homeowners. After being net buyers for most of the year, landlords became neutral in Q4, signaling a quiet end to the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 72 properties in Sauk County, with individual landlords holding 76.4%.
The investor-owned portfolio is split between 34 financed properties and 38 properties owned outright with cash. Of the 72 properties, 52 are confirmed rented. The investor market consists of 93 distinct landlords, of which 77 are individuals and 16 are companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords paid a surprising 16.6% premium over homeowners, an average of $60,218 more per property.
This Q4 premium marks a significant shift from Q1 2025, when landlords secured a 30.4% discount. The price dynamic has been highly volatile, with investor-paid premiums reaching as high as 31.1% in Q2. The average landlord purchase price has increased from $304,450 in 2024 to $391,646 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented just 0.6% of Q4 2025 purchases, acquiring only 1 of 170 properties sold.
A single institutional investor (1000+ portfolio tier) accounted for 100% of landlord buying activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made zero purchases during the quarter, showing a complete halt in small investor acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 88.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sauk County.
In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 2.8% of the local investor portfolio, or 2 properties. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 49 properties, which is 68.1% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 90% of single-property portfolios.
In the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), individuals still maintain a strong majority, owning 75% of the properties. Data for Sauk County does not show any tier where companies become the majority owners, underscoring the dominance of individual investors across the board.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Sauk County is highly localized and sparse, with the top zip code holding just 5 properties.
Investor ownership rates are extremely low across the county, with the highest penetration rate at just 0.7% in the 53556 zip code. There is no significant concentration of investor properties, indicating a market without investor-heavy neighborhoods.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Sauk County became neutral in Q4 2025 after a year of net buying, with 1 purchase and 1 sale.
This Q4 slowdown contrasts with strong net buying activity earlier in the year, where landlords acquired a net of 4 properties in Q2 and 3 in Q3. For the full year 2025, landlords remained net buyers, adding 8 properties to their portfolios (17 buys vs. 9 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions were a fraction of the market in Q4, accounting for just 0.4% of all activity.
The only landlord transaction was a purchase by an institutional investor for $424,000. Mom-and-pop tiers recorded zero transactions, either buying or selling. This single institutional purchase was not sourced from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 72 properties in Sauk County, with individual landlords holding 76.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sauk County is minimal, comprising just 72 single-family residential properties, which represents a scant 0.5% of the total 15,621 SFRs in the market.

The market is dominated by small, individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 55 properties (76.4% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 18 properties (25.0%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 77 individual landlords compared to just 16 company landlords, demonstrating a local market driven by small-scale operators.

Within the investor portfolio, ownership is nearly evenly split between leveraged and unleveraged assets. Landlords hold 34 properties with financing, while 38 properties are owned free-and-clear with cash.

The primary purpose of these holdings is clear, with 52 of the 72 properties (72.2%) actively rented, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income within this small investor community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords paid a surprising 16.6% premium over homeowners, an average of $60,218 more per property.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to typical market behavior, landlords in Sauk County paid a significant premium for properties in Q4 2025. The average landlord acquisition price was $424,000, which is 16.6% higher than the $363,782 paid by traditional homeowners—a difference of $60,218.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been extremely volatile throughout the year. While landlords paid a premium in Q2 ($121,360 or 31.1%), Q3 ($6,673 or 1.9%), and Q4, they achieved a substantial 30.4% discount in Q1, paying $114,833 less than homeowners.

This volatility suggests that low transaction volume allows single, high-priced acquisitions to heavily skew quarterly averages, rather than indicating a consistent market-wide trend.

Overall, investor acquisition prices have trended upward significantly. The average price paid in 2025 ($391,646) is a notable increase from the 2024 average of $304,450.

This recent price escalation also surpasses the pandemic-era boom, where the average price from 2020-2023 was $303,100, signaling a recent acceleration in the cost of entry for investors in this market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords represented just 0.6% of Q4 2025 purchases, acquiring only 1 of 170 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Sauk County's housing market was nearly non-existent in Q4 2025. Landlords purchased only 1 single-family home out of a total of 170 sold, capturing a marginal 0.6% of the market's sales activity.

The entirety of this quarter's landlord purchasing activity came from a single institutional investor from the 1000+ property tier. This one transaction represented 100% of all landlord acquisitions.

In a stark display of inactivity, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made zero acquisitions in Q4. This demographic, which constitutes the vast majority of ownership in the county, paused its buying completely.

Similarly, mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) were also absent from the market, recording no purchases during the final quarter of the year.

The data reveals a market where the dominant small investor base has stepped back, leaving a single large-scale investor to account for all landlord-driven acquisition activity in Q4.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 88.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sauk County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sauk County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively hold 88.9% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 49 properties. This single tier accounts for 68.1% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the highly fragmented nature of ownership.

Despite recent media focus on large investors, institutional players (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in the county. They own just 2 properties, representing only 2.8% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) also have a very limited presence, collectively owning only 6 properties, or 8.4% of the total investor portfolio.

This distribution underscores a market defined by local, small-scale investment, where the influence of large, corporate, and institutional landlords is minimal compared to the dominant mom-and-pop segment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 90% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of Sauk County's landlord market, particularly at the entry level. Within the single-property tier, individuals own 45 of the 50 properties, a commanding 90.0% share.

This pattern of individual dominance continues into slightly larger portfolios. Among landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals control 9 properties, representing a 75.0% majority compared to the 3 properties (25.0%) owned by companies.

In the two-property tier, ownership is exclusively individual, with a single property held by a person and zero by companies.

Unlike in larger metropolitan markets, there is no observable crossover point in Sauk County where companies become the majority owners. Individuals maintain control across all smaller portfolio tiers for which data is available.

This data illustrates a market where corporate ownership is a minority strategy, and the path to building a rental portfolio is almost exclusively pursued by individual investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Sauk County is highly localized and sparse, with the top zip code holding just 5 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sauk County is thinly spread, lacking any significant geographic concentration. The zip code with the most investor-owned properties, 53578 (Prairie Du Sac), contains only 5 such homes.

Other top areas by count, like 53561 (Lodi) and 53583 (Reedsburg), each have just 3 investor properties, reinforcing the low-density nature of rental ownership.

Ownership rates are negligible throughout the county, failing to surpass 1% in any zip code. The highest rate is found in 53556 (Lake Delton) at just 0.7%, followed by 53561 (Lodi) at 0.6%.

The data shows no correlation between areas with the highest count and the highest percentage of ownership, primarily because the total numbers are too small to establish a meaningful pattern.

Overall, the geographic analysis reveals that Sauk County is not a target for concentrated investor activity, with ownership distributed in very small numbers across various local communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Sauk County became neutral in Q4 2025 after a year of net buying, with 1 purchase and 1 sale.
Detailed Findings

After a consistent period of accumulation, landlord transaction activity in Sauk County balanced out in Q4 2025. Investors recorded 1 purchase and 1 sale, resulting in a net neutral position and halting portfolio growth for the quarter.

This Q4 activity represents a marked deceleration from earlier in the year. In Q3 2025, landlords were strong net buyers with a 2-to-1 buy/sell ratio (6 buys vs. 3 sells), and in Q2 they were even more aggressive with a 3-to-1 ratio (6 buys vs. 2 sells).

Despite the quiet end to the year, landlords were net buyers for 2025 overall. They purchased 17 properties while selling 9, for a net gain of 8 properties across the county.

This trend of accumulation extends to the previous year as well. In 2024, landlords were even more active net buyers, acquiring 24 properties and selling only 10 for a net gain of 14 properties.

The historical data shows a consistent pattern of portfolio growth over the past two years, which only came to a halt in the most recent quarter.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions were a fraction of the market in Q4, accounting for just 0.4% of all activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a minimal force in Sauk County's real estate market, involved in only 1 of the 275 total SFR transactions, a share of just 0.4%.

All landlord transaction activity was driven by a single institutional investor (1000+ tier), who made one purchase at an average price of $424,000.

There was a complete absence of activity from the mom-and-pop segment (1-10 properties). These small investors, who own the vast majority of the county's rental stock, did not participate in any transactions during the quarter.

The sole institutional purchase was acquired from a non-landlord, meaning there was no inter-landlord trading activity observed in Q4. This indicates a lack of portfolio churning or sales between investors.

The Q4 data paints a picture of an extremely quiet quarter for investors, with the market's dominant small players on the sidelines and only a single, large outlier transaction taking place.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Sauk County's Investor Market: Mom-and-Pop Landlords Own 89%, Yet Institutions Drove All Q4 Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 72 single-family properties in Sauk County, representing just 0.5% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 55 properties (76.4%), compared to 18 (25.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a notable Q4 outlier, the sole landlord purchase was made at a 16.6% premium over traditional homeowners, with an institutional investor paying $424,000 compared to the homeowner average of $363,782.
Activity
Investor acquisition activity nearly vanished in Q4, with landlords buying only 1 of 170 properties sold (0.6% share). This single purchase was by an institutional investor, with zero new mom-and-pop landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the local market, owning 88.9% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 2.8%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant across smaller portfolios, owning 90% of all single-property rentals. There is no tier in Sauk County where company ownership surpasses that of individuals.
Transactions
After being net buyers for most of the year, landlords shifted to a neutral stance in Q4 2025, with an equal number of purchases and sales (1 buy vs. 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Sauk County, WI is characterized by a minimal footprint and local, small-scale ownership. Investors hold just 72 single-family properties, a mere 0.5% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 88.9% of the investor-owned portfolio. Individual investors, rather than corporations, are the primary owners, holding 76.4% of these properties and solidifying the image of a market operating outside the sphere of large-scale corporate investment.

Despite the dominance of small landlords in overall ownership, their activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025. A single transaction from an institutional investor accounted for 100% of landlord purchases, representing just 0.6% of all homes sold. This lone purchase was made at $424,000, a surprising 16.6% premium over what traditional homeowners paid. This quarter of inactivity marked a shift from earlier in the year, when landlords were consistent net buyers, and resulted in a neutral buy-sell position to close out 2025.

The key takeaway for the Sauk County housing market is its insulation from the large-scale investor trends seen nationally. The market is defined by its hyper-local, fragmented ownership structure, not by institutional capital. The single institutional purchase in Q4 appears to be an anomaly rather than the start of a new trend, highlighting how individual transactions can skew perceptions in a low-volume environment. For now, Sauk County remains a market primarily for traditional homeowners and a small, established base of local landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:50 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySauk (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell