Outagamie (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Outagamie (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Outagamie (WI)
59,338
Total Investors in Outagamie (WI)
1,749
Investor Owned SFR in Outagamie (WI)
1,423(2.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,458
SFR Owned
1,022
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
291
SFR Owned
422
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,423 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Outagamie County's Investor Market, Controlling 92.5% of Holdings as Institutions Retreat
In Outagamie County, investors own 1,423 SFR properties, representing just 2.4% of the market. This sector is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (92.5%), with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.5%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 2.9% of homes sold, securing a significant 21.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors continued to be net sellers for the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,423 SFR properties in Outagamie County, with individuals holding 71.8%.
Of the 1,423 investor-owned properties, 907 were purchased with cash, nearly double the 516 that are financed. The portfolio is highly rental-focused, with 1,208 properties designated as non-owner-occupied. There are 1,458 individual landlords compared to just 291 company landlords, a ratio of over 5 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 21.7% less than homeowners, a massive discount of $74,623.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 17.9% landlord premium in Q2 to the 21.7% discount in Q4. Overall, landlord acquisition prices in 2025 ($335,792) show a significant 34.6% appreciation over the 2020-2023 average ($249,417).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired just 18 SFR properties in Q4 2025, a minimal 2.9% of all market purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove nearly all investor activity, accounting for 15 of the 18 purchases (83.3%). Institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market saw 12 new single-property landlords enter in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
In contrast to the dominance of small landlords, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 7 properties, which amounts to only 0.5% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone account for 70.8% of all investor holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a much earlier crossover than in larger markets.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 86.5% of single-property rentals, companies control 88.4% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier and 91.9% in the 11-20 unit tier. This indicates a clear shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale, even at modest levels.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 54911, 54130, and 54914, which together hold 673 properties.
The areas with the highest counts of investor properties, like 54911 (246 properties), have relatively low investor penetration rates (3.2%). Conversely, zip code 54931 has the highest concentration with a 12.8% ownership rate, despite having fewer total properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Outagamie County are net buyers, but institutional investors are net sellers, actively reducing their small holdings.
For the full year of 2025, all landlords combined bought 133 properties while selling 101, showing modest accumulation. In contrast, institutional investors sold more than they bought (3 sells vs. 1 buy), signaling a strategic retreat from the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in just 2.3% of all 947 SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $332,483, significantly more than any other tier. Zero transactions in Q4 were between landlords, indicating a lack of portfolio trading within the investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,423 SFR properties in Outagamie County, with individuals holding 71.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership comprises a small fraction of the Outagamie County housing market, with 1,423 landlord-owned SFRs representing just 2.4% of the total 59,338 SFR properties.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals, who own 1,022 properties (71.8% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 422 properties (29.7%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the landlords themselves. There are 1,458 individual landlords compared to only 291 company entities, demonstrating that the market is primarily driven by small-scale operators.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition for investors in this market. There are 907 cash-owned properties, significantly outnumbering the 516 properties that carry financing, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The vast majority of the investor portfolio is actively used for rentals, with 1,208 properties identified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the rental-focused strategy of landlords in the area.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 21.7% less than homeowners, a massive discount of $74,623.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Outagamie County demonstrated powerful purchasing leverage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average price of $269,390. This represents a substantial 21.7% discount compared to the $344,013 paid by traditional homeowners, saving an average of $74,623 per property.

However, this discount is not consistent, revealing a volatile market. In Q3 2025, the discount was a more modest 9.8% ($36,247), and in Q2 2025, landlords actually paid a 17.9% premium ($63,713) over homeowners, suggesting opportunistic buying rather than a stable market advantage.

Despite the Q4 discount, property prices for investors have seen significant long-term growth. The average 2025 acquisition price of $335,792 is 10.7% higher than the 2024 average of $303,274.

The post-pandemic price appreciation is even more stark. The average 2025 price represents a 34.6% increase from the average price of $249,417 paid during the 2020-2023 period, highlighting rapid equity growth for long-term holders.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired just 18 SFR properties in Q4 2025, a minimal 2.9% of all market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity remained subdued in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring only 18 of the 616 total SFRs sold in Outagamie County, capturing just 2.9% of the market share.

The market's growth is exclusively fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 83.3% of all landlord purchases, totaling 15 properties.

New entrants and first-time landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, purchasing 9 properties, which accounts for 50.0% of all investor acquisitions this quarter. This activity was spread across 12 distinct entities.

In stark contrast, large institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4, reinforcing their minimal presence in the county.

Mid-size landlords showed minimal activity, with investors in the 11-20 property tier acquiring 2 properties and those in the 101-1000 tier purchasing just a single property.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Outagamie County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a massive 92.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone, comprising 1,021 properties, accounts for 70.8% of all investor-held housing, highlighting the importance of new and small investors.

Conversely, the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a near-zero presence, holding just 7 properties, or 0.5% of the total investor portfolio.

The ownership concentration drops off sharply as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) control only 6.9% of the portfolio combined, further cementing the market's small-investor character.

The entire large-scale end of the spectrum (101+ properties) is virtually non-existent, with only two entities in these tiers owning a combined 8 properties, or 0.6% of the market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a much earlier crossover than in larger markets.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Outagamie County shifts dramatically as portfolios grow. While individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where they hold 76 properties (88.4%).

Individual investors are the backbone of the entry-level market, owning 899 single-property rentals (86.5%) and 36 two-property rentals (58.1%).

The transition to corporate ownership is rapid. After the 3-5 property tier, where ownership is nearly split (53.0% individual vs. 47.0% company), company dominance accelerates, reaching 91.9% in the 11-20 property tier.

This pattern reveals a distinct strategy: individuals initiate rental portfolios, but a corporate structure is strongly preferred for scaling beyond a handful of properties in this market.

Even at the smallest scales, companies have a foothold. They own 140 properties (13.5%) in the single-property tier, indicating some investors incorporate their holdings from the very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 54911, 54130, and 54914, which together hold 673 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration of investor ownership is evident in Outagamie County, with three zip codes accounting for a significant portion of the portfolio. Zip codes 54911 (246 properties), 54130 (220 properties), and 54914 (207 properties) collectively contain 673 investor-owned SFRs.

The zip codes with the highest number of investor properties do not necessarily have the highest market penetration. The top areas by count, 54911, 54130, and 54914, have modest investor ownership rates of 3.2%, 2.5%, and 2.4%, respectively.

A clear distinction exists between volume and density. Zip code 54931 stands out with the highest investor saturation at 12.8%, indicating a pocket of concentrated rental activity that differs from the broader, lower-density areas.

Another area with notable investor presence is zip code 54152, which has the second-highest ownership rate at 5.4%, further illustrating that investor strategy is not uniform across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Outagamie County are net buyers, but institutional investors are net sellers, actively reducing their small holdings.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Outagamie County is in a state of slight accumulation, with landlords acting as net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 22 properties and sold 17, for a net gain of 5 properties.

This trend of net buying has been consistent throughout the year. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 133 SFRs while selling 101, resulting in a net increase of 32 properties to their portfolios.

However, a significant divergence in strategy appears at the institutional level. The 1000+ property tier investors are net sellers, divesting from the market. In 2025, they sold 3 properties while acquiring only 1, a clear signal of retreat.

This contrasts with their position in 2024, when they were net buyers (2 buys vs. 1 sell), suggesting a recent strategic shift to reduce their already minimal exposure in the county.

The buy/sell activity for all landlords has been relatively balanced throughout 2025, with Q2 showing 34 buys vs. 33 sells and Q3 showing 27 buys vs. 26 sells, indicating a stable but not aggressive market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in just 2.3% of all 947 SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transaction volume represented a very small slice of the overall market in Q4 2025. Of the 947 total SFR transactions in Outagamie County, only 22 involved a landlord buyer, accounting for just 2.3% of market activity.

A surprising pricing pattern emerged among investor tiers. First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price by a wide margin, at $332,483 per property during the quarter.

This is significantly higher than prices paid by more experienced landlords. For example, the 3-5 property tier paid an average of just $124,400, and the 6-10 tier paid $220,000, suggesting new entrants may be paying a premium to enter the market.

The investor market showed no internal liquidity in Q4. None of the 22 landlord purchases came from another landlord, resulting in a 0.0% inter-landlord transaction rate and suggesting investors are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners.

Transaction activity was dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who conducted 19 of the 22 total investor transactions, while institutional investors made zero transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 92.5% of Outagamie County's rentals as institutions sell off their minimal holdings.
Holdings
In Outagamie County, landlords own 1,423 SFR properties, representing 2.4% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 1,022 properties (71.8%) compared to 422 (29.7%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords secured a substantial 21.7% price advantage over homeowners in Q4 2025, paying an average of $269,390 versus $344,013—a discount of $74,623 per home.
Activity
Investor activity was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing just 18 properties for a 2.9% market share. The market's growth was driven by 12 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 92.5% of all investor-held SFRs, while institutional investors own a mere 0.5%.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate entry-level portfolios, companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at just 6-10 properties, controlling 88.4% of homes in that tier.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are modest net buyers in Outagamie County (22 buys vs. 17 sells in Q4), but institutional investors are actively divesting as net sellers for the year (1 buy vs. 3 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, is fundamentally a story of the local, small-scale investor. Landlords own 1,423 properties, a modest 2.4% of the county's 59,338 SFRs. This market is overwhelmingly shaped by individuals, who own 71.8% of the rental stock. The ownership structure is highly concentrated at the small end of the scale, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 92.5% of all investor-owned homes, leaving a negligible 0.5% for institutional investors.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to a cautious but opportunistic market. Landlords acquired just 2.9% of homes sold, but did so with a significant pricing advantage, paying 21.7% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is driven almost exclusively by new and small investors, with 12 new single-property landlords entering the market. Transaction data reveals a key divergence: while the overall landlord pool acts as slight net buyers, institutional-scale investors are net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat from this market.

The key takeaway for the Outagamie County housing market is that it remains insulated from the large-scale corporate ownership trends seen elsewhere. The rental landscape is defined and serviced by local mom-and-pop operators, not institutional capital. The early crossover to corporate structures for portfolios larger than five properties suggests a preference for legal protection and formalization as investments scale, but the soul of the market remains with small, individual enterprise. Future trends will likely be dictated by the purchasing power and sentiment of these local investors rather than national-level funds.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:40 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyOutagamie (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth