Dodge (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dodge (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dodge (WI)
25,452
Total Investors in Dodge (WI)
2,974
Investor Owned SFR in Dodge (WI)
2,597(10.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,453
SFR Owned
1,851
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
521
SFR Owned
772
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,597 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Dodge County, Owning 94.5% of Rental Homes and Securing 37% Purchase Discounts
In Dodge County, WI, the investor landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords, who own 2,324 of the 2,597 investor-held SFRs. These investors were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 10.7% of all homes sold while paying an average of 36.8% less than traditional homeowners. The market shows strong accumulation, with landlords acting as net buyers, acquiring 3.6 properties for every one they sold in the last quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,597 SFR properties in Dodge County, with individuals holding a 71.3% majority.
Of these holdings, 1,682 properties are owned free-and-clear (cash), far outpacing the 915 that are financed. The vast majority of the portfolio (2,511 properties) is designated as non-owner-occupied rentals. By entity, 2,453 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 521 company investors.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Dodge County paid 36.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $121,461 per property.
This price advantage shows significant volatility, widening dramatically from a 13.0% discount ($44,442) in Q3 2025. Earlier in the year, the discount was even larger, hitting 50.6% in Q2. Landlord purchase prices have fallen from a 2024 average of $356,884 to $220,273 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 10.7% of all single-family homes sold in Dodge County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated this activity, accounting for 79.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions. The quarter saw 23 new single-property landlords enter the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Dodge County.
This leaves a negligible footprint for institutional investors (1000+ properties), who own just 9 properties, or 0.3% of the total investor portfolio. Single-property landlords alone account for 1,863 properties, representing 69.4% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, signaling a key scaling threshold for investors.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 81.1% of single-property rentals, companies control 52.9% of properties in the 3-5 property tier. This trend accelerates in larger tiers, with companies owning 97.1% of portfolios in the 21-50 property range.
Geographic Distribution
The 53916 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Dodge County, with 783 investor-owned properties.
While 53916 leads in raw numbers, the 53010 zip code has the highest concentration of investors, with a 37.5% ownership rate. The top 5 zip codes by count hold a significant portion of the county's total investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Dodge County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with 162 properties bought versus 46 sold year-to-date in 2025. In 2024, the buy-to-sell ratio was even higher at 4.6, with 204 acquisitions against only 44 dispositions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 8.8% of all Dodge County property transactions in Q4 2025.
In Q4, new single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $237,078, significantly more than larger investors. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only one transaction (4.3%) in the single-property tier originating from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,597 SFR properties in Dodge County, with individuals holding a 71.3% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 10.2% share of the single-family residential market in Dodge County, with a total portfolio of 2,597 properties.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,851 properties, which constitutes a commanding 71.3% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company investors own the remaining 772 properties (29.7%).

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals, with 2,453 individual landlords compared to just 521 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 5-to-1.

Cash is the preferred ownership method, with 1,682 properties owned outright, compared to 915 properties that carry financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 2,511 of the 2,597 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary business model of these landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Dodge County paid 36.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $121,461 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors demonstrate a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $208,700, a steep 36.8% discount compared to the $330,161 paid by traditional homeowners.

This equates to a substantial cash advantage of $121,461 per property, highlighting a distinct purchasing strategy or access to off-market deals not available to the general public.

The landlord discount has been volatile throughout 2025, ranging from a low of 12.5% ($36,866) in Q1 to a high of 50.6% ($160,359) in Q2, suggesting fluctuating market conditions or opportunistic buying.

Comparing prices over time reveals significant market shifts. The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($220,273) is markedly lower than the 2024 average ($356,884), indicating a potential cooling in the segment of the market where investors are active.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 10.7% of all single-family homes sold in Dodge County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing accounted for 29 of the 271 total SFR sales in Q4 2025, representing a 10.7% market share of all acquisitions.

The market's growth is driven by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 23 of the 29 investor purchases (79.3%).

New entrants are a key feature of the market, as 23 new entities purchased their first investment property in Q4, buying 17 homes and making up 58.6% of all landlord acquisitions.

Mid-size investors also showed activity, with those in the 11-50 property tier acquiring 5 properties, or 17.2% of the investor total.

Notably absent from Q4 activity were institutional investors (1000+ properties), who made no purchases, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of the Dodge County rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Dodge County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Dodge County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 94.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the largest single group, with 1,863 properties making up 69.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented and localized nature of rental ownership.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000 or more properties have a minimal presence, owning just 9 properties, which amounts to only 0.3% of the market.

The mid-size landlord segment (11-100 properties) holds a combined 4.9% share, indicating that scaling beyond 10 properties is relatively uncommon in this market.

This distribution definitively shows that the narrative of large corporations controlling the housing market does not apply in Dodge County, where the rental stock is overwhelmingly managed by local, small-scale operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, signaling a key scaling threshold for investors.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges as portfolios scale: individuals dominate the entry-level, but companies take over as operations grow. Individuals own 81.1% of single-property portfolios and 68.2% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs in the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, where companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding a 52.9% share of properties.

Company dominance solidifies in larger tiers. In the 11-20 property bracket, companies own 66.3% of the homes, and in the 21-50 bracket, their control is nearly absolute at 97.1%.

This trend suggests that as investors expand beyond a few properties, they increasingly turn to corporate structures like LLCs for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Even with this shift at higher tiers, the sheer volume of small individual landlords means they own the majority of properties overall (71.3%), reinforcing their central role in the market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 53916 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity in Dodge County, with 783 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated geographically within Dodge County. The zip code 53916 stands out as the area with the highest volume of investor activity, containing 783 investor-owned SFRs.

Other key areas for investor ownership by count include 53034 with 143 properties and 53050 with 135 properties.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. The 53010 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 37.5%, meaning more than one in every three SFRs is investor-owned.

The 53933 zip code also shows a high density of investor ownership, with a rate of 25.4%.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas reveals different market dynamics, pointing to both large rental markets and smaller communities with a high proportion of rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Dodge County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a strong and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among Dodge County landlords. In Q4 2025, they were decisive net buyers, with 36 acquisitions and only 10 sales.

This equates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.6, indicating a clear strategy of growth and a bullish outlook on the local rental market.

This behavior is not a recent phenomenon. Across all of 2025, landlords purchased 162 properties while selling only 46, maintaining a high net acquisition volume.

The trend was even more pronounced in 2024, when investors bought 204 properties and sold just 44, for an even stronger buy-to-sell ratio of 4.6 to 1.

This consistent pattern of net buying across multiple years signals long-term confidence and continued capital deployment into the Dodge County single-family rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 8.8% of all Dodge County property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 36 of the 407 total SFR transactions in Dodge County, capturing an 8.8% share of market activity.

A surprising pricing pattern emerged among buyers. First-time investors in the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $237,078 per home.

In contrast, larger, more experienced landlords paid substantially less. Investors in the 11-20 property tier paid an average of just $137,750, and those in the 3-5 property tier paid $127,333, suggesting they target different types of properties or have superior deal-sourcing capabilities.

The market for inter-landlord transactions is underdeveloped. Among the 23 purchases made by single-property landlords, only one (4.3%) was acquired from an existing landlord, indicating that most acquisitions come from the traditional homeowner market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, recording zero transactions in the quarter, further cementing the market's reliance on smaller players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Dodge County, Owning 94.5% of Rental Homes and Securing 37% Purchase Discounts
Holdings
Investors own 2,597 single-family residential properties in Dodge County, WI, representing 10.2% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 1,851 of these properties (71.3%), while companies own the remaining 772 (29.7%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of 36.8% less than traditional homeowners. This translated to a discount of $121,461 per property, with landlords paying $208,700 compared to the homeowner average of $330,161.
Activity
Landlords purchased 29 properties in Q4, accounting for 10.7% of all sales, with activity heavily concentrated among small investors. The market saw 23 new single-property landlords make their first purchase, highlighting robust grassroots growth.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 94.5% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.3% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 3-5 property tier. This trend accelerates as portfolios expand, indicating a shift to formal business structures with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Dodge County, acquiring 3.6 properties for every one they sold in Q4 (36 buys vs 10 sells). Institutional investors were entirely absent from the transaction market, reporting no buys or sells in the quarter.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Dodge County, WI is fundamentally a local, small-business ecosystem. Investors own 2,597 SFR properties, representing 10.2% of the county's housing stock. This market is dominated not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 71.3% of these homes. The distribution of ownership is heavily skewed towards the smallest players; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 94.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, while large-scale institutional investors have a nearly non-existent footprint at just 0.3%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 points to strategic and confident growth. Landlords acquired 10.7% of all homes sold, and they did so with a remarkable pricing advantage, paying 36.8% less on average than traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 23 new landlords buying their first property in the quarter. Transaction data confirms a strong accumulation trend, as investors acted as net buyers with a 3.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio, signaling a bullish outlook on the local market's future performance.

The key takeaway from this data is that the narrative of Wall Street-driven housing acquisition does not apply in Dodge County. Instead, the market is characterized by a high volume of small, individual investors who are adept at finding deals and are consistently expanding their portfolios. This dynamic suggests a stable and fragmented rental market, where competition and opportunity are driven by local operators rather than national institutions. The primary market dynamic is the interaction between these savvy local investors and the traditional home sales market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDodge (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4