Washington (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washington (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washington (VT)
17,782
Total Investors in Washington (VT)
3,269
Investor Owned SFR in Washington (VT)
2,274(12.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,727
SFR Owned
1,840
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
542
SFR Owned
495
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,274 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Washington County with 99.5% Ownership as Institutional Investors Remain Absent
Investors own 2,274 SFR properties in Washington County (12.8% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 99.5% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q4 2025, these small investors drove 100% of landlord purchasing activity and were strong net buyers, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions and were net neutral for the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,274 properties in Washington County, with individual investors holding 80.9%.
The entire investor portfolio of 2,274 properties is held in cash, with no financing recorded. Of these, 2,249 (98.9%) are designated as rented, confirming a strong focus on investment.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 14.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $521,920 vs. $457,972.
The landlord pricing advantage is extremely volatile, swinging from a 13.5% discount in Q3 to a 14.0% premium in Q4. Pricing data is not split between individual and company buyers in this market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 17.1% of all Single-Family homes sold in Q4, acquiring 34 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions. In contrast, institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting their complete absence from the Q4 market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.5% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the market (2 properties). Single-property landlords alone own 92.4% of all investor SFRs. Price data by tier is not available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for this county.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing an 87.5% share. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, incorporation becomes the standard for even modest growth.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 05674 (Waitsfield) and 05673 (Warren).
These two zip codes not only have the most investor properties (412 and 410, respectively) but also boast extremely high ownership rates of 43.7% and 34.9%. This indicates they are true investor hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
For the full year of 2025, investors bought 138 properties and sold just 22, maintaining strong accumulation. In contrast, institutional investors were net neutral for the year, with 2 buys and 2 sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 16.0% of all Q4 market transactions, totaling 51 transactions.
Single-property landlords paid an average of $517,365, while the few larger mom-and-pop buyers paid more ($695,000). These small investors primarily source properties from homeowners, with only 6.1% of their purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,274 properties in Washington County, with individual investors holding 80.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 12.8% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Washington County, owning 2,274 out of 17,782 total properties.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 1,840 properties (80.9%), compared to 495 properties (21.8%) owned by companies. This 4-to-1 ratio underscores the market's 'mom-and-pop' character.

By entity count, individual landlords (2,727) outnumber company landlords (542) by a 5-to-1 margin, indicating a highly fragmented market composed of many small-scale owners.

A striking feature of this market is the complete absence of financing; all 2,274 investor-owned properties are held with cash, signaling a market with high equity or unconventional purchasing patterns.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 2,249 of the 2,274 properties (98.9%) classified as rented, leaving little doubt as to their primary use as investment assets.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 14.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $521,920 vs. $457,972.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising reversal of typical trends, landlords in Washington County paid a significant 14.0% premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $521,920 compared to $457,972 for traditional homeowners.

This represents a substantial price difference of $63,948 per property, suggesting investors were targeting higher-value properties or competing fiercely for limited inventory during the quarter.

The price dynamic for investors is highly volatile on a quarterly basis. The 14.0% premium in Q4 followed a 13.5% discount in Q3 and an 11.2% premium in Q2, indicating a lack of consistent pricing strategy or rapidly changing market conditions.

The average landlord acquisition price of $521,920 in Q4 marked a dramatic 37.2% increase from the Q3 average of $380,355, signaling a major shift in the type or quality of assets being purchased.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 17.1% of all Single-Family homes sold in Q4, acquiring 34 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors captured 17.1% of the total market activity in Q4 2025, purchasing 34 of the 199 SFR properties that sold in Washington County.

The entirety of this Q4 purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties), who acquired all 34 properties, demonstrating that small investors are the sole source of acquisition growth.

The market is being fueled by new entrants, as 49 new single-property landlord entities were formed in Q4. These first-time investors acquired 32 properties, accounting for 94.1% of all landlord purchases.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties were completely dormant, recording zero purchases and exerting no influence on the Q4 market.

This heavy concentration of activity among new, single-property landlords signals a healthy and accessible market for small-scale investment, with low barriers to entry.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.5% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Washington County is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small landlords. Investors with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with 2,132 properties in their portfolios, which accounts for a massive 92.4% share of all investor-owned housing.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no presence, holding just 2 properties in total. This represents a 0.1% market share, debunking any narrative of corporate landlord takeover in this region.

The mid-size investor segment is nearly non-existent. Tiers 05 through 08 (11-1,000 properties) collectively own just 10 properties, highlighting a sharp drop-off after the mom-and-pop level.

This ownership structure reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, powered almost exclusively by small, local investors rather than large-scale corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for this county.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the market overall, a clear pattern of incorporation emerges as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority property holder at the 6-10 property tier, owning 87.5% of the assets in that segment.

This represents a critical crossover point. In the tier just below (3-5 properties), individuals still control a 68.1% majority, indicating that scaling beyond five properties is the primary trigger for adopting a corporate structure.

Individuals are the driving force at the entry level, owning 80.2% of single-property portfolios and 72.6% of two-property portfolios.

The company share of ownership steadily increases with portfolio size, growing from 19.8% in the single-property tier to 31.9% in the 3-5 property tier, before leaping to 87.5% in the tier above.

This trend highlights a distinct lifecycle for investors in Washington County: entry as an individual, followed by incorporation as the investment portfolio scales towards a half-dozen properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in zip codes 05674 (Waitsfield) and 05673 (Warren).
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Washington County is geographically hyper-concentrated, with just two zip codes—05674 (Waitsfield) and 05673 (Warren)—accounting for 822 properties, or 36.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

These areas also have the highest investor penetration rates in the county. In 05674, investors own 43.7% of all SFRs, while in 05673 they own 34.9%, suggesting these markets are heavily defined by rental and vacation properties.

There is a notable difference between areas with high counts and high rates. For example, Barre (05602) has the third-highest count of investor properties (242) but a much lower ownership rate of 7.4%, indicating a larger overall housing market.

The data reveals a clear geographic focus, likely driven by the tourism and ski industries centered around the Mad River Valley, which includes Waitsfield and Warren.

In contrast to these hotspots, other areas have much lower investor penetration, demonstrating that investor strategy is targeted at specific sub-markets rather than being spread evenly across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Washington County are in a strong accumulation phase, demonstrating overwhelming confidence in the market. They ended 2025 as aggressive net buyers across all timeframes.

This trend accelerated sharply in Q4 2025, when landlords purchased 51 properties while selling only 5, resulting in a powerful 10.2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

Over the full year of 2025, investors acquired 138 properties and sold 22, a net gain of 116 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.3 to 1.

The acquisition pace has remained robust and consistent, with 138 buys in 2025 closely tracking the 164 buys recorded in 2024, signaling sustained investor demand.

Institutional investors are a non-factor in this trend. Their activity for 2025 was perfectly balanced with 2 purchases and 2 sales, indicating a neutral-to-divestment strategy that starkly contrasts with the accumulation by smaller landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 16.0% of all Q4 market transactions, totaling 51 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were involved in 16.0% of all SFR transactions in the county, participating in 51 of the 318 total sales.

The market's transaction activity was almost entirely driven by its smallest participants. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 49 of the 51 investor transactions (96.1%).

New and small investors are acquiring their properties from the traditional market, not from other investors. Only 6.1% of purchases made by single-property landlords came from another landlord, showing they are competing directly with homeowners for inventory.

A price disparity was evident among active buyers in Q4. While the high-volume Tier 01 investors paid an average of $517,365, the single transaction in the 6-10 property tier was for a higher-priced property at $695,000.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the Q4 transaction market, recording zero activity and ceding the entire field to mom-and-pop buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Washington County's rental market is a 'Main Street' story, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.5% of holdings.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,274 SFR properties in Washington County, representing 12.8% of the total market. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,840 properties (80.9%), while companies own the remaining 495 (21.8%).
Pricing
In a volatile pricing environment, landlords paid a 14.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, an average of $521,920 versus $457,972, reversing a 13.5% discount from the previous quarter.
Activity
Investors purchased 17.1% of all homes sold in Q4 (34 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop landlords. The quarter saw an influx of 49 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is almost entirely composed of small players, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.5% of investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors own just 0.1% (2 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control (87.5% share) in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, marking a clear point of incorporation for scaling investors.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 10.2-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (51 buys vs. 5 sells). Institutional investors, however, are effectively neutral, with an equal number of buys and sells in 2025 (2 each).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Washington County, Vermont, is fundamentally a 'Main Street' phenomenon, not a 'Wall Street' one. Investors own 2,274 properties, or 12.8% of the county's SFR housing stock, but this ownership is highly decentralized. Individual investors own a commanding 80.9% of these homes. An astonishing 99.5% of all investor-owned properties are held by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), while large-scale institutional firms have a near-zero footprint with just 0.1% of the market.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive accumulation and a focus on acquiring inventory from the traditional market. In Q4 2025, small landlords were strong net buyers, purchasing 10 properties for every one they sold, and accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions. This activity was fueled by new entrants, with 49 first-time landlords joining the market. Their purchasing strategy appears targeted and competitive, as they paid a surprising 14.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, signaling a willingness to pay top dollar for desirable assets.

The key takeaway is that the dynamics of Washington County's housing market are shaped by the collective decisions of thousands of small, local investors. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes like Waitsfield (43.7%) and Warren (34.9%) points to a market heavily influenced by local economic drivers like tourism, rather than a broad corporate strategy. The future of rental availability and pricing in this county rests not with distant corporations, but with the local mom-and-pop owners who overwhelmingly control it.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:20 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWashington (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions