Bayfield (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bayfield (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bayfield (WI)
11,745
Total Investors in Bayfield (WI)
6,217
Investor Owned SFR in Bayfield (WI)
5,004(42.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,233
SFR Owned
4,060
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
984
SFR Owned
1,052
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,004 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Bayfield County's Investor Market: High Penetration, Small Landlords, and a Q4 Activity Freeze
Investors own a significant 42.6% of Single-Family Residential properties in Bayfield County, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.5% of this portfolio. While historically strong net buyers, the market saw a complete halt in investor purchasing in Q4 2025, signaling a dramatic shift in activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,004 SFR properties (42.6%), with individuals holding 81.1%.
The vast majority of investor properties are held in cash (4,898) versus financed (106). Nearly the entire portfolio (4,951 of 5,004 properties) is categorized as rented or non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (5,233) vastly outnumber company landlords (984).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2025, landlords paid a 26.0% premium over traditional homeowners.
Landlords paid an average of $369,980 compared to the homeowner average of $293,679, a surprising difference of $76,301. The market saw a significant price appreciation for landlords from a $231,553 average in 2020-2023. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2024 or Q4 2025, preventing a direct quarterly comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity came to a complete halt, with 0 landlord purchases in Q4 2025.
Landlords acquired 0.0% of the 0 total SFR properties sold in the quarter. Consequently, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero new property acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 87.0% of the investor-owned housing stock with 4,435 properties. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (Tier 09) in Bayfield County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own over 70% of properties in smaller tiers, but companies take over at 6 properties.
Companies become the majority owner in the 6-10 property tier, holding a 69.2% share. For single-property landlords, individuals hold a commanding 80.8% share (3,662 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 54821, 54847, and 54873.
These three zip codes contain the highest counts of investor-owned properties: 898 in 54821, 860 in 54847, and 846 in 54873. The highest investor ownership rate is 60.2% in the 54873 zip code.
Historical Transactions
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 1 in 2025.
This trend was even more pronounced in 2024, with landlords buying 280 properties and selling just 16. There is no recorded transaction data for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord transaction market was frozen in Q4 2025, with 0 landlord transactions recorded.
With zero total transactions in the quarter, landlords' share was 0.0%. No transactions occurred across any tier, from mom-and-pop to institutional, and no inter-landlord trades took place.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,004 SFR properties (42.6%), with individuals holding 81.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bayfield County is exceptionally high, with landlords holding 5,004 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 42.6% of the county's total SFR market of 11,745.

Individual investors are the definitive force in this market, owning 4,060 properties, or 81.1% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 1,052 properties, a 21.0% share, highlighting the 'mom-and-pop' character of local real estate investment.

The number of individual landlord entities (5,233) far surpasses company entities (984), reinforcing that ownership is fragmented among many small-scale investors rather than concentrated in large corporate hands.

A striking 97.9% of investor-owned properties (4,898 out of 5,004) are owned outright with cash, while only 106 are financed. This indicates a market of financially stable investors who are not heavily reliant on leverage, possibly focusing on vacation or second homes.

The portfolio is heavily geared toward rental use, with 4,951 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on generating rental income or use as non-primary residences within the investor community in Bayfield County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2025, landlords paid a 26.0% premium over traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Bayfield County paid a significant premium for properties in Q1 2025. The average landlord acquisition price was $369,980, which is 26.0% higher than the $293,679 paid by traditional homeowners, a difference of $76,301 per property.

This premium suggests that investors may be targeting higher-value properties, such as waterfront or vacation homes, that command higher prices than the general housing stock purchased by typical homeowners.

Acquisition prices have risen sharply since the pandemic era. The Q1 2025 average of $369,980 represents a 59.8% increase over the average price of $231,553 recorded between 2020 and 2023.

A complete absence of landlord purchase activity was recorded for Q4 2025, making a direct quarter-over-quarter price analysis impossible. This halt in purchasing marks a significant shift from previous periods.

The average price for landlord acquisitions in 2024 was $311,759, indicating a substantial jump in prices leading into early 2025 before activity ceased at the end of the year.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity came to a complete halt, with 0 landlord purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a total freeze in investor acquisition activity in Bayfield County. Landlords purchased zero of the zero total SFR properties sold, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who dominate the local market, made no new purchases during the quarter.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional investors also recorded zero acquisitions, indicating a market-wide pause in investment from all segments.

The absence of new purchases means no new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, a stark contrast to historical trends of consistent, if small-scale, investor entry.

This halt in purchasing activity represents a significant and abrupt shift in market dynamics, suggesting that economic conditions, interest rates, or local market factors may have deterred all investor buying at the end of the year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bayfield County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market is exceptionally fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) representing the largest single group, holding 4,435 properties, which is 87.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 24 properties, or 0.5% of the investor-owned market.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership (1,000+ properties) in Bayfield County. This 0.0% share underscores the market's purely local and small-investor character.

This distribution reveals a market structure built on thousands of individual investment decisions rather than the strategies of large corporations, which has significant implications for market stability and rental stock management.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own over 70% of properties in smaller tiers, but companies take over at 6 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Bayfield County rental market, particularly at smaller portfolio sizes. In the single-property tier, individuals own 3,662 properties (80.8%) compared to 872 for companies (19.2%).

The crossover point where corporate ownership becomes dominant occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). In this segment, companies own 9 properties, representing a 69.2% majority share, suggesting that formal business structures become preferable as portfolios grow.

Even in the 2-property tier, individual ownership remains strong at 73.1% (223 properties), and in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 78.9% (255 properties).

In the small-medium tier of 21-50 properties, companies also hold the majority with 3 properties, or 60.0% of that segment's holdings.

This pattern shows a clear lifecycle: investors typically start as individuals and incorporate as their portfolios expand, seeking liability protection and organizational benefits for larger holdings.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 54821, 54847, and 54873.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership within Bayfield County is highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The area of Cable (54821) has the highest count of investor-owned properties with 898, representing a 54.1% ownership rate.

The zip code for Iron River (54847) follows closely with 860 investor-owned properties, though at a lower penetration rate of 42.5%.

The zip code for Washburn (54873) has the third-highest count with 846 properties, but boasts the highest ownership rate among the top regions at 60.2%, indicating that over three-fifths of all SFRs there are investor-owned.

Other areas with very high investor penetration include the 54827 zip code (Cornucopia) at 59.8% and the 54844 zip code (Herbster) at 56.4%, showing that coastal and recreational areas are prime targets for investors.

This geographic concentration suggests that investor strategy is heavily focused on specific communities, likely those with strong vacation rental markets or other recreational appeal.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 1 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Bayfield County have been aggressive accumulators of property. In 2025, they were strong net buyers, purchasing 25 properties while only selling 1, resulting in a net gain of 24 properties to their portfolios.

The net buying trend was even more robust in the full year of 2024, when landlords acquired 280 SFRs and sold only 16, a buy-to-sell ratio of 17.5 to 1 and a net gain of 264 properties.

This consistent pattern of net buying across recent years highlights a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among local investors, which makes the Q4 2025 halt in activity even more significant.

The data does not contain any transaction records for institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties), which aligns with the finding that they have no ownership footprint in the county.

The sustained net buying activity prior to Q4 2025 indicates a previously confident market where investors were actively increasing their holdings before a sudden stop.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord transaction market was frozen in Q4 2025, with 0 landlord transactions recorded.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a complete cessation of transaction activity involving landlords in Bayfield County. Landlords were involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, for a 0.0% share of the market.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who constitute the vast majority of owners, did not buy or sell any properties.

There were no recorded transactions from mid-size or the non-existent institutional tiers, indicating a market-wide standstill.

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions of any kind took place.

This data points to a market that became completely illiquid for investors at the end of 2025, a dramatic deviation from the active net buying seen in previous periods.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own 42.6% of Bayfield County SFRs, but a Q4 Market Freeze Halted All Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 5,004 Single-Family Residential properties in Bayfield County, representing a substantial 42.6% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 4,060 properties (81.1%), compared to 1,052 (21.0%) for companies.
Pricing
Contrary to national trends, landlords in Bayfield County paid a 26.0% premium over homeowners in Q1 2025, with an average acquisition price of $369,980 versus $293,679.
Activity
Investor acquisition activity completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, or 0.0% of all sales. This pause meant no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The market is the domain of small investors, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.5% of investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding 69.2% of SFRs in that tier.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 (25 buys vs. 1 sell), all transaction activity abruptly ceased in Q4 2025, with 0 recorded landlord-involved transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Bayfield County, WI, is characterized by an exceptionally high level of investor penetration, with landlords owning 5,004 Single-Family properties, or 42.6% of the total market. The ownership structure is dominated by small, individual investors, who hold 81.1% of the portfolio. This 'mom-and-pop' dynamic is further emphasized by tier data, which shows that landlords with 1-10 properties control 99.5% of all investor-owned housing, while large-scale institutional investors have no presence.

Investor behavior in Bayfield County presents a unique profile. In early 2025, landlords paid a significant 26.0% premium compared to traditional homeowners, suggesting a focus on high-value or niche properties. This active purchasing, part of a multi-year trend of being strong net buyers, came to a sudden and complete halt in the fourth quarter of 2025. During Q4, there were zero purchases and zero transactions involving landlords, indicating a market that became completely illiquid for investors at the end of the year.

The key takeaway is a market defined by extremes: extremely high ownership by small, local investors, and an abrupt shift from active accumulation to a total freeze in activity. This suggests that local economic factors, possibly related to the vacation rental market or regional economic shifts, had a profound and immediate impact on investor confidence. The lack of leverage, with 97.9% of properties held in cash, provides a stable foundation, but the sudden stop in transactions signals significant uncertainty heading into the new year.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBayfield (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price