Ferry (WA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Ferry (WA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Ferry (WA)
2,311
Total Investors in Ferry (WA)
1,543
Investor Owned SFR in Ferry (WA)
1,134(49.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,463
SFR Owned
1,057
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
80
SFR Owned
83
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,134 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor-Dominated Ferry County: 49.1% Market Share with Zero Q4 Sales Activity
Investors own 1,134 single-family residential properties in Ferry County, representing a staggering 49.1% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.8%), with individual investors making up 93.2% of the portfolio. The market showed no signs of activity in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or transactions recorded for landlords or homeowners, indicating a deeply illiquid, buy-and-hold environment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,134 SFRs (49.1% of market), with individuals holding a 93.2% majority.
All 1,134 investor properties were acquired with cash, with zero identified as financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,128 properties (99.5%) functioning as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, indicating a completely frozen market.
The lack of transactions in recent quarters prevents any analysis of a price gap between landlords and homeowners. The only available historical data is a $64,400 average price from the 2020-2023 period, though it corresponds to zero properties, suggesting minimal activity even then.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, or 0.0% of market sales.
The market saw no new activity from any investor segment. Mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases for the quarter, and no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have no presence in Ferry County. Single-property landlords alone account for a massive 86.9% of all investor-owned homes, totaling 1,013 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No Q4 2025 sales data is available to compare individual versus company acquisition prices.
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, including holding 60.0% of properties in the 6-10 property tier. There is no crossover point to company dominance in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 99166 holding 559 properties, 49.5% of all investor SFRs.
Multiple zip codes show extreme investor penetration, with 99155 and 83854 at 100% investor ownership. Five separate zip codes have investor ownership rates above 62%.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data suggests a highly illiquid, buy-and-hold investor market.
Without recorded buy/sell transactions, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. This points to a market where properties rarely change hands and inter-landlord trading is minimal or non-existent.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, involved in 0.0% of the quarter's 0 total transactions.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from single-property landlords to institutional funds. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of pricing strategies or inter-landlord trading for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,134 SFRs (49.1% of market), with individuals holding a 93.2% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant stake in the Ferry County housing market, owning 1,134 of the 2,311 available SFR properties, which constitutes a 49.1% market share.

The ownership base is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 1,057 properties, accounting for 93.2% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 83 properties (7.3%).

A similar pattern is seen in the entity count, where 1,463 of the 1,543 total landlords are individuals, reinforcing the small-scale nature of real estate investment in the county.

The entire investor portfolio of 1,134 properties was acquired with cash, indicating that financing is not a common strategy in this market. This suggests a market of financially stable, long-term holders rather than leveraged investors.

Nearly the entire portfolio is actively used for rental purposes, with 1,128 properties identified as rented, underscoring the rental-focused strategy of local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q4 2025, indicating a completely frozen market.
Detailed Findings

The Ferry County real estate market experienced a complete halt in sales activity during Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by either landlords or traditional homeowners.

This lack of transactional data makes it impossible to perform a contemporary price comparison or identify any purchasing discount that investors might typically achieve.

The absence of sales prevents any analysis of quarter-over-quarter price trends, signaling a highly illiquid or stable market where properties are not actively traded.

Historical data provides little insight, with an average acquisition price of $64,400 listed for the 2020-2023 timeframe but corresponding to zero properties purchased, further emphasizing the market's low velocity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties, or 0.0% of market sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord purchasing activity was non-existent in Ferry County, with investors acquiring 0 of the 0 total SFRs sold, for a 0.0% share of the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who dominate ownership, made zero purchases during the quarter.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were also absent from the market, recording zero acquisitions in Q4.

The market saw no new entrants, as the number of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquiring their first rental home was zero.

This complete freeze in acquisitions across all tiers points to a market characterized by long-term holds rather than active portfolio growth or turnover.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Ferry County is completely dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, holding 1-10 properties) own a combined 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, alone controlling 1,013 properties, which represents 86.9% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size investors are virtually non-existent, with only two properties held by landlords in the 11-1000 property tiers combined.

Institutional capital has no footprint in the region, as investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own 0.0% of the market.

This distribution highlights a market exclusively driven by small, local investors, far removed from the influence of large corporate landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No Q4 2025 sales data is available to compare individual versus company acquisition prices.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all active portfolio tiers in Ferry County, a sharp contrast to national trends where companies dominate larger portfolios.

Even in the largest active local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 60.0% of the properties, demonstrating their sustained control as portfolios grow.

The data shows no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, underscoring the market's reliance on private, non-corporate capital.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 952 homes (93.7%) compared to just 64 for companies (6.3%), setting the tone for the entire market structure.

The complete lack of Q4 sales activity prevents any analysis of pricing strategies or differences between individual and company buyers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 99166 holding 559 properties, 49.5% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Ferry County is geographically concentrated, with a single zip code, 99166, accounting for 559 properties, or nearly half (49.5%) of the county's entire investor-owned SFR inventory.

The data reveals several pockets of extremely high investor saturation. Two zip codes, 99155 and 83854, are 100% investor-owned, indicating areas that may function exclusively as rental communities.

Beyond the top areas, high investor penetration is widespread. Zip codes 99140 (66.1%), 99150 (65.8%), and 99146 (62.5%) all show rates where investors own more than three out of every five homes.

The region with the highest count of investor properties (99166) also has a high ownership rate of 49.5%, showing an alignment between volume and concentration.

This intense geographic clustering suggests that investor activity is focused on specific, targeted communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data suggests a highly illiquid, buy-and-hold investor market.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data for Ferry County is empty, indicating a market with extremely low or no recorded sales activity among investors over time.

This absence of data prevents any analysis of whether landlords are net buyers or sellers, as there are no buy or sell transactions to compare.

It is not possible to determine the level of inter-landlord trading, but the lack of transactions suggests that sales between investors are not a feature of this market.

Similarly, a comparison of average buy and sell prices to gauge potential profit margins cannot be conducted.

The overall finding is that Ferry County's investor market is characterized by a buy-and-hold strategy, where assets are acquired for long-term rental income rather than for appreciation and resale.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, involved in 0.0% of the quarter's 0 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of real estate transactions in Ferry County, with a total of 0 sales recorded, of which 0 involved a landlord.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recording zero transactions.

With no purchases made, it is impossible to analyze average purchase prices by tier or identify any price differences between small and large investors for the quarter.

The level of inter-landlord trading was zero, as no properties were bought from other landlords by any investor group.

This stagnant transactional environment in Q4 reinforces the insight that the Ferry County investor market is built on long-term ownership rather than active trading.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individuals Hold 93% of Ferry County's Investor Market, Where Half the Homes are Rentals and Q4 Sales Froze
Holdings
Landlords own 1,134 SFR properties, representing a 49.1% penetration of the Ferry County market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,057 of these properties (93.2%), compared to just 83 (7.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No sales were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, making a price comparison impossible and signaling a market with zero recent transactional activity.
Activity
Q4 investor activity was nonexistent, with landlords responsible for 0 purchases, or 0.0% of all market sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period of complete inactivity.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert almost complete control over the investor market, owning 99.8% of the housing stock, while institutional investors have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every active portfolio tier in Ferry County; there is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type.
Transactions
The absence of any recorded transactions in Q4 2025 means landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers; the market was entirely static with a buy/sell ratio of 0.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Ferry County, Washington, is uniquely characterized by profound investor penetration and a near-total absence of recent sales activity. Investors own 1,134 single-family homes, a staggering 49.1% of the entire market. This landscape is shaped not by corporations, but by small-scale individuals, who own 93.2% of the investor portfolio. The market structure is definitively grassroots, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.8% of investor-held housing, while institutional firms have no presence at all.

Investor behavior in Ferry County is defined by a buy-and-hold philosophy, evidenced by a complete freeze in market activity during Q4 2025. There were zero purchases by investors and zero transactions recorded, preventing any analysis of pricing advantages or recent trends. This illiquidity is further highlighted by the fact that all 1,134 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, signaling a stable, unleveraged owner base focused on long-term rental income rather than short-term gains.

The key takeaway from Ferry County is a portrait of a deeply entrenched, landlord-heavy market that operates on a different cycle from more transactional regions. With nearly half the homes owned by investors and properties rarely changing hands, the market is defined by stability and minimal turnover. This environment suggests that rental availability is likely consistent, but opportunities for new buyers, whether owner-occupants or investors, are exceptionally scarce due to the lack of available inventory for sale.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:26 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFerry (WA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price