Marinette (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Marinette (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Marinette (WI)
11,788
Total Investors in Marinette (WI)
81
Investor Owned SFR in Marinette (WI)
63(0.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
65
SFR Owned
46
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
16
SFR Owned
17
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 63 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor Activity Halts in Marinette County with 0.5% Market Share and Zero Q4 Purchases
Investors own just 63 single-family properties in Marinette County, representing only 0.5% of the market. This small portfolio is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (93.7%), who were completely inactive in Q4 2025, making zero purchases. The recent trend shows divestment, with landlords acting as net sellers in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 63 SFRs, just 0.5% of the market, with individuals holding a 73.0% majority.
The entire investor-owned portfolio of 63 properties was acquired with cash, with zero properties currently financed. Of these, 46 are confirmed rented properties, indicating a strong focus on rental income among owners.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison against homeowners.
The complete halt in purchasing activity in Q4 follows a period of minimal investment, with an average acquisition price of $65,750 recorded for the few properties purchased between 2020-2023. This data indicates a significant investor slowdown in the county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing 0% of the 22 total market sales.
The complete absence of investor purchasing was universal, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recording zero acquisitions. No new landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate with 93.7% control of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 44 properties, which is 69.8% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the market's backbone, owning 84.1% of all single-property rentals.
The ownership model shifts in larger, albeit still small, portfolios. In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is evenly split 50/50 between an individual and a company, marking the crossover point.
Geographic Distribution
Investor presence is minimal across the county, with the highest ownership rate reaching only 2.7% in zip code 54120.
By raw count, zip code 54143 leads with 10 investor-owned properties, followed by 54114 and 54104 with 9 each. Despite these small concentrations, overall investor penetration remains exceptionally low everywhere.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Marinette County were net sellers in 2024, signaling a trend of divestment.
During 2024, landlords sold 10 properties while acquiring only 7, resulting in a net portfolio reduction of 3 properties. Institutional investors had no transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Confirming a market pause, landlords accounted for 0 of the 37 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords and larger entities alike recording zero transactions. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 63 SFRs, just 0.5% of the market, with individuals holding a 73.0% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investor presence in Marinette County's single-family housing market is minimal, with landlords owning just 63 out of 11,788 SFR properties, a market penetration of only 0.5%.

The ownership landscape is dominated by small, individual investors, who own 46 properties (73.0%), compared to the 17 properties (27.0%) held by companies.

A significant financial characteristic of this market is that 100% of the 63 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with zero properties carrying financing. This all-cash position suggests investors are operating without leverage.

The market is composed of 81 distinct landlord entities, with 65 being individuals and 16 being companies. This higher number of entities relative to properties (81 vs 63) confirms that the market is composed primarily of single-property owners.

The primary use for these properties is rental income, with 46 of the 63 properties identified as rented, underscoring the investment-focused nature of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, preventing any price comparison against homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Marinette County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by landlords. This lack of activity makes it impossible to compare investor pricing against traditional homeowners for the quarter.

The current inactivity reflects a sharp deceleration from previous years. During the 2020-2023 period, the average acquisition price for the few properties investors did buy was $65,750, highlighting a market focused on lower-cost assets.

The absence of any recorded landlord purchases in 2024 or Q4 2025 signals a clear trend of investor retreat or market saturation, where opportunities meeting investor criteria are either unavailable or not being pursued.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, capturing 0% of the 22 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

In a clear sign of a dormant investor market, landlords were responsible for 0.0% of the 22 single-family homes purchased in Marinette County during Q4 2025.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the vast majority of owners in the area, made zero purchases.

Similarly, there was no activity from mid-size or institutional investors, underscoring a market-wide pause in acquisitions.

The data reveals no new landlord entrants in Q4, as the single-property tier, typically representing first-time investors, recorded zero purchases.

While the overall housing market saw 22 transactions, the complete lack of investor participation indicates that all sales went to other buyer types, such as traditional homeowners.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate with 93.7% control of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Marinette County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) hold a combined 93.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market's foundation is built on single-property owners (Tier 01), who alone account for 44 properties, representing 69.8% of the investor-held housing stock.

In stark contrast to national trends, there is absolutely no presence of institutional investors (Tier 09), who own 0.0% of the properties. This highlights a market completely untouched by large-scale corporate landlords.

Mid-size landlords are also exceedingly rare, with investors owning more than 10 properties controlling only a combined 6.3% of the rental housing stock.

This tier distribution reveals a hyper-localized market structure, reliant on very small, likely local, individuals rather than professional or large-scale real estate investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the market's backbone, owning 84.1% of all single-property rentals.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive players in Marinette County's rental market, especially at the entry level, owning 37 of the 44 single-property portfolios (84.1%).

Company ownership becomes more prevalent as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals still hold a slight majority in the 3-5 property tier (54.5%), companies are more competitive, holding the other 45.5%.

The crossover where corporate ownership strategy matches individual ownership occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where the two properties in this category are split evenly, one to an individual and one to a company.

Even in the smallest tiers, companies maintain a presence, holding 7 of the 44 single-property rentals (15.9%), suggesting some use of LLCs for liability protection even by small landlords.

This pattern demonstrates a clear market structure where individuals initiate investment, with corporate structures becoming more common only as portfolios begin to scale modestly.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor presence is minimal across the county, with the highest ownership rate reaching only 2.7% in zip code 54120.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Marinette County is thinly spread and represents a fraction of the housing market in any given area. The highest concentration by rate is in zip code 54120, where investors own just 2.7% of SFRs.

In terms of absolute numbers, the most investor-owned properties are found in zip code 54143, with a total of 10 properties, which only amounts to a 0.2% ownership rate.

Other areas with minor concentrations include WI-Marinette-54114 (9 properties, 0.5% rate) and WI-Marinette-54104 (9 properties, 2.2% rate).

The data shows no significant geographic clustering of investment, reinforcing the narrative of a market characterized by sparse, small-scale ownership rather than targeted acquisition strategies.

The low counts and low percentages across all reported zip codes confirm that no single area within the county serves as a hub for real estate investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Marinette County were net sellers in 2024, signaling a trend of divestment.
Detailed Findings

The prevailing trend among Marinette County landlords is divestment, not expansion. In 2024, investors were net sellers, with dispositions outpacing acquisitions.

Specifically, landlords sold 10 SFR properties throughout the year while only purchasing 7, leading to a net decrease in their collective holdings.

This selling pressure indicates a potential shift in market sentiment, where existing landlords are choosing to exit their positions rather than deepen their investment in the area.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were entirely absent from the transaction market, recording zero buys and zero sells, which is consistent with their 0% ownership stake in the county.

The net seller status, combined with the halt in Q4 2025 purchasing, paints a picture of a shrinking investor presence in Marinette County's housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Confirming a market pause, landlords accounted for 0 of the 37 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transaction activity completely ceased in Q4 2025, with investors involved in 0 of the 37 total SFR transactions in Marinette County, representing a 0.0% market share.

This halt in activity was not isolated to a specific type of investor; it was a market-wide phenomenon affecting all tiers, from single-property owners to the county's largest landlords.

The average purchase price for all tiers was $0, as no acquisitions took place, reinforcing the complete lack of buying interest from the investor community.

The absence of transactions also means there was no liquidity within the investor market itself, with 0% of properties being bought from other landlords.

This data illustrates a stark contrast between the active traditional real estate market, which saw 37 sales, and the completely dormant investor submarket.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small individual investors define Marinette County's dormant rental market with 0.5% penetration and zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own just 63 SFR properties, 0.5% of the market in Marinette County, with individual investors holding a 73.0% majority (46 properties).
Pricing
No landlord property acquisitions occurred in Q4 2025, indicating a market halt that prevents any price comparison against homeowners.
Activity
Landlords acquired 0 properties in Q4, representing 0.0% of all market purchases and signaling a complete pause in investor activity.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the local market, controlling 93.7% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the bedrock of the market, controlling 84.1% of single-property portfolios; companies only reach a 50% share in the small 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Reflecting a broader trend of divestment, landlords were net sellers in 2024 (7 buys vs. 10 sells) and recorded zero transaction activity in Q4 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Marinette County, Wisconsin is exceptionally small and locally driven. Investors own a mere 63 properties, which constitutes just 0.5% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership, with individual investors controlling 73.0% of these properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) represent 93.7% of all investor holdings, while institutional investors have absolutely no footprint, owning zero properties.

Investor behavior in Marinette County points toward a dormant and shrinking market. There was a complete halt in purchasing activity in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero homes. This inactivity follows a broader trend of divestment, as landlords were net sellers in 2024, selling 10 properties while only buying 7. Financially, the entire investor portfolio is owned outright with cash, indicating a low-risk, no-leverage strategy among the few active landlords.

The key takeaway for the Marinette County housing market is that real estate investors pose virtually no competition to traditional homebuyers. The market is defined by a tiny contingent of small, individual landlords who are currently inactive or reducing their holdings. This is not a target for large-scale investment, and its dynamics are driven by local, small-scale economic factors rather than broader real estate investment trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:36 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMarinette (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price