Wahkiakum (WA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wahkiakum (WA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wahkiakum (WA)
1,724
Total Investors in Wahkiakum (WA)
825
Investor Owned SFR in Wahkiakum (WA)
584(33.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
762
SFR Owned
529
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
63
SFR Owned
72
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 584 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive 34% Market Share in Wahkiakum County, Controlling Over 99% of Investor-Owned Homes
Investors own 584 SFR properties, representing a significant 33.9% of the total market in Wahkiakum County. This ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual landlords who control 99.5% of the investor portfolio, compared to a near-zero institutional presence. In Q4, landlords were active, purchasing 34.8% of all homes sold and demonstrating a strong net-buyer position with more than three properties bought for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 584 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 90.6% share.
The investor portfolio is largely held free and clear, with cash-owned properties (398) outnumbering financed ones (186) by more than two to one. A total of 572 investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals. The market consists of 825 distinct landlords, 762 of whom are individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 40.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal from prior quarters.
The price dynamic in Wahkiakum County is highly volatile, swinging from a 36.7% landlord discount in Q2 to a 40.0% premium in Q4. This represents a swing of over $370,000 in the relative price paid by landlords versus homeowners between the two quarters. The prior trend consistently showed landlords acquiring properties for less than traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 34.8% of all home purchases in Q4 2025, buying 8 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 87.5% of all landlord purchases, acquiring 7 of the 8 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases, showing no activity in the county this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.5% of investor-owned homes in Wahkiakum County.
Single-property landlords alone own 495 properties, which accounts for 81.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just one single property, or 0.2% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all portfolio sizes in Wahkiakum County.
Unlike larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become majority owners; individuals maintain over 76% ownership even in the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier. Companies own only 48 of the 495 single-property landlord homes (9.5%).
Geographic Distribution
The 98612 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 413 investor-owned properties.
Investor ownership is highly concentrated across the county, with rates exceeding 43% in the 98621 zip code and 46% in 98632. The top five zip codes all feature investor ownership rates above 27%, indicating widespread investor presence.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring over 5 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
In Q4 2025, landlords continued this trend by purchasing 11 properties while only selling 3, resulting in a net gain of 8 homes. Institutional investor activity is minimal, with only 2 purchases and 1 sale recorded for the entire year of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.9% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $550,000 per home. In contrast, the only transaction by a larger landlord (101-1,000 tier) was an inter-landlord deal at a much lower price of $243,042.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 584 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 90.6% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial footprint in Wahkiakum County, owning 584 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 33.9% of the total 1,724 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 529 properties, accounting for 90.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold the remaining 72 properties (12.3%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 762 of the 825 total landlords (92.4%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

A significant portion of the investor portfolio is owned outright, signaling a well-capitalized investor base. There are 398 cash-owned properties compared to 186 that are financed, a ratio of more than 2-to-1.

The vast majority of the portfolio is actively part of the rental supply, with 572 properties identified as rented, underscoring the vital role these investors play in providing housing in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 40.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, a sharp reversal from prior quarters.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of typical market patterns, landlords in Wahkiakum County paid a significant premium for properties in Q4 2025. The average landlord acquisition price was $344,608, which is $98,465, or 40.0%, higher than the traditional homeowner price of $246,143.

This Q4 premium marks a dramatic shift from earlier in the year. In Q2 2025, landlords secured properties at a deep 36.7% discount, paying $470,289 compared to the homeowner average of $742,484—a discount of $272,195 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has proven to be extremely volatile, moving from a 1.0% discount in Q1 to a 36.7% discount in Q2, and then flipping to a 40.0% premium in Q4. This volatility is characteristic of a market with low transaction volumes.

Historically, the purchasing power of investors has been stronger. During the 2020-2023 period, the average landlord acquisition price was $354,456, indicating that recent pricing, despite quarterly fluctuations, is within a similar range to the pandemic-era boom.

The data on transaction volume is sparse, with zero landlord purchases recorded for several recent timeframes, highlighting the sporadic nature of investor activity in this small market and making trend analysis sensitive to individual high- or low-priced sales.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 34.8% of all home purchases in Q4 2025, buying 8 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity remained strong in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 8 of the 23 total SFRs sold in Wahkiakum County, capturing a significant 34.8% market share.

The market's new investor activity is driven entirely by small-scale players. Mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) accounted for 7 of the 8 investor purchases, representing 87.5% of the landlord acquisition volume.

New entrants and very small landlords led the charge. Landlords buying their first property acquired 3 homes (37.5%), while those buying their second property acquired 4 homes (50.0%).

In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no presence in the purchasing market this quarter, acquiring zero properties and ceding all activity to smaller operators.

The data indicates the entrance of 4 new landlord entities into the market, each purchasing their first investment property, signaling sustained interest from new, small-scale investors in Wahkiakum County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.5% of investor-owned homes in Wahkiakum County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Wahkiakum County is the definitive example of mom-and-pop dominance, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

The market structure is heavily weighted towards the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone of the rental market, owning 495 properties, which represents a massive 81.8% of the total investor portfolio.

Mid-size and large investors have a very limited footprint. Landlords with 3-5 properties own 55 homes (9.1%), while those in the 101-1,000 property tier hold just 2 properties (0.3%).

Institutional ownership is practically nonexistent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own only a single property in the county, accounting for just 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

This distribution highlights a market completely opposite to the narrative of corporate consolidation, demonstrating that the local rental supply is overwhelmingly provided by small, local property owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all portfolio sizes in Wahkiakum County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Wahkiakum County, maintaining a clear majority across all portfolio sizes.

Among single-property landlords, individuals own 459 of the 495 properties, a commanding 90.5% share, while companies own just 48 properties.

Even as portfolio sizes increase, individuals retain control. In the two-property tier, individuals own 85.2% of the homes, and in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), they still hold a 76.4% majority with 42 properties.

The data reveals no 'crossover point' where corporate ownership becomes dominant, a common feature in more urbanized markets. In Wahkiakum, the rental market remains firmly in the hands of individual owners regardless of portfolio scale.

This pattern shows that both entry-level and portfolio-building activities in the county are primarily undertaken by private individuals, not corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 98612 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 413 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is heavily concentrated within specific areas of Wahkiakum County, with the 98612 zip code alone accounting for 413 investor-owned properties.

While 98612 leads in raw count, other zip codes exhibit even higher saturation of investor ownership. The 98632 zip code has the highest rate, with 46.2% of its homes owned by investors, followed closely by 98621 at 43.8%.

The top five zip codes by ownership rate all show significant investor penetration, with rates of 46.2% (98632), 43.8% (98621), 39.3% (98647), 33.8% (98643), and 32.8% (98612).

This geographic concentration suggests that certain neighborhoods or areas are particularly attractive to rental property investors, leading to a high density of non-owner-occupied homes.

The data illustrates that investor activity is not just a minor factor but a defining characteristic of the housing market in several key areas of the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring over 5 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Wahkiakum County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 68 homes while selling only 12, establishing a powerful 5.67x buy-to-sell ratio.

This net-buyer behavior was sustained through the most recent quarter, Q4 2025, where investors bought 11 properties and sold just 3, a buy/sell ratio of 3.67x and a net portfolio increase of 8 homes.

The trend of net acquisition has been consistent over the past two years. In 2024, landlords demonstrated an even more aggressive 8.0x buy-to-sell ratio, with 56 purchases versus only 7 sales.

In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ unit portfolios) have a negligible transaction footprint. They were slight net buyers in 2025, with 2 acquisitions and 1 sale, but their low volume has no significant impact on overall market dynamics.

The sustained, high-volume net purchasing by the broader landlord community signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a continued expansion of the rental housing supply.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.9% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 11 of the 38 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 28.9% market share.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among tiers this quarter, with new investors paying a premium to enter the market. Single-property (Tier 01) buyers had the highest average purchase price at $550,000 across 4 transactions.

In contrast, landlords in the two-property tier acquired 6 homes at a much lower average price of $190,000, suggesting a focus on more affordable properties for portfolio expansion.

The only transaction from a larger investor (101-1,000 tier) was sourced from another landlord, indicating strategic acquisition within the investor community. This single purchase was for $243,042.

None of the 10 transactions conducted by mom-and-pop landlords in Q4 were sourced from other landlords, suggesting they are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other market sellers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 33.9% of Wahkiakum's Market, Controlling 99.5% of Investor Housing
Holdings
Landlords own 584 single-family properties in Wahkiakum County, representing a significant 33.9% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 529 properties (90.6%), compared to just 72 (12.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a highly unusual Q4, landlords paid an average of $344,608, a 40.0% premium over the $246,143 paid by traditional homeowners, reversing a trend of discounts seen in previous quarters.
Activity
Investors purchased 34.8% of all homes sold in Q4 (8 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords driving 87.5% of this activity. The quarter saw the emergence of 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.5% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) own just one property, a 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding over 76% of properties even in larger mom-and-pop tiers. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner in this market.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.67x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (11 buys vs. 3 sells), signaling aggressive portfolio growth. Institutional transaction activity is virtually non-existent.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Wahkiakum County is heavily influenced by a concentrated, yet fragmented, investor base. Landlords own 584 properties, a substantial 33.9% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is the epitome of 'mom-and-pop' ownership; individual investors own 90.6% of these homes, and small-scale landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 99.5% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional ownership is a non-factor, with only a single property held by a large-scale investor.

In Q4 2025, investor behavior underscored their market impact. Landlords acquired 34.8% of all homes sold, acting as aggressive net buyers with a 3.67-to-1 buy/sell ratio. Pricing dynamics were anomalous, with landlords paying a 40.0% premium over homeowners, a sharp reversal from significant discounts observed earlier in the year. This volatility, particularly the high prices paid by new single-property entrants ($550,000), points to a competitive, low-volume market where entry costs can be high.

The key takeaway for Wahkiakum County is that its housing market is uniquely shaped by small, individual investors who are actively growing their holdings and provide a substantial portion of the rental supply. The lack of corporate or institutional presence means market dynamics are driven by the decisions of hundreds of small operators, not a few large firms. This creates a resilient but highly localized investment environment where understanding the behavior of mom-and-pop landlords is critical to understanding the market as a whole.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:41 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWahkiakum (WA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional