Grant (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grant (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grant (WI)
13,095
Total Investors in Grant (WI)
1,654
Investor Owned SFR in Grant (WI)
1,404(10.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,497
SFR Owned
1,248
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
157
SFR Owned
169
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,404 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Grant County with 97.5% Ownership, Acquiring Homes at a 48% Discount
Investors own 1,404 SFR properties in Grant County (10.7% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 97.5% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords purchased 11.8% of all homes sold, securing them for 48.0% less than traditional homeowners and continuing a strong trend of net buying.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,404 properties in Grant County, with individual landlords holding 88.9% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,121) versus financed (283), a ratio of nearly 4-to-1. A total of 1,341 properties are rented, indicating that 95.5% of the investor portfolio is actively used for rental housing.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords acquired property for 48.0% less than homeowners, paying an average of $125,512.
This represents a massive $116,074 average discount compared to the homeowner price of $241,586. The price gap has been consistently large throughout the year, fluctuating from a high of 58.8% in Q1 to a low of 20.9% in Q3 before widening again in Q4.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 16 homes in Q4, capturing 11.8% of all market sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 93.8% of these purchases (15 properties), while institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market saw 18 new or existing single-property landlords acquire 14 of the homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors own 97.5% of all landlord-held SFR properties in Grant County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties control a negligible 0.1% of the market. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 70.3% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every single portfolio size, never ceding majority control to companies.
There is no crossover tier where companies take over; individuals maintain an ownership share between 88% and 93% across all the most common portfolio sizes. This pattern highlights a market driven by personal investment, not corporate strategy.
Geographic Distribution
Platteville (53818) leads investor ownership by volume with 252 properties, while Boscobel (53801) has the highest penetration at 38.7%.
The investor ownership rate in Boscobel (38.7%) is more than triple the county-wide average of 10.7%. Several other zip codes, including Woodman (31.1%) and Livingston (21.0%), also show significantly high concentrations of investor ownership.
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with a full-year 2025 buy-to-sell ratio of 4.5-to-1 (72 buys vs. 16 sells). This activity marks an increase from 2024, which saw 60 buys and 17 sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 9.6% of all Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors driving 95% of the deals.
Single-property buyers paid a significantly higher price ($134,887) than the one active mid-size investor ($27,400). Notably, 100% of landlord purchases were sourced from the public market, with zero transactions occurring between landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,404 properties in Grant County, with individual landlords holding 88.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 10.7% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Grant County, with a portfolio of 1,404 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,248 properties (88.9%), compared to just 169 properties (12.0%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, with 1,497 individual landlords compared to 157 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 10 to 1.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 1,121 properties (79.8%) owned outright, far surpassing the 283 properties that are financed.

The investor portfolio is sharply focused on rental income, as 1,341 of the 1,404 properties (95.5%) are classified as rented.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords acquired property for 48.0% less than homeowners, paying an average of $125,512.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing advantage for investors was evident in Q4 2025, as they paid an average of $125,512 per property, a 48.0% discount compared to the $241,586 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price gap translates to an average savings of $116,074 per property, suggesting landlords are effectively targeting distressed properties or off-market deals not accessible to typical buyers.

The landlord discount has remained significant throughout 2025, though it has been volatile, ranging from a high of 58.8% ($162,925) in Q1 to a low of 20.9% ($50,982) in Q3.

Overall acquisition prices have appreciated, with the average landlord purchase price in 2025 ($142,908) rising from $134,854 in 2024 and $127,013 during the 2020-2023 period.

This persistent and substantial price gap indicates that investors and homeowners operate in fundamentally different segments of the Grant County real estate market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 16 homes in Q4, capturing 11.8% of all market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity accounted for 11.8% of the total market in Q4, with landlords acquiring 16 of the 136 SFR properties sold in Grant County.

The acquisition market is completely controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made 15 of the 16 purchases, a 93.8% share of activity.

New entrants and first-time landlords were the primary drivers of growth, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 14 purchases (87.5%) by 18 distinct entities.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were entirely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4 and signaling a lack of large-scale corporate interest in the region.

Mid-size landlord activity was minimal, with only a single property purchased by an investor in the 11-20 property tier, further emphasizing the market's reliance on small-scale buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors own 97.5% of all landlord-held SFR properties in Grant County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Grant County is defined by the near-total dominance of small landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling 97.5% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 1,027 properties, which accounts for 70.3% of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of a corporate takeover has no footing here, as institutional investors (Tier 09) own just 2 properties, representing a minuscule 0.1% market share.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with ownership spread across many small investors rather than consolidated among a few large entities.

Even mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning less than 3% of the investor-owned properties in the county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every single portfolio size, never ceding majority control to companies.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly control portfolios of all sizes in Grant County, maintaining a majority stake in every reported tier.

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no 'crossover point' where companies become the dominant owner type. Individuals own 89.4% of single-property portfolios and still own 88.9% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range.

This consistent pattern shows that as investors grow their portfolios in this market, they tend to do so as individuals rather than forming corporate entities.

Companies consistently hold a minority share of 10-12% in the most common mom-and-pop tiers, playing a supporting role in the rental market.

This ownership structure confirms that the local rental housing supply is provided and managed almost entirely by local individuals, not by out-of-market corporations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Platteville (53818) leads investor ownership by volume with 252 properties, while Boscobel (53801) has the highest penetration at 38.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investor holdings are most concentrated by volume in the 53818 zip code (Platteville), which is home to 252 investor-owned SFR properties.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found in the 53801 zip code (Boscobel), where landlords own a remarkable 38.7% of all single-family homes.

This divergence reveals different investor strategies: one focused on the higher property volume in a population center like Platteville, and another focused on achieving high market share in smaller communities.

Several zip codes exhibit investor ownership rates that far exceed the county average of 10.7%, including Woodman (53827) at 31.1% and Livingston (53810) at 21.0%.

The top five zip codes by property count (53818, 53805, 53801, 53573) collectively contain a significant portion of the county's investor-owned housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties while selling only 3 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Grant County are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position with 20 purchases against only 3 sales in Q4 2025.

This behavior is part of a sustained trend; for the full year of 2025, investors bought 72 properties and sold only 16, resulting in a net gain of 56 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.5x.

Investor acquisition activity has accelerated year-over-year, increasing from 60 purchases in 2024 to 72 in 2025.

By consistently absorbing more housing stock than they release, investors are playing a key role in providing liquidity and stability to the local real estate market.

Data on institutional transactions is unavailable, which, combined with their minimal ownership, confirms they are not a factor in the county's transaction market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 9.6% of all Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors driving 95% of the deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a party to 20 of the 209 total SFR transactions, representing a 9.6% share of all market activity.

The market's transaction volume is fueled by small investors, as mom-and-pop buyers (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 19 of the 20 investor deals (95%).

A distinct pricing difference between tiers was observed, with 18 single-property buyers paying an average of $134,887, while one mid-size investor (11-20 properties) acquired a property for just $27,400.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) conducted zero transactions, reaffirming their passive role in the Grant County market.

The market showed no signs of inter-landlord trading, as 100% of the properties purchased by investors came from non-landlord sellers, indicating a focus on acquiring stock from traditional homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Grant County with 97.5% ownership, acquiring homes at a 48% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,404 SFR properties, representing 10.7% of Grant County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors with 1,248 properties (88.9%), while companies own the remaining 169 (12.0%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4, paying 48.0% less than traditional homeowners with an average price of $125,512 versus $241,586—a discount of $116,074 per property.
Activity
In Q4, landlords acquired 11.8% of all homes sold (16 properties), with activity almost entirely driven by small investors. The market welcomed 18 new or growing single-property landlord entities.
Market Share
Small, local landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.5% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a nearly nonexistent share of 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier, maintaining roughly 90% control and never ceding a majority to companies, even as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers, with a 6.7x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (20 buys vs. 3 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity, confirming their passive role in the market.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Grant County, Wisconsin, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale players. Investors own 1,404 single-family properties, or 10.7% of the total market, but this share is highly fragmented. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.5% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional firms hold a mere 0.1%. This structure is built on individual ownership, with 88.9% of properties held by individuals compared to 12.0% by companies, confirming the rental market is powered by personal investment, not corporate capital.

Investor behavior underscores a strategy of opportunistic acquisition and steady growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were responsible for 11.8% of all purchases and demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure deals, paying 48.0% less than traditional homeowners. This purchasing advantage is coupled with a strong accumulation trend; investors are consistent net buyers, acquiring 4.5 properties for every one they sold throughout 2025. This activity is driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, as institutional buyers were completely absent from the market.

The key takeaway for the Grant County housing market is its insulation from national institutional trends. The rental housing supply is firmly in the hands of local individuals who leverage market knowledge to acquire properties at a significant discount. This creates a stable, ground-up market characterized by fragmented ownership and steady, small-scale accumulation rather than large, volatile corporate plays. The health and direction of this market are dictated by the decisions of hundreds of individual landlords, not a handful of boardrooms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGrant (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct