Forest (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Forest (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Forest (WI)
7,801
Total Investors in Forest (WI)
4,263
Investor Owned SFR in Forest (WI)
3,437(44.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,684
SFR Owned
2,867
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
579
SFR Owned
607
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,437 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Forest County with 99.9% Ownership Amid 44.1% Market Penetration
Investors own 3,437 SFR properties in Forest County, representing an exceptionally high 44.1% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely controlled by small mom-and-pop landlords (99.9%), with individuals making up 83.4% of all investor holdings. In Q4, landlords purchased 38.1% of homes sold, securing them at a massive 45.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,437 homes (44.1% of market), with individuals holding 83.4%.
Portfolio financing is rare, with cash deals (3,110) outnumbering financed ones (327) by nearly ten to one. Of the 3,437 properties, 3,414 are confirmed rented, indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 45.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a $116,209 average discount.
The landlord price advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 46.0% premium in Q1 to a 45.1% discount in Q4. This demonstrates extreme price fluctuations in a low-volume market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 38.1% of all Q4 home sales, with mom-and-pops driving 100% of activity.
All 8 investor purchases in Q4 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from institutional investors. The market saw 9 new single-property landlords enter in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.9% of investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone account for 87.8% of all investor-owned properties (3,073 homes). Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate all investor tiers, owning 82.7% of single-property portfolios.
There is no tier where companies are the majority owner; even among landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals hold a commanding 89.8% share. This market lacks the corporate crossover point seen in other geographies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 54520, with 925 properties.
Several zip codes exhibit extreme investor penetration, with 54491 leading at 66.7% and five others exceeding a 55% investor ownership rate. This indicates specific neighborhoods are heavily rental-focused.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in 2024 were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 261 properties while selling only 5.
This activity reflects a buy-to-sell ratio of over 52-to-1, indicating an exceptionally strong accumulation phase for investors. No institutional transaction data exists, aligning with their zero market presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 35.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
All 11 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with 0% of their purchases sourced from other landlords. A surprising price inversion occurred, with single-property buyers paying $155,722 on average, double the price paid by two-property buyers ($77,500).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,437 homes (44.1% of market), with individuals holding 83.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Forest County is exceptionally high, with 3,437 single-family residential properties held by landlords, accounting for 44.1% of the county's total SFR market of 7,801 homes.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 3,684 individual investors, who own 2,867 properties, representing 83.4% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, 579 companies own just 607 properties (17.7%).

This individual dominance is further highlighted by the entity ratio; with 4,263 total landlords for 3,437 properties, it indicates a market structure composed almost entirely of single-property owners, many of whom may co-own properties.

Cash is the predominant form of acquisition, with 3,110 properties owned outright compared to only 327 that are financed. This nearly 10-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties suggests a market characterized by low-cost assets or cash-heavy buyers.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 3,414 of the 3,437 investor-owned properties identified as rented, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 45.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a $116,209 average discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Forest County secured properties at a remarkable 45.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $141,500 while homeowners paid $257,709.

This significant pricing advantage translates to a savings of $116,209 per property, showcasing a strong negotiating position for investors in the current market.

The price gap has been extremely volatile throughout 2025, highlighting the nature of a thinly traded market. In a dramatic reversal from Q1, where landlords paid a 46.0% premium ($96,095 more than homeowners), the market has shifted to heavily favor investor buyers.

The trend shows a progressively widening discount for landlords over the year. The advantage grew from just 6.6% in Q2 to 28.3% in Q3, before culminating in the substantial 45.1% discount in Q4.

This increasing discount suggests that investor purchasing power has strengthened considerably, allowing them to acquire assets at increasingly favorable prices relative to the general market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 38.1% of all Q4 home sales, with mom-and-pops driving 100% of activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a powerful force in Forest County's Q4 2025 real estate market, purchasing 8 of the 21 total SFRs sold, which constitutes a significant 38.1% market share.

The entirety of this investor activity was driven by small-scale mom-and-pop landlords. Of the 8 properties purchased, 7 were acquired by single-property investors (Tier 01), and 2 by two-property investors (Tier 02), with zero purchases from mid-size or institutional tiers.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with 9 new landlord entities making their first purchase in Q4. This influx of new, small investors underscores the accessible nature of the local market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, acquiring 0 properties and holding 0.0% of the Q4 purchase volume.

The concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum highlights a market defined by local, individual participation rather than large-scale corporate investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.9% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Forest County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop-dominated market, with landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

This concentration is most extreme in the single-property tier (Tier 01), where landlords own 3,073 properties, making up 87.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

The scale drops off sharply, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding 229 properties (6.5%) and those with 3-5 properties holding 193 (5.5%).

There is virtually no presence from larger investors. Landlords with 11-50 properties collectively own just 3 homes, representing a negligible fraction of the market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are entirely absent from Forest County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. This reinforces the market's character as one completely driven by small, local participants.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate all investor tiers, owning 82.7% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single investor tier in Forest County, reinforcing their control over the local rental market.

In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 2,565 properties (82.7%) compared to 535 owned by companies (17.3%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues up the scale. For two-property landlords, individuals own 79.2% of the properties. Among those owning 3-5 properties, the individual share is even higher at 89.8%.

Unlike in many other markets, there is no crossover point in Forest County where companies become the majority owners. The portfolio size remains firmly in the hands of individuals, even as it scales slightly.

This data illustrates a market structure where the growth path for investors is predominantly an individual pursuit, with corporate structures playing a minor, supporting role across all portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 54520, with 925 properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Forest County, investor ownership is most concentrated in the 54520 zip code, which contains 925 investor-owned properties, representing a 39.0% ownership rate for that area.

While 54520 leads by sheer volume, other zip codes demonstrate even more intense investor penetration. The 54491 zip code has the highest rate, with 66.7% of its SFRs owned by investors.

A pattern of hyper-concentration is evident, with multiple areas showing investor ownership rates above 50%, including 54562 (60.4%), 54104 (59.1%), 54521 (57.0%), and 54542 (56.8%).

The top five zip codes by count (54520, 54511, 54566, 54465, 54541) collectively hold 2,836 properties, accounting for the vast majority of investor activity in the county.

This geographic analysis reveals that investor activity is not evenly distributed but is instead focused in specific communities where rental properties constitute a majority of the housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in 2024 were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 261 properties while selling only 5.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 reveals that landlords in Forest County were overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for portfolio expansion.

Across 2024, landlords purchased 261 SFR properties while selling only 5, resulting in a net gain of 256 properties to their collective portfolio.

This equates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 52.2, a powerful indicator of a market in a phase of aggressive accumulation by investors.

This buying trend suggests strong confidence in the local rental market and a clear strategy of holding assets rather than flipping them.

Consistent with their 0% market share, institutional investors recorded no buy or sell transactions, underscoring that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, non-institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 35.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the final quarter of 2025, landlords played a role in 11 of the 31 total SFR transactions, representing a 35.5% share of all market activity in Forest County.

All of this transaction volume was concentrated among mom-and-pop investors. Landlords in the single-property tier were responsible for 9 transactions, while those in the two-property tier conducted 2 transactions.

A notable finding from Q4 is that 0% of investor purchases came from other landlords, indicating that investors are acquiring properties from homeowners or the new-build market, rather than trading assets among themselves.

Q4 pricing by tier revealed an unusual anomaly: single-property landlords paid an average of $155,722, more than double the $77,500 average paid by two-property landlords. This inversion is likely caused by the low number of transactions and the specific properties involved.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions, maintaining their absence from the market's transactional flow and reinforcing the dominance of small investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Hyper-Local Investors Dominate Forest County, Owning 44.1% of Homes with 99.9% Mom-and-Pop Control
Holdings
Investors own 3,437 SFR properties, a 44.1% penetration of the Forest County market, with individual investors holding a commanding 2,867 properties (83.4%) compared to companies' 607 (17.7%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant buying power in Q4, paying an average of $141,500, which is 45.1% less than traditional homeowners ($257,709)—a discount of $116,209 per property.
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 38.1% of all homes sold (8 properties), an effort driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, including 9 new landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The market is almost exclusively controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.9% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence at all (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, owning 82.7% of single-property portfolios. Unlike other markets, there is no crossover point where companies gain majority control.
Transactions
Based on 2024 data, landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 52.2x buy/sell ratio (261 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Forest County, Wisconsin, is defined by an exceptionally high level of investor penetration and is almost entirely controlled by small, individual landlords. Investors own 3,437 properties, a remarkable 44.1% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is dominated by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who control 99.9% of the rental housing inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence. Ownership is overwhelmingly personal, with individual landlords holding 83.4% of the properties compared to just 17.7% for companies.

Investor behavior in Forest County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and a strong buy-and-hold mentality. In Q4 2025, landlords captured 38.1% of all homes sold, with 100% of that activity coming from mom-and-pop buyers. They demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties at an average 45.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Transaction data from 2024 further reveals an aggressive accumulation strategy, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, purchasing over 52 properties for every one they sold.

The key takeaway from Forest County is a housing market that operates as a distinct ecosystem for hyper-local, small-scale investment. The combination of high investor penetration, complete mom-and-pop control, a prevalence of cash transactions, and the total absence of institutional capital points to a stable, community-level rental market. This structure suggests that market dynamics are driven by local economic conditions and individual financial decisions rather than national trends or corporate strategies, making it a unique case study in grassroots real estate investment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyForest (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail