Burnett (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Burnett (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Burnett (WI)
11,138
Total Investors in Burnett (WI)
6,804
Investor Owned SFR in Burnett (WI)
4,951(44.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,865
SFR Owned
4,058
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
939
SFR Owned
999
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,951 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Burnett County, Owning 44.5% of All SFRs and Paying Premiums
Investors own 4,951 single-family properties in Burnett County, a staggering 44.5% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (99.5%), with individuals holding 82.0% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, new landlords drove all investor purchasing activity, acquiring 21.9% of homes sold and paying a surprising 57.7% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling aggressive market entry.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,951 SFRs, 44.5% of the market, with individuals holding 82.0% of the portfolio.
The portfolio is heavily skewed towards cash ownership, with 3,847 properties owned outright compared to 1,104 that are financed. Of the 6,804 total landlords, 5,865 are individuals, outnumbering companies by more than 6-to-1. A near-total 99.4% of investor-owned properties (4,920 of 4,951) are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, Q4 landlords paid a 57.7% premium over homeowners, averaging $444,506.
This Q4 premium of $162,592 marks a significant shift from Q3 and Q2, where landlords enjoyed substantial discounts of 23.8% ($83,241) and 32.5% ($122,814), respectively. The dramatic swing suggests a new wave of highly motivated buyers entered the market at year-end. This trend contrasts with a modest 4.2% premium paid in Q1.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 21.9% of all homes sold in Q4, with new investors driving 100% of the activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active investor segment, purchasing all 21 properties acquired by investors. Notably, all of these purchases were made by 37 new single-property entities entering the market for the first time. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control, owning 99.5% of Burnett County's investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 4,514 homes, representing 89.4% of all investor-owned properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible footprint, owning just 5 properties, or 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership in the 6-10 property tier, a low threshold for corporate control.
While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios (82.0% of single-property tier), companies take a 52.2% majority stake in the 6-10 property tier. This crossover happens much earlier than in typical markets, indicating a strategic focus for companies on building small to mid-sized portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 54830 holding 40.8% of all investor properties.
Some zip codes show extreme investor saturation, with ownership rates hitting 69.2% in 54859 and 51.8% in 54801. The top five zip codes by property count contain 90.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, demonstrating intense geographic focus.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
The strong net-buyer position was consistent throughout the year, with 149 properties purchased versus only 11 sold in 2025. This trend also held true in 2024, when landlords bought 155 properties and sold just 5. Institutional investors reported no transaction activity, underscoring their absence from the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of Q4 transactions, all driven by new single-property investors.
These new mom-and-pop investors purchased 37 properties at an average price of $444,506. Institutional investors made no transactions. Of their purchases, 10.8% (4 properties) were acquired from other landlords, showing a degree of portfolio churn within the investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,951 SFRs, 44.5% of the market, with individuals holding 82.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has reached a remarkable concentration in Burnett County, with landlords holding 4,951 single-family residential properties. This constitutes 44.5% of the county's entire SFR housing stock of 11,138, indicating a market heavily influenced by rental investment activity.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 4,058 properties, making up 82.0% of the total investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 999 properties (20.2%). This challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced, with 5,865 individual landlords compared to just 939 company landlords. This 6.2-to-1 ratio underscores that the typical investor in this market is a small-scale, individual operator.

Financial strategies heavily favor liquidity, with cash-owned properties (3,847) outnumbering financed ones (1,104) by a ratio of nearly 3.5 to 1. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio's purpose is clear, as 4,920 properties—or 99.4% of all investor-owned SFRs—are non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rentals highlights the deep penetration of investment activity into the local housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, Q4 landlords paid a 57.7% premium over homeowners, averaging $444,506.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in acquisition strategy occurred in Q4 2025, with landlords paying an average price of $444,506 per property. This represents a staggering 57.7% premium compared to the $281,914 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $162,592 per transaction.

This Q4 premium marks a complete reversal of the trend seen earlier in the year. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a 23.8% discount ($83,241), and in Q2, they achieved an even larger 32.5% discount ($122,814). This sudden pivot from deep discounts to a significant premium suggests a surge in aggressive, less price-sensitive investor demand at the end of the year.

The year-over-year price appreciation for landlords has been substantial, with the average acquisition price climbing from $272,664 in 2024 to $304,164 for the full year of 2025. This reflects strong market-wide price growth.

Comparing the recent quarter to the pandemic era (2020-2023), the Q4 2025 average landlord purchase price of $444,506 is 79.4% higher than the $247,798 average from the boom years, highlighting intense recent price acceleration.

While the first quarter of 2025 saw a minor 4.2% premium paid by landlords, the scale of the Q4 premium is an anomaly. It indicates that the investors active in the final quarter were competing fiercely for limited inventory, possibly in desirable locations, and were willing to pay well above the market rate established by homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 21.9% of all homes sold in Q4, with new investors driving 100% of the activity.
Detailed Findings

Investors maintained a strong presence in the Burnett County market during Q4 2025, purchasing 21 of the 96 total SFR properties sold, which amounts to a 21.9% market share. This demonstrates continued and significant investor demand absorbing over one-fifth of available housing stock.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity this quarter was driven by the smallest players. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of the 21 properties bought by investors, highlighting the grassroots nature of the local investment scene.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, acquiring zero properties. This inactivity stands in stark contrast to the active participation of smaller landlords.

A wave of new entrants defined Q4 activity. All 21 investor-bought properties were acquired by single-property landlords (Tier 01). These purchases were made by 37 distinct entities, indicating co-ownership on some properties and signaling a fresh influx of first-time investors into the market.

The data reveals a market where growth is fueled from the bottom up. The lack of acquisition by mid-size or institutional tiers, combined with the 100% concentration in the single-property tier, points to a highly accessible and attractive market for new, small-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control, owning 99.5% of Burnett County's investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Burnett County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), hold a combined 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs, a level of dominance that marginalizes larger players.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 4,514 properties, representing an overwhelming 89.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that the vast majority of landlords are neighbors, not distant corporations.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a minuscule presence. Their holdings amount to just 5 properties, or 0.1% of the investor market, debunking any notion of significant institutional influence in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a very small share. The combined tiers from 11-1000 properties own only 21 properties, which is less than 0.5% of the total investor portfolio, further cementing the market's small-investor character.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and democratized rental market. Ownership is not concentrated in the hands of a few large entities but is spread across thousands of small, independent landlords, shaping a unique local housing dynamic.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership in the 6-10 property tier, a low threshold for corporate control.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the rental market in Burnett County, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolio tiers. They own 82.0% of all single-property holdings (3,780 properties) and 68.3% of two-property portfolios (209 properties).

The transition to majority-company ownership occurs surprisingly early. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 12 properties, capturing a 52.2% share, while individuals own the remaining 11 properties (47.8%). This indicates that as landlords scale beyond five properties, a corporate structure becomes the preferred vehicle.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain strong control, owning 150 properties for an 80.6% share, compared to just 36 properties (19.4%) owned by companies. The sharp reversal in the very next tier highlights a clear strategic shift.

This early crossover point suggests that professionalization and the adoption of corporate structures happen at a smaller scale in Burnett County than in larger metropolitan areas. Investors looking to grow even modest portfolios are quick to incorporate for liability or financial reasons.

The data illustrates two distinct investor paths: a massive base of individuals content with 1-2 properties, and a smaller, more focused group that incorporates as soon as they begin to scale their operations beyond a handful of homes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 54830 holding 40.8% of all investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Burnett County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 54830 is the epicenter of this activity, containing 2,021 investor-owned properties, which alone accounts for 40.8% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

Several zip codes exhibit extremely high rates of investor penetration, suggesting they are prime rental or vacation home markets. Zip code 54859 leads with a 69.2% investor ownership rate, followed by 54801 (51.8%) and 54830 (51.5%). In these areas, investors own more than half of the single-family housing stock.

The geographic concentration is stark: the top five zip codes by investor property count (54830, 54893, 54872, 54840, 54801) collectively hold 4,678 properties. This represents 94.5% of all investor-owned homes in the county, leaving very little activity spread across the remaining areas.

There is a strong correlation between the regions with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage rates. For instance, WI-Burnett-54830 and WI-Burnett-54801 appear on both top-five lists, indicating these are large, deeply saturated investment markets.

This intense clustering reveals that investor strategy in Burnett County is targeted and localized. Rather than a broad-based approach, investors focus their capital on specific micro-markets, driving ownership rates to exceptionally high levels in those zones.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Burnett County demonstrated a strong appetite for acquisition throughout 2025, consistently operating as net buyers. In Q4 2025, this trend was particularly sharp, with 37 properties purchased and only 3 sold, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of over 12-to-1.

This aggressive accumulation of properties was a year-long pattern. Across all of 2025, landlords acquired 149 SFRs while divesting only 11, for a net gain of 138 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 13.5-to-1. This signals overwhelming confidence in the local rental market.

The net-buying behavior extends back through 2024, when the acquisition pace was even more lopsided. During that year, landlords purchased 155 properties and sold a mere 5, resulting in a net gain of 150 properties and an extraordinary 31-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were entirely dormant in the market. The transaction data shows zero buy or sell activity for this segment across all observed timeframes, confirming their lack of participation in the county's real estate dynamics.

The persistent and high-volume net-buying from the landlord community as a whole indicates a sustained period of portfolio growth. Investors are clearly in an accumulation phase, continually adding to the stock of rental housing in the county rather than liquidating assets.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of Q4 transactions, all driven by new single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 37 of the 158 total SFR transactions, a market share of 23.4%. This activity highlights that nearly one in four home sales in the county involved an investor.

All 37 of these landlord transactions were purchases made by the smallest investor tier: single-property landlords. This indicates that all Q4 investor activity was driven by new entrants to the market or existing homeowners buying their first investment property, with zero activity from mid-size or institutional players.

These new investors paid a premium price, with an average purchase price of $444,506. This is significantly higher than homeowner prices for the quarter, suggesting these buyers were targeting high-value properties or were competing aggressively to enter the market.

A notable portion of these acquisitions came from fellow investors. Of the 37 properties purchased by new landlords, 4 were bought from other landlords, representing 10.8% of their transaction volume. This points to a fluid market where properties are traded between investors.

The Q4 transaction data paints a clear picture of a market where growth is fueled by an influx of new, well-capitalized, small-scale landlords who are actively buying, sometimes from the existing investor pool, and are willing to pay a premium to establish a foothold.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Burnett County, Owning 44.5% of Homes and Driving Market Activity
Holdings
Investors own 4,951 SFR properties, representing a massive 44.5% of Burnett County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 4,058 properties (82.0%) compared to 999 (20.2%) for companies.
Pricing
In a surprising Q4 reversal, landlords paid an average of $444,506, a 57.7% premium over traditional homeowners ($281,914), indicating aggressive competition among new investors entering the market.
Activity
Landlords purchased 21.9% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with 100% of this activity driven by 37 new single-property landlords. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 99.5% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, an unusually low threshold that signals rapid professionalization as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 12-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (37 buys vs 3 sells), continuing a multi-year accumulation trend. Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Burnett County, Wisconsin, is fundamentally shaped by investors, who own a staggering 4,951 properties, or 44.5% of the total SFR stock. This market is not the domain of large corporations; instead, it is overwhelmingly controlled by 6,804 small, local landlords. Individual investors own 82.0% of the portfolio, and 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties) command a 99.5% share, while institutional firms have a nearly nonexistent presence with just 0.1% of holdings.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was defined by aggressive acquisition from new market entrants. Landlords purchased 21.9% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a new, single-property investor. In a dramatic shift from previous quarters, these buyers paid a 57.7% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for limited inventory. This buying spree reinforces a long-term accumulation trend, as landlords across the county operated as strong net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every one they sold in Q4.

The key takeaway is that Burnett County's housing market is a robust ecosystem of small-scale capitalism, where local landlords, not Wall Street, drive rental supply. The high concentration of investor ownership, particularly in certain zip codes where it exceeds 50-60%, has profound implications for housing affordability and availability for traditional homeowners. The recent influx of new investors paying significant premiums suggests this trend is not slowing, but rather intensifying, which will continue to define the local real estate landscape for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:16 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBurnett (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell